Previous page Next page

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Hands-on Preview

November 2011 | Amadou Diallo


Preview based on a pre-production DMC-GX1 with firmware 0.1

Panasonic's Lumix DMC-GX1 is the company's latest addition to its G-series lineup. And although the camera bears the '1' appendage in its model name, it is clear from even a cursory glance that with the GX1, Panasonic has provided the long-awaited spiritual successor to the highly regarded Lumix DMC-GF1. Of perhaps even greater significance, the move to introduce a separate GX product line (as opposed to releasing the camera as a 'GF4') would seem to suggest a long-term commitment by the camera maker to meet the demands of enthusiasts who embraced the GF1.

Launched back in 2009, the GF1 was, ironically, Panasonic's attempt to court compact-camera owners looking to upgrade, with what was then billed as, 'the world's smallest, lightest interchangeable lens camera'. Instead, the GF1's high quality Raw output and classic rangefinder aesthetic gained a strong and passionate following in the enthusiast market. DSLR owners looking for a second 'go-anywhere' camera with high image quality embraced the camera's external control points and its relatively compact Micro Four Thirds lens offerings.

It is precisely these users who have been disappointed twice over with the Lumix DMC-GF2 and Lumix DMC-GF3 releases, which broke with the retro styling and button-driven operational control in favor of ever-smaller form factors and design cues that pointed unambiguously to users who may be turned off by an overly complex (and expensive) camera. With the GX1 Panasonic is taking square aim at more advanced users for whom the GF1 struck a pleasing balance between size and operability.

Of course, the competition for these users has grown much stiffer today, and Panasonic recognizes that if it wants to expand the camera's appeal, the GX1 must offer advantages not only to the GF series but to a crowded market that includes strong APS-C sensor competition from both Sony and Samsung. In this regard, the GX1 employs a 16MP sensor that we have been led to believe is identical to the chip recently seen in the Lumix DMC-G3, although it is now being pushed to a top ISO of 12,800.

A brand new viewfinder, the LVF2 has been introduced alongside the GX1. With a higher magnification and resolution, the LVF2 is a noticeable improvement over its predecessor, the LVF1. Crucially though, a new spec and connector makes the LVF2 incompatible with any GF models; neither is it possible to fit the LVF1 on the GX1. Faster communication between the camera and lenses helps the GX1 focus even faster than the 120Hz sensor readout allowed in the recently released G3 and GF3 models, with Panasonic claiming a 10% improvement.

Panasonic's well-regarded touchscreen interface has also gotten some new tricks, with a level gauge and clever Touch Tab icon that allows you to hide, reveal (and of course activate) a small panel of menu options directly on-screen. Another very welcome feature is the inclusion of an orientation sensor that automatically rotates vertical images even when captured with non-OIS lenses.

The GX1 is being made available in both black and silver bodies. Unlike previous GF models, none of the GX1's kit options includes a fixed focal length lens. Instead, the kit lens options are limited to just two; the Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH Power OIS zoom lens and the more conventional (and less expensive) Lumix G Vario 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS lens.

By creating a separate product line for the GX, Panasonic has by implication made clear that it sees significant growth potential in its GF lineup among compact-camera upgraders. With the GH2 appealing to users who shoot a lot of video and the G3 designed for (primarily) still shooters who desire a built-in EVF and articulated LCD, the GX1 is rather sensibly positioned as an enthusiast offering for those who want the highest image quality from a Micro Four Thirds camera, in a form factor that comfortably accommodates a range of zoom lenses and does not skimp on external controls.

Panasonic GX1 specification highlights

  • 16MP Micro Four Thirds sensor
  • ISO 160-12,800
  • Orientation sensor (providing information with non-OIS lenses)
  • 3.0", 460k dot LCD
  • Full AVCHD 1080/60i video (from 30fps sensor output)
  • Continuous shooting up to 20fps (at reduced resolution)
  • Electronic level gauge
  • Four available Fn buttons (two onscreen)

Differences between the GX1 and the GF1

  • Higher resolution sensor (16MP vs 12MP)
  • Touchscreen interface
  • Top ISO of 12,800 (vs 3200)
  • AVCHD 1080/60i video (vs 720p AVCHD Lite format)
  • Stereo mic
  • Electronic level gauge
  • Two additional Fn buttons

Compared to the Samsung NX200

The Panasonic DMC-GX1 is taller than the Samsung NX200, which actually houses a larger APS-C sensor. The GX1's mode dial sits atop the camera plate as opposed to the recessed profile found on the NX200.
From this top view you can see that the GX1 packs more control points along the camera's top plate, which maintains a traditional rangefinder-inspired shape compared to the more aggressively contoured design of the NX200.

What's not evident in the images above is just how much more heft the GX1 has in comparison to the NX200. With a solid metal body construction that weighs in at nearly 320g without a lens, the GX1 feels in hand rather substantial, in a way that calls to mind not only the GF1, but classic film camera bodies.

Compared to the Sony NEX-7

The GX1 appears almost svelte in comparison to Sony's NEX-7, with significantly less bulk in the handgrip.
One of the more obvious distinctions here is the built-in EVF on the Sony NEX-7, whose forward-thinking design only reinforces the more traditional classic-camera aesthetic of the GX1.

Although the GX1 has slightly smaller dimensions in both width and depth, it's worth remembering that that Sony has managed to pack a built-in EVF, articulating LCD and of course an APS-C sensor into the NEX-7. The GX1's traditional (some may say conservative) control point layout stands in sharp contrast to the sleek, hewn-from-a block-of-granite design of the NEX-7. Both cameras offer a sure, firm grip, although users with larger hands may find one-handed shooting slightly less comfortable with the lower profile handgrip of the GX1.


If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.

Images which can be viewed at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a larger (typically VGA) image in a new window.

To navigate the review simply use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the navigation bar at the top.

DPReview calibrate their monitors using Color Vision OptiCal at the (fairly well accepted) PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally A,B and C.

This article is Copyright 2011 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Previous page Next page
Share:

Comments

Total comments: 318
123
a practical man
By a practical man (Jan 24, 2012 at 21:52:14 GMT)

There are images of the function buttons appearing to show rub wear at:

http://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonicdmcgx1/page3.asp

http://www.techradar.com/reviews/cameras-and-camcorders/cameras/digital-slrs-hybrids/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gx1-1044318/review?artc_pg=2

0 upvotes
Andy Crowe
By Andy Crowe (Jan 26, 2012 at 13:45:50 GMT)

Those look like reflections of black sheeting that presumably surrounds the lightbox used to capture those studio shots, the edges of the buttons are mirrored so would pick up reflections like this.

