Nikon Coolpix 8700

8.0 megapixels | 1.8" screen | 35 – 280 mm (8×)

User reviews

Average rating: 4.29
5 stars
(15)
4 stars
(11)
3 stars
(0)
2 stars
(1)
1 stars
(1)
Sort by
123
SW2CAM
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: SW2CAM posted on Nov 1, 2008 UTC

Opinion: After four years with this camera, I have to say it's the second mosted hated rig I've owned in the past 40 years. Dollar for dollar this camera is worth about 2 cents, fact is I'd never buy this rig again had I known about a few other cameras on the market at the same time. After using NIKON film rigs for years I was drwn to buy a NIKON performance point and shoot like a bug to the flame, and we all know what happens to the bug once he arrives at the flame

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Isoflex
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Isoflex posted on Feb 22, 2008 UTC

Opinion: I've had this camera since Dec. 2004. Images are great, no noise or artifacts in any image. Recording speed is slow compared to new cameras but the images are second to none. Takes great pictures in full auto but has plenty of settings for manual usage. Have had NO PROBLEMS with the camera after about 5000 pictures.

The articulated LCD screen is a joy to use.

ISO speed is low and gets grainy quickly are my only real complaints.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
PEstevo
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: PEstevo posted on May 18, 2006 UTC

Opinion: Depois de usar uma sony 707 mudei para a Nykon 8700.
É uma camera leve e compacta um ótimo zoom de 8x a autonomia da bateria é muito boa.

Problems: Esta camera não muito fácil para usar.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Coolpix8700
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Coolpix8700 posted on May 6, 2006 UTC

Opinion: The camera can take very good pictures but only to static subjects.

Problems: Forget to use it for kids or pets running around you.
It's difficult to use, the menu system and the position of the buttons are not intuitive.
You can get an high percentage of bad pictures, the autofocus sometimes fails and the powerful zoom lens would require an anti-shake system.
The flash is too strong for close subjects

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
antanas
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: antanas posted on Apr 16, 2006 UTC

Opinion: No problems,

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Maxi_67
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Maxi_67 posted on Apr 12, 2006 UTC

Opinion: The Nikon Coolpix 8700 is an upgrade of the 5700, using the same magnesium alloy chassis, with some significant changes. Of course, the biggest change is the the growth from 5 to 8 megapixels. On a practical level, this means that flawless 16×20 prints are now a reality for advanced amateur digital photo enthusiasts. Other changes are
1) A significantly better LCD that is both bigger and brighter,
2) A gorgeous viewfinder that is crisp and finely detailed (a real improvement here!),
3)Easier menus that ironically provide even more choices, 4) A focus in ... www.redopinion.com

Thanks

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
AikenFamily4
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: AikenFamily4 posted on Nov 30, 2005 UTC

Opinion: Excellent NON-SLR Camera for the newbe. Many features to tool around with. Menu's Take alittle getting used to but when you get familiar with them then it is like second nature. Very nice handling. Adapts well to the user and the user adapts well to the camera.

Problems: a few things I encountered with the camera is low light focusing using zoom, Hi res picture saving time (about 16 seconds), and remote cord buttons are small. Other than that the Coolpix 8700 is an excellent camera for not being an SLR.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
rick
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: rick posted on Jul 15, 2005 UTC

Opinion: Good older chip camera , good image I would score at 4.3 but I score it below panasonic fz20 by a hair and V3 from Sony. No shake stabilization!!!! which makes even outdoor shots which this camera is for iffy, no manual focus wheel to get those shots if you wanted to fine tune like fz20, but you can't,, a bit old dreary chips like reviewer said ," "nothing that makes it stand out" a bit of noise, less then Panasonic.Poor low light, way worse then Panasonic and rather slow clunky. Good images if you happen to be at right place and right time ( good luck with that) . There are better nikons now out there! Be forewarned

Problems: horrific menu, the worse menu system I ever tried to figure out. The popup flash pops up way too often when you change settings unless your willing to undo it everytime you make a change ,even at NO FLASH. Why does it pop up on no flash? ??????????? If the camera had a stablization it would be a buy but there are simply too many situations that this camera gets to be a hassle. Battery life is nothing to write home about either

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
AMMO
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: AMMO posted on Jun 10, 2005 UTC

Opinion: very nice camera for a lover of photography, not professional... photos with great quality.

Problems: poor quality of phtos with up 200iso

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
123