Nikon Coolpix P7800

Announced Sep 5, 2013 •
12 megapixels | 3 screen | 28 – 200 mm (7.1×)

The P7800 would have been a great camera in 2009, when its 1/1.7 sensor and Expeed C2 processor would have competed in the Advanced Compact segment. Currently selling at $349.00 refurbished, it seems a good investment, with reservations. But better responsiveness and image quality can probably now be found in 1" and four-thirds market segments. So why would someone buy and keep a P7800, going into 2015? The 28-200 lens is excellent. The fully articulating RGBW LCD is improved. Its broad ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

Merry Christmas and Sorry for my bad english! I often wonder if people who make negative comments about a particular camera: Have they tried? I had not bought the Nikon Coolpix P7700 because it had no viewfinder. At the announcement of the P7800, I said at last! The man always wants more than what you give it ... I took the P7800 and I went to do what it was made: take pictures. I have not explored everything with this compact camera, but I can say that this is a very good camera that my ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

Very impressed with the P7800, specially with the JPEG image quality, the good range of the zoom - it makes it a good all-round travel light camera. These are very important items. In contrast the drawbacks, such as poor EVF are not that important for my use, easy to live with. Slow write times in RAW ? With fast ultra cards hardly noticeable! Very good value for the money. The interface is a bit confusing, but, finally, it is a P & S - I can live with it, considering the final product: good ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

Nikon made a lot of things right again. Everybody talks about the good things, so let me just add two flaws I found. FIRST flaw is the sensor: Why did Nikon not use a chip with more than 24bit (8 bit/pixel). The comnpetitor has 36bits/pixels. That allows to correct little over- or underexposures and handle problematic light situations to do something HDR-alike in the photo editor. SECOND flaw is, that other formats than 3:4 are not available in display are not storable as raw. I want to ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

Mine came today! #509. Still playing and adjusting, but it FEELS great, somehow more solid than 7700 (which I loved!). Macro shot below just for the pixel peepers to tear apart. If it has the same sensor as the 7700, and the same results, the build alone lets me give it 5 stars. I love having my beloved P7700 WITH a viewfinder when I want it. ISO400, 1/20 f2.8 Macro setting, natural light. Handheld, and just noticed date on watch was wrong... doh!

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review