Previous page Next page

Nikon D810 Shooting Experience

By Barnaby Britton

Anyone who has ever used a Nikon D800/E or, for that matter, a D700, D7100 or D4 could pick up the D810 and feel completely at home. The upgrade from 800 to 810 is almost entirely internal: exterior controls and ergonomics are little changed. I didn't find much to complain about in how the D800 handled, and the D810 offers a very pleasant experience overall. Load the camera up with some high-quality glass and it becomes pretty big and heavy pretty quickly but that's the price you pay for using a full-frame DSLR in preference to a mirrorless system. It's been a while since I went out shooting with a full-sized DSLR and multi-lens kit, and I must say that I have not missed the shoulder and neck pain.

Nikon describes the D810's 36MP full-frame sensor as 'new' and it's most likely an improved version of the one we've seen in the D800/E and the Sony A7R. Like the latter camera, the D810 lacks an optical low-pass filter for optimal resolution.

That said, having taken a look though my first batch of images from the D810, in my opinion it's a price worth paying. The D810's image quality is incredibly good. Compared to the D800, images from the D810 look like they've had a veil removed (and bear in mind that images from the D800 look very nice). As I'd hoped, Nikon has tweaked the D810's JPEG processing to deliver sharper-looking, more detailed files than the D800, more in line with those from the D800E. This is good news, although for D800 shooters it might leave a slightly bitter taste in the mouth (there's really no reason why the D800's JPEGs couldn't look sharper, too with tweaked firmware).

Putting history behind us, where it belongs, the point is that the D810's image quality is top-notch. At low ISOs shooting at wide-ish apertures with a good lens, detail capture is fantastic. It's not an exaggeration to say that the D810 really does approach medium-format digital cameras for image quality, assuming of course that you're prepared to invest in the best lenses.

ISO 64 - JPEG (100% crop)

ISO 64 - Adjusted raw (click for original)

As far as noise is concerned, the D810 can be considered effectively noise free until around ISO 1000 in JPEGs but even at ISO 6400 and upwards there's still plenty of detail and noise is fairly easily dealt with in Raw files if you're prepare to put a little time into post-processing.

ISO 320

100% crop

ISO 3200

100% crop

ISO 25,600

100% crop

The maximum effective ISO sensitivity of the D810 is one stop higher than the D800/E and my impression of image quality at the higher ISO settings is that the newer camera probably is roughly one stop better although this difference is only really noticeable once you get up above ISO 3200.

Previous page Next page
401
I own it
427
I want it
64
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

Total comments: 1571
12345
NikonStephen

Hello. I realise that producing the detailed performance analysis that DPreview creates will of course take time, but I am sure many would be keen to see the full D810 review soon. Santa needs to know what I want!

1 upvote
munro harrap

The D810 seems OK, BUT and it is big BUT, looking at the file sizes here the D810 file sizes are so much bigger than the D800/800E's for the same image at the same ISO- i.e. 74.3 MB @100 (D810) as against the 43.6MB @ 100 of the D800E,
that there really must be something very odd going on, as this means 4/7ths the number of shots to a card and vastly increased (by 4/7ths again) use of and consumption of Hard Drive Space, plus slower to work with files- that I as a user of Lightroom 4 and Elements 11 am unable to open with even the most recent updates- and I note with bitterness and rancour that Capture NX2 does NOT open D810 RAW files at all.
Are the original files here at compressed as against uncompressed? or 12 instead of 14 bit- what IS going on please????

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
balico

Surely the settings for recorded files are not similar. With "lossless compressed raw" setting, I get files of maximal 45MB with my D810. I suppose yours is set to "Uncompressed raw" instead!
Capture NX2 doesn't support the Nikon D810, you can download Capture NX-D instead (which is free) to open the files.

Comment edited 5 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
munro harrap

These figures come straight from the above Image Quality compared of the preview! They are Dpreview's own results of the same subject still life (above if you are on the right page of the preview- Studio Scene, Image Comparison tool) with the D810 and D800E set to RAW at 100 ISO. Take a look, the size difference is huge.
I do not have an 810, but if I was about to buy one this file size increase would put me off. I have an i7 with 16Gb ram and its just about enough with the 800's files. With the 810 you'll need 24Gb or 32Gb Ram to be as efficient, surely?

