HP Photosmart 435

3.1 megapixels | 1.5" screen | 36 mm

User reviews

Average rating: 3.12
5 stars
(1)
4 stars
(2)
3 stars
(7)
2 stars
(3)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
12
FZ18
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: FZ18 posted on Dec 20, 2007 UTC

Opinion: Done with its mission (taking 0-1 yr baby still photos). It was broken when it was dropped. My nikon never breaks. It's easy to use because it has no features. I'm glad I only paid <$100 for it.

Problems: died

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ilovepotatos
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ilovepotatos posted on Dec 14, 2005 UTC

Opinion: I've had this camera for about 2 years now.
Poor construction. The entire camera is one mistake after another.
I don't recommend this camera unless you see it at a garage sale for 20 bucks.
The LCD is laggy and refreshes the preview slowly, the lens gets dirty very easily.
The biggest issue is the battery consumption. You get about 5 shots on fully charged Nickel Metal Hydrate batteries.
I recommend getting any other brand of entry level camera, or at the very least, the newer M23.
For those of you who want durability, keep looking. This cameras cheap, plastic body loves to break. I've had to fix it with spare screws and tape for many times now.
The only reason I didn't throw this camera away and get a better one is my lack of funding until now.
It is pretty easy to use, though. But that is more or less implied, because there's virtually nothing you can do with this camera except point it at your target, and take the picture.

Problems: Battery compartment came loose.
Body screws fell out, had to put new ones in.
Extremely dirty lens.

Was dropped at a party, 435 blew apart into a million pieces.
The bottomline: It's not even that great at being a paperweight.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Jorge de Vicien
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Jorge de Vicien posted on Oct 6, 2005 UTC

Opinion: Would never buy it again.
LCD display is awful.
Big battery eater. 10 pics with alkaline batt.
Image quality is poor, not sharp depite colors look real.
Takes long time between shots.
Inacuurate batt indication.

Problems: When low battery problems such as the needance to reset the cam appear, or to format the memory.
BAD CAM!!! My 1.3 MP 1998 Olympus Camedia D-360L
Shoots much better pictures

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
MBEN
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: MBEN posted on Aug 27, 2005 UTC

Opinion: I just bought this on a whim yesterday. I found it on clearance at WalMart for $60. However, I'm still going to take it back.
Yes, like many point and shoot digitals that I've used with regular AA batteries this one does use them quickly, esp. with the flash and the display. My old fuji used 4 AA's and lasted somewhat longer. I'd say it's just below average.

It is small and works well with WinXP without loading any software.

It's hard to find a whole lot good that doesn't have more bad to be said.

It is really easy to use and set up if your even a little familiar with digitals.
The ISO can be adjusted a little, the flash can be turned on always or off or used with Red-Eye. I think the exposure can be adjusted a little bit also.
That's really all I can tell- it has some type of "sport" mode, but I don't know if it is really useful at this point - it still seems to have a shutter lag.

Problems: It doesn't work too well in low light, and feels a little flimsy.
The images are pretty good for a $60 camera, but the zoom is horrible!!!!!! All it does is crop the picture. I could just do that later in photoshop, and probably with better results.
It has an mpeg feature that is easy to use but very choppy and bad in low light. My dad's old 8mm film movie camera (the ones from the early 70's) looked smoother...!

Like I said I'll probably be taking this back within the week.
I guess I'm just spoiled by my d-reble so it's even harder to be objective about a cheap point and shoot- with no real zoom, or really any other features.
I guess it DOES have a movie button! but hmmm, did I mention that I'm taking it back. Maybe I'll look into a used canon or something.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
jackitere
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: jackitere posted on Jun 29, 2005 UTC

Opinion: ~~when purchased with hp photosmart 145 printer it's great to be able to take the printer with you and print the photos then and there.

~~BUY THE EXTENDED WARRANTEE! I purchased my camera 6 months ago. One day it simply wouldn't turn on. After chatting with tech. support it was determined that my camera needed to be repaired. But since I hadn't purchased the warrantee I was up that proverbial creek without a paddle. I do enjoy this camera enough though that I am currently searching ebay.com and amazon.com to replace it.

Problems: ~~battery life stinks--though I've recently read that digital camera batteries cure this.

~~you have to buy hp photo paper or about 1/2" of your photo will not print

~~using the zoom results in poor quality image

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Mika Kujala
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Mika Kujala posted on Dec 9, 2004 UTC

Opinion: Quite deasant as a first camera. Simple to use with average pictures. Consumes batteries quite fast, but still a bit better camera than I expected...

Problems: Batteries that came with the camera died almost instantly, but MH batteries last longer.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Ruben Gullini
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Ruben Gullini posted on Dec 6, 2004 UTC

Opinion: Is perfect. And EVERYBODY KNOWS digital cameras eat batterys!!!

Problems: None

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
vinvin
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: vinvin posted on Mar 24, 2004 UTC

Opinion: Easy to use.

Problems: The battery life is too bad.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Esko Syvanen
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Esko Syvanen posted on Mar 17, 2004 UTC

Opinion: Tried a chep one and got what I asked.
Very bad functionality. Exposure fails often.
Slow. Batteries empty all the time.
The camera just doesn't work properly.

DON'T BUY THIS CAMERA!

Problems: Problems with memory card. The camera needed to be restarted all the time, especially when batterie began to be low or when photographing in cold weather.
Shut down, eject memory card, insert memory card and restart.... Taking sking photos was like hell.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
12