Fujifilm MX-500

Add to: 
User reviews (12)
4.00
1.3 megapixels | 1.8" screen | 35 mm
Average rating: 4.00
5 stars
(2)
4 stars
(8)
3 stars
(0)
2 stars
(2)
1 stars
(0)

Most helpful user reviews

The list below shows the five most helpful user reviews. See all 12 reviews...
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Jan 28, 2001 UTC

Opinion: I know this camera is discontinued, I still own one and am having a hard time deciding to get rid of it or not. The MX-500 was one of the first 1.5 (relative) megapixel cameras to hit the market for under $500, and for the time, it blew the competition away. The features are very basic compared to what's available now, but the striking feature of this camera (still) is it's image quality. ISO is rated at 100, 2x digital zoom (no optical), gerat macro mode, a bit of manual adjustment...on par with a typical point and shoot.

I've always been a fan of Fuji's transparency slide film (E-6), it screams color and contrast. The MX-500 is the only digital camera I've used that seems to reproduce this effect. You're not going to get it in low light or with the flash, but in bright colorful outdoor or landscape shots, this camera still amazes me. Sharpness in 1280x1024 is great if you use a tripod, 640x480 is excellent all around.

I'm wondering if anybody else out there still has one of these too and would like to join in on the opinions?

Problems: No problems, just drawbacks (because of age) which include...

-Serial download only. Sloooooooow with 1280x1024 images.
-No optical zoom.
-Power on, shutter lag and storage time increases CONSIDERABLY as smart media size is inreased. (Nearly 15-20 seconds with a 64meg smart media card)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Apr 10, 2001 UTC

Problems: Too slow to snap....candid almost inpossible

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Alan
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Alan posted on Jun 22, 2001 UTC

Opinion: Bought my MX-500 in March of 99 for $399. It came bundled with another 8mg Smartmedia and the floppy adapter. I tried the serial download once, but the floppy adapter is much faster. Certainly not state of the art anymore (and I suspect that it never was), but it has never failed me, takes good outdoor shots, and great macros. I'm in the market for a new camera, but I plan on keeping the MX-500 handy because it's so compact and reliable. Love that retractable lens cover too! I'll be including Fujifilm in the new models consider.

Problems: Uses up those standard AA batteries pretty quick, but then of course I am only using the cheapest ones I can find....

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
JOHN PETTIFOR
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: JOHN PETTIFOR posted on Nov 28, 2001 UTC

Opinion: Owned this camera for about two years now, and It hasn't let me down once, easy to use, and returns the brightest sharpest pic's I have seen with out adjustment on some other camera's even at more pixels use.
Macro's are fantastic, and landscapes are best, dull lighting needs adjustment.
Love the shutter over lense, something when I was buying was inportant, also th efact it uses normal batteries, when travelling you cannot get to a plug socket sometimes, but batteries can be found even in the depths of India or Peru...

Problems: Slightly bulky, slow serial download, no optical zoom

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report