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
balico

Surely they have the D800E and D810 at different settings then in their test. I checked my files and although I have some raw's of 50MB (fine details), most of them are around 40-45MB at full resolution and the camera set to "lossless compressed raw".

0 upvotes
balico

Another thing that is not correct in this preview is that for AE bracketing a maximum difference between shots is specified as 1EV, my D810 clearly is able to shoot 5 shots at 2EV difference!
Seems like the preview was somewhat rushed and now we are still waiting for the full review..

0 upvotes
DenWil

"We" are still waiting for a full review?

You bought it and you still need validation from someone else.

0 upvotes
Black Box

"To non-native English speakers that aphorism might not make any sense, but basically it means that you don't get anything for nothing - there's always a price to pay in the end."

Seriously?

Barney, you need to ALWAYS assume the worst - that your readers are smarter than you.

0 upvotes
Black Box

Best buy says this camera has 7fps. True or false?

1 upvote
mg428

In the October the 29th newsletter Barney says he is "writting the conclusion to the review", and now saying in today's most recent newsletter that he is "putting the finishing touches".

Even though I mostly agree with lorenzo, I really wonder whether dpreview would support the claim of less shake -due to the new mirror box mechanism and shutter- with some scientific methods, if there exist any, and set forth how much difference there is. So far other user and website reviews lack these aspects-- they merely say there is less shake.
.

0 upvotes
mg428

Here comes November, and the review is still not out!

2 upvotes
lorenzo de medici

DPR has really dragged their feet getting this review out, for unknown reasons. Oh well, that's life with Nikon. There are enough user reviews and reviews on other sites similar to DPR, that whatever Barney has to say now will be quite irrelevant.

0 upvotes
balico

Yes it is strange, the D810 is after the D800(E) a revolution in digital photography, but it takes ages to get a full review out!

0 upvotes
Galbertson

No, it does not take ages to compile full review. Much of its data already out, well tested. It truly odd such an important camera to many photographers would be on hold to review. Then throw in lack of full review of D750, another great camera.

Christmas marketing season here NOW.

Hey, DPR very large corpoate linked company, most reviews are in some way.

Maybe Canon putting delay on Nikon full reviews, knowing full well how D750 and D810 would eat into early Christmas purchases.

Santa, it's on my list.

0 upvotes
mg428

I've just learned that dpreview is owned by amazon.com, and now I can clearly see why the review has not been published yet. Apparently they want to deliberately coincide the review with the Holiday Season to increase the sales.

While doing this, in today's newsletter they, again, state that they "are putting finishing touches to our review of the Nikon D810". They have been putting those magic touches for almost a month!! If I were them, I would not mention anything about D810 in those newsletters because they are acting us as if we are fools. What a shame!

1 upvote
Galbertson

Mg428
Wow, rather depressing news. Easy to imagine how Amazon.com would compile great intellect to manipulate camera sales. If true that Nikon difficult to deal with, can imagine why DP Review/Amazon.com holds back on D810/D750 reviews. As it stands, Nikon has two great cameras, easy buys for large number of photographers.

Maybe Canon owned by Amazon??? :-o

0 upvotes
Guy F

I've been waiting for the full review too. But at this point, I'll just wait for the D810S since it should be out very soon. ;-)

1 upvote
Mr G Clips

I just purchased the D810 and started to compare it with my D800. By first feel, there are quite a few differences, so I think this upgrade is indeed, a quite significant one.

The grip is much more secure, the Metering button relocation makes sense, the BKT is also easy to reach, the new LCD is brighter and sharper, the viewfinder display is also better and clear looking, the ISO performance is better, the camera's shutter is MUCH more quiet, the processing is faster and so is the auto-focus and the frame-rate, which in DX mode is plenty enough for general sports photography even.

Though the D810 looks more or less as a D800, yet, I feel as the two are not the same at all. Like the D810 was/is a different and much better camera.

I'm probably going to try and sell my D800 if I can for a reasonable price, but it may be a challenge right now due to D810 and the D750.

