Previous page Next page

Ricoh GR Hands-on Preview

April 2013 | By Richard Butler


Preview based on a production Ricoh GR running firmware v1.1

With the launch of the Nikon Coolpix A we marvelled at how, in the space of a year, the idea of a large sensor compact with a fixed, prime lens, has gone from being an obscure niche (as it was when Sigma launched the original DP1) to a burgeoning and competitive area of the market. Now, with the Ricoh GR, Pentax Ricoh has added to this trend by introducing an APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm equivalent F2.8 lens.

The Nikon is an obvious reference point for this camera, since they share the same field-of-view, the same maximum aperture and, quite plausibly, the same sensor. But it's important to give credit to Ricoh as the only manufacturer to have a continued history of building compact cameras with prime lenses. The GR is not just the immediate successor to a line of enthusiast compacts with bright, fixed-focal-length lenses, it's the continuation of a range that dates back into the film era.

Ricoh GR key specifications

  • 16.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor with no low-pass filter
  • 18.5mm (28mm equivalent) F2.8 lens
  • ISO 100-25,600
  • 3.0" 1.2m dot LCD
  • Up to 4fps continuous shooting
  • 1080p movies at 24, 25 or 30fps
  • 12-bit Raw in DNG format
  • 10MP 35mm equivalent crop mode
  • Built-in 2-stop ND filter

However, while much of the Ricoh's core specification looks similar to the Coolpix A, there is at least one significant difference - the price. Whereas Nikon decided it could ask $1,100 for the Coolpix A, Pentax Ricoh has been much more aggressive - asking just $800 for the GR.

Interestingly for a camera with such deep Ricoh roots - the GR is the first camera to show signs of the company's purchase of Pentax. The camera gains the Pentax TAv (Time and Aperture priority) mode, allowing the photographer to specify both shutter speed and aperture, with the camera selecting the appropriate ISO. Having this option as a dedicated mode, rather than letting AutoISO operate in Manual exposure mode as some recent cameras have, has the benefit that it's been properly thought out, so you still have access to exposure compensation. It also avoids the logical inconsistency of having the camera make decisions for you in a supposedly manual mode.

Beyond this, the GR uses an interface that's consistent with previous Ricoh models - and that's something we're delighted to see. We've often referred to the Ricoh interface (as used in the GRD and GXR models) as arguably the best enthusiast-focused interface on a compact camera, so we're delighted to see it retained.

Existing Ricoh users will be pleased to hear that the GR is still capable of interval shooting and has retained the much-loved Snap Focus and Full Press Snap focus modes that push focus to a pre-determined distance to make it easy to get grab shots.

The GR also perpetuates something of a history shared by Ricoh and Pentax - the ability to shoot Raw files conforming to Adobe's DNG open standard.

28mm equivalent GR lens

The Ricoh uses a 28mm equivalent F2.8 lens - an apparent step down from the F1.9 lens offered on the GRD IV but, as a result of the much larger sensor, actually effectively two stops more capable in terms of depth-of-field control and light-gathering capability.

The design features seven elements (two of which are aspheric) in five groups and there's a 9-blade diaphragm nestling inside. As with many cameras with a shutter in the lens, the maximum shutter speed is limited by the selected aperture.

Aperture Maximum available shutter speed
F2.8 - F3.2 1/2000th sec
F3.5 - F4 1/2500th sec
F4.5 - F5 1/3200th sec
<F5.6 1/4000th sec
The front of the GR's lens, when set to close-focus. The outer tube of the lens doesn't change length on focusing - instead the lens assembly can be seen shunting back and forth within it.

As you may be able to see from this image, the lens itself is remarkably small - the front element is only around 12mm across.

The lens itself is set within an extending tube, whose length doesn't change as you focus. Instead you can see the front element of the lens shunt back and forth within the tube. Internal-focus lenses are usually fastest to focus, since you have less mass to accelerate and decelerate each time you focus, but although the Ricoh doesn't take this approach its speed is perfectly acceptable.

Movie shooting

The Ricoh GR can capture 1080p movies at 24, 25 or 30 frames per second and save them in the MOV format with H.264 compression. It doesn't include a socket for an external mic, limiting audio quality by having to rely on built-in stereo microphones.

There's no exposure control when shooting movies (not even exposure compensation), so videographers shouldn't get too excited by the idea of the GR. You can apply many of the camera's film-related 'Effects' processing modes to the footage, but that's about it, in terms of control.

Optional accessories

A series of accessories is being launched alongside the GR, including an adapter (that allows use of 49mm filters) and lens hood combination (GH-3) and a wide-angle lens (the GW-3, that mounts on that adapter). Optical viewfinders, both for the camera's native 28mm equivalent coverage and the wide-angle adapter's 21mm equivalent field-of-view will be available, as will a dedicated flash.

