Canon PowerShot S100

12.1 megapixels | 3" screen | 24 – 120 mm (5×)

User reviews

Average rating: 3.55
5 stars
(1)
4 stars
(6)
3 stars
(1)
2 stars
(1)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
Kiron
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Kiron posted on Feb 26, 2012 UTC

Opinion: Overall, I love the size and image quality of the images.

Problems: When using the video mode there is a faint vertical line that appears on the screen.
This line is about two thirds on the right of the screen. Upon playback of the recorded images this vertical line also
appears on the playback. However the line is blatantly obvious in the playback mode. I am playing imags son imovie.
Is this normal?

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
TakePictures
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: TakePictures posted on Feb 23, 2012 UTC

Opinion: This is an impressive little camera, though it looks quite humble from the outside. If there were something like quality per square centimeter, the S100 would be the absolute winner. It's incredible what they managed to squeeze into this little package: a great sensor with impressive noise performance (great up till ISO 1600, useable at ISO 3200 and even 6400), a nice bright (at least at 24 mm) lens with a reasonable zoom, and all the manual controls you need. Auto white balance does an impressive job (way better than my old LX3 and current D300 DSLR). The GPS, though a real battery drain, is a very nice feature as well.

It's not flawless, though. Battery life is worse than expected based on reviews and user's comments, even with the GPS turned off. I have an spare battery, but might buy an extra one.

Problems: None so far, except for battery life, which is not too hard to deal with.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
gail
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: gail posted on Jan 17, 2012 UTC

Opinion: I am still a big fan of the S90, but the S100 has many features that are more useful to me such as:

- more useful focal range
- does better in low light (up to and including ISO 1600; 3200 and above suitable for only snapshots)
- excellent auto white balance
- fast continuous mode
- very good video quality (mine does not have the flickering some have experienced)
- built-in neutral density filter
- ergonomics have improved by leaps and bounds

I don't regret my purchase and expect to keep and use the camera for a very long time.

Problems: - needs a button to manually pop-up the flash

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Bipbip
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Bipbip posted on Jan 9, 2012 UTC

Opinion: I have a Canon 60d and had also the S90. I just replaced it with the S100, and it's a great update ! Very fast, great images and the direct video button is a big plus.

Problems: None so far.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
NoCoShutter
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: NoCoShutter posted on Jan 3, 2012 UTC

Opinion: I can't see a way to update my original review, thus an additional one. See the "problems" section.

Problems: I've noticed more out of focus shots that absolutely should have been in focus, despite being slower to focus in low light. But that's not my main gripe.

ISO IS LOCKED TO 80 FOR ANY EXPOSURE LONGER THAN 1". Yep. The s90 could do 2" or 4" or 8" or 15" at any ISO on the camera. So could the s95. I had both. Loved it. I took those cameras on my wilderness trips (canoe, XC skiing, mountaineering, hiking, etc). Often I would take really cool shots at night via moonlight, or of the stars, or of mountains. No more. The s100 is simply not capable of it due to Canon's engineering lockout of any ISO higher than 80. This is NOT an improvement. A shot with the s100 at 1" ISO 6400 is TERRIBLE compared to an 8" shot at ISO 800 on a s95. And a 15" shot at ISO 80 is nearly useless for starlight or moonlit landscapes. This is pathetic. My ancient Ricoh GX100 could do exposures five MINUTES long that were awesome. Hey, if I wanted to haul my 5DII or 1Div into the boonies, I could ... but then I wanted a small camera so I would not have to to it.

If it were a technical impossibility, I could see the point. But this is going BACKWARDS well over two generations. I think it stinks. I really hope they change this with a firmware update. The camera has so many other great things going for it. Why do this?