0 upvotes
realsand
By realsand (Jan 26, 2012 at 13:58:48 GMT)

Cant sy for sure, but that does not look like wear to me.

0 upvotes
a practical man
By a practical man (Jan 23, 2012 at 21:02:21 GMT)

The GX1 appeared to be ticking all the right boxes for me and I was on the point of purchase. However, I have just noticed that a number of web images of the camera show what appears to be considerable wear to the silver finish on quite a few of the function buttons on the rear panel, rendering them cosmetically very scruffy.
I don't know if these are pre-production examples, but I would certainly be disappointed if my shiny new camera looked the same after a couple of months' use....
Has anyone else noticed this?

0 upvotes
realsand
By realsand (Jan 24, 2012 at 06:15:26 GMT)

Nope, maybe it's just on the preproduction models.. any links?

0 upvotes
danduranduran
By danduranduran (Feb 8, 2012 at 07:12:29 GMT)

I've had one for over a month that'a always around my neck and haven't noticed any button wear. Hard for me to imagine it being a problem. Much better button and over all build then my GF1, which now seems a bit big and plasicy to me!

0 upvotes
patchfree
By patchfree (Jan 22, 2012 at 19:23:08 GMT)

When we got a review on dpreview?!

The GX2 will be already out when this review will appear...

6 upvotes
realsand
By realsand (Jan 23, 2012 at 12:54:15 GMT)

I cant wait! Also the G1X would be nice, to be able to compare them side-by-side.

1 upvote
SDPharm
By SDPharm (Feb 12, 2012 at 07:36:28 GMT)

It's now Feb 11, 2012, about 3 months after this 'preview' was published. Still no real review....

1 upvote
regova
By regova (Feb 13, 2012 at 06:00:21 GMT)

Isn't it strange?????? There has been previews and samples of Canon and Fuji mirrorless models which came after GX1 but still no full review about GX1. How should one interpret that?

1 upvote
TBaker73
By TBaker73 (Jan 18, 2012 at 14:56:29 GMT)

Just got mine today cant wait to use it this weekend, cheapest i found it was £499 at fotosense, but that was with the standard lens the x lens was £649 http://www.fotosense.co.uk/catalogsearch/result/?q=gx1&_antispam=antispam_749
Ill let you know what i think of it on Monday, how much of an improvement will i see from my G1 got the 14-140 lens as well so will be having a play around :)
Anyone got any images they have taken, im just getting into protrait photography so any help would be appriciated.

1 upvote
hello world
By hello world (Jan 17, 2012 at 19:04:03 GMT)

will there ever be a REVIEW of this cam?

8 upvotes
DonMon
By DonMon (Jan 18, 2012 at 16:01:47 GMT)

I was thinking the same thing...I think I've come back to dpreview at least 100 times over the last few months to check for this review...hmmm..perhaps that's their game :)

4 upvotes
brianbxb
By brianbxb (Jan 19, 2012 at 07:00:11 GMT)

me too. Are Pana' getting a fair crack of the whip here ?

1 upvote
arvinoculus
By arvinoculus (Jan 21, 2012 at 01:26:12 GMT)

I've also been waiting for a review to come out.

Maybe these smaller reviews will tide you guys over:
http://www.mu-43.com/f108/featured-forum-post-panasonic-gx1-mini-review-20135/

http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/panasonic_lumix_dmc_gx1_review/

http://www.pocket-lint.com/review/5709/panasonic-lumix-gx1-compact-system-camera-review

http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/panasonic/dmc_gx1-review

http://www.steves-digicams.com/camera-reviews/panasonic/lumix-dmc-gx1/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gx1-review.html

2 upvotes
felix ip
By felix ip (Jan 22, 2012 at 02:55:03 GMT)

Sometimes, I think they they're not going to do the Pana's review. Even the later released model had finished the review!!!

Comment edited 31 seconds after posting
1 upvote
hello world
By hello world (Jan 22, 2012 at 17:40:16 GMT)

would be sooo bad since this is the follow-up of the GF1, which is a very good cam.... there seem to be differences in performance between GX1 and G3, where the GX1 has better color rendering and being able to pull more details in shadow area's in PP.... I'm just curious how it comes out in studio tests as I always follow DPR, so those tests im familiar with and I can form some baseline... the other sites I dont really follow, so it doesn't give me any baseline for comparison...

0 upvotes
bchalifour
By bchalifour (Jan 6, 2012 at 13:42:45 GMT)

Gaspipe1,
Yes the GX1 (I have used a GF1 for several years now on top of a Nikon D3... not at the same time ;o) ) is an interesting alternative to an SLR. Especially if one travels or walks a lot.
Now between the 14-42 and the 20 mm, unless you plan on using the f 1.7 wide aperture of the 20 mm for short depth of field or low available light, I would go for the zoom and then get either the 20 mm or the 14 mm as a light and short complement (although the 7-14 mm, price, size and max f-stop, set aside, is also an excellent lens to consider). The 100-200 mm is also a good bargain for its quality generated/price ratio.

0 upvotes
bchalifour
By bchalifour (Jan 6, 2012 at 13:37:04 GMT)

Jolkfoto,
It's not the camera it is still the person that stands behind it and makes the crucial decisions such as subject matter and composition that makes the money.
Other than that of course one can make money with the image quality generated by this camera; but image quality alone will not cut it. The real question is: can you make money with a camera? If the answer is yes; then you will make money with the GX1! ;o)
That simple.

1 upvote
jolkfoto
By jolkfoto (Jan 6, 2012 at 20:11:48 GMT)

Yes, I totally agree with you. But my concerns are all regarding the technical capabilityes of the camera itself, as, for examplo, some image stocks and photographer agencyes reject several pictures due to color aberration, lack of focus, noise and all. If with a camera like this and the lens available we can get superb quality images, it s the way future goes... DSLR will be restricted to studyo, fashion, jewerly and more technical images.

