Casio Exilim EX-Z120

7.4 megapixels | 2" screen | 38 – 114 mm (3×)

User reviews

Average rating: 4.29
5 stars
(5)
4 stars
(7)
3 stars
(1)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
12
ShatteredSky
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ShatteredSky posted on May 7, 2008 UTC

Opinion: In good light generally correct exposure, colors and sharpness. In high contrast
scenes the usual blown highlights, but acceptable overall. A4 prints generally
satisfying. Battery life with high capacity NIMH IS good, flash exposure and range
good for indoor situations. Reasonable small and well built, but the screen, though
large, could be of higher resolution. Easy mode yields best results, fussing around
too much with the limited range of adjustable settings not necessary. The optical
viewfinder "zooms" in, but is not very acurate.

(four images here
http://SpiralTower.smugmug.com/gallery/4263698_U2YdC/1/249372527_uFm2q)

Problems: The extended lens seems to be quite fragile.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
yuswar
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: yuswar posted on Oct 26, 2006 UTC

Opinion: Small, easy to carry; to use and good overall performance.

Problems: -

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Rafael Pinto
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Rafael Pinto posted on Sep 1, 2006 UTC

Opinion: Great camera for the price!

Problems: None, until now.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
fenix
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: fenix posted on Aug 3, 2006 UTC

Opinion: excellent camera, thx casio

Problems: no

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Lambert Tsu
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Lambert Tsu posted on May 28, 2006 UTC

Opinion: Small, easy to carry and to use.

Problems: Alot of noises. Gets worse when the subjects are not brightly lit. The subjects don´t have sharp contours, as if there was some movements during the capture.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
liwei
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: liwei posted on May 27, 2006 UTC

Opinion: very good camera, cheap & good

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Roland L Richardson
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Roland L Richardson posted on Mar 31, 2006 UTC

Opinion: This is a great camera. I have compared it with the Casio QV3000 http://market-yourself.com/pictures_ronrlr. The ability to create Best Shot shortcuts alone allows a beginner to achieve great pictures right from the start.

Problems: None

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
D P Cole
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: D P Cole posted on Mar 23, 2006 UTC

Opinion: Overall, a fine camera - if you account for some minor issues.

When configuring the camera, keep flash intensity up a notch and color saturation down 1 notch for realistic color saturation. The images taken tend to be on the cool side as well (for example, burgundy looks more purple than red)

Also keep jpg settings to "fine" as the camera tends to compress things.

Auto-focus is a bit disappointing, my previous digital camera doing rather better with it...

As for noise, this camera is overall low noise (especially with chroma noise), better than others on the market, but today's market does stress "MEGAPIXELS!" over "image quality". My older cameras of lesser megapixels having lower noise overall.

Chromatic aberration is also good on this camera; little purple fringing to be found anywhere. :)

And it's compact.

The camera's functionality allows use for beginners or experts; aperture, shutter speed, and just about everything else can be modified. There's even an optional histogram monitor on the display. :)

Overall, a great value.

Problems: Shutter release button tends to stick after a while (first started noticing around pic #800).

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
jowen
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: jowen posted on Feb 6, 2006 UTC

Opinion: I purchased the Casio Exlim EX-Z120 on February 1st and returned it on February 5th. It is quite unfortunate that I had to return it, I feel that this camera is an excellent buy in all areas except for image quality.

My previous (and still current) camera is the Canon Powershot S45 and after taking a ton of family pictures I found myself looking for another camera. Some of the features I was looking for that I didn't like about the S45 were:
- A faster full or half press lag (the S45 has about a 1.2 second lag)
- A camera that uses AA batteries, not proprietary
- A smaller form factor
- A better navigation cursor
- Less red-eye

Kids are the main use for this camera, tons and tons of pictures of our three children on the go everyday. We take pictures under all types of conditions and we really want a great point-and-shoot camera. The Best Shot feature of the Casio intrigued me and I figured it would help set the camera up for some of the different lighting situations we find ourselves in with our children (swimming, little gym, low light, fast action, you name it).

The Casio is well built and feels solid. It is easy to hold in your hands but if you're going from a bigger camera to a smaller camera it takes a while to get used to the smaller form factor. The LCD is nice and big but a little blurry compared to the one on my S45. I didn't get a chance to see the LCD in direct light.

The full and half lag time on this camera is great but I wasn't expecting the camera flash recharge rate to take as long as it did. Features were good on this camera but one that I didn't realize I wanted till I missed having it was the auto-rotation feature of the S45 when you take a picture with the camera rotated.

The Best Shot feature was nice but it seamed like there should be more options available. I found myself taking most of my pictures with on the plain-jain snapshot setting.

The image quality is what made me return this camera. The sharpness and color of the images was on par if not better than the S45, however the images were noisy and grainy. It took several comparison photos between the Casio and the Canon for me to finally put my finger on what I didn't like about the images. After doing some research and testing I found that the higher the ISO setting the more noisy the picture. Keeping the ISO at 50 to keep the noise down defeated the purpose of a point and shoot.

I really liked this Casio and I wish the image quality was good enough for me to want to keep it. With kids on the move it's unrealistic to use the red-eye reduction features of digital cameras and I use iPhoto to remove red-eye. The images were noisy enough where the red-eye removal tool in iPhoto didn't clean up all the red-eye.

If you are the type of person that looks at HDTV and says "what's the big deal" or are upgrading from a 1MP camera this might be a good option for you but if you're used to very good image quality you might want to reconsider.

As an aside, I wish the full manual came in paper form and not PDF on a disc.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
12