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ScubaBruce
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ScubaBruce posted on Dec 28, 2011 UTC

Opinion: I'm disappointed to see that Canon has removed the short cut button from the S100, a change from its predecessors the S90 and S95. I use an S90 with a Canon underwater housing primarily while scuba diving. The camera is capable of taking remarkable underwater pictures without a strobe! This is possible by resetting the custom white balance for every change of depth and lighting condition by simply pressing the short cut button and pointing the lens at a white dive slate. How easy that is. In over thirty years of diving and taking uw pictures with various Nikonos and housed cameras with strobes, I've never had as much success as I do now. I normally dive to depths of 60 to 100 feet. The camera's ability to sense low level light and put the colors back in with custom white balance is awsome. Someday I may have to replace the S90 - I can only hope that the next Canon S (S105 ?) camera corrects this omission.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Angelfire
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Angelfire posted on Dec 11, 2011 UTC

Opinion: My little Fujifilm F31fd finally gave up the ghost with an irrecoverable line across the sensor which shows in all photos and when I travel or go out socially I do not like carrying my DSLRs and lenses (Nikon D7000/D200 and 16-85 + 70-200VR II and 12-24). I looked at all the cameras that were small with good image quality and settled on the S100. A little pricey but I thought it was worth it until I saw that Amazon had dropped the price by £50 (but not available until January 2012).

I was pleasantly surprised at the clean image quality right up to ISO 800 on the S100 and images are very useable even up to ISO2000 with 3200 and 6400 still providing images clear enough for use. Images stay pretty well detailed and saturated at high ISOs.

Great to have full control and I love the front ring on the S100 and I love the ability to shoot RAW.

The manual controls are excellent and the menu system is easily learned.

Typical of cameras with small sensors and decent lens, close up shooting is easy and highly detailed with good depth of field.

The focus acquisition, shutter lag and shot to shot times are just about acceptable because image quality is so good for this pocketable little camera. Not a camera to use with kids/dogs running around unless you pre-focus. The Nikon P300 and P9100 were noticeably quicker but the form factor of the Canon was more appealing to me.

Problems: Price point is too high but I needed a small camera in a hurry. (Amazon have put it on sale for over £50 less from 1st January 2012 and I could have picked up a S95 for £200 less but the 24mm wide and extended zoom to 120mm of the S100 appealed more).

The ultra poor battery life thus far is not acceptable. The Fujifilm took over 500 shots every time and could be left for days/weeks/months and used without further charging. The S100 lasts for a maximum of 100 shots even if you don't review many of your photos in-camera and about 20 shots if you turn on the GPS and the battery simply does not seem to hold its charge. I thought I might improve battery life if I turned off all the default helpful things the camera does like intelligent image stabilisation but after the last charge the camera battery needed charging again after 12 shots! Perhaps I have a bad battery.

I will be buying spare batteries but not Canon own make (ludicrously expensive and if the after market batteries last longer I will be contacting Canon).

As with most digital cameras auto white balance is not that good and at its worst under tungsten lighting - easily corrected in post production.

The software included from Canon (DPP) is pretty slow at converting RAW files even though the results are excellent. I will be seeking a different/faster conversion software solution.

The pop up flash is very weak and is a pain when I forget to move my fingers when turning the flash on. Fortunately the default for opening the flash means you are unlikely to easily open it quickly by accident.

F2 is great at 24mm but soon shuts down as you zoom.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Ziv Tal
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Ziv Tal posted on Nov 28, 2011 UTC

Opinion: Hi,

Finally I got one, This camera looks great with lot's of options...

Video seems good but without manual options. Good optical 7D with 16-35 f2.8 looking darkness then S100 f2 (with same ISO).

Tomorrow I am going trip to Europe I'll report after that with Image Samples.

Problems: Image quality not bad can't say it's like 7D/5D when I am using 640 ISO I got smeared littel image . But I must say that's better then any other pocket cameras that I have ever seen.

GPS works nice, Missing option to tag Image to last signal point (If you enter place without signal), Tracking not work with Eye-Fi card :\

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
NoCoShutter
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: NoCoShutter posted on Nov 15, 2011 UTC

Opinion: I'll skip all the line resolution junk and get to the meat: how it makes pictures. And the answer is: it makes great pictures (depending on the user, of course).