I really expect that Panasonic releases some zooms f2.8 or 1.7, why not?, such as the best Nikkors... As you said, the 7-14mm would be a great choice if the apperture was wider and constant to the different focal lengths.
regards!

0 upvotes
jolkfoto
By jolkfoto (Jan 5, 2012 at 15:47:59 GMT)

Although I'm very anxious for the complete review and prone to by a GX-1 soon for dayly and travel pictures, I have a main question regarding the GX-1 as well as all those MFT models: Can one make money with pictures from these cameras?

I'm a DSLR user and generally sell some prints and participate on serous art photography contests, so my concern is about the usability of MFT pictures for these purposes.

Regards,

0 upvotes
Andy Crowe
By Andy Crowe (Jan 26, 2012 at 13:48:33 GMT)

Print quality is good up to A2 and possibly beyond depending what you're printing on (canvas etc), so there's no reason you couldn't

0 upvotes
gaspipe1
By gaspipe1 (Jan 2, 2012 at 02:38:34 GMT)

Could use a little help, I am going from a P&S b/c I am sick of the poor quality and wish to get a DSLR type. After reading the article on the mirrorless roundup it seems to be a good idea. The offer great quality photos, removable lenses and decent size. I am mostly looking to take pics of my kids whether at the park playing or at a birthday party. I also love the idea of taken video. I really want to stay below $1k, wifey is going to flip-out if she finds out lol. But like I said I really do want a good quality cam that I will be happy with for years to come. IF this is the right cam for me would anyone recommend a package? I was thinking about the 14-42 power zoom lens for $900. Or would I be better with purchasing the body for $700 and the Panasonic LUMIX G 20mm f/1.7 Aspherical Pancake Lens for another $350? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

1 upvote
chickensushi
By chickensushi (Jan 3, 2012 at 13:39:43 GMT)

If you're looking for something small and portable and you're moving up from a P&S, I would suggest maybe a GF3 instead of the GX1. I recently got the GX1 and I love it, but I wouldn't recommend it to a beginner in photography. There are simply too many controls and functions on it, and even the auto function offers many advanced photography tools. The premium you pay for the GX1 is for all of the control and functions. However if you are interested in studying up some photography then I would definitely recommend the GX1. I came from a DSLR and I couldn't be happier.

The 14-42mm power zoom is a nice lens but is very pricey. Optically the lens is as good as the $100 kit lens, so you need to understand that the price premium is for the compact size.

The 20mm f/1.7 is a fantastic option if you think you can live without zoom, and it's quite sharp. This lens takes fantastic photos for its price.

0 upvotes
gaspipe1
By gaspipe1 (Jan 4, 2012 at 20:13:31 GMT)

TY chickensushi, I know I'm all over the place but after looking at the reviews and for the price the Sony Nex 5N seems like a great value. I'm sure by the time I buy something I will have changed my mind 3 more times. TY again for your input.

0 upvotes
bchalifour
By bchalifour (Jan 6, 2012 at 13:47:56 GMT)

Pb with the Sony NEX 5N is the bulk of the lens (it is an APS-C after all) so one loses in compacity. Commands as are as "intuitive" as on the GF1/GX1.
Going back to the commands on the GX1 compared to the GF3, the GX1 is a more serious camera (away from the simplifying strategy used by Panasonic from the GF1 to the GF3) than the GF3 but it can be as easy to use as a GX1 for a start and then one has an overall better camera (having access to a good, although expensive, electronic viewfinder can be quite a plus.

0 upvotes
Gedi Prime
By Gedi Prime (Jan 14, 2012 at 12:08:43 GMT)

Gaspipe 1 I've owned the GF2 since its release with the G 20mm f/1.7 Love it for those Fast Kids and Dawgs Running around indoors with no flash!

0 upvotes
kenai1
By kenai1 (Dec 31, 2011 at 19:30:44 GMT)

I just purchased a GX! (santa helped.) It appears to take nice pics, but shooting in raw only nothing will recognize the format. (iPhoto, CS4, LR2, Aperture). I have a GF1 and use it in raw which works fine. It appears they both shoot RW2.
Is the GX1 shooting in a different raw format, or is there something in setting up the camera. If I shoot raw + jpeg, I get the jpeg image

I tried calling Panasonic and they were no help.
If its a new raw format I can't believe I'm the only having problems.

Any thoughts?

0 upvotes
cptbtptpbcptdtptp
By cptbtptpbcptdtptp (Jan 1, 2012 at 04:19:36 GMT)

i think u got to update the adobe camera raw version to 6 or something like that..got to adobe website.....I got the GX1 but the darn PS elements 8 is no longer supported, i can't update ACR...so can't open the raws files in my elements...

0 upvotes
Kuppenbender
By Kuppenbender (Jan 2, 2012 at 18:45:39 GMT)

Try Adobe DNG Converter 6.6
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=106&platform=Windows

0 upvotes
chickensushi
By chickensushi (Jan 3, 2012 at 13:47:19 GMT)

Update Adobe. It works fine on my CS5. I checked the RAW compatibility on Adobe camera raw and it does show GX1 on the chart.

Worst comes to worst you could use the software that came with the camera.

0 upvotes
bchalifour
By bchalifour (Jan 6, 2012 at 13:50:48 GMT)

Yes, Kenai1,
This happens all the time and Panasonic is not the only one to do it. Although with the same label, the RAW format is slightly modified and you'll have to wait for Apple and Adobe to update their Raw Processor software... and maybe upgrade to LR3 or/and CS5 to be able to do so.

0 upvotes
Gedi Prime
By Gedi Prime (Jan 14, 2012 at 12:19:50 GMT)

Kenai. Convert the RAW in SILKYPIX to a TIFF. file use the "save as".

0 upvotes
historianx
By historianx (Dec 23, 2011 at 17:57:39 GMT)

As the owner of a GF2, mostly because I was not willing to pay the inflated prices for a dated GF1, I am happy to see this camera for one simple reason: the ability to disable the touch screen interface. The only way this can be done on the GF2 is by either turning the camera off or attaching the LVF1 EV. Although the GF2, coupled with the 20mm pancake, takes outstanding RAW captures, I found it frustrating when leaving the camera on sleep mode and hanging off my neck, to have the TSI bumping into my chest and activating the touch focus and shutter functions, taking pictures without my knowing so and generally being a HUGE hassle. I really hope that Panasonic includes this option to disable the TSI in a future firmware update, because it is the only real albatross in an otherwise fine camera (the absence of a mode dial I can live without).

