Why get this over the 18-105? Four reasons: 1. 16-85 has a metal mount; the 18-105 has a plastic mount 2. 16-85 has active VR, and Nikon claims it is VRII; 18-105 does not have active VR, and Nikon does not claim VRII 3. 16-85 has ful AF-S system (i.e., MA/M switch); 18-105 has only an A and M switch 4. The additional 2 mm at the wide end is very noticeable It gets a 4.5 based on the above and given its very high image quality (considering it is a zoom). It loses half a star due to the cost ...
View review in forums Leave a comment on this review