Downside: So far, the one and only issue I see is "purple" tones on the images in the dark areas.

That's it... :)

3 upvotes
Aneek

Thanks for your personal input! But why do you think the images are a little purple in the blacks? I know with the D750, i was experiencing greenish tints on my images in the LCD monitor. So I changed my brightness, but then found the problem to be a WB problem. This purple-ish tint isn't a problem like that, is it?

Thanks!

0 upvotes
balico

Mr G Clips is right, try shooting at high iso, 6400 or 12800 slightly underexposed, adjust exposure during raw development and see the purple appear, mainly at the frame borders!

0 upvotes
Hauer

Wonder as to when we can expect an in-depth review of the D810. Afterall the preview was in July and it is now... October! There was a time that DPReview "shined" in this respect. Just an observation...

7 upvotes
mg428

+1.

I am especially interested in dpreview's observation or even better technical analysis comparing D800/E and D810 in terms of camera shake due to the new mirror box and shutter mechanism employed in D810. So far other reviews or users say it is better, but we don't know how much better. I believe we cannot know this unless some technical analysis including solid numbers is carried out.

1 upvote
Galbertson

My primary reason to buy D810 is its electronic first curtain for best IQ. But I shoot mostly in live view exposure preview and above review states electronic first curtain not available in live view. How might that effect my IQ? Is there a workaround? I normally shoot 4X5, enjoying taking my time to get to image i want.

0 upvotes
HFLM

@Galbertson:To use EFC in live view
1. Activate EFC in the menu
2. Switch to MLU mode on the upper left dial
Then activate the shutter TWICE:
1. First time to reset the sensor,
2. Second time to take the picture.
If you set exposure delay to e.g. 2 seconds, you only need to press once, as far as I know.

1 upvote
Galbertson

Hflm.
Thanks much for you answer. My guess i would use 2 second delay to keep any finger on shutter button movement. Can it be sent forlonger delay? Of course, i maybe could use remote release...but would prefer shutter delay to keep process simpler.

Thanks again!

0 upvotes
Galbertson

Hflm,
I forgot to mention before shuttering will be in live exposure preview. I only use lcd, only in full manual mode, much preferring to see constant effect on image as i juggle preferences of shutter speed(1/4-1/15 second mostly), ISO! And f stop. I am often critisized for not using evf and graphs/histograms. Just how I prefer to shoot.

In other words, can i use your technique if I am in live exposure preview?

0 upvotes
Galbertson

Could anyone tell me process to use older AI/AIS manual lenses? I know perameters of lens must be set in non lens menu. Does save data for my 24, 35 and 105mm lenses? Is/can data be recalled by camera buttons?

0 upvotes
LeanderL

I handled a D750 yesterday for a couple of minutes. I was considering it to replace my D700. But that is not going to work for me.
It felt so much smaller and less comfortable in my hands. Also the finder seemed much dimmer and smaller (don't know if that is only my perception).
In all the D700 is in a totally different class. So I am looking at the D810 again, even though the 36MB files are a bit too much for my taste.

0 upvotes
Patrick Dodds

I've been looking for something to replace my D700's and, when I saw what the D750 was, bought a D810. It's early days but I haven't been disappointed so far. I used the 810 alongside a 700 at a wedding last week and, when post-processing, I have been surprised how much nicer (less noise, and obviously far more definition and a greater ability to crop) the D810 files are. So much so, in fact, that I'm thinking of selling both 700s and buying another 810. File size is a bit of an issue but the advantages brought by the newer camera in terms of picture quality significantly outweigh this issue, at least IMO - YMMV.
One thing - a Sigma 35mm 1.4 doesn't seem as sharp on the D810 so I'm going to have to look into that.
One other advantage that occurs to me - the quieter shutter is a godsend!

0 upvotes
balico

The 36MP files (35-45MB) of the D810 (D800) are not to much at all!
I came from D300 which has the same 12MP as the D700. I am very happy with the resolution of the D810. Even with a significant crop there is still more resolution left then with 12MP.
Buy a 4TB drive (only US$149) and you can store around 100K photo's..

