Kodak EasyShare P880

8.0 megapixels | 2.5" screen | 24 – 140 mm (5.8×)

User reviews

Average rating: 4.51
5 stars
(29)
4 stars
(12)
3 stars
(3)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
12345
skinnywolf
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: skinnywolf posted on Jan 9, 2008 UTC

Opinion: The camera took good pics, but unreliable.

The lense's wide angle is great for taking pics interior shots or when you want to take tourist scenes. It was easy enough to use by people who are familiar with only shot-and-shoot camera (convenient if you want to have someone else take a shot for you on vacation)

Problems: The on-off switch was broken on our long trip. It would power cycle the camera every other shot at best, or stayed unpowered. It was very disappoining to have a relatively new camera malfunction like that especially on an oversea trip.

I found several posts from other P880 owners with similar power switch problem so this is not unique. Would not buy another Kodak due to reliability problem.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Mr Ralf
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Mr Ralf posted on Nov 11, 2007 UTC

Opinion: Superb Lens, and the manual zoom is plain fun to use.
Very good handling.
However....

Problems: ...I sold it and returned to an entry DSLR.
The processor and AF are so painfully slow that the cam is useless for anything that moves.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Aleksander Wasiewicz
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Aleksander Wasiewicz posted on Jul 22, 2007 UTC

Opinion: I have bought Kodak ES-P 880 fifteen months ago mostly because of its unique wideangle lens and TIFF and RAW writing files formats. I think it is a very good camera for most users - but the freshmen in photography - even for professionals as a additional one. P 880 is very easy to use though it features plenty of manual settings buttons and knobs – just intuitive.
Lens and sensor duo output are outstanding pictures – something a halfway between high end analogue SLR using good film and DSLR supplied in very good CMOS image sensor (using TIFF or RAW writing file option in PASM / C modes).
Cannot complain about metering, WB and AWB, movie modes, flash performance, noises (but ISO 400) and even focusing. Very versatile optical zoom range and fairly usable digital twofold zoom. Lots of setting options with PASM modes and additional three custom modes let you have all the control you need for taking outstanding pictures.

Problems: SDHC or 4GB SD memory cards cannot be used in P 880.
ISO 800 and ISO 1600 speed features are pointless due to very poor picture quality (1024x768 pixels) at that settings.
RAW and / or TIFF writing file format setting is not possible in ANY scene mode (even extremely quality demanding Portraits and Landscapes). This is such annoying for me so I do not use any scene mode.
JPEG’s B and S quality are overcompressed and even JPEG F quality is not in line with camera performance possibilities.
TIFF writing speed is too low; RAW writing could have also been much faster.
Tends to overexpose pictures when shooting at RAW setting in most demanding daylight conditions.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Piacek
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Piacek posted on May 28, 2007 UTC

Opinion: Great camera. I use it 1 year. Any problem. Nice quality. Many interesting and praktice features.

Problems: Too low max ISO level.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
RedMtl
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: RedMtl posted on May 14, 2007 UTC

Opinion: I have now owned and used this camera for nearly a year, and to the tune of some 7500 photographs.

The picture quality is excellent, especially at the lower ISO settings.

The lens is of very high quality, having little distortion at either end of, and good results throughout, the zoom range.

This camera will appeal most to those who do not wish to go to the expense of a digital SLR, but who do wish to have the option of precise manual control -- along with the option of several programmed settings. It is not for people who have no photography experience, or even for those who have some experience, but who have no interest in doing other than aiming and shooting.

The learning curve is steep, and for those who do not have film SLR experience, considerable time will be needed to learn the hows and whys regarding settings. The results, however, will be worth it.

This camera, and the sister camera (P712) together make an excellent combination and cover almost all conceivable shooting needs. The fact that the two take the same battery, the same cards, the same flash and the same add-on lenses/filters (with appropriate adapter rings) is a bonus. Owning the two of them (I do.), and adding on the dedicated Kodak 1.4 zoom lens, the shooting range goes from 24 mm up to 605 mm. All this without the problems associated with removeable lenses, and at half the price of a DSLR. And, it's probably lighter in weight carrying the two than one DSLR with lenses.

The manual zoom on the P880 is a great advantage when fine-tuning is required.

Comment: note that while the range is supurb with the cameras, they are not a replacement for a DSLR if that is what someone really wants and/or needs. I speak/write this as a Nikon user, as well.

Problems: The write times to the card for the P880 are slow. This is vastly improved by a firmware download, and by using a good quality high speed card.

The focus also has a slowness problem, which is virtually eliminated by the firmware download.

With a good card, and the firmware downloaded, I had no trouble capturing the US Navy's Blue Angels as they flew past at high speed during shows.

The incandescent white balance is poor, and should be avoided. Use auto white balance for shots under incandescent light.

The manual focus is not worth bothering with. Fortunately, the autofocus is excellent.