Has anyone heard of a updated release date for the GX-1? They really dropped the ball by not having it ready for Xmas release.

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
theDA
By theDA (Jan 5, 2012 at 20:00:10 GMT)

I have the GF2. You can disable the touch screen shutter release button as well as the aperture slider control so it does not appear on the screen. I can confirm this because that's how I have mine set up. The only touch command I have is touch focus, which is extremely handy.

0 upvotes
lindner
By lindner (Dec 23, 2011 at 17:49:27 GMT)

Here is one reader who would prefer to see a proper review immediately, and skip the 'preview'.

If Panasonic thought it was a good idea to avert risk by demanding a straight up review to be postponed until over a month later, I'm pretty sure they shot themselves in the foot. I might well have bought one for Christmas, and will not now for quite a while.

2 upvotes
andrewlockie
By andrewlockie (Dec 20, 2011 at 16:32:13 GMT)

There does not appear to be the Dynamic Black & White picture option on the new GX1. Have I made a mistake? This was my favourite feature of the GF1 model. Or does anyone know how to emulate the dynamic b&w in settings? Thanks if anyone can help.

0 upvotes
danduranduran
By danduranduran (Dec 31, 2011 at 07:20:34 GMT)

It would appear that they have taken it off, but if you select "Picture Styles" in the menu (not with a function button) you can increase the contrast and sharpness, which seems like it's similar. It was one of my favorites too. They also seem to have removed the ability to star favorite images during playback, along with the "Delete all but starred' option, which is just baffling. You can star images by using the "Favorites" function in the menu, but that's not nearly as convenient. Maybe I'm missing something. Hopefully they'll correct it with firmware. Otherwise, this thing is bloody fantastic. Looks like I'll be selling off my GF1.

Comment edited 7 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
danduranduran
By danduranduran (Dec 31, 2011 at 20:56:17 GMT)

Scratch that bit about no "Delete all but starred" option. You have to hit "Delete All" first to get to that menu, same as on the GF1 and all the other Panasonics. Don't know what I was thinking there, total brain freeze.

Comment edited 25 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Jim Radcliffe
By Jim Radcliffe (Dec 20, 2011 at 16:28:05 GMT)

The specs on the GX1 and samples images I have seen so far are great but the one thing I really wanted on the GX1 was a built-in EVF.. I also had hoped that the LCD would be articulated. Other than those two things, for me at least, the GX1 looks to be a very good camera.

0 upvotes
Andy Crowe
By Andy Crowe (Dec 28, 2011 at 13:49:10 GMT)

Perhaps the camera you are looking for is the G3?

1 upvote
Brian Mosley
By Brian Mosley (Feb 7, 2012 at 09:57:02 GMT)

Sounds like the Olympus OM-D will fit the bill nicely Jim. :)

0 upvotes
Jo2trs
By Jo2trs (Dec 11, 2011 at 16:12:05 GMT)

When are you guys will be able to post the detailed review for the GX1? I need to get a gift to my wife this Christmas. I am torn between NEX5N and GX1. Bigger sensor from Apsc or a smaller sensor for the micro 4/3? Need help...thnaks

5 upvotes
KonstantinosK
By KonstantinosK (Dec 19, 2011 at 21:47:14 GMT)

She would love either of them, so buy her the cheaper one and keep the change for a gift to yourself...

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
2 upvotes
historianx
By historianx (Dec 23, 2011 at 18:02:48 GMT)

Amazon is saying between 1-3 months now.

0 upvotes
Sad Joe
By Sad Joe (Dec 8, 2011 at 17:28:48 GMT)

I hope this makes Nikon with their silly 1 series cry!

Why is the Nikon 1 series called the 1 series ?

Because there will only ever be 1 series before they bin the lot and start again

0 upvotes
GeorgeD200
By GeorgeD200 (Dec 14, 2011 at 17:28:55 GMT)

Yeah, 4.2 FPS is WAY better than 10 FPS.

0 upvotes
Steven Micallef
By Steven Micallef (Dec 18, 2011 at 07:42:13 GMT)

Speed is only part of it.

2 upvotes
Calvin Chann
By Calvin Chann (Dec 7, 2011 at 17:10:43 GMT)

Kind of sitting on the fence on this one. 6 months ago, I would have immediately pre ordered the GX1. But now, with the NEX system around, I'm not too sure. I'm not sure it will have better IQ than the NEX and they've moved the drive mode switch. WHY?

1 upvote
Bilgy_no1
By Bilgy_no1 (Dec 22, 2011 at 08:57:29 GMT)

IQ is determined by the combination of sensor, lens and processing. The big advantage of the GX1 over the competing NEX-5N is the availability of the 20mm f/1.7 pancake lens at a decent price. To get a similar lens for NEX (in terms of focal length and aperture), i.e. to really benefit from the better sensor, you need to buy the 24mm f/1.8 lens. But that's over €600 more than the 20mm pancake, and much bulkier. For that kind of money, you can buy the 45mm f/1.8 and the 14mm f/2.5 on top of the 20mm and still save some money.

As to the drive mode switch: there's a direct button on the four way controller to bring up the drive mode selection. And, since you're comparing, does the NEX-5N have such a drive mode switch?

Don't get me wrong, the NEX-5N seems to be a great camera. But depending on your user scenario, there are still areas where the GX1 or E-P3 is still a better deal. Especially if that scenario involves using compact, bright and AF primes at decent prices.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Erik Neu
By Erik Neu (Dec 2, 2011 at 06:34:36 GMT)

Great preview,
but I would like to know how the manual focus works with other brand lenses like nikon or voigtlaender via adapter. I tested the mf on previous Olympus, Panasonic and Sony. The Sony Nex 5 did the best for my kind of shooting style.
I am a little disappointed that there is no plugin for an external micro but they waste the space for a cable release.

Still a great camera and good competition for the Sony Nex 7.

