Fujifilm FinePix S3000 Z

3.1 megapixels | 1.8" screen | 38 – 228 mm (6×)

User reviews

Average rating: 3.62
5 stars
(6)
4 stars
(17)
3 stars
(8)
2 stars
(5)
1 stars
(1)
Sort by
1234
jimo6
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: jimo6 posted on Jul 10, 2007 UTC

Opinion: Bought this camera as I liked the shape and fit to the hand as well as the longer than normal zoom. I should have taken more test shots in the store to check image quality.

Far too many shots are not to my liking. Shutter lag is ridiculous on this camera. I always seem to end up with a picture of what came one second after I was viewing when pressing the shutter release.

After a few months of frustration, I gave this to my kid to play with and bought a descent camera; Panasonic FZ-20. Suddenly I am not such a terrible photographer!

Problems: Shutter lag, blurry pictures. Viewfinder not so good.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Derek F
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Derek F posted on Apr 27, 2007 UTC

Opinion: I had been very pleased with my Fujifilm Finepix 1300 and decided about 2.5 years ago to "upgrade" to the S3000 Z. This time I had shopped around a little, but my good fortune with the Finepix 1300 meant that I was leaning towards a Fuji product. I perhaps should have done some more research on the particular model I selected.

Initially, the construction and features impressed me; however I soon realized that the images I was getting, even with double the effective pixels, were not that much better than I had been getting with my 1300.

Initially, I put this off as not being familiar with the model of camera, but over the past 2.5 years, and several readings of the owners manual, I still haven’t been able to get the S3000 Z to operate at what I feel “should” be it’s potential. On a few occasions, I’ve even grabbed the 1300 out of retirement rather than deal with the finicky S3000 Z.

Problems: • ISO of 100 really limits what one can do with the camera.
• Drains batteries quite rapidly, even when not in use.
• Slow data storage means what seems like long waits between exposures.
• Auto focus does not work in low light situations

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
pasasha
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: pasasha posted on Jan 20, 2007 UTC

Opinion: You definitely get what you pay for. Poor quality photos, hardly considered a camera in low light. This camera had a once avid photo-taker not even wanting to take pictures. Pictures taken outside are somewhat acceptable. Indoor photos find walls and carpets in focus and the subject out of focus almost 100 percent of the time. Never again.

Problems: see above

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
jcatfood
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: jcatfood posted on Feb 28, 2006 UTC

Opinion: BAD CAMERA.
This camera replaced my earlier fuji finepix model, which I loved. The S3000 cannot focus except in full daylight. No matter how I adjusted the setting, every picture was blurry. If the flash is used in any low light situations the picture ends up completely washed out. Manual settings do very little to alleviate this problem. I took approximately 10,000 pictures with my s2800 and they were all excellent. I have taken about 6000 pictures with the s3000, and have been almost universally dissappointed. The only high quality pics this camera can take are full daylight, outdoor shots.

Very dissappointing.

The Fuji Finepix series has seemed to be almost all great cameras. How could they have messed up this model so badly?!?!

Problems: Terrible Focusing

Terrible White balance

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Fisu
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Fisu posted on Aug 22, 2005 UTC

Opinion: Well I've just sold my S3000 to buy a new camera but I have to say that the Fuji has been a fair good camera as a result.-
My fisrt experiences in digital photography where with this camera and I have learn a lot, I first was like most of the coments here, focus problems, etc... But after 7 months of usage I learn how to takes pictures with the S3000.-
Here a few pictures taken with the cam:
http://photos23.flickr.com/28423244_1324154eda.jpg
http://photos14.flickr.com/15411102_5083498382.jpg
http://photos21.flickr.com/28423245_fa959940d6.jpg
As you see I managed to kae pictures at slow shuitter speeds with out the hability to set it. work with withe balance, Scene modes, and manual settings.
And You will get amazing results.
I might consider myself as an experienced amateir photographer, Also remember to use aditional light to shoot (flashlight recomended).
It is low price. the camera has a lerning process that once you got it, you will get the results. recomend this camera.

Problems: Focus on low light. Use aditional light such as flash light to ensure focus.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
crashman
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: crashman posted on Jul 29, 2005 UTC

Opinion: Bought this when it first became available at military exchanges overseas (I work at a US Army base in Germany) a couple years ago. I was very pleased with the image quality and ease of use, but I was unsatisfied with the effectiveness of the pop-up flash indoors and don't understand why they even bother including such a tiny (16MB) xD picture card... i would've been willing to pay $50 more to have a 256MB card included in the box.

Problems: I left it in a hot car and the power switch melted slightly and has popped off on a regular basis ever since (incredibly irritating). I also accidentally dropped the camera and the hinge on the media door broke, so I had to tape it shut to use the camera. The hinge was my fault, but I feel the switch should not have been so easily damaged. I finally decided to upgrade and bought a FinePix E550 last month, so I could use the same media.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
jimgarrison
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: jimgarrison posted on Apr 29, 2005 UTC

Opinion: Camera has a delay between when you shoot picture and when it captures image. The image captured on the viewfinder is not the image captured on the media. This works fine for landscape shots, but if there is any movement, you will not get the shot you want.

Problems: Lag Time between shot and image capture

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
BareFeet
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: BareFeet posted on Jan 28, 2005 UTC

Opinion: Same with me as Gerard. Moving up to S5000. I actually like the features of the 5000 over the 5100, more so the 3000. The 3000 was, to me, a snapshot camera that didn't even do that very well for what it's supossed to be.

I feel the body was poorly constructed, I could feel the mold seams whenever I picked up the camera, wasn't impressed with the LCD viewfinder and I hated that I had to keep selecting the LCD everytime I turned on the camera. Very good pictures.

Problems: Zoom assembly became stuck in the out position, eventually, after a few minutes of playing with it, the zoom lens fell out and that was the end of
that cam.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Gerard McGregor
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Gerard McGregor posted on Jan 25, 2005 UTC

Opinion: I have to admit that it did not take too long for my Dis-Ease with this camera to set in.I could only take shots outside on a sunny day.My wife thought that I had developed some form of Tremens.All the rest of my shots were awful.A greater disappointment was the fact that there were no controls that I could adjust to make things better.The best thing this camera did was to propel me forward to greater things(FujiS5500)AHHHHH!BLISS.

Problems: What can I say? Owning this camera is a problem or it will give you some. Lack of control. No auto-focus in low light. If you have no control and no auto focus then I do not know what it is that you have got.I can't be positive at all,at all.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report