Nikon Coolpix 990

3.1 megapixels | 1.8" screen | 38 – 115 mm (3×)

User reviews

Average rating: 4.27
5 stars
(49)
4 stars
(52)
3 stars
(18)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
1234567
coolpicks
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: coolpicks posted on Aug 28, 2009 UTC

Opinion: Coolpix 990 - beginner's problem???

Problems: Hi,
Have just upgraded fron the Coolpix 900 to the 990.
In the monitor, upper right hand corner it says "SLOW", and below this - slightly to the left - there's a little symbol that flashes continuously - what's that, and how can I get rid of it please? At the same time, I cannot set the focusing by pressing the leftmost button under the monitor (the button with a flower, a mountain etc. on it)...nothing happens on the monitor when I press that.
Does anybody here know if this is normal, or - if not - how I can fix this please?
A pic of what the monitor image looks like, with the tiny flashing symbol in the right hand corner here:
http://www.pela-teknik.com/990Mon1.JPG
Many thanks!!!
Peter

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Manfred Lai
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Manfred Lai posted on Nov 24, 2004 UTC

Opinion: This camera is awesome. I swear I was one of the first few guys to get this camera. I got it on very day it was released in Japan and paid around USD900 for it back in 2000. It was a version 1.0.

Then I sold it when the Cybershot F707 was released as I couldn't resist the 5.0 mega wave. After 4 years, I saw this mint condition 2nd hand Nikon 990 at a 2nd hand store for only 120USD. I couldn't resist and brought it again.

The controls and options are rich and extensive. White balance is good. Exposure is nice, Sharpness is excellent.

At this moment I have 4 other cameras in my possession.
Sony S70;
Sony F505v;
Sony F55v;
Sony F828.
The Nikon has better control than most of them above and is worth collecting.

If you print 6"x4" (4R), this Nikon Coolpix would be enough for your needs under any situation.

If you don't believe me, try this on your friends. I took some identical photos using the Sony Cybershot F828 (8.0 Mega pixels) and the Nikon 990. Then I had these printed at a photo lab at 4R (at the maximum resolution without any resize, cropping, highest dpi possible). Then I asked various friends to pick out which shot was 8.0 mega and which was 3.3 mega. Interestingly most would could not.

The point I am driving at is the Nikon 990 is excellant on its own. That main advantage the Cybershot F828 has over it is resolution. In terms of control, the Nikon is really good.

[Yeh yeh yeh, I know, if you want larger prints, more resolutions is better. And this NIkon 990 with 3.3 mega pixels is not enough for 8"x10" prints. BUT just remember 95% of time, we are printing 3R, 4R prints of friends, family, etc.]

Problems: Please remember this camera was designed back in 2000. Its startup speed, recording speed is slower compared to newer camera now. But that is not fatal unless you are into sports photography.

If you are going to buy a budget digicam, (one for your kids) why not pick up a Nikon 990.

In a way, AA batteries is a plus. Especially when you are on a trip. Of course, life isn't as good as those Li-Ion cells but at least you can buy spares anytime.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Antti Roine
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Antti Roine posted on Mar 24, 2004 UTC

Opinion: Excellent macro with tripod but TTL Flash is still missing. Therefore sharp hand held macro shots difficult to take.

The small film sensor makes possible the long depth of field. The lens focuses from infinity down to extremely small minimum frame area. These both properties are needed in macro shots.

Problems: - TTL flash is still missing, although it was invented already 1975 (Olympus OM2).
- Shutter lag makes it impossible to take action shots.
- Flash over exposes faces without manual finetune.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
sven
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: sven posted on Jan 15, 2004 UTC

Opinion: Still a great choice, despite it's age. I have taken over 10,000
photos on this gem, and it is still going strong. It's really a
workhorse. But the amazing thing is that it actually takes as good
or better pictures than the newer 4500 I just bought. They have a
very smooth, realistic quality, and are a little sharper than the 4500
shots. They stack up very well against any current offering. Build
quality is a little better on the 990 too. Manual control is excellent
too - comparable to a mid range SLR. The twist body design is a
work of art. It seems odd to the uninitiated, but once you get used
to it, it's the only way to go.

Pros:

Twist body design

reliability

Image quality in bright light is amazing. You'll have to move to the
5700 to see much of an improvement.

When used with the Nikon 3X tele-converter, it provides a sharp
maximum zoom of 345m equivalent.

User interface is superior to newer Nikons.

Battery life with good high output rechargables is excellent.

3MP is more than adequate. If you compare the actual picture size
to a 4 or even 5Mp shot, it's not really that much smaller. You need
to jump to the 6-8Mp range to really see an increase in size.

Problems: Image buffer/speed. This is where it starts to show it's age. It is
definitely slow compared to anything out there, but it's not a
problem if you like to take your time composing your shots.

LCD is dim compared to current offerings.

Size: it's a little on the bulky side.

