HP Photosmart 435

Announced Aug 11, 2003 •
3 megapixels | 1.5 screen | 36 mm
FZ18
 
0
replies

Done with its mission (taking 0-1 yr baby still photos). It was broken when it was dropped. My nikon never breaks. It's easy to use because it has no features. I'm glad I only paid <$100 for it. Problems: died

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

Would never buy it again. LCD display is awful. Big battery eater. 10 pics with alkaline batt. Image quality is poor, not sharp depite colors look real. Takes long time between shots. Inacuurate batt indication. Problems: When low battery problems such as the needance to reset the cam appear, or to format the memory. BAD CAM!!! My 1.3 MP 1998 Olympus Camedia D-360L Shoots much better pictures

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Mika Kujala
0
replies

Quite deasant as a first camera. Simple to use with average pictures. Consumes batteries quite fast, but still a bit better camera than I expected... Problems: Batteries that came with the camera died almost instantly, but MH batteries last longer.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
vinvin
 
0
replies

Easy to use. Problems: The battery life is too bad.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Bas Emmen
 
0
replies

Very very bad short battery life. With Duracell's took 12 photos and its done !!!! Dont buy this camera ! Mine goes into the eternal archive Problems: Battery life See above

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
J1963M
 
0
replies

The camera is low priced for a 3+ mpix camera. The pictures are fair. The 5x digital zoom sucks though. The quality is very poor over 2x zoom shooting esp indoors no matter how much light there is. Regular shots with lots of light are very good. Problems: Avg Quality shots indoors Poor shots with zoom Eats batteries like crazy (6 battery changeouts after 100 pics shot)

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review