Casio QV-4000

Announced Jun 22, 2001 •
4 megapixels | 1.8 screen | 34 – 102 mm (3×)
Chuck Steenburgh
0
replies

Great as a simple point-and-shoot but has full suite of controls for advanced users with easy access. Excellent image quality in spite of aggressive noise reduction. Uses simple AAs and CF cards so easily compatible with my DSLR gear.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
w_mathews
 
0
replies

I love this camera, but it just died on me in the thirteenth month, just like the last poster advised. I used an Olympus in the past and was very dissatisfied with the camera. I bought the Casio as an upgrade and immediately loved it. I have taken some amazing pictures with this model. I have sent the camera off to Casio for diagnostics and repair if possible. I will let everyone know how they handle the warranty issue since it is one month out of warrant. The service tech told me that they ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
roncrowell
 
0
replies

Just went dead in the 13th month (warranty just expired). Company wants $275 before they look at it. Moral of the Story: Buy a camera from a camera co., not a watch company. When it worked, I liked it just fine. I feel really ripped off. The company is MIA now that problems have arisen.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
pixelAngst
 
0
replies

Look at Casio's own gallery for some excellent sample images, including some taken with the optional convertor lenses. It also shows features such as the in-camera soft focus effect. Here's the site: http://www.casio-europe.com/euro/qv/qv_4000/report/

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Dirk Vancraeynest
0
replies

In short a very nice camera for the money. I had a complaint about Casio after sales service. But They fixed a problem for free. And, my camera had a better image quality afterwards! - good image quality - very nice feature set - nice 'bestshot' feature - compact format - with the overly strong noise reduction gone, the image quality is so much better - images are slightly too blue (before they were too red) Problems: - After a year, the camera would jam in the middle of a shoot, even with ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
notqytryt
 
0
replies

Let me first say Ive been shooting film for 26 yrs and have made prints A3 in size with this camera that are equal to 35mm film. If you use an icm printer (epson) you get outstanding results in conjunction with power-rip software also when it comes to true color the bottom line is "With Photoshop all things are possible" Learn it, love it, live it. bottom line is I get about the same quality picture with this palm sized gem as I do hanging a 35mm with 5 lbs of glass around my neck. I still ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
rp8162
 
0
replies

Great Camera for most shots, but appalling focus on infinity. I did an A3 + print of a Bird, outstanding, but 10 x 8 (4mp)off a Landscape was awful, my old Kodak DC280 produces better pictures at 2mp! Is this a faulty camera? Or is the Kodak 280 a better camera for Landscapes? Problems: Lack of Sharpness when set at Infinity

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Paulo
 
0
replies

I Need Urgent Help if anyone can Help me My son broke acidently my casio qv4000 cd... So I Lost my bestshots Scenes ... Can anyone compile me and send me by mail ? Much thanks to all Allways enjoy this great Camera.... Problems: none

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Hollye
 
0
replies

I am enjoying my qv-4000. The flash takes a long time to recharge, which can be annoying, but I don't see it as a big issue. When in automatic mode one cannot push the "preview" button to view the last picture taken. You have to go to the "preview" setting on the power switch. The LCD is hard to see in broad daylight, but apparently thats well-known news. The qv-4000 takes good pictures and has many great features/settings. This is my first digital camera and I'm very satisfied. Problems: ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
LJZ
 
0
replies

After Nikon Coolpix775 and 995, it became my 3rd digital camera 3+ weeks ago. Because of usage of CF card and AA batteries, I chose it. With many functions and features, it is really a great digital camera. Excellent construction, ease of usage, and abundant funtions offer you to invent the profound of digital photography. The big aperture of F2.0 let you can get photoes of less depth of field. Besides, during nightshooting, at small aperture of F8.0, the radiance of spot light is very ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review