Olympus C-21

1.9 megapixels | 1.8" screen | 38 mm

User reviews

Average rating: 4.07
5 stars
(3)
4 stars
(21)
3 stars
(3)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
123
redsfotografie
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: redsfotografie posted on Mar 11, 2003 UTC

Opinion: I use this one as a pint and shoot to get the idea for a proffesional picture...

It lacks of zoom, but I did a test with the 220 zoom and still the 21 has a better autofocus and macro and more quality pictures so still not beaten in his class (2.0/2.1 megapixels).
The battery's are no problem, use a GP Powerbank with at least the 1800 MHA battery and you survive easy 4 times a 64 mb memcard full pictures. But don't use the display that much!!!

I can only say I want to change the camera for a zoom one but still can't find a small quality strong and light super AF camera that can beat this one...

Have any questions mail me,

specialsred@hetnet.nl

Problems: WATCHOUT if you change the battery's it can change the image settings to low 800X600, it looses the settings.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Marvin Chan
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Marvin Chan posted on Jan 20, 2003 UTC

Opinion: Bought this camera in the fall of 1999, so I've had it for 3 years now. The CR-V3 batteries it needed were so new no store in town had them, nor could I find it on the Internet. Learned to use NiMH, found they trigger the camera's low battery warning after only a few shots but continue to work fine for many more. I can now buy CR-V3 batteries, of course, and even though they run $10 each, they seem to last a realy long time. I put one in before Thanksgiving and it lasted through the holidays! About the rest of the camera; I would say it is excellent. Outstanding image quality, easy enough to use for my non-technical girlfriend to be able to just point and shoot. I agree with the reviewer who said it takes good pictures without flash - great for when you can't eliminate 'red-eye' using that flash setting. No problems with the battery cover, but the lens cover seems to slide too easily sometimes, and it has partially slid up over the lens during a picture or two... but I can see the result and take another picture right away--that's the digital advantage, right? I paid full price ($700 US) for mine and it's been worth every penny.

Problems: None

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Apr 28, 2002 UTC

Opinion: The C-21 is really good for holiday pictures with sunshine: shoot and forget. In most cases you've got a good picture.

Problems: Battery problems: My C-21 has the problem, that 2 NiMH-Batteries (1600 mAh) by Olympus itself have too less voltage. My C-21 shows me all the time on the display, that the power goes down, even if the batteries are full charged. Two flashes and the problem begins. Has anybody the same problems? For that reason, the "Value for money" ist for me only average.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Apr 12, 2002 UTC

Opinion: Ho comprato questa digicam nell'agosto 2000 e posso dire di essere abbastanza soddisfatto. La qualità delle immagini è ottima se si stampa a 300 dpi (A6), ma se si fanno degli ingrandimenti non conviene andare oltre al formato A5.

Problems: Due solo batterie sono un po' poco come autonomia, anche se si dispone di batterie ricaricabili. In compenso è molto piccola e leggera.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Apr 10, 2002 UTC

Opinion: Very good point and shoot light wieght camera. I have taken about 5000 shots and the results are pretty good. I very rarely get a bad picture and some are excellent.

Problems: Problems encountered are:
Battery hatch design is weak. The location lugs break. My solution is to use a rubber band (mountain bike inner tube cut into a ring) placed over trhe end of the camera to keep the hatch closed. Not very elegant.
Battery life is poor and I am constantly changing batteries and always carry some spare - defeats the point of a compact camera.
The standard 8MB Flash card is a joke. Get a bigger one now that they are pretty cheap.
Serial interface is unnaceptable. I use a Flash card reader with USB linked to a PC running XP. Works far better that the Olympus SW.OPeration of the functions is fiddly and could be much better. I believe this camera is discontinued so value depends on what deal you can get.
The lens cover sometimes is not completely open yet the camera will take a picture with the lens partially obscured.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Feb 28, 2002 UTC

Opinion: First digital, received as gift from overseas. Am extremely happy with photo results and "user-friendliness" overall, considering I was unable to rely the original manual that came in a foreign language...must reinstate how satisfied I am with the printed end product. Have not needed to rely on my 35mm (Olympic) automatic or photo labs in almost a year!

Problems: Battery Hatch is about to go, after two years of use.
Sliding cover tends to open a bit too easily, which may accidentally use up precious battery life. This happened when removing/returning it from its protective case, on more than one occasion.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Feb 8, 2002 UTC

Opinion: I used this camera exactly for abour an year, and I'm pretty much satisfied. Its hue, and the tone .. I love it~! And, it's quite remarkable how this small lens makes all that happen.
I think it's very sensitive to light and the picture is taken actually lighter than the real. You don't really need to flash.
But, it doesn't zoom, and it has color contrast disorders when taking a red/green only pictures. And, don't count on this camera on taking a picture of running dogs and cats.

Problems: color contrast is poor, especially when taking flower pictures.
For example, re~d to pink flowers on gree~n stems : the color of the flower is pale.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Jan 23, 2002 UTC

Opinion: I actually got this camera as a gift/standby. Other than the fact that it does not have a zoom (optical) I found that I was using it more often than my other camera (Olympus 3000). True batteries are doomed in this camera and it doesn't have a USM connection BUT, with a smart media reader, and an extra set of rechargables... it's smooth sailing. BY THE WAY.... watch the battery cover... it'll break on you

Problems: The battery cover tabs broke after 3 weeks.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Jan 20, 2002 UTC

Opinion: This is the first digital camera I've owned, but not the first I've used. It produces superb results from a very compact package.

Problems: The battery life is fairly low and the Li cells are expensive. I've overcome by making a pack from some special rechargable Li cells.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
123