|
Average rating:
4.54
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Average rating:
4.54
|
|
Opinion: I note that the last user review for this wonderful little camera was way back in 2005.
I purchased my CP8400 on the 8th December 2004 and have never regretted it. As so many have commented, the 24mm wide end of the zoom (24 ~ 85) was the deal clincher. Far too many so-called prosumer (or mid-range) digital cameras start at 28mm : not good enough.
The lens is pin-sharp and this combined with excellent metering makes it (even today seven years later !) a match for my Panasonic G1 with the fabled Lumix f1.7 20mm pancake lens.
For sure it is slow, but I can live with this as most of my photography comprises landscapes. My only worry, thesedays, is the battery, once it dies my trusty little Nikon will have to be retired.
Opinion: Very good camera. Almost the only one, still today, to offer wide angle coverage in 4:3 mode with RAW capture. Good lens.
I use it as a complement to my two expert/pro DSLR when I want to travel light. Highly recommended for landscape photography with good light.
Can be use to shoot inside when used with an external flash (accept all compatible Nikon flashguns, including Metz fitted with a proper adaptor).
Problems: Noise slightly visible at 50 ISO, can not be use at high ISO settings.
Slow when saving RAW files.
Internal flash lacks power.
Opinion: Das ist die Nikon für anspruchsvolle Familien- und Reiseaufnahmen!!!!
Klein, leicht und intuitiv zu bedienen (wenn man wie ich über Jahrzehnte eine Nikon FE2 benutzt hat).
Hervorragend der interne und der externe iTTL-Blitz!
Sucher und (kleiner) schwenkbarer Monitor.
Idiotensicher zu bedienen und individuell anzupassen, wenn man weiß, was man erreichen will.
28 mm Weitwinkel ist beachtlich (auch beim Blümchenfoto), aber jenseits der 85mm (=Portrait) fehlt's an Brennweite. Ich habe Tele-Vorsätze ausprobiert und finde das Gefummel unerträglich (und sieht an der sonst sehr eleganten Kamera beschissen aus!).
Die Kamera liegt ausgezeichnet in der Hand, läßt sich auch mit ausgestreckter Hand (dank schwenkbarem Monitor) gut bedienen.
8 MB lassen auch bei 13x18 cm Prints noch 4-fache Ausschnittsvergößerungen in guter Qualität zu.
Sprach- und Film-Aufnahme als Notiz brauchbar
Problems: Bildrauschen (ab Iso 100 merklich, ab Iso 400 auch nicht mehr per Noise-Software retuschierbar!),
langsames Speichern bei RAW, Hi und Extra 8MB.
Es ist halt keine D200, dafür aber kleiner, leichter und den superkompakten Coolpix S...(mit den gleichen Menüs) im Bildergebnis haushoch überlegen.
Opinion: 影像質素高,色彩表現佳
外形美觀夠專業
夠慳電, 一次有排用,
用SD
無得頂
Opinion: 影像質素高,色彩表現佳
外形美觀夠專業
夠慳電, 一次有排用,
用SD
無得頂
Opinion: Very very good camera!!!
Opinion: I’m Italian, I hope my English will be understandable.
I bought the 8400 mainly for the 24mm equivalent lens since I believe that in the street photograph is much more useful a wide-angle lens rather than a tele.
My cameras (digital and film) are Canon and Leica M and this was the first Nikon I ever had. The first thing that I have to say is that Canon and Leica seem to be designed by photographer or, at least, from people that know the needs of a photographer. Nikon is much more similar to a computer in terms of controls and settings. For example, for some setting, you have to hold down a very little key while turning a dial: many time you don’t succeed. With Canon once you pressed the key you have just to turn the dial, no simultaneous operation, you succeed the 100% of time. In few words Canon and Leica give you the idea you can easily control them, with Nikon you fell you have to force it.
The automatic white balance is very poor in comparison with my Canon Ixus 400 (that is only a point and shot camera!!). I took some picture in interval mode in house i.e. absolutely same light condition for all the shoots and I had different result in terms of white balance: unacceptable! Better to select one of the mode available (external, internal, and so on).
The thread of the lens hood is not fit for purpose and you have very often to screw it. Canon G6 and all the powershot have a bayonet attach, much better. Once again Nikon seems that doesn’t know his trade.
On the street the camera is very good and I like a lot the electronic viewfinder. Sometime I feel like I had my Leica M, even better because I have a very useful zoom 24-85, good enough for almost all the street photos. What’s very different from my Leica M is that after you take one picture you have to wait 2,5 second before take another!! This means you have just one opportunity to take the right picture, especially in the portrait. This is a big leap behind the time: Leica was born to allow people to shoot quickly, with this camera you feel like the folder camera of your grandfather.
In conclusion the camera is not perfect but the results are very good, it’s only question to know what is capable to do and to act consequently.
In conclusion I would recommend this camera to all the people that want a really wide angle lens but, for sure, as soon as Canon will produce a camera with 24mm equivalent I’ll sell it.
Opinion: Other than viewfinder/LCD/WYSIWYG issues below, I love the camera and love the photos. The extra wide angle sets you way back, but makes for some dramatic hassle free shots. Great for limited space spots and/or interior shots. Also great for group photos. Recovery is a bit slow. Recently reduced price and photo quality make this a super buy. I absolutely love the remote control operated self-timer. Great for family gatherings or getting yourself in the vacation photos.
Problems: Am I the only person who found the "either/or" use of the viewfinder/LCD a total pain? Camera requires user to "select" whether you want to use the viewfinder or LCD for setting up and/or viewing shots. You do this by pressing the "select" button. In all my other Nikon digital cameras (5400, 4500, 4300), both viewfinder and LCD were active at the same time. Additionally, what I saw through the viewfinder was what I saw in print. With the 8400, what I saw on the viewfinder and/or the LCD had a dark and bluish cast to it. Did anyone else notice this? Or do I have a lemon? I'd try to adjust settings for what I thought the camera was seeing. However, even when I didn't make any adjustments - just shot in program or auto mode, the photos came out great - so the problem was: I wasn't seeing what I was getting. It's not WYSIWYG. How can one adjust for that? I am a real estate appraiser. I am constantly taking exterior photos of houses to use as comparable properties in reports. People don't like it when they see someone drive up and take a picture of their house. They think you're casing the joint. If I have to hesitate and take a second (or third) shot (to make sure I got the photo I need) - this compounds the problem. I've had old ladies come out and chase me with a broom. A lot of people stare me down. Or ask me what I'm doing. So if I have to drive away to avoid confrontations, and I don't get the shot, I have to drive back to that area at another time, which in some cases could be as many as 100 miles away from my office. That's no good. I need a reliable WYSIWYG camera with quick recovery time so I can avoid these situations. I'm not taking artistic shots, although from time to time, with my home area being Napa, California, I come across scenes that are so captivating, I have to pull over and take the photo. Or 20. Or 50. That's what I love about digital photography. You're only limited by the size of your card. In the end, this viewfinder/LCD/WYSIWYG problem was so bothersome to me, I went back to my 5400 and gave the 8400 to my husband, who needs a wide angle for his work. Now I'm looking for a built-in wide angle digital that has image stabilization and a decent size LCD display. Any suggestions? Has anyone else had these problems with the 8400?
Opinion: Excellent camera, exactly what I need for mountaneering expeditions, climbing and travel, absolutly perfect. Incredible quality. I am very, very pleased. I was considering this camera year ago and price was too high. i am glad that I waited. It is realy excellent camera and I love it.