I had the s80, G7, G8, G10, s90, s95, and now… the s100. Love it. Canon really listened and got a ton of things right on this. Here's the minor upgrades that make a major difference in my opinion.

The grip. I've had to mod the slippery grip on every previous sXX camera. Dropped them in the snow with slippery gloves, etc. Not this one. The little grip on the front is little… but it's enough. The have also added a small rubberized grip on the back where your thumb naturally goes. Together with the front grip, makes is the most solid in the hand 6oz camera I've ever had. Oh, and Canon added a slightly textured finish to the entire camera (at least on my black one) that makes it look, and *feel* great.

The buttons. Subtle, but they have changed the ergonomics of the buttons. The buttons are slightly rounded and inset. You'd think that would make them harder to use than the flat, raised ones on the previous models. I find the opposite is true. These are easier to hit on purpose and harder to hit on accident. Oh, and that pesky control wheel on the back that always got spun accidentally? It's tighter now (in fact, I don't see where this model needs after-market mods at all). AND they took the +/- control of the wheel and it makes you bump the top and THEN spin it -- so it's near impossible to accidentally change. Yes, and the direct to video button (thank you!). The control wheel around the lens is tighter too.

High speed shooting. I remember challenging my brother in law with my s95 and his Lumix LX5. I swore mine could do something like three shots in five seconds. Woo Hoo! His edged mine out. Big deal. The s100 can do an ACTUAL 8 FULL RES IMAGES IN ONE SECOND. Yes. That's ye ol' "8fps" of DSLR fame. Honest. Yes. It can do it. And let me tell you, 8fps is stinkin' awesome for a pocket camera. It begins your shots EXACTLY when you mash the shutter. No delay. I shot a friend's daughter jumping on a snow ramp & snowboarding. The first time she did it, I had finished all 8 frames by the time the nose of her snowboard barely cleared the end of the ramp. Had to adjust and start shooting the split second she hit the air and THEN got a good five or six frames of her mid air every time. My 1DmkIV is jealous, as it sits inside and the s100 goes out to play.

Lens. FINALLY! FINALLY! FINALLY! Yes! Canon, I could hug you! 24mm equiv on the wide end! Yes. Yay. This is huge for me and was the reason I bought it ASAP. I've wanted this feature ever since the Ricoh GX100 (which I had and still is awesome for daylight, not so hot indoors compared to s90+). Wow, I missed 24mm. Now I have it again. And at f/2.0. The longer zoom is nice in full sun, but it's a really dim f/5.9 or so at full length. BUT if I had to choose a bulkier camera (like the LX5) to get a fast f/ at full zoom or this… I'd take this any day. That's me, and your mileage may vary. I can throw a 85mm 1.8 on a 5DmkII any time I want shallow. For a pocket camera… this is totally where it's at.

High ISO. It's still a small chip. It's still got grain. But every generation gets a little better, this is no exception. The biggest change here is the fact that user can now choose one of three noise reduction levels for JPEGs. Sure, RAW is cool, but if you just want to shoot and use, this is great. You like Lumix-like smudgy grain erasure? You got it. You like crispy grain with detail? You got it. And truth be told, the auto-noise reduction on this is as good or better than I can do in RAW, even with extra software. It's hard to beat.

I'll leave the pixel to pixel comparisons to others, as well as the whining and fan-boy stuff. I just like this camera. If Nikon or Pentax or Ricoh made one with better specs at the same size, I'd give it a whirl. But this one is so small, so powerful, so customizable (yes, you can reduce TTL flash output in 1/3 stops!). It's just sweet. Hopefully, other Mfgs. will raise their bars too and force the next crop to be even better than this.

Problems: Though not a "problem" I take half a star off for just 15 seconds in manual exposure. Really? Only 15 seconds? C'mon! Let us shoot some nice stars at lower ISOs. If someone knows a hack for this… let us know! Heck, even my "old school" Ricoh GX100 could do shots of several minutes!

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report