Fujifilm FinePix S7000 Zoom

6.0 megapixels | 1.8" screen | 35 – 210 mm (6×)

User reviews

Average rating: 4.58
5 stars
(104)
4 stars
(43)
3 stars
(3)
2 stars
(2)
1 stars
(1)
Sort by
1234567
Farside
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Farside posted on Jul 17, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I've had this for two years and it was probably two years old when I bought it, as a re-introduction to digital photography a bit better than the P&S I was using before. I was impressed by its ease of use and the very high quality pics it was capable of producing. I supplemented it with an Olympus TCON 1.7 to give a useful extension to the zoom length, via a stepping ring.
Now it stays permanently in the vehicle as a standby camera as I have confidence in its ability to accurately record anything I happen to see on a trip where I don't have my other cameras with me. A big benefit is its use of AAs, no worrying about whether its battery is charged, it's dead easy to always have a spare set of charged AAs as they're so commonly used for other appliances.
I now tend to use this as a quick and dirty video camera, finding the VGA res video perfectly adequate for playback on a TV screen and 15mins /GB isn't too bad, especially with the low price of memory now.

Problems: No power zoom when recording video, but not a big deal.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Alby144
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Alby144 posted on May 2, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I have been using my S7000 for 4 or 5 years now. It has been an excellent choice for my camera needs. I have been able to produce very nice images in most situations. It also has many functions that enable me to capture great images in those situations that aren't so normal. It's low light capabilities have been astounding. I have taken sunrise and sunset shots, without the use of a tripod, and have gotten very good results. I have used the Macro modes with great results also. It has been a great tool for my beginning to the world of digital photography. Another plus to this camera is it's capability to produce pretty good video. It's use of AA batteries is a very good feature. With the advent of the new high capacity recharable batteries it is even a better feature. If you're thinking about moving up from a compact point and shoot camera and looking to advance into the DSLR world, this camera is a great stepping stone. It's point and shoot capabilites are very good and it has many features of the DSLR cameras.

Problems: The one major flaw, that I have noticed, with this camera is it's propensity to create noise or distortion from shiny items in a bright light situation. In bright sunlight it produces kind of a zig-zag effect on reflective items like the chrome trim on cars.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Dave G Owens
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Dave G Owens posted on Jun 6, 2008 UTC

Opinion: Bought the camera not long after it came out and have been happy with it ever since, I have thought about upgrading but I keep deciding to stick with old faithfull. It is well made, robust, nicely designed, easy to use and produces excellent images

Problems: Heavy on batteries but since I switched to high capacity rechargeables this is no longer a problem

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Mark Gordon
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Mark Gordon posted on May 10, 2008 UTC

Opinion: I think I bought the last one in Sydney in mid 2005, following owning a 6900 for 4 year. I had two specific requirements for a camera - firstly that it took AA batteries (invaluable if you are stuck with flat proprietary batteries in the middle of nowhere, and soured by my experience with the 6900's poor battery life and expensive NP80 batteries), and secondly that it would accept a barrel and filter to protect dust getting into the zoom mechanism. I am often in less than ideal conditions fro cameras, and this is vital. A have a colleague who used one without this protection, and the mechanism did fail. I have had no problems with the camera, find it easy to use and the picture quality is great. Hopefully it will last me a long time - from looking at them and reading reviews it appears the later models in this line are not as good.

Problems: I still do not like digital viewfinders, and the autofocus can be confused in difficult conditions. The manual focus is next to useless due to the digital viewfinder. The next step would be a DSLR, however the portability of DLSR's is not ideal.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ft254a
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ft254a posted on Oct 23, 2007 UTC

Opinion: I have used my s7000 for 4 years and I enjoyed it's quality and features. When buying the s7000 I carefully researched the field and decided to go with the digicam over the SLR field, which at time was much narrower.

I found that I never appreciated it enough until I recently purchased a D80 Nikon with 18-200 VR lens. I found that digicam is loaded with many of the features. The contained zoom feature means no lens changing. Compact and easy to use, it works as a point-and-shoot camera, but you will soon be delving into the world of creative photogaphy.

I strongly recommend this camera as an alternative to SLRs if price is an issue. The contained zoom feature means no lens changing. I am now using it as a second camera and will keep it close at hand.

