Nikon Coolpix 4100

Announced May 28, 2004 •
4 megapixels | 1.6 screen | 35 – 105 mm (3×)
0
replies

Horrible circle time* when using flash. When the camera was new, the circle time with flash was about 11 seconds. Unbelievable! Now that the camera is 18 months old, the circle time is about 20 seconds. So, these's not much indoor use for this camera. Outdoors it works fine. *circle time: the shortest possible time between two shots.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
prncssjamie
0
replies

I bought the coolpix because of it's size and effective 4 megapixels. Over 10,000 pictures and a year and a half later I wished I had done more research. I do like the fact with the internal memory you can save pictures from your card or someone elses and still have many options. The battery meter is pretty effective and does help and give warning before your battery gives out. Problems: 1.Long delay after taking a picture. When posing for group shots or even normal shots, I have ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
NimrodA
 
0
replies

I have had the 4100 for 9 mothns and have shot over 2000 photos under a range of conditions. It is my third digital camera. I have been a keen photgrapher with 35mm for over 40 years and I just cannot see myself going back to film. Under good lighting this camera will take great photos. Indoors with a flash and close up, photos are good. If you like taking photos with ambient light indoors, or in poor light out of doors, there are better cameras available (but there is a cheat mode you can ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
mehmetd
 
0
replies

I don't say for any cameras excellent. I used rating score sometimes good. I really like the colour of the pictures. Also pc program really good and easy. to save to memory (taking photo) may be little slow but you know it's not a pro camera. I don't care! I really like my camera and I recommend it. note: I test the camera; I took all photo from all resulotions. I printed them and I saw, in 10x15 format only lowest 540x680(?) format photo have the quality problem . Problems: this not problem, ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Tomk2
 
0
replies

SLOW! SLOW! SLOW! I returned it.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Gooman
 
0
replies

Witam.Miałem ten aparat jakis czas temu.Teraz posiadam canona A510 i musze stwierdzic ze zdjęcia z Canona są znacznie lepsze.Uważam że nie ma sensu kupowac aparatu z 4 mpx gdy wraz z tym nie zostaje powiekszona matryca a tak własnie jest w tym przypadku.Szumy duże,wyswietlacz słaby.Ogólnie srednio i tak tez oceniam.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

A truly stunning little camera for next to no money! Now available to UK buyers for £95 including VAT (Dec 2005). So presumably much cheaper everywhere else. It can easily produce near photo quality 10” x 8” prints using the high quality, max. res (4M*) image mode. Some say it can handle 11” x 14” but I think that’s pushing it a bit too far for a 4Mpx camera. Not bad video recordings either - providing the CF (continuous focus) mode is switched off otherwise you hear the autofocus on the ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
SCREWBUSH
0
replies

4100 IS GREAT FOR EXTREME CLOSE-UPS, WHICH IS WHY I BOUGHT IT. OPERATION OF THIS CAMERA IS VERY COUNTER-INUITIVE--SOMETIMES YOU H AVE TO PUSH MENU BEFORE SOMETHING ELSE AND OTHER TIMES A FTERWARDS. Problems: I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANYTHNG EAT BATTERIES LIKE THIS CAMERA--I HAVE TO N OT USE THE MONITOR OR I WILL NEED TO CHANGE THE BATERIES ONCE FOR E VERY 20 PICS. I BOUGHT IT OVER THE INTERNET, OTHERWISE I WOULD R ETURN IT. I AM GOING TO USE IT JUST FOR CLOSE UPS AND USE MY OLD R ELIABLE HP 320 FOR ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
ScorpioII
 
0
replies

This is my 1st digital camera. Overall I am pleased. Problems: I find the flash to be in need of improvement. Quite a few shots turned out quite dark even with good lighting.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Vibhor Gupta
0
replies

Not so Good. The picture quality in low light is not very good at all. Basically they lack sharpness. Pictures taken during night time are not any good (as expected).

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review