0 upvotes
balico

@Patrick Dodds; My Sigma 35mm 1.4 had very disappointing sharpness as well on my D810 (especially at f/1.4). I bought the Sigma dock and recalibrated the lens, now it is my favorite lens..

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Galbertson

Do not have d810 in hand...yet. Have downloaded both d810 and d750 users manual. The d750 seems to have limitations in Live View mode regarding live exposure preview. It will not totally show image in all scenarios, such as extreme low light. Has anyone compare the two cameras Live View exposure preview differences? I rarely use histogram, preferring to see my manual settings on lcd.

0 upvotes
JohnD5100

How is the audio quality from it, and what is the video sampling quality?

0 upvotes
Derrick Siu
0 upvotes
Sundu21

Awesome.

0 upvotes
JohnD5100

Thanks, you two made me curious :-)

0 upvotes
PeterFree

I don't know what you are doing with your lens in the studio test, but you are not getting the maximum out of the Nikon D800E/D810 compared to other AA filter equipped sensor cameras, the D800 being the first example. One does have to have the right glass and the correct technique to get these AAlfree sensors to really shine and you are not accomplishing this. Done correctly with the right glass and the difference is HIGHLY visible at 100%. DxO Mark rates the resolution increase at 30% and it is definitely visible in many other comparisons. Something is not right in your testing...

0 upvotes
luigibozi

hi guys
could anybody explain to me how does this
"Viewfinder type: Optical (tunnel)"
work?
It's a typo in the article?!

0 upvotes
Galbertson

Greetings,
Been researching intensly D810. Also D610 , but does not have Live View exposure preview...what a stupid deletion.

Does anyone know if new iPhone soon to be released work as as external monitor directly out of hdmi port?

0 upvotes
olyflyer

Ask that question on an iPhone forum.

0 upvotes
Galbertson

My question is not directed toward general iPhone users, nor is it directed toward general D810 users, but to the many, many D810 users who have experience with external monitors and might understand technical data within present and the future iPhone about it's compatability as external monitor. That question fits this forum much better than on Apple forums.

If a iPhone buyer knew of this, he would not rush out to buy a $3,500 camera...but if a D810 owner knew the $150 iPhone he had or could soon buy would work as external, he just might rush out to buy.

I will be buying D810 soon. Have researched external monitors. If iPhone worked as external monitor, i would wait to buy new iPhone 8.

0 upvotes
Galbertson

This is best logical forum to ask D810 users if they are using or plan on using iPhone 8 as their external monitor

0 upvotes
PBear2

check out " idisplay" it might be a solution, maybe some workaround somewhere.

0 upvotes
ihv

Indeed, the lack of the exposure preview seems to be weird.
I wonder if that could be implemented later on in the firmware?

0 upvotes
Galbertson

No exposure preview??? In specs it states it has Live View preview. I would not contemplate this camera if I could not see my shutter speed/f stop/ISO settings before capture.

Quite some time ago, rejected purchase of Nikon D5300 because it did not have live view preview, only histogram before capture. I believe most, perhaps all, pro level FF cameras have live view preview. The D810 certainly a pro camera.

Will certainly dig into this, need to confirm before i purchase.

BUT, maybe you were referring to lack of live exposure preview in D610, which is true. Have yet to hear of any camera that live view preview added with update.

Nice to hear D750 has it, amongst other improvements over D610. Might even sway away from D810...but D750 has AA filter.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 10 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
ihv

Looks like the exposure preview on the live view is there in the D810 by pressing the 'ok' button.

However didn't catch that in the manual for movie mode (maybe just got unnoticed when browsing quickly).

0 upvotes
munro harrap

With no filters sharpening is unecessary, but colour tends to improve with NX2- better than Adobe.

Is anyone using Capture One with theirs?

0 upvotes
Coliban

Hmm, when i consult the studio scene, the IQ of the D800E is better than that of the D810. I would expect the IQ of the D810 should be better. It is clear when you compare the test charts at the left and bottom corners. Is this a result of this special setup, I can't imagine that the D810 performance is below the D800E.

Or do I misinterpret something

0 upvotes
RichyjV

The raw processing software manufacturers take some time to really get the most out of the conversion, so while it is supported now it should get better over time. I'm a D800E owner and I would expect to see a very small difference in favour of the D810 after a few months.

