Nikon Coolpix L18

8.0 megapixels | 3" screen | 35 – 105 mm (3×)

User reviews

Average rating: 4.03
5 stars
(2)
4 stars
(3)
3 stars
(1)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
Q Kingston Peng
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Q Kingston Peng posted on Aug 7, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I purchased this camera in Jan 2009. Refab one cost me only about $70 bugs. After using this refab camera for 8 months, I brought it on Las Vegas and Canada trip. I am very satisfied with the result this camera brought to me. I start to use it as my primary vacation camera, mainly due to it's easy to use and good quality picture results.

This camera takes better image than many point and shoot cameras (I have used more than 10 of them, and still owns about 7-8 P & S), especially in the dark areas under the light. Night scend on Las Vegas is not easy to get very good quality pictures, but this camera took number of excelent ones. It impressed me very much.

Big screen with date imprint is what I liked this camera. Construction is a little cheap (looked plastic). My Sony looked nicer (W55.

Problems: 1. It was slow to start.

2. The SD memory became very difficult to latch to the slot after 6 month of usage. This seemed to be a mechanical problem.

3. Suggest use rechargeable 3x or 4x AA batteries, or the battery will run out of power quickly.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Trek2120
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Trek2120 posted on Mar 28, 2009 UTC

Opinion: The L18 is very good as a "secondary" camera. I cycle, rollerblade, kayak, hike, walk, etc. I carry the L18 on a belt pack. It's great for those unexpected shots. I also have a Canon S5 IS that I use for more serious photography, but I'd never carry it when out enjoying my physical hobbies. I do cross country cycling trips every year. I carry both cameras, but use the L18 far more because I can pull it out, turn it on, and take pictures with one hand. There are a lot of photo opportunities that I'd pass on if I had to stop and use my Canon.

Both the L18 and Canon units met my basic requirements: Use AA batteries and SD memory cards, and capture video in the AVI format. I can't always recharge batteries on my trip, but you can purchase AA batteries virtually anywhere. I prefer SD memory because I have several devices (MP3 players, GPS, etc.) and it allows me to share the memory. It's also the least expensive and readily available memory around. I prefer the AVI video mode because it drops into the video editing software that I use (Pinnacle Studio) without having to convert it. I had the L3 camera and always had to convert the video from QuickTime to use it.

Like any device that needs information transferred, I wish it had a conventional mini USB connector so that I would have to use a specific cord. The image quality is what I expected from a unit of the L18's size and price. It's quite good, but not as good as my Canon. The video quality is decent as well. I'm a pilot and sometimes attach the L18 to the bill of a baseball cap (hat-cam!) and record my landings. The L18 is a great "utility" camera.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Warren Kishimoto
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Warren Kishimoto posted on Jan 22, 2009 UTC

Opinion: Hi, I had a lot of digital cameras and this camera takes great pictures. I use it for putting pictures on Ebay. I like the pictures that it takes. Clear and makes everything look great! The cost of the camera is great

Problems: On taking the SD memory card out of the camera someone said that you had to take out the batteries to take out the memory card but if you press down on the memory card it just pops out.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
graywh
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: graywh posted on Jan 15, 2009 UTC

Opinion: There's not much I like about this camera. It runs on 2xAA, which I thought would be convenient, but the flash recharge time is very slow. The shutter speed is very slow. Pictures in low light have a lot of noise. There is no control for editing videos like my previous camera. Cannot browse the memory card filesystem when the camera is connected to a computer or add files to it--you can only get the files off using software.

Overall, the controls are fairly simple and not that different from other P&S's I've used. There is very little manual controls, even when not using the "stupid easy" mode.

Another reviewer mentioned difficulty removing the memory card, but I have no problem getting it out while leaving the batteries in.

I would not recommend this camera to anyone, ever.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
RichL
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: RichL posted on Jan 1, 2009 UTC

Opinion: good overall in function and display.
Nice simple layout, menus etc.
One of few point and shoots left that
uses 2AA batteries, a big plus.
Big display.

Problems: -a real disappointment in convenience is that it connects
by USB using the "MTP" (media transfer protocol)
and shows up in the folder structure as an "imaging device" rather than a MSC (mass storage class) device which gets a drive letter assigned. Some third party image editors will not "see" MTP devices, only drive letters. Unlike some other cameras, the L18 does not allow you to select the USB protocol in any menu.
-Normally this problem is easily solved by just popping out the storage card and use a card reader. The L18 has the
card and batteries behind the same flimsy door and the card is a little hard to remove without removing the batteries. On top of this, some runs of this model have a service advisory warning that if you put the batteries in
backward, they can melt the camera!! ( there is a policy
of sending it in to be modified)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
NK  HILLSIDE
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: NK HILLSIDE posted on Aug 14, 2008 UTC

Opinion: East of use, value for money.

Problems: ISO can not be adjusted manually.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report