0 upvotes
OneGuy
By OneGuy (Nov 23, 2011 at 19:32:23 GMT)

Yo, Austrian, that's what it's about. In this setup:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepl3/page20.asp

I've made the setting for JPEGs at ISO 800: P3 compared with N5, NX200, and G3. I put the view zoom rectangle in the upper right hand corner's checker flag: All EXCEPT P3 fuzzy -- possible lens corner softness. Then I move on to the beloved VW: All EXCEPT P3 look spotted as if sitting three weeks in Gary IN [in the old days]. Then I go to the queen of hearts: NX200 is beginning to wash out, G3 is grainy, P3 and N5 quite presentable in a draw. Then onto the photo of a lady. No contest, P3's got the best color and best DR (5N's got got white lips outline and flat cheeks, NX200's is washed out, G3's has grainy pimples). After hard work I turn to Irish Whiskey label and, well, it's winning colors for P3 again.

Da point is that the sensor is where it starts and ends. Other things being "equal" between P3 and FX1 (and they are), FX1 must match P3's JPEGs to sell anywhere near P3.

0 upvotes
Austrian
By Austrian (Nov 24, 2011 at 20:58:13 GMT)

Okay,there is some difference to see. But i came from Olympus (First Pen, AF way to slow) and like now my GF1 /GF3 (Handling,Colours, IQ) I d'ont now if the new Pens can really run circles around my cams. See:
http://hans-egger.smugmug.com/Das-Neuste/Admonter-Sp%C3%A4therbsttage/20085750_j6TXNX#1584426596_Z2B6C7m

0 upvotes
OneGuy
By OneGuy (Dec 4, 2011 at 20:08:15 GMT)

Nice pics, great DR in the valleys. Might be interesting to stitch a panorama at the peak of a mountain. I tried GF3 with 14-24 X PZ lens in a store and found the AF very fast. Reviews say the GF3/GX1 AF is on par with P3/PL3/PM1. In the US the GF3 with 12-24 kit lens is going for $400 in some stores. I like the colors of PM1 and with no prior bad Oly experience the PM1 is on my short list.
I drove through the Austrian Alps on my way to Bad Ischl. Walking toward the Schauberger's house I came upon the Kaiser statue with a dead dear -- in bronze. Well, as good sportsman Kaiser was I could not take a picture of it. Got a good pic of the Schauberger house, though.
Cheers,

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Michael Jardine
By Michael Jardine (Dec 15, 2011 at 17:17:56 GMT)

So, why does P3 have such a low rating?

0 upvotes
OneGuy
By OneGuy (Dec 30, 2011 at 19:48:52 GMT)

Don't know Jardine why you say P3 has such a low rating. It certainly has my high rating and it has 87% Highly Recommended rating from CameraLabs.com
I guess if you cannot tell a good pic from a bad one you must rely on somebody else to tell you.

0 upvotes
Austrian
By Austrian (Nov 22, 2011 at 07:38:15 GMT)

If you cant wait, compare your mini with the G3 (same sensor as GX1). Can you show me the circleruns from your beloved jewel ?
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepl3/page20.asp ??

0 upvotes
OneGuy
By OneGuy (Nov 21, 2011 at 13:31:51 GMT)

I like previews but .. being too literal with specs I got sold on a camera I wish I wouldn't (rhymes with cludgie). As much as I like what I see here on GX1 (excepting price for now), there is just that one little mountain to climb: the IQ.
Da mini Pen is running circles around not only the G3 but Sony as well, its 12MP sensor outdueling 5N's 16 on DPR's standard studio scene -- you pick the ISO and watch not only the resolution but color and contrast as well.
Zo, I want some samples of low light pictures and I want them now! Okay, make your preproduction excuses but then I'll know the mountain has not been scaled. But if it has, raise the flag and the price and I'll keep my mouth shut on that score.
Cheers,

0 upvotes
bzanchet
By bzanchet (Nov 21, 2011 at 12:11:41 GMT)

Hey guys I'm a little worried about the f3.5 lens.. what about low light? Should I get a f1.7 lens everytime I have to shoot at night? Isn't the 20mm f1.7 not wide angle? Thanks!

0 upvotes
historianx
By historianx (Dec 23, 2011 at 18:13:17 GMT)

the 20mm is a great night shot lens. and according to metadata the focal length is 41mm (equiv on a 35mm) so it's not quite a wide angle and not quite a "standard" lens. get one, great optics, great value.

0 upvotes
OneGuy
By OneGuy (Dec 30, 2011 at 20:18:41 GMT)

Definitely. Got a 20mm 1.7 in the GF1 kit two weeks ago and I'm not even thinking of trying another lens.
I wish DPR would use this lens when doing the GX1 Studio shooting. Putting in an adapter and another "the best" lens (as they are routinely doing now) is just not representative of the actual shooting scenarios of the Enthusiasts in general and the (GX1) street shooter in particular.

0 upvotes
lucavascon
By lucavascon (Nov 18, 2011 at 23:41:49 GMT)

Hummmm, very curious to see it live.
I'm a pro, I use fullframe nikons and Canons, both for the REALLY good sensors and for the REAL prism finder (I come from Nikon F3 and then Contax, RX and RTS3) but since last winter my own pocket hosts an Olympus EPL1.
NO finder is better than BAD finder (with weight and space consumption.
I'm evaluating GX1 AND Nex7.

0 upvotes
Desertbilly
By Desertbilly (Nov 18, 2011 at 19:25:34 GMT)

I'm happy to see this model. I was an early adopter of a GF1 and have gotten a lot of use from it. I wasn't crazy about the controls direction of the GF3, and prefer the traditional rangefinder feel. I could see buying one of these (or its successor) in a year or two.

It's regrettable that the LVF1 is incompatible -- I just bought one for a motorcycle tour of Africa. It did the job, but I wasn't crazy about it. An exchange program might be nice.

And I'm looking forward to getting the new power zoom lens.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
2 upvotes
ahson
By ahson (Nov 16, 2011 at 00:01:26 GMT)

MFT has it's advantage on the weight, size, still the manual control and the picture quality.

0 upvotes
danju
By danju (Nov 15, 2011 at 23:58:37 GMT)

it seems to me that the main advantage of micro 4/3 over the lager senson ilcs is lens size. even if sony etc release better lenses they will not have the same zoom range unless they are huge. this for me is a dealbreaker, and im guessing that is one of the main reasons for choosing a imirrorless over a dslr..

0 upvotes
tsarandoi
By tsarandoi (Nov 14, 2011 at 20:04:14 GMT)

Can you switch to electronic shutter at 16MP ?