The LCD could use a better resolution.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
jove
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: jove posted on Apr 21, 2007 UTC

Opinion: Very happy with first digital camera. Can do almost everything my old Nikon reflex camera can do, and much more. Digital shooting is a real pleasure. I think I have a new hobby.

Positive:
- manual wide-angle lense is really great
- image quality
- I have used ISO 800 and ISO 1600 as a last option, with not too bad results
- great colours
- good video clips, although only VGA is good enough, therefore quickly big files
- SD cards
- battery life
- price/value: I paid 261 euro on Internet.

Negative:
- bulky: nearly same hight, as width and length. Need a SLR case/bag to put it in. Weight I find OK.
- macro: somewhat complicated and limited possibilites
- rather slow, tele is limited: use is limited for sport+wildlife
- would've preferred more "photography" manual, and not just technical manual
- many buttons, some of them I don't use (share, favorites)

Problems: None

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Noel Hastings
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Noel Hastings posted on Apr 3, 2007 UTC

Opinion: For $299 refurbished, this is about as nice a camera as you will find with a good travel lens (24-140mm). There are few cameras with this lens range and quality, and the feature set is perfect. My only five complaints are listed below in "problems encountered".

This chip has very realistic colors and contrast, which is better down the road because you can adjust color and contrast as you like on the computer. Some other things I like about the camera:

1. Having setting buttons avoids too much menu use
2. the battery lasts much longer than my S80 batteries. Took about 250 images in Zion over 4 days without a battery change. This was with "auto-preview" off and using the viewfinder a lot instead of the LCD screen.
3. lens & chip quality very good
4. good flash exposures (although I rarely use flash)
5. comfortable grip, easy to navigate menus, intuitive
6. 3 custom settings you can make exactly the way you want! (although I wish you could name them besides remembering was C1, C2 & C3 are.)
7. CHEAP!

Problems: 1. the processor and card writing is SUPER slow (my only REAL complaint)
2. the off/on switch is poor design with the "favorites" setting getting in the way. It is also easy to accidentally turn on but the auto-power off feature keeps you from losing much battery.
3. The file compression is poor for the large file sizes. You notice compression when performing extreme crops.
4. The macro setting is very user unfriendly, but will do good macro if you fiddle with it.
5. The "continuous auto-focus" is annoying and you hear the motor in movie setting (but you can switch it to single auto-focus)
6. The manual focus ring is pretty much useless
7. I really wish you could get image stab on this camera and a slightly longer zoom (200 perhaps?)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
squodge
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: squodge posted on Mar 9, 2007 UTC

Opinion: The camera is a little small for my hands, and it's the shape that causes the problems. If it were built as a compact P/S, my hands wouldn't feel so cramped. It's also very plasticky, although this doesn't make using the camera difficult.

The feature set is excellent for a camera at this price point. It has the widest angle of all prosumer cameras, and this 24mm wide angle does not even produce vignetting on a normal day outside - so top marks to Kodak for managing that. I have no problem with the max telephoto range at 140mm, which exceeds all dSLR kit lens [which tend to offer up to about 105mm].

On top of the wide angle and decent telephoto range, there is the 8MP sensor, the ability to shoot in RAW, many custom modes, a proper rubberised manual zoom, hot shoe on the camera, a decent flash unit [the P20], and ISO50. Even the video mode produces excellent results for a stills camera, and the manual zoom can be used too.

Image quality is good from ISO50 to ISO200. ISO400 is too grainy, although this can still be used if you purposely want a grainy photo. ISO800 and ISO1600 are pointless. The colours are absolutely superb, even in auto mode. Plus you have complete control of WB, something that even some dSLRs lack. There's little distortion from the lens, so kudos to Kodak for not trying to squeeze more than a 5.8X zoom on the camera.

Lots of buttons = great handling, just like my Nikon. I would've prefer an extra job dial on the front of the camera, hence it loses one star. The manual focus mode is a joke, but most of us use autofocus anyway. All controls are fairly intuitive after about two weeks' use.

For £230, this is one of the best investments I've ever bought. Much better and used more than my mp3 player, the excellent video mode means I don't have to buy a dedicated camcorder just for the occasional video clip, and it's definitely a camera in a class of its own. DP Review are correct in putting it just outside a Highly Recommended rating.

Problems: The camera froze on a couple occasion when I used certain auto modes. But as I don't usually use auto, it's no longer a problem.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Colvin
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Colvin posted on Jan 6, 2007 UTC

Opinion: Just got the P880 for Christmas. Wife got it through Costco for $249. WOW! What a deal. So far I love almost everything about this camera, still have lots to learn.. Ease of use is great just haven't found out how to use everything yet.

I came from a SLR film background and haven't used digital much. With that said the P880 isn't very hard to get used to.

Love the wide lens.
love the feel
Try one and you'll like it.

Problems: No problems at all.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report