Canon PowerShot S90

Add to: 
Canon PowerShot S90
75%
Silver Award
Reviewed: Apr 2010
User reviews (84)
4.27
10.0 megapixels | 3" screen | 28 – 105 mm (3.8×)

The S90 may not look much like the S80, S70 and all its earlier predecessors, but it has been conceived in much the same spirit; a smaller, more stylish alternative to the G series, offering key enthusiast features (such as raw capture and manual controls) in a compact body. And for the most part the S90 delivers on its promise; the image quality is surprisingly good, the user interface well thought out and the design truly pocket-friendly. The handling takes some getting used to, which I guess is inevitable given how much Canon has tried to cram into a camera the size of an Ixus/Elph. The tiny body might not make for particularly good handling, but it's small enough to carry anywhere and the image quality it produces rarely disappoints.

Average rating: 4.27
5 stars
(38)
4 stars
(34)
3 stars
(11)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(1)

Most helpful user reviews

The list below shows the five most helpful user reviews. See all 84 reviews...
keysmith
1 out of 1 user have found this review helpful
By: keysmith posted on Mar 29, 2011 UTC

Opinion: Excellent for compact at low ISO. I 've been using it for 5 months (i bought one second hand for 200€). I also have a Canon 500D 18-200IS. I ve ended up using more the S90 as I can always carry it with me. It is a good camera compared to all compacts. SLRs of course are better but allot bigger as well
Image quality:
* Very good with noise especially with low ISO (80-100), where results are acceptable with virtually no noise. Due to bright lens (f:2 at 28) iso can be kept low even in low light conditions. Noise handling is acceptable for even a DSLR user, but keep iso low.
* Sharpens is also good at low iso. Default contrast is high for my taste.
* Dynamic range is NOT good compared to SLR but typical for compact (Except fuji EXR sensors). You can easily burn bright parts of the photo (sky, windows when in rooms, etc). You often need to underexpose.
* Colour is oversaturated when default colour settings are used.
ease of use:
Alot of professional settings which even my 500d dont have. Two customizable jogs (back and a front ring) and a custom button is all you need for smooth handling.
Lens:
excellent f2 at 28mm, but drops to f5.6 at 105. Fall off and distortion is digitally (software) corrected by camera making it look perfect.
Flash:
I don really use it, but it appears it constantly overexposes, so i have to underexpose (it has separate flash compensation settings). I hate the motorized pop up of it (no spring). It can cause accidents (fall of camera).
Response:
Very responsive for COMPACT. But not even close to SLR.
LCD:
Brilliant!
Battery:
Ok for a full day. I have also bought a second one (second party) from ebay for 5€

Problems: it droped when switched off from 1m. When switched on lens jammed (lens error). I paid 60€ plus shipping for repair (no spare part needed only fixing of original lens). Do NOT use flash on Auto. It will jump and scare someone holting it causing camera to fall.

I would prefer a 24mm and a true 3:2,16:9 (not crop) like the panasonic LX5. By the way it does NOT have 3:2 option (crop at least) but only 4:3 (native), 16:9 (crop)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Sorin Nica
0 out of 1 users have found this review helpful
By: Sorin Nica posted on Aug 22, 2009 UTC

Opinion: Sorry. Please delete my review.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
mcshan
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: mcshan posted on Aug 31, 2009 UTC

Opinion: Here we go again. Would the dpr PLEASE erase the first review of the S90 ( and this second one as well).
The camera is not even out yet.

Problems: Reviews are supposed to be about cameras forum members have tried.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
sirwheatley
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: sirwheatley posted on Oct 5, 2009 UTC

Opinion: but mcshan, Ken Rockwell say it is... 'World's Best Pocket Camera' lolz.
(probably will be)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report