1 upvote
dentaku
By dentaku (Nov 13, 2011 at 12:55:57 GMT)

Too bad Panasonic either designed the GF1 accessory port badly or decided to change it in a cynical attempt to shift more high margin accessories and potentially lose customers. The whole point of a system camera is that I don't have to throw all my accessories in the bin when I buy a new body.

With some decent primes, this camera looks ideal, but I would need the finder, but not if it won't work on the GX2 etc.

2 upvotes
Tobias Giesen
By Tobias Giesen (Nov 13, 2011 at 21:19:10 GMT)

It will probably work on the GX2. The problem is that this time, they increased resolution and data rate so much that backwards compatibility was not feasible. They won't do that too often.

3 upvotes
Happy Harry
By Happy Harry (Nov 16, 2011 at 18:16:51 GMT)

It is impossible for any manufacturer to design anything to be fully future-proof. When it comes to making design parameter choices you have to go with what's here and now and what's on the short horizon. Designing for pie-in-the-sky is foolish, wasteful and unnecessarily expensive to build in capability for something that may never see the light of day.

If you design/engineer for backward compatibility you can seldom incorporate and take full advantage of newer technologies. As long as the lenses and flashes are compatible that's really all that matters.

1 upvote
RazzleDazzle
By RazzleDazzle (Dec 3, 2011 at 00:46:02 GMT)

I think you're right and Panasonic is quite calculating and the feature set of its camera models is driven largely by marketing.

As a GF1 user, being immediately abandoned with the release of the GF2 and GF3 that were such different cameras almost turned me completely off Panasonic.

And just 18 months after the GF1 release, with many promises at the time of new lenses pending, the latest X series lenses are not compatible.

It's been very shoddy treatment and now with theGX1 there seems to be an attempt to recapture those customers. But in the meanwhile, after such a strong start, there's a bunch of other competing products now. Nikon's first attempt is not too exciting, but no doubt it and Canon will eventually hit the market with a high level of skill and hopefully better focus on its customers and protecting their investments with a clear upgrade path.

Panasonic needs to be careful or it will slip and be one of those companies that had an innovation but lost direction.

Comment edited 5 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
Alberto Battelli
By Alberto Battelli (Nov 12, 2011 at 10:45:36 GMT)

how does this viewfnder compare with the Oly evf2?

1 upvote
88SAL
By 88SAL (Nov 23, 2011 at 05:29:09 GMT)

I hope well, as I was a little dissapointed with EVF2. Compared to the EPL3/EP3 LCD screens, its a pretty rubbish for using manual focus.

0 upvotes
maksrossi
By maksrossi (Nov 11, 2011 at 22:45:44 GMT)

bof.... another gadget camera...
nobody of us will remember this camera next year
optional viewfinder but touchscreen.....
poor photo-camera but rich tecno-camera

0 upvotes
historianx
By historianx (Dec 23, 2011 at 18:16:30 GMT)

boy that waste of bandwidth added to the discussion

0 upvotes
Shungyiu
By Shungyiu (Nov 11, 2011 at 06:53:36 GMT)

Hi,

Could anyone advise whether the Ex. Tele Conversion mode on GX1 is a Full HD one like GH2's, or is it a scaled down one (1280 x 720) like the one on GF2?

Thanks.

1 upvote
fstopx2
By fstopx2 (Nov 11, 2011 at 04:48:47 GMT)

I am not sold on this. I had the prior GF1 and ended up very disappointed with it. Prior to this I had owned a Canon 10D and a G9 that took great pictures till the day the lens jammed open.

The GF1 took nice pictures WHEN you could see the LCD. This was my first camera that didnt have a viewfinder and I quickly discovered that it sucked in extremely bright sunlight like on a summer day.

I had the addon viewfinder from Panasonic. That helped but it was annoying to put it on. It always felt like it was cheap plastic junk like it was going to break off. If you put on the zoom lens the camera is not at all pocketable. Sure its smaller than an equivalent SLR from Canon or Nikon but its not that much smaller.

After a bunch of sessions I became so annoyed with it I sold the whole mess on Ebay for very close to what I paid for it. I went back to Canon and bought a Rebel T2I that is far easier to use with a real viewfinder and is only marginally larger and heavier.

Comment edited 50 seconds after posting
2 upvotes
ahson
By ahson (Nov 11, 2011 at 05:07:06 GMT)

A MFT with a zoom lens is still smaller, and so much lighter than a DSLR with a similar range zoom lens. As you said, a MFT with a zoom lens might not be so portable/pocketable, but still a huge difference especially when you need to walk around with it.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
5 upvotes
hobbit mob
By hobbit mob (Dec 7, 2011 at 05:45:25 GMT)

I think it just depends where you're coming from. I had a similar issue with the GF1 (and G1). It's not that I didn't like the camera (I do), it's that because it isn't poketable, I still had to carry a camera; and if I am carrying one anyway, I would prefer to take my 7D and get better pictures.

0 upvotes
ahson
By ahson (Nov 11, 2011 at 04:05:55 GMT)

I am really excited about the GX1. It has most of the things that I want, except the missing viewfinder. Though I can probably live with it as there is the LVF2 as an accessory purchase. Can't wait for the actual camera gets in stock here. Will pair up with a 20mm pancake lens and wait patiently for the who knows when will be here 12-35.

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
mppnyc
By mppnyc (Nov 10, 2011 at 14:43:54 GMT)

Why couldn't Pana add an external microphone input??? This camera would be such a nice successor to my GF1, shooting some handheld video with fixed focal lenses...but missing the external mic input...arghhh those marketing stooges do they ever listen...what is it...10 bucks more p. camera? And an articulated screen would have really made this a leap of a camera....! Ah well tiny steps...

4 upvotes
FrankS009
By FrankS009 (Nov 10, 2011 at 04:02:27 GMT)

Apart from lens issues, I resist the ergonomics of the NEX7. I don't like the feel of the lens so far to the left. I prefer the better balance of my GF1, especially being left handed.

Wonder how much the new removable EVF will cost in addition to the GX1 plus X kit lens. Lets see, $949.00 plus...? How much does a GH2 cost with kit lens? Maybe about the same.

Might not be a bad idea if I can afford it to upgrade my G1 to the GH2, and then wait it out for the GX..n with built in EVF. Am enjoying the two body system. The GF1 is better when obtrusiveness is an issue.

