Olympus SP-560 UZ

Add to: 
Recommended
Reviewed: Dec 2007
User reviews (12)
4.25
Amazon reviews (42)
4.50
8.0 megapixels | 2.5" screen | 27 – 486 mm (18×)

<p>Second generation 18x zoom camera from Olympus offers a compelling specification mix (including 27-486mm lens range, full photographic control and raw mode) and a list of features as long as your arm. Obviously squeezing so much lens into a small package means compromises in image quality, and in low light (at high ISO settings) the results leave much to be desired. The SP-570UZ's biggest problem, however, is that there are better - and cheaper - competitors out there.</p>

Average rating: 4.25
5 stars
(5)
4 stars
(5)
3 stars
(2)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)

Most helpful user reviews

The list below shows the five most helpful user reviews. See all 12 reviews...
allenns
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: allenns posted on Sep 29, 2007 UTC

Opinion: 560 just arrived. upgraded form the 550. same solid build quality so feels like you got your monies worth. nice to handle. menu options good especiallly wityh new FD group mode etc. With 8MPIXEL seems to have really all one needs for P&S as well as playing around with some level of DSLR capabilities all-in-one. Picutre quality out-doors excellent. In fact using Helicon Filter I saw no significant PF-really!

Problems: Indoor shots a little noisy-definitely require flash here. But overall I enjoyed the little beast.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Charles1
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Charles1 posted on Oct 19, 2007 UTC

Opinion: The camerea itself is ok. But the image quality is really poor. The pictures are extremely grainy. I believe that Olympus is trying to get too much zoom out of it. I would like to see less zoom and higher pixel rating if they make the censor better. I returned the camera and bought a Sony Cyber Shot DSC H7.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
marc850
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: marc850 posted on Nov 2, 2007 UTC

Opinion: I really love this camera. I have shot several thousand pics with it so far and am
really happy with the results. I compared this camera back-to-back with the 550
before purchasing and can say that the 560 is a big improvement. It is also
extremely well built and designed. When compared to the competition you can
really notice the difference in quality and feature set. The ability to shoot raw is a
great plus. the use of rechargeable 4 AA's is definitely better than battery packs in
my case. I truly like the lens, but the features and mode selection will keep even a
professional happy. As a quick field back-up, the ease of manual inputs is a snap.
For the amateur, the ability to pre-select your pictures, the built-in 33 picture
modes, and the in-camera guide will help you learn to shoot like a pro in no time.
Unlike one reviewer, I have more than a passing exposure to this camera and can
attest to its true abilities. Like the 550, it fits well into my hand(s) and easily tucks
away when not needed. The extreme zoom and wide angle in one small package
truly suits a mobile and adventurous lifestyle. If you just like to shoot pics indoors
and carry around a suitcase full of lenses, then this is not your camera. Common
sense dictates that you can't compare a full-featured ultra zoom camera to a SLR.
This camera is for those on the go and not merely show. So, grab a monopod and
hit the trail or mountain. Dump the extra lenses and fill the backpack full of food,
water, and camping gear(real necessities) and go for a true adventure off the
beaten path. Or for others so inclined/reclined, your knees and back will be happier
when you leave the luggage behind. You can really do most all with this one
(27mm-to 486). Btw, this is one digital camera that sips battery go-juice like a
camel!

Problems: None discovered as yet.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
dennis dogman
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: dennis dogman posted on Dec 26, 2007 UTC

Opinion: This is NOT a good camera ! Images lack quality, colour and precision (even in good dayllight). Why Olympus would tarnish its good name with such a dud is beyond me (I've owned 4 of their cameras).

PROS
. looks good, feels great in your hands
. indoor flash photos are ok

Problems: CONS
. soft images that lack detail and precision
. lots of noise at medium to low daylight
. movement in sports mode in morning daylight is always blurred (I photograph althletes)
. colours are warm and disappointing

Don't buy this camera is you like good clear and precise images. Im going back to using my Old Olympus 770 until I find a good replacement in another brand.

The 560 has been updated with the 570 - watch for the lab reports and owners reviews before buying one.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report