HP Photosmart 435

Add to: 
User reviews (13)
3.12
Amazon reviews (85)
3.00
3.1 megapixels | 1.5" screen | 36 mm
Average rating: 3.12
5 stars
(1)
4 stars
(2)
3 stars
(7)
2 stars
(3)
1 stars
(0)

Most helpful user reviews

The list below shows the five most helpful user reviews. See all 13 reviews...
SFields
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: SFields posted on Dec 28, 2003 UTC

Opinion: it's inexpensive, and it's good enough for snapshots, considering the price, the image quality is not that bad, but 3,14MP? it says so. But when using a tripod in perfect conditions, it can make you happy

Problems: not really

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
J1963M
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: J1963M posted on Feb 8, 2004 UTC

Opinion: The camera is low priced for a 3+ mpix camera. The pictures are fair. The 5x digital zoom sucks though. The quality is very poor over 2x zoom shooting esp indoors no matter how much light there is. Regular shots with lots of light are very good.

Problems: Avg Quality shots indoors
Poor shots with zoom
Eats batteries like crazy (6 battery changeouts after 100 pics shot)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Bas Emmen
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Bas Emmen posted on Feb 9, 2004 UTC

Opinion: Very very bad short battery life.
With Duracell's took 12 photos and its done !!!!

Dont buy this camera !
Mine goes into the eternal archive

Problems: Battery life
See above

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
AdamT2222
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: AdamT2222 posted on Mar 2, 2004 UTC

Opinion: Don't buy! My mom bought this camera and I have used it for over a month and I must say this camera is a discrace to photography! Don't buy if at all possible. Battery life sucks, images suck. =[

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report