Olympus D-300L

Announced Sep 5, 1996 •
1 megapixels | 1.8 screen | 36 mm
0
replies

I feel I just have to write about this camera too. i bought one when it was the first camera I known that droped under $1000 in 1997. I have traveled around the world with that camera and a zip-drive and used it for every party or just holiday-standard pictures. I have taken over 7000 photos with it. There are some bad behaviours about it like the slow cable (11 minutes for 6Mb), slow memory (6 secs before next shot), the LCD is EATING battery and there is no zoom.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
frans
 
0
replies

prima camera voor niet te veel geld,zeer goed contrast,helder beeld,ontdanks een lagere resolutie dan de nieuwere types,flits van dichtbij geeft iets overbelichting,makkelijke bediening,

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

Ive had this camera for 4 years now. Aside from the slow download I've found it to be quite useful. Still does everything I need it to do and I don't intend on upgrading any time soon. But if I do it will certainly be another Olympus! Problems: None

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

I purchased the Japanese model of this camera in Japan, so I had it months before it showed up on the US market. I still like the camera, as it takes good pictures for web applications and it looks and feels like a standard point and shoot. The camera also has stood the test of time -- daily use for years in all sorts of weather here in Alaska. Its design also allowed it to be stowed under a heavy jacket in extremely cold weather and fished out for pictures at temperatures as low as -45 to ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

A great workhorse...used it for years before upgrading to a Kodak. Never had any problems with it, and even today, the images it produces are better than many of the lower end digital cameras. Problems: None

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review