Canon EOS 350D (EOS Digital Rebel XT / EOS Kiss Digital N)

8.0 megapixels | 1.8" screen | APS-C sensor

User reviews

Average rating: 4.46
5 stars
(202)
4 stars
(96)
3 stars
(22)
2 stars
(7)
1 stars
(1)
Sort by
1234567
ProfHankD
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ProfHankD posted on Oct 16, 2011 UTC

Opinion: Although this camera is now quite old, I'm writing this review to make a point about DSLRs....

I had one of these for my research, and it was great in that it was a very good quality DSLR that could be remotely operated by a computer. However, I was using a remotely-operated PowerShot S70 side-by-side with the 350D and the kit zoom lens, and the 7MP S70 out-resolved it by something like 20%! This shocked me, especially because the S70 has a collapsing lens, bringing serious doubts about construction tolerances. Both cameras were used in well-controlled optimal conditions, and I'm sure the 350D would have been much more tolerant of less-than-optimal conditions, but the disturbing truth was that the optics on Canon compacts were way better than the kit lens on their DSLRs.It is also true that various lens options probably would have brought the 350D a little past the S70 in IQ. Note that dpreview commonly tests DSLR resolution with prime "fast 50s" set to their optimal aperture, whereas compacts are tested with the lens they come with.

The 350D sensor and camera body are pretty good, if rather plastic. Operation is quite fast, high ISO performance is good, and images look very smooth (PP well).

Problems: Buying a DSLR to use exclusively with a mediocre kit lens is hard to justify on IQ grounds, and the 350D definitely came with a lousy kit lens.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ahaack
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ahaack posted on Nov 11, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I did not like this camera and sold it after some month.
This was my 10th digital camera.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
dholl
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: dholl posted on Jun 13, 2009 UTC

Opinion: a good modern improvement to the 300D (faster with more features), but the camera in itself is a little dull to use.

If you're coming from a non-DSLR, then it's absolutely fine...but for others used to DSLR's it's a fairly pointless option.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
stridert
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: stridert posted on Nov 26, 2008 UTC

Opinion: My first SLR was the Canon EOS Rebel 2000. This took great film shots. My problem was getting the films developed. I decided to move to a DSLR. After long analysis, I chose the EOS 350D. I bought a bundle that had the battery grip (for extra battery charge and for taking vertical shots). This helped make the camera more substantial and easier to grip. I had the standard lens and a 55 to 200 telephoto. These served me quite well.
This camera takes great photo's and with the ability to take 1,000's of shots at no extra charge has helped me learn the art of photography.
I have no problems using this camera, and have now bought the Canon EF 28-300 f/3.5-5.6L IS USM "L" series lens and the Speedlite 580 EX II flash. This might sound extreme for a low end camera, but the camera takes great shots that have been recognised by professional photographers. I use this setup for sports, landscape, portrait & function photography.
I got the lens & flash with the forsight of getting the EOS 5D Mark II next year (when I can afford it), but I will keep the 350D as a great backup.

Problems: No problems to date. This is a great Beginner - Semi-Pro DSLR.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
giotesei
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: giotesei posted on Sep 25, 2008 UTC

Opinion: My first digital-SLR after traditional SLRs. It is very easy to use, picture quality is amazing and colours very realistic. The rear colour-screen is small but leaves extra space for the LCD which is very useful. Battery life is excellent. Probably the construction is cheap with much plastic around but this makes the overall package a light thing to bring around.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ursamajorRO
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ursamajorRO posted on Sep 12, 2008 UTC

Opinion: I bought one second hand 350D, with about 11000 shots. I like the pictures taken with Parameters 1, they are absolutely fantastic. Good contrast, sharpness and saturation. I like the good dynamic range too. Still a good camera, though we are in 2008.

Problems: For now, not problems. I have already 2000 shots (+ 11000).

The big problem is the costliness of the good lenses.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ursamajorRO
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ursamajorRO posted on Sep 12, 2008 UTC

Opinion: I bought one second hand 350D, with about 11000 shots. I like the pictures taken with Parameters 1, they are absolutely fantastic. Good contrast, sharpness and saturation. I like the good dynamic range too. Still a good camera, though we are in 2008. I have 18-55 kit lens and 55-250IS. Enough for me. http://gdvlad.blogspot.com/

Problems: For now, not problems. I have already 2000 shots (+ 11000).

The big problem is the costliness of the good lenses.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
kaidieg0
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: kaidieg0 posted on Jul 24, 2008 UTC

Opinion: Excellent first DSLR camera. Upgraded from a G6 point and shoot. Rock bottom price for under $360 from a local store and is brand new. Using a 50mm f/1.8 and a 70-300mm f/4-5.6 lens. Learning so much in a short period of time. Can't believe I waited so long to get an SLR. Already want to get a full frame 5D in the next couple of years :)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
sv1dpp
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: sv1dpp posted on May 15, 2008 UTC

Opinion: Excellent picture Quality, easy to use!

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report