Low light performance is not as bad as many will lead you to
believe. No digital cam with a lens this small has "good" low light
performance. The thing about the 990 is that it is fussy about
locking in on a subject, and low light only aggravates the situation.
Once you learn to finesse the camera, and take advantage of it's
focus zones, it works well. But it is not a point and shoot camera -
people that want to just aim and squeeze the trigger will not like
this camera. The folks that spend a lot of time composing and
adjusting will like it.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Pat Fish
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Pat Fish posted on Jan 6, 2004 UTC

Opinion: Thousands of tattoo photographs later I am still charmed by this
camera. I have been using it 3 years, and it brought me out of the
stone age, letting me take so MANY shots of each piece I do and then
decide later in my computer which to keep. I just broke the battery door
and decided to shop online for a replacement new camera, but the
comments on this forum have convinced me to pay the repair fee
instead.

Problems: I put in a set of AA batteries that were apparently larger than the
rechargeables that I usually use and they burst the plastic battery door
hinge. So they say it will be $180 to repair....
The lens cap on a string is lame, it ought to have a quality permanent
cord attachment.
Flash should be more diffused.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
speedshots
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: speedshots posted on Nov 4, 2003 UTC

Opinion: The feel of the split body was unusual at first,than the more you work with the camera ,the more you appreciate the possibilities of difficultties postions that would have made shooting much harder with a regular camera.For a point and shoot camera,it sure has more bells and whistles than some of the other cameras in it's class that I've work with.
As for the sharp photo's that it produces for a 3.34 meg,I'm pretty impress.I've heard some bad stories that this camera is not as sharp as a SLR,well,the problem is that,I use a tripod and I- take- my -time,if I want that good SLR photos.The Auto white balance is right in there and a good one at that.I like the Matrix zone for my exposures and the spot when it's difficult on some situations where I couldn't get it correctly with the matrix.
It's color and contrast is up on par and if I don't like the shot ,I can go in the menu and adjust what needs to be done.The swivel head is very firm and it doesn't tend to droop with any heavy lens that is attach to it.I like the features for sharpening in the menu where if the sharpness is to sharp, I can go in and tone it down to a softer shot,to get that mood I'm looking for.There's more to this camera than you can think of.It's a great camera if you study it inside out.Than,if your just want to point and shoot,just setup the camera in the menu and you shouldn't have any problems.Read the instuctions manual.

Problems: It does have the red eyes with the built in flash,but never use it.I use an external flash above the camera and it's gone.The noise from the focusing mechanism motor,heck my Motor drive F3HP makes 10 more noise than the 990.Purple fringing on edges,heck ,who's going to blow it up poster size.If I wanted a good camera that I'm not going to cry and whine about, than I'll just buy a Digital SLR with all the trimmings.Simple as that.!!!!

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
psychxpsilxcybin
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: psychxpsilxcybin posted on Oct 20, 2003 UTC

Opinion: - Great value for money
- Puts out wonderful images in a variety of situations, beautiful colors that are often very accurate and can be easily manipulated to meet my needs in Photoshop.
- Exceelent swivel design, I've used it SO much!
- Good beginner digital camera - not too many options to confuse.
- Beautiful macro mode. High quality.

Problems: - Spot on lens from moisture hard to clean
- Slow buffer.
- Not so great in low light situations.
- Not a fan of the strap design, oh well :P.
- Would like a sepia mode possibly.
- Needs longer battery life. Maybe a pack instead of AA's.

Don't let these fool you, its a great camera. I just purchased a more professional upgrade - a Canon EOS 10D but I always want to have my 990 around! It's portable, friendly, and fun - but the best part is that it can produce artistically impressive shots with ease.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
kellie-swiss
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: kellie-swiss posted on Aug 17, 2003 UTC

Opinion: I've used this camera for a couple years, but only casually for vacation
travel photos. I cosnidered it a starter digital camera, but it really proved
itself to me this past week at a photography workshop. I spent five days
in Tuscany, photographing in various locations in the country and in
villages. Took more than 1500 photos with great results -- beautiful
color, focus, lighting. The camera functioned really well despite
incredible heat and dust. Having the two-part body allowed me to get
shots from various heights and in and around corners that would have
been nearly impossible otherwise. It also made it possible to capture
nice candids of people in cafes and on the street. I have the telephoto,
wide angle and fish eye lenses -- easy to change on the go to get
specific shots. I hope to keep using the camera for a few more years.

Problems: Initially some problems with manual focus, but that was most likely user
error! Still get a lot so noise in very dark and black portions of images,
but there is software that can help work around that in post process. I
shot a lot of handheld in low-light, highlights tend to get lost, but overall
result is a nice soft image (which was what I was after in this case).

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
shanelavalette
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: shanelavalette posted on Jul 4, 2003 UTC

Opinion: Had this for almost a year and works wonderfully. Beautiful camera, nice design, comfortable in hands.

Problems: terrible flash :P

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report