Problems: Noise is an issue as many people report.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Daniel Ho
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Daniel Ho posted on Jan 29, 2007 UTC

Opinion: I bought this camera 2nd hand online. I love it to bits! Just upgraded to a dSLR, but I love this camera too much to sell it. It's been with me thru almost all kinds of weather. Cold, damp, sandy, blazing hot... It's great!

It takes excellent shots and is packed full of wonderful functions. I love it...

-dan-

Problems: The memory card compartment cover is right where your hand-grip is. And if your camera's a little old like mine, the cover might get a little loose. So once in a while when i accidentally loosen the cover, the camera will shut down.

The lack of any image stabilization might be a downfall.

-dan-

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
asdadave
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: asdadave posted on Jul 9, 2006 UTC

Opinion: i am by no means an expert with a camera but i have had the s7000 12 months now and can tell you it is a fantastic camera i nearly moved up to the samsung 815 a few weeks ago but that was just because of the bigger zoom and lcd to be honest it would have been hard to part with my 7000 it is well built if you are thinking of buying one go for it

Problems: no problems just wish it had longer zoom

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
The PhotomanBournemouth
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: The PhotomanBournemouth posted on Feb 6, 2006 UTC

Opinion: Bought one when they first came out ,what a top camera ,Buy one you
won't regret it !

Problems: I SOLD IT TO UPGRADE TO A D 70 FOR BACK UP ! I MISS IT ! No faults
at all in over 3500 shots

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Beefy_SAFC
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Beefy_SAFC posted on Jan 17, 2006 UTC

Opinion: This camera is a good solid camera, capable of exceptional photos in good light. It is absolutely packed with features that will get many people on the road to SLR land, because as you learn to use all it's bits and pieces, it leaves you wanting more.

The 55 mm thread enables you to attach extra lenses, both wide angle and telephoto (you will need the latter) and being an earlier Fuji design, the menu system is fairly simple. The nested menu system of the S5600 and F10 had not been introduced with this 2003-launched camera. The earlier Fuji design means that although digital zoom is only available at lower resolutions, it does not use interpolation (rather a hardware cropping method) and there is no loss of image quality when used.

The big bonus is the programmability of the camera and shutter and aperture can be manipulated to your heart's content. More basic settings enable the novice to also use this camera and progress to more complex features as they learn how to use the S7000.

First 5 and Last 5 rapid fire multiple frames are available also at any resolution and a 40 frame repeat is availableat 3 megapixels and lower. One criticism of later Fuji designs (S5500 and S5600) is that this was reduced to first 3 and last 3.

Problems: However, there are reasons I'm not giving the camera top marks and (despite what I've said above) why I sidestepped to the S5600. Firstly, it only has a 6x zoom (the S5600 and others have a 10x zoom or better), which makes a telephoto lens essential for longer range shots that you would expect as standard for this camera. I would opt for an Olympus TCON-17 in this case, which will fit directly to the standard Fuji ring adaptor. The use of the non-interpolating digital zoom at lower megapixel settings, as described above, can partially compensate for this too.

The camera also offers up to 6 megapixels, interpolated up to 12 megapixels if wanted; the image quality is very good at 6 MP in reasonable light, however, the 12 MP image on close inspection can seem a bit noisey. That said, do you really need 12 megapixels (I normally dropped back to 3 or 6 MP)?

In poor light, images taken in Auto mode can seem very pastey or washed out compared to other cameras - the S5600 for example seems to fair a little better. The only way round this is to start playing with the shutter and aperture settings in order to compensate.

My final problem was speed - start up took a few seconds for example, not good when I wanted a snap shot. Also, focussing can be slow when light is not perfect.

With the introduction of the 5MP S5600 (I don't personally need the 12 MP mode), I decided to look at what I wanted most out of a camera and decided speed (start up and focus) and extra zoom (10x) were more important to me - most of what I want is on the S5600 (including being able to fiddle with shutter and aperture settings).

I feel the S7000 has aged quite rapidly given other developments - not so long ago, each of the marks I've given would have been .5 higher. Whether you opt for this depends on what you want out of it. If you want lots of features and good multiframe shooting, the S7000 gives you easy access to these. If you want a fast operating camera that is ready to go in a flash, look elsewhere.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report