0 upvotes
sam0912
By sam0912 (Nov 9, 2011 at 23:45:38 GMT)

I love my GF-1, but would say it misses weather proofing more than anything. All of the features on the GX1 are very nice, particulary the new sensor and viewfinder. However, I don't think the difference between either would warrant shelling out on a new camera.

For those buying now, it's a no-brainer, - better sensor, faster AF, better VF, touch screen, etc. But for those like me, happy with the photos from the GF1, things could still be better. Notably:

Weather proof Mag Alloy body
Fast zoom lenses (Oly 12-60/50-200 weather proof perfect example)
Full frame!

Ultimately, it's always a compromise, m34 will never beat FF for quality, FF may never beat m34 for compact, take anywhere convenience. For us non-pro's, a weather proof, fast AF camera with lots of external controls and fast, weather sealed glass and good IQ, is the holy grail.

For now I'll spend the money on glass instead......

Comment edited 5 minutes after posting
1 upvote
Feczo
By Feczo (Jan 18, 2012 at 04:06:17 GMT)

> FF may never beat m34 for compact, take anywhere convenience
it did already:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/FujifilmX100/

0 upvotes
Gerardjan
By Gerardjan (Jan 19, 2012 at 08:32:22 GMT)

ever looked at a pentax k5 and WP glass

0 upvotes
Uaru
By Uaru (Nov 9, 2011 at 22:20:23 GMT)

What interests me, is how GX1 would compare to Fuji X100.

I got GF1+20mm and loved to take pictures with it, carrying it almost everywhere.

My biggest complaint about GF1 was not very high ISO in comparison with recent cameras. And that is why I got Fuji X100.
My biggest challenge is to take pictures in public aquarium. Very dark and not possible to use flash.

That is why originally I got Nikon D700. Nice, but very heavy - sometimes I do not want to travel with it. But it was a must when having plans to visit an aquarium. GF1 was good almost for anything, but not for this…

Fuji X100 was the first small camera to offer a very similar quality to D700 (if not better;-)). This is the camera, which is good enough even for aquarium photograhy. I love the camera and the pictures I take with it.

However, the ergonomics of GF1 is clearly superior.
So I might be interested, if the picture quality is good enough...

0 upvotes
lowpine
By lowpine (Nov 11, 2011 at 13:43:36 GMT)

<not camera related> when I saw your name I wondered if you were named after the fish, or just a coincidence... then you mentioned aquariums! I once kept an uaru, what a wonderful fish! probably one of my all time favorites!

3 upvotes
Uaru
By Uaru (Nov 11, 2011 at 15:45:57 GMT)

It is not coincidence, it is after the fish;-)

3 upvotes
Will Gerrits
By Will Gerrits (Nov 9, 2011 at 19:29:22 GMT)

Why the "old" normal 14-42 mm and not the compact new X lens in the size comparison pictures ????? The new X lenses are made for this body and give it a great size advantage. It's in my opinion unfare DPreview to set this point aside in comparisons.

1 upvote
sensibill
By sensibill (Nov 9, 2011 at 21:56:48 GMT)

I agree... The new compacting kit lens would make this a killer setup for people wanting DSLR quality in a compact carry-around.

0 upvotes
yabokkie
By yabokkie (Nov 11, 2011 at 19:52:28 GMT)

because this preview is about the camera, not the lens, I think, and you effectively said that it's the lens, not the camera, that interests you right?

0 upvotes
Dr Aref
By Dr Aref (Nov 9, 2011 at 15:48:25 GMT)

It is really puzzling to me why Panasonic fails to understand the aspirations and desires of many pros as well as enthusiasts when they bundle lenses with their ILC cameras. Recently they have completely stopped to bundle Lumix 20mm F1.7, which is a superb lens. In fact one can choose Micro4/3 only to use this lens on a second camera that can easily slip inside his overcoat pocket. GF3 was bundled with 14mm, logic Panasonic gave - smallest and lightest ILC. Fine, I can understand that. But is it wrong to offer another bundle with the 20mm? Will it be too expensive? A little may be, but many are eager to see the 20mm 1.7 to be bundled with the new GX-1 at least.

If Panasonic fails to do this, many will opt for a 3rd gen Olympus Pen cameras & add the Lumix 20mm to it. Choice is more flexible with the 3 Pens (we get the Zuiko bundled zoom as well). A more flexible & attractive choice I guess and the Zuiko zoom is not bad.

I hope Panasonic will not do the same mistake again with GX-1.

2 upvotes
yabokkie
By yabokkie (Nov 9, 2011 at 16:46:53 GMT)

I also prefer 20mm over 14mm (I may need it sometimes).
20/1.7 is not bad but I would not call it superb.

0 upvotes
Mike Beller
By Mike Beller (Nov 9, 2011 at 12:57:54 GMT)

I think I represent the classic target market - I only want one camera but I'm frustrated by the quality and low light performance of compacts. I'm currently using a Panasonic super zoom DMC-FZ35 and would like to upgrade to something with faster focus and better low light performance. I don't use too many manual adjustments and I don't use extra lenses, flash or VF accessories, etc.

The GX1 looks great (especially with the G X VARIO PZ 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 lens but I'd probably want a longer zoom) but I don't really need manual adjustments/hot shoe/etc. I'm thinking the GF3 with the G VARIO HD 14-140mm/F4.0-5.8 lens could be a good all around replacement. I'm also considering the direct upgrade path to the DMC-FZ150K which would be much less expensive. Does the GF3 outperform the FZ150K?

GX1? GF3? FZ150K? Any recommendations? Considerations?

0 upvotes
theDA
By theDA (Nov 9, 2011 at 13:30:44 GMT)

GF2 has a hot shoe. GX1 has a much better sensor than the GF3.

0 upvotes
rccasgar
By rccasgar (Nov 9, 2011 at 23:26:20 GMT)

If you don't want manual controls and you want a big zoom, go for the GF3 with G X VARIO PZ 45-175mm.

0 upvotes
Steven Micallef
By Steven Micallef (Nov 9, 2011 at 11:11:29 GMT)

I for one am so excited for this camera. I own a GF1 (and GF2 and GH2) and the one thing I've wanted all along was a high-res live viewfinder just like Olympus users had available. It doesn't have to be built-in NEX7 or X100-style in my opinion.

