Olympus E-10

3.7 megapixels | 1.8" screen | 35 – 140 mm (4×)

User reviews

Average rating: 4.42
5 stars
(103)
4 stars
(78)
3 stars
(8)
2 stars
(2)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
1234567
Rodriaan Spruit
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Rodriaan Spruit posted on Jan 16, 2012 UTC

Opinion: Exellent camera, especially for its time. Very good lens, no shutter lag. Annoyances when used now: startup time = 4 s. Write times to card very slow which can be limiting with a buffer of 5 frames.

The E10 is quite a lot quicker than the newer E20 because the E20 has the sam processor with more pixels to handle: longer times needed for processing the larger amounts of data.

Problems: After falling from about 1,5 m height on the pavement the camera stopped working.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Rodriaan Spruit
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Rodriaan Spruit posted on Jan 16, 2012 UTC

Opinion: Exellent camera, especially for its time. Very good lens, no shutter lag. Annoyances when used now: startup time = 4 s. Write times to card very slow which can be limiting with a buffer of 5 frames.

The E10 is quite a lot quicker than the newer E20 because the E20 has the sam processor with more pixels to handle: longer times needed for processing the larger amounts of data.

Problems: After falling from about 1,5 m height on the pavement the camera stopped working.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
kernicek
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: kernicek posted on Nov 7, 2011 UTC

Opinion: Great camera, even though a little old now. I mostly miss that I can't use other lenses and the resolution isn't really big even though it's enough. Also miss that there are only few menu options and that the camera's got a really slow writing speed. But after some time, everyone will probably find out that he wants to upgrade to a newer camera (Canon EOS 60D in my case...).

Problems: Non-changeable lenses, resolution.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ac680
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ac680 posted on Mar 3, 2007 UTC

Opinion: A wonderfully well constructed camera, love the feel and look. Owned for 5 years now, 10.000 pics plus..Stellar picture quality, did a few billboards up to 20 by 9 FEET. low pixel count.. who cares, great clear sharp bright lens makes it all happen.
Low light quality is very nice, but.. difficult to focus when dark. Never had exposure problems. This camera is absolutely quiet, It goes with me to noise sensitive shoots (music).
For its money it simply cannot be beat.
Slow focus, low burst talents, and slow read write are issues, but you know.. its cheap and indestructible with older technology, but with really wondefull rendering.
Of yah, its seen a lot of salt water, doused once or twice.. still works great..

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ac680
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ac680 posted on Mar 3, 2007 UTC

Opinion: A wonderfully well constructed camera, love the feel and look. Owned for 5 years now, 10.000 pics plus..Stellar picture quality, did a few billboards up to 20 by 9 FEET. low pixel count.. who cares, great clear sharp bright lens makes it all happen.
Low light quality is very nice, but.. difficult to focus when dark. Never had exposure problems. This camera is absolutely quiet, It goes with me to noise sensitive shoots (music).
For its money it simply cannot be beat.
Slow focus, low burst talents, and slow read write are issues, but you know.. its cheap and indestructible with older technology, but with really wondefull rendering.
Of yah, its seen a lot of salt water, doused once or twice.. still works great..

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ac680
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ac680 posted on Mar 3, 2007 UTC

Opinion: A wonderfully well constructed camera, love the feel and look. Owned for 5 years now, 10.000 pics plus..Stellar picture quality, did a few billboards up to 20 by 9 FEET. low pixel count.. who cares, great clear sharp bright lens makes it all happen.
Low light quality is very nice, but.. difficult to focus when dark. Never had exposure problems. This camera is absolutely quiet, It goes with me to noise sensitive shoots (music).
For its money it simply cannot be beat.
Slow focus, low burst talents, and slow read write are issues, but you know.. its cheap and indestructible with older technology, but with really wondefull rendering.
Of yah, its seen a lot of salt water, doused once or twice.. still works great..

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
GalleryB
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: GalleryB posted on Dec 2, 2006 UTC

Opinion: Another 2006 perspective of this old "war horse" dSLR, Oly's E-10. For the bargain basement price a mint condition E-10 and Oly's lenses and other E-10 specific accessories are available for it, the E-10 is absolutely unequaled for studio and still photos!

I find the E-10 to be superb for studio/product photos where its slower read/write times aren't critical. By the time I've finished re-arranging the products I'm photographing, my E-10 is always ready for another round of 4 photos.

It's perfect for its price for very high quality studio/product and landscape photos. I find its gorgeous fixed aspheric zoom lens takes beautiful still photos, coupled with the fact that the E-10 is an incredibly well-built, very durable camera, even if a bit on the heavy side.

Problems: The E-10's dSLR technology is obviously 6 years behind the curve and it takes a long time to write JPG and especially RAW files to the CF memory card. It is not a dSLR for action/sports and/or "on the move" type photos, its read/write times are too slow for that. Its gorgeous aspheric zoom lens is permanently affixed to the E-10, thus, there is no interchangeable lens capability. However, Oly's add-on E-10 lenses, the MCON-35, the TCON-300S, TCON-14B and WCON-8B are excellent, all things considered.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
canada snap
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: canada snap posted on Sep 28, 2006 UTC

Opinion: Reviewed from a 2006 perspective ... Today this camera can be purchased for nothing, i got a demo model with all accersories for $200 USD. Today this camera is an excellent buy. The build quality is second to non, maybe even better then my 20D. This camera has meny fetures that make it a joy to use, through the lens viewing, no mirror so its very quiet, excellent fast lens, great focus speend and accuracy, excellent manual controls. The image quality is great for 8x10 or maybe even larger. If you want a great cheep travel camera, or something just to kick around for fun ... get one.

Problems: The write and review speed is really slow. The camera is not suitible for action photography. But for travel and landscape photography there isn't a better deal today.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
kbarni
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: kbarni posted on Mar 22, 2006 UTC

Opinion: This was the top camera of the Olympus at the time it appeared, and you can really feel it. It's a very responsive camera, much better than most of today's sub-1000$ dSLRs.
It's very robust (although a bit heavy), it has excellent optics, very good image quality, the TTL is much better than any LCD, it's very silent (no mirror mechanism). And it has live preview, an unique feature even in today's dSLRs. The image quality is impeccable, it has a very natural color reproduction
And it can be bought these days for pennies on ebay, so don't hesitate, if you want one!

Problems: As good the construction of the camera is, as stupid is its software. Very slow image processing, slow card access times, stupid menu system. It doesn't know higher ISO than 320, and it's rather noisy (but still usable - it doesn't use any noise reduction).
Definitely it's not a camera for sport photos, but otherwise these problems aren't a real obstacle in using this great camera!

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report