There's no accessory port on the back so, unlike the GXR module, you can't fit an electronic viewfinder.

A lens hood and adapter are available. The adapter then allows the use of other accessories, such as the 21mm equivalent wide-angle adapter.


If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.

Images which can be viewed at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a larger (typically VGA) image in a new window.

To navigate the review simply use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the navigation bar at the top.

DPReview calibrate their monitors using Color Vision OptiCal at the (fairly well accepted) PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally A,B and C.

This article is Copyright 2013 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Previous page Next page

Comments

Total comments: 267
123
Harold66
By Harold66 (3 weeks ago)

Hello Mr Butler
any idea of availability in US yet ?

0 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

Mid-May, according to my notes.

0 upvotes
Harold66
By Harold66 (3 weeks ago)

thank you very much for the quick reply

0 upvotes
JacquesBalthazar
By JacquesBalthazar (3 weeks ago)

Looks great. I have the A already, and love it. But I am pretty sure I'd love the GR even more. If only because I still have a GR1 film version in my bag, purchased back in the mid Nineties, that i truly enjoyed and that still works.

Wish I had known this one was about to be launched.

The 21mm adaptor is pretty cool as well and not an option for the Nikon. Optical quality of that adaptor will need to be tested.

I like the GR's grip a lot. Makes it easier to grab and pull from pocket than the A.

The A produces superb pictures. Judging by the corner test here, looks like the GR might be even more spectacular in that respect. .

One thing I certainly prefer in the A is the manual focus ring on the lens! That is more user friendly than the GR lever on the back. OTOH, Ricoh's "snap" feature is cool, even if one will have to consider much less forgiving DoF than with the small sensor GRs.

For the rest, feature list looks practically identical. The Nikon A is made in Japan. The GR?

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 3 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

If the same QA processes are implemented, does it matter?

1 upvote
wayfarers
By wayfarers (3 weeks ago)

"the same QA processes" are easy to implement in some countries, and more difficult to consistently implement in other countries. There are also countries where they are not possible to implement at all. Isn't that so, Mr Butler?

1 upvote
vodanh1982
By vodanh1982 (3 weeks ago)

The GR is made in China.

0 upvotes
JacquesBalthazar
By JacquesBalthazar (3 weeks ago)

@R Butler: it is a personal thing. I try, whenever possible, to allocate my disposable income usage on purchases that comply to my views regarding ethical and sustainable trade. I try and avoid funding dictatorships or supply chains that do not provision proper social rights for workers and proper environmental impact controls. In a nutshell, I am mostly ok with purchasing goods manufactured in Japan, Europe and a handful of other locations. I try and avoid "Made in China" as much as I can (and often fail). China is a dictatorship that does not allow free unions and tolerates quasi-slave labour. Therefore I feel OK spending 200 EUR more on something manufactured in Japan, even if I assume that much of innards come from China. Some Nikon stuff is made in Japan. Some is made elsewhere. I pick and choose as often as I can. If I had more disposable income, I'd buy Leica. I do the same with clothes, bicycle parts, furniture, etc. I buy less quantity, and feel better in the process.

13 upvotes
vodanh1982
By vodanh1982 (3 weeks ago)

I agree with JacquesBalthazar and I did the same thing like him.

0 upvotes
AngryCorgi
By AngryCorgi (3 weeks ago)

"Therefore I feel OK spending 200 EUR more on something manufactured in Japan, even if I assume that much of innards come from China."

That's where you lost me. You feel justified in paying thru the nose as long as the final assembly (less than 10% of the cost of the product) is done in a country with labor unions?? Seems an odd stance.

1 upvote
flektogon
By flektogon (3 weeks ago)

Yes, finally a fair discussion of how it matters where the products are made. I remember how I bought a blender (which we actually didn’t need) several years ago in Walmart. I’ve bought it only and only because it was the only item not made in China (it was made in Spain) :-)

0 upvotes
bobbarber
By bobbarber (3 weeks ago)

I don't get these anti-China arguments.

They always seem to tend towards quality control, even though OP studiously avoided that point in his reply.

China is a nuclear power, and people act as if nobody in China can hammer a nail into a board correctly.

If the point really is about unions, there's plenty of quasi-slave labor in Spain, the United States, and elsewhere. Many impoverished immigrants from Latin America migrate to both Spain and the United States, where they work illegally or barely legally for less than minimum wage. If the point is that China "tolerates" this sort of thing, and the U.S. doesn't, then I guess we have a different definition of tolerate. In my world, if you know it's going on and don't really do much about it, then you tolerate it, regardless of what your laws are or your public stance is.

0 upvotes
Kalin
By Kalin (3 weeks ago)

I have a GRX-200 which is made in China and is built like a tank; tight panels, every knob and switch work perfectly. I hope Ricoh has kept their QC level; then it will be a very well-built cam

0 upvotes
iamphil
By iamphil (3 weeks ago)

That seems intellectually convenient. Nikon made in Japan or Nikon made in Thailand, money ends up going to the same place.