However, I'm surprised that this hasn't been brought up by others. The GX1 looks closer cosmetically to the GF2 than the GF1 (which is no bad thing because that too is a wonderful camera.)

Essentially, the GX1 is a GF2 with a mode dial. I like in the review where they say the flash unit is "very similar to the one found in the GF1." That it may be, but, it is IDENTICAL to the design found on the GF2, same for the placement of the flash release button being further left. And the HDMI outlet on the right. It even has the silly IA button in the same spot. I wish there were some side-by-side comparisons of the GX1 and GF2(perhaps in the full review). Or maybe they won't since so many want to pretend the GF2 never existed. Lol, weird.

1 upvote
Gerardjan
By Gerardjan (Jan 19, 2012 at 08:45:56 GMT)

@yabokkie: And you were born when? Yesterday?

0 upvotes
Nerkdergler
By Nerkdergler (Nov 9, 2011 at 04:42:34 GMT)

I know I'm in the minority on these kinds of forums, but I personally appreciate Panasonic sticking to the LCD-only form factor. I guess the thinking must be - let's keep the GF/GX line as small as we feasibly can, with as big an LCD screen as we can, and those who really want a peep-hole VF will either buy a G/GH-series or the add-on VF.

Like many things, the viewfinder is a matter of personal preference - despite the usual pointless comments to the effect of 'real photographers use a peephole VF, everyone else is a happy snapper'. It's a preference hangover from the days of cameras where an (optical) VF was the only option (although ironically even older cameras still had what might now be called 'live view'!). These days there is a perfectly valid other option (the LCD), even for 'real' photographers. :) It has its drawbacks, but also its advantages, as anyone who has used a view camera or a RF with two eyes open can attest to.

2 upvotes
yabokkie
By yabokkie (Nov 9, 2011 at 15:33:30 GMT)

real photographers have been using view finders for 150 years just like people use LCD and live-view now. though some old cameras may be not "live" (have to put in the film/glass before exposure, costing an extra 5 seconds or so).

the 35mm SLR only became popular in the 1970s and declined in the 1990s, and it's used by only a fraction of pros, photojournalists who can afford the low image quality of 35mm film. .

0 upvotes
skytripper
By skytripper (Nov 10, 2011 at 18:14:11 GMT)

I would love to see someone, even a pro, try shooting with a GF body (any GF body) + 14-140 zoom (or any other big lens) while holding this rig out a arm's length. Ridiculous!

Now that we have high-rez LCD's, it would be fair to say that viewfinders and LCD's both have strengths and weaknesses. Every camera needs both for maximum flexibility, imho.

It is gratifying to see a few of the new small cameras including a built-in EVF. I hope this trend continues. I also hope that good EVF's get cheaper eventually. It is ridiculous to pay half again as much for a clip-on EVF as you pay for a camera and lens kit!

0 upvotes
Deusex
By Deusex (Nov 13, 2011 at 17:49:05 GMT)

and do not forget the people with glasses that preffer to use LCD and not VF

0 upvotes
OneGuy
By OneGuy (Nov 15, 2011 at 09:04:38 GMT)

I think the hard core EVF guys are a not a majority. They are possibly a minority if they don't put their money where their mouth is. Here is my own reason for an LCD:

EVFs (presently) don't have the always-live outside frame that them ol' optical VFs had. I like using the LCD display and with the camera slightly in front because I also have the peripheral vision of what's going on around the subject (this becoming more important for videos). I want quality AND I want to look good with the camera AND I want interesting pics/videos.

I don't care about "pros" because I don't think the "Enthusiast" (that's me) is not on a straight line between P&S and SLR -- we are in a separate category. GF3 does not appeal to me because some marketing guy thought the prospective buyer does not want the best available sensor.

GX1's on my short list and so is G3. Now, if you (the really smart Panasonic guy) kit the new X power zoom with G3 I probably would not be able to sleep until I got it.

Cheers

1 upvote
Fpac12
By Fpac12 (Dec 15, 2011 at 16:25:07 GMT)

Reasons to have/add built in EVF (peep hole)
- Conserve battery life for must have shots when recharging is not an option.
- Stealth shooting when illuminating yourself will distract subject or get you "removed from the premises."
- Option to continue shooting when the inevitable LDC screen fails.

1 upvote
Fpac12
By Fpac12 (Dec 17, 2011 at 23:28:11 GMT)

(one more) - easier to see on extremely bright days

0 upvotes
dscottsatx
By dscottsatx (Nov 9, 2011 at 00:17:12 GMT)

Want. :)

0 upvotes
Howard Shooter
By Howard Shooter (Nov 8, 2011 at 15:38:55 GMT)

Richard, give us a smile!

0 upvotes
Camp Freddy
By Camp Freddy (Nov 8, 2011 at 13:57:08 GMT)

They had to put the G3 chip in really. It will be more interesting to see

1) more sane ISO qualityh 800- 1600

2) AF vs the olympus 3 series

I think it is a sensible launch twixt GF and G

0 upvotes
Photo Grapher
By Photo Grapher (Nov 8, 2011 at 13:41:44 GMT)

Really nice camera, was expecting for this one, I think I will only use X lenses on the GX1

0 upvotes
BobBill
By BobBill (Nov 8, 2011 at 12:06:13 GMT)

In a word, NICE. In a phrase, thoughtful improvement, but the new viewfinder should have been made to fit previous models...

0 upvotes
Steven Micallef
By Steven Micallef (Nov 8, 2011 at 11:03:27 GMT)

Did anyone else notice on the body and design page, it shows the dimensions to be 124mm wide. The GF1 is 116mm wide according to it's review.

0 upvotes
Aleo Veuliah
By Aleo Veuliah (Nov 8, 2011 at 10:12:40 GMT)

Is it me that don't see, or there is no information about the Venus engine version ?

I think I looked well on the specifications

1 upvote
MPA1
By MPA1 (Nov 8, 2011 at 09:43:04 GMT)

Let us hope it has a good VF. I cannot stand cameras where you have to watch TV to take pictures.

0 upvotes
Andy Crowe
By Andy Crowe (Nov 8, 2011 at 11:57:59 GMT)

The new EVF is the same as they use in the G3

0 upvotes
Total comments: 318
123