Nikon Coolpix 5200

5.0 megapixels | 1.5" screen | 38 – 114 mm (3×)

User reviews

Average rating: 4.33
5 stars
(2)
4 stars
(2)
3 stars
(0)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
shaileshnanal
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: shaileshnanal posted on Mar 19, 2008 UTC

Opinion: This was my first camera and not it dates back to almost more than 36 months. The best p&s perhaps canon is created. Any where it gives the comfort. Especially in low light situations it performs dam well i have taken pictures when twilight is there and pictures have come out damn well. A nice camera to take to parties also to give kids for learning photography.

Problems: Poor battery chamber construction. THe socket has come loose only one tag holds the battery. Poor coloring the color fades off also small lcd panel and poor battery performance.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Piecan
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Piecan posted on May 3, 2007 UTC

Opinion: I've had this camera for about 18 months and think it's brilliant. Would like a bigger zoom and manual settings and a larger lcd, but am having a hard time finding something to upgrade to.
It is very well built and has a good range of features including iso preference and auto bracketing. Performs well in low light and in bright light I don't get any purple fringing. Although the lcd screen is small I can see whether the picture is sharp or not unlike some other p&s cameras. Not sold anymore but if you see one second hand I would recommend it.

Problems: none

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
mikeperl
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: mikeperl posted on Dec 13, 2005 UTC

Opinion: Great little camera which gives stunningly high resolution images across the frame when examined critically - something which many of the smaller cameras seem unable to do. Excellent natural colour and almost perfect white balance. Exceptionally good macro for a mini camera. Doesn't really offer much manual control apart from ASA equivalent setting, but performs very well within its limitations. In my view the "soft image" question is a total non-issue, as the images are very high resolution and look extremely natural. I do not feel any need to post-process them. In most other ways it is about as good as the competition - there are some annoyances compared with a "serious" camera but it is very usable. And the output is *very good indeed*.

Problems: Won't bother many people, but lens distortion at wide-angle is higher than I'd hoped for (no better than or maybe slightly worse than some competing cameras) and spoils an otherwise near-perfect technical performance.

Oh, and the AF is less reliable than 5 year old Nikons at long focal lengths, and bad enough to be an annoyance - don't believe the stuff about the AF light providing some sort of panacea where AF is concerned.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Human
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Human posted on Aug 6, 2005 UTC

Opinion: I had the Nikon Coolpix 5200 for a couple of weeks and I've now returned it. I'm a novice so I can't possibly give a proper in depth review. There aren't any other reviews here, so I may as well share my opinion.

The cam was an impulse buy. I urgently needed a cam. I took over 1000 shots with it... I was pretty unsatisfied considering I paid $600 for it here in Australia. Not including the 128 MB SD card and extra warranty, which were also refunded. I definitely paid much more than this camera is worth.

Generally, the images were soft.

With a LOT of the shots I took, the images were either overexposed or underexposed.

The noise was bad in low light settings, on the lowest ISO setting... whether I used the flash or not.

But there seemed to be very low level of noise in better lighting (outdoors)

4 cm isn't an amazing figure, but the macro on this cam is really good.

Colours were pretty accurate... a little dramatic sometimes but that's a good thing for me

The camera looks good, seemed allright to hold, fits in a regular decent sized pocket.

Pretty easy to use.

I didn't notice any extreme flaws... there was a bit of purple fringing... didn't notice many halo artifacts, or jaggies... but the review on this site would be better at judging that of course.

Problems: Listed what I could think of. I would advise you to try the cam out for yourself if you have a high interest... but I returned it because it wasn't worth anywhere near what I paid for it...

It's okay if you just want a point-and-shoot to whip out of your pocket. I wanted something with more manual controls, and the image quality was nothing to rave about. I think this site says in their conclusion that better quality is achieved by image editing programmes... not something I'm interested in.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report