0 upvotes
ogl
By ogl (3 weeks ago)

You can get 21, 28 and 35 mm with Ricoh GR.

5 upvotes
Samaistuin
By Samaistuin (3 weeks ago)

You can get 21 & 28. Cropped pics? No thanks.

0 upvotes
abortabort
By abortabort (3 weeks ago)

Well the 35mm mode is roughly 10MP, the same as the previous GR. A perfectly fine resolution I'd say.

9 upvotes
FriendlyWalkabout
By FriendlyWalkabout (3 weeks ago)

If you think of it as a 10mp m43 sensor with 35mm eq lens, would you feel better?

Comment edited 54 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Kevin Purcell
By Kevin Purcell (3 weeks ago)

Just the same as cropping to 3936×2608 in post ... no better or worst.

Comment edited 11 minutes after posting
1 upvote
ogl
By ogl (3 weeks ago)

The lens of Ricoh kills Nikon Coolpix A.

3 upvotes
marike6
By marike6 (3 weeks ago)

Are you sure? Because I have two Jacks and a Queen that say otherwise.

I'm a GRD user since the III, but I'm going to wait and see some other apertures before I put on my fanboy hat.

2 upvotes
DaveCS
By DaveCS (3 weeks ago)

Thanks for pointing this out Marike6 - this is very interesting - this is only a "Preview" as per DPReview's titling suggests so I wonder if something in their testing needs to be tweaked OR perhaps they have a poor Coolpix A copy.

I too loved the GR II and III (owned both) but I've since moved to the Coolpix A for my "carry everywhere" P&S - yes it was pricey but I'm pleased with the High ISO and IQ out of the camera. I too will await more testing before figuring out what to do because the one thing that will trump the Nikon is the Ricoh's ergonomics.

0 upvotes
marike6
By marike6 (3 weeks ago)

@DaveCS I wouldn't worry about a wide open test. The Ricoh does have very good corners, but if you look at the total image, the Coolpix A's image actually looks sharper.

That said, I do like the grip on the Ricoh, the menus, and the fact that the 2-sec self-timer doesn't reset after each exposure like most compacts. And the price is wonderful.

But I'm guessing that the video on the A will be better and the DPR sample images from the Coolpix A look significantly better than these GRD samples.

0 upvotes
DaveCS
By DaveCS (3 weeks ago)

We'll see how it all turns out in the end. I have loved, so far, what the A can do - and specifically once you pop on a Nikon flash which is one thing Ricoh won't be able to handle with ease (Nikon's flash exposures are the best I've seen - it made me switch from Canon about 3-4 years ago). Good to have Ricoh back in the game - I wonder how long a review will take :D
Cheers,
Dave

0 upvotes
JEROME NOLAS
By JEROME NOLAS (3 weeks ago)

Fantastic job Ricoh! I already made a garage to park my new Ricoh...

2 upvotes
ogl
By ogl (3 weeks ago)

Video - H.264 format

0 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

MOV with H.264 compression.

0 upvotes
memau
By memau (3 weeks ago)

finally a GRD with reasonable initial price !!
IQ seems to blow off coolpix A
can't wait to get one

2 upvotes
Fazal Majid
By Fazal Majid (3 weeks ago)

"But it's important to give credit to Ricoh as the only manufacturer to have a history of building compact cameras with prime lenses."

This is in no way to detract from Ricoh's rich heritage with the GR1 series, but it's far from the only digital large-sensor compact maker with a prior backjground in premium film compacts with primes.

Nikon had a complete line of compact film cameras with primes, like the 35Ti, as did Leica with the CM and Minilux, Minolta (now Sony) with the TC1. The only premium film compact manufacturer missing from the digital era is Contax (oh, how I have longed for a digital Contax T3...).

0 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

But most of those didn't continue to make digital versions. This is the only essentially unbroken series I can think of.

4 upvotes
marike6
By marike6 (3 weeks ago)

What about the Sigma DP series?

0 upvotes
ogl
By ogl (3 weeks ago)

Shutter - Mechanical, 300s-1/4000s

Wrong info in your specs, DPREVIEW

0 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

No need to shout.

The spec sheet we were given appears to be more error-strewn than we'd realised. I'm updating our database now.

The maximum shutter speed is also aperture-dependent so I'll have to check how we reported it on the RX1. It's 1/2000th at F2.8 but 1/4000th below F5.6.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 5 minutes after posting
1 upvote
dgreene196
By dgreene196 (3 weeks ago)

Is the minimum shutter speed 30 seconds or 1/30 seconds?

0 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

It's actually 300 seconds (in manual mode, at least).

2 upvotes
dgreene196
By dgreene196 (3 weeks ago)

Thanks!

0 upvotes
Total comments: 267
123