Canon EOS 400D (EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X)

Announced Aug 24, 2006 •
10 megapixels | 2.5 screen | APS-C sensor
5
replies

I bought this brand new in around 2006/2007 and 8 years later it's still going strong. What more can I say - it's a pretty darned good camera.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
6
replies

Honestly I love this camera, even though it is outdated eight years. One things I didn't know about it was a Compact SLR. I still use it today for photography at my High School events and special events. My experience with this camera is something I will never forget as a photographer. For the camera it self, it produces 16 megapixels and Noise starts to appear in ISO 800 Aperture at 2.8. But the RAW's on this are like any other modern camera and I LOVE the results it comes out with. Like for ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Meowr
 
0
replies

This camera earns points for being a robust, easy to use, entry level DSLR. As it was my first DSLR it was the tool that helped me to learn more about photography. Paired with a Tamron 17-50 that I also owned, it made for the perfect street/travel photography combination, allowing me to capture precious moments in my life. It lacks the toughness of mid-range DSLRs with a plastic body but because you can get it so cheap on the second hand market, you don't feel like you have to take care of it ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
VikingPhotographer
 
montemayor
 
0
replies

i would recommend you get the equivalent of this camera. the nikon D60. picture-wise they are equal with their kit lenses, but add other lenses, Nikon's AF-S lenses are far superior and can rival d3000, d3100, d5000 and other nikon new entry level dslrs. the feel of D60 feels like a shrunk D90. ergonomically well build, you may consider getting canon 500d instead if you're a canon user. Problems: looks and feels cheap and plastic.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

This is a great camera! My first "professional" camera! I have been using since 2008, and it never disappoint me. I have two lenses: Tamron 18-200 and Sigma 50-500, but the most used is the Tamron. This camera has great controls, easy menu, and for any beginner, it's very easy to work on. With a Canon 400D you will be very confident in what are you doing.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
gneztek
 
0
replies

I am using it shooting in Greek Soccer Superleague games,with a Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS lens.I am completely satisfied with my images,considering the limited ISO of the camera.I am alson shooting nature,portraits and everything an enthusiast likes to shoot.I also shot under the rain without protection,in very low temperatures of -4 C and it worked perfect!A feature that is not mentioned in the review is the pixel density which is very important.This camera is many more than a piece of X00D ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

This entry-level DSLR is amazing! The picture quality is great and the menus and button layout are very easy to use. Some buttons are programmable. It is built so well, the body is plastic but feels so strong and sturdy. I reccomend it as a first or secondary DSLR. Problems: AF is not too sharp, otherwise it is perfect. USB, AV and remite plugs cover annoying to open

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
gneztek
 
0
replies

Having used it in football games with a canon 70-200 2.8 IS lens the images were great.The only disadvantage of the camera is the slow continuous shooting but it was not so difficult to overpass it!The density pixels/sensor is a very important feature which is not known to many photo enthusiasts!It is very good in low lighting and portrait photography too.The battery can shoot about 400 times in very low temperature(0 C)!Compared to canon 500d with same light conditions,the same lens and ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

romania o camera buna la un pret destul de accesibil 400$ www.okazii.ro calitatea pozelor ff acceptabila in raport cu pretul unui slr .Testata cu obiective sigma 18-200 DC si lens 28-300 DC IF aspherical. Problems: inconvenient: blitzul care cateodata nu se ridica trebuie ajutat,si senzorul care se pune praf ff usor pe el in ciuda sistemului antipraf electronic

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review