HP Photosmart 320

Announced Jul 2, 2002 •
2 megapixels | 1.5 screen | 38 mm
ace123
 
Babya
 
0
replies

Got this HP for $1-I like their cameras because of the very easy to use controls and have also got a 1.0MP Photosmart 120. Onmly 4x digital szoom, easy to choose flash settings and a small LCD do not detract from the fact it can capture nice looking photos. Problems: Doesn't handle 2GB SD cards well

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
marrtha
 
0
replies

I bought this camera about a year ago for $5.00 US, thus the 5.0 rating for value for money. It takes good photos indoors with flash, even in low light. Outdoor photos are very good, with bright colors and no color cast. I have much more expensive cameras with many more features, so this is only a backup for me. But my great grandchildren, 10 and 12, love it. They figured out how to use it with no help from me. So, if you run across one that seems to work, and the price is low, grab it ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

I like the camera, but the slowness between click and flash has made me loose some pitcures. Wish it had zoom..... Problems: I have lost the installation cd that came with my camera, and need it to install on a new computer. Don't know how to get a replacement cd or download it.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
SCREWBUSH
 
0
replies

THERE IS NOTHING BAD I CAN SAY ABOUT THIS CAMERA--IT IS NOT GOOD FOR E XTREME CLOSEUPS WHICH IS WHY I BOUGHT A NIKON 4100 WHICH EATS B ATTERIES LIKE JELLY BEANS. THE HP 320 USED A TOTAL OF 8 BATTERIES IN A Y EAR AND THE LAST 4 ARE STILL GOOD. I LET A FRIEND, WHO HAS PANIC A TTACS, USE IT BECAUSE IT IS SO EASY TO USE--SHE SAYS SHE CANT TELL THE D IFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 320 PICS AND THOSE FROM HER SONY (WHICH D RIVES HER CARZY BECAUSE IT'S OPERATION IS SO COUNTER-INTUITIVE. THE 3 20 IS A ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

Problems: Can't install the carry strap

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
frymierzc
 
0
replies

I got this camera from my father for my birthday. I was taking pictures right out of the box. I'm only 12 years old but am very very smart when it comes with computers. My computer runs Win98. It was very easy to install the software and download the pictures to the computer. I print 8x10 pictures from this camera on my HP Deskjet 3620. I would reccomend this to anybody looking for a solid camera that takes great pictures. Problems: None :)

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

I also own a SONY P31 camera which gives me outstanding quality & features with ease of use. After you have used the Sony, you will find that the HP 320 is much more basic although they share the same megapixels. The zoom function of the HP can be somewhat confusing, as well as the quality settings. With Sony you can set the picture quality & the image resolution seperately, with the HP 320 it sets the resolution automatically as you change the image quality. I find the HP's image quality to ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

Don't buy it! and if you bought it, take it back. I thought this was a nifty little camera until I looked at the pictures. Not good. They were always blurry. Inside, outside, flash, no flash, action, no action, it didn't matter, the pictures were always blurry. Perhaps mine had bad optics? I took it back after 2 days and got an Olympus D-390 instead. A far superior camera for the same money. More complicated to operate, but worth the effort. JW Problems: Image quality.

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
0
replies

Having already purchased an Olympus E-20n Digital SLR for my "serious" art photography, I became frightfully aware of the horrible weight of that camera when going on fun day trips, where artistic perfection was totally unnecessary, and I just wanted to shoot some easy pics with friends and family. SO - I decided to buy another second camera, one that would be extremely simply, be point-and-shoot with no special functions, and one that would give good image results. I have received all of ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review