Canon EOS 10D

Announced Feb 27, 2003 •
6 megapixels | 1.8 screen | APS-C sensor
jarnvarg
 

This is the upgrade from D60, the first to use the "D" after de number, great camera, with a lot of functions and features, low ss at 1/4000 but fast enough, good battery life, specially with the battery grip atached, the same of the D30 and D60 but sadly not compatible with later models, the LCD screen, as many of these years were to small and not so good, the body have a superconstruction, still use the ugly painted logo instead the laster engraved, but are so far better than plastic D60, ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

This was my first dSLR - I still have it, but now it's relegated to a cheap throw-it-in-the-panniers type of camera that I wouldn't be heartbroken over if it got stolen. At the time of writing you can pick one up for less than thirty quid. I paid 250 for mine, used, when it was about two years old. Having said that, it's still a decent performer, if you take its quirks into account. Put a decent lens in front and the inherent quality of sensor will show itself - I recommend an old Rollie or ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Ashley Pomeroy

I've had one of these for a month or so, although I have converted it to infrared. It's a popular infrared conversion camera because it's available very cheaply on the used market, and it has overall good performance and image quality. The EF lens mount opens up a world of adapted manual focus lenses. As a conventional digital SLR it is a good although not great used choice nowadays. It tends to be overshadowed by the 20D, which has a higher resolution, a faster processor, and an EF-S lens ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
dholl
 

Definitely excellent value for money. Highly recommended for those who want a serious upgrade from the entry-level DSLR's or their compact/bridge but don`t want to spend any real money (haha, don't we all). The 10D is a fine first serious camera, if a little slow by today's standards.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
waveloom
 

With good lens, this camera will shot reference image quality, for magazines, reviews, advertising and all the professional photography out-there. Modern cameras with same quality costs $$$$$ and camera with same build quality, are not as-good-as-this, in image output. A big success for Canon, one of the best camera ever for a professional that can't afford a Mark 3 or a D3. Problems: Slow access time to cf card, slow photo preview, no support for ES-F optics, limited support for class-series ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Ed G
 

I still use this camera because with good glass it is VERY capable. Everything improves ---IQ, focusing, color balance, low light. Unfortunately, my rating is a little low but only compared to the features of a current camera. A beautiful 6 MP image can be gotten up to 400 ISO and decent above that. Built like a tank. Problems: The problems are only a result of comparison to newer models: data write speed, review time, nit-picky things like that.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
martinu
 

A nice camera: I've used it with Canon 35-55 and 70-300 lenses. Good sharp photos and excellent low-noise on long exposures (eg 10-20 seconds). Problems: Playback images are initially blurred and then become sharper after about 2 seconds - just long enough for me to panic and think I've made a focussing or camera-shake boo-boo! Having been used to a Minolta A1 non-SLR, I miss the ability to use the image screen for composition and judging exposure when taking awkward shots that are not at ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
stevesowerby
 

It all started with Canon Film cameras (Ftbn, F1, T70, T90). Then came the D30 and opened my eyes to the digital world. So here I am with a 10d. Its no longer state of the art but the ease of use and images, especially in low light mean that my pics get used for newspapers, musicians' web sites and CD covers. Yes, I could spend more money but would it capture what my eye sees any much better?

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
calonas
 

slow replay (comp 20D 30D), but great image quality! Excellent build quality (better than 20D)

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
John99
 

This was our first DSLR and it is still going strong. The image quality and focusing is not up to that of newer models but, nonetheless, it keeps going. It is used 3 times a week for low res stuff and has taken many thousands of images. Always felt better in the hands than a 20D to me .... the build seems much better than the newer stuff. Problems: The camera we have was our forth. The first two went back to Park cameras as we were not happy with the focus. The third seemed better but we ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review