HP Photosmart 435

Announced Aug 11, 2003 •
3 megapixels | 1.5 screen | 36 mm
ilovepotatos
0
replies

I've had this camera for about 2 years now. Poor construction. The entire camera is one mistake after another. I don't recommend this camera unless you see it at a garage sale for 20 bucks. The LCD is laggy and refreshes the preview slowly, the lens gets dirty very easily. The biggest issue is the battery consumption. You get about 5 shots on fully charged Nickel Metal Hydrate batteries. I recommend getting any other brand of entry level camera, or at the very least, the newer M23. For those ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
MBEN
 
0
replies

I just bought this on a whim yesterday. I found it on clearance at WalMart for $60. However, I'm still going to take it back. Yes, like many point and shoot digitals that I've used with regular AA batteries this one does use them quickly, esp. with the flash and the display. My old fuji used 4 AA's and lasted somewhat longer. I'd say it's just below average. It is small and works well with WinXP without loading any software. It's hard to find a whole lot good that doesn't have more bad to ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
AdamT2222
 
0
replies

Don't buy! My mom bought this camera and I have used it for over a month and I must say this camera is a discrace to photography! Don't buy if at all possible. Battery life sucks, images suck. =[

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review