Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM

Telephoto zoom lens | Canon EF
14
replies

This lens has many problems that make it frustrating to use. It is probably the cheapest access to 480mm equivalent reach, but much better options are available from Canon for only slightly more money. It has terrible chromatic aberrations giving thick, vibrant green and purple fringing on high contrast areas. I am into birds and hoped this lens would give me good closeups, but any time the sky has sticks in front of it the aberrations get grazy. These aberrations are corrected via optics and ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

If you want cheap telephoto get the Canon EF-S 55-250 IS. If you have Full Frame and want cheap telephoto, get EF 70-300 IS or Tamron 70-300 VC. Not much good to say about this lens, Image quality is not great, it is light (can be a good thing), but really shaky because of lack of IS.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
badboybhushan
 
0
replies

Hi..its too good lens..who nos hot use..for what n which purpose..for..them..its..best..on price..and what u get.. Problems: no problem..but cannon has to give lens hood..with lens....plz..cannon....

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
fastHID
0
replies

Bought this lens a year ago for use on my 60D and found it to be quick, and decent optics. the long end got me some good close shots of wildlife. Using a tripod, I was pleased with how little distortion there was. and fast to focus for sure. But, comparing it to the 55-250 Canon IS I later purchased, and after doing comparison shots, the 75-300 just did not keep up with the clarity and crisper shots that IS can produce. Nice lens though for what you can now buy them for Problems: only that it ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review