0 upvotes
Coliban

@RichyjV
RAW is the RAW data, from the sensor and needs no big conversions, once the data I captured, I compared the raw data. The process which is constantly improved is the jpg-conversion. Off course all processes are improved, but the raw data is the data the sensor delivers, without fundamental conversions.

Maybe I am wrong, but it seems to me, in this studio scene, that the IQ of the D810 is worse than the IQ of the D800E and even other cameras.

Can you confirm that?

0 upvotes
Willie

RAW data is RAW data, but computers cant directly display RAW files. The RAW files have to be converted to something that can be viewed.

1 upvote
marc petzold

To get the most out of the D810, just like any other Nikon DSLR, you need a Nikon-based RAW Converter - "generic" ones like ACR into PS or LR doesn't show the full potential the Sensor is capable of.

@Willie

RAW is not simple RAW, each Brand does their own format, and some RAW files are pre-cooked inside the DSLR/DSLM, and the IQ varies with different RAW converters.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
3 upvotes
MikeF4Black

@Marc: do you mean that switching for my D800E from my current LR4.4 to NX2 would show a noticeable improvement?

That is of interest to me, as I'm in the process of getting a new laptop and possibly a separate screen (Eizo 24?).

0 upvotes
Coliban

@marc

I have already a "Nikon based raw converter" I own the D800E and I've downloaded the RAW-files of D810, D800E and compared them. But I can't see much difference in IQ between them.

Besides that, what is the advantage in buying for a higher price a camera, which has no advantages in IQ, no matter, if the camera or the raw converter is responsible or not, if the user is not able to benefit from the higher price.

Regards

0 upvotes
marc petzold

@Mike4Black LR4 vs CNX2 (it's into german, my bad - but you can see the sample comparsions) http://www.foto-just.de/vgl_raw.0.html

@Coliban That's a very good question from you, indeed. Besides the slightly detail improvements of the D810, your D800E is a very good DSLR. My best Nikon currently is only a DX-based D7000, and i have a FF A7 Sony, too. The D810 is no revolution,
but a slightly evolution of the D800(E) concept. When you compare the D800E & D810, they're way close together with DxOMark, for some ppl it's worth to upgrade to the D810 because of many minor enhancements. Enjoy your great D800E Nikon.

0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

@Marc, vielen Dank; I can read German!

Cheers (Schüsz?),

Michiel

0 upvotes
marc petzold

Alright, nice. ;) Cheers!

1 upvote
HFLM

The difference of D800E to D810 is there, but requires the best lenses to be visible. I subscribed to diglloyd.com. He has a very thorough test comparing both. The D810 is slightly sharper (could be sensor filter stack), but it's very close. The main advantage is autofocus improvement, LCD, EFCS amongst others. I really like my D810 and have problems now using our D610 or XT1, as the D810t is just mazing in most respects and the other cameras feel like toys compared to it.

1 upvote
Galbertson

Question regarding tripods for D810.

I am accustome d to large, heavy tripods for my 4X5. Since D810 has mirror up and electronic first curtain, can i use a much lighter tripod? I am used to working slowly, giving time for camera to settle down. Also will only be shooting 24-105mm lenses. How light can i go and still make full IQ of 36 mp?

My guess if i purchased light Sony A7R, would need my 4X5 tripod to settle down its agressive shutter shake.

0 upvotes
TBImages

The answer to this question may be obvious to those on this forum exceptionally familiar with the engineering details of the D810, not so much for me....

Is there an impact on dynamic range, noise, etc. when using the D810 in something other than full resolution mode? 20 megapixel or 9 megapixel mode for example?

1 upvote
R Vaquero

At least noise is less visible shooting with lower resolutions, don't know about DR

1 upvote
StevenMajor

OK DPR we've been patient. it's been 2 + months since the this first impressions review was published. Where is the review? Have you found something that Nikon would not like to see in print? Have politics intervened? Are you just overworked? Understaffed? What could it be that delays publishing the test results of this marvel?

5 upvotes
mayurgogoi

May be DPR will be more cautious before giving 80+!Because after DPR giving Gold Ratings to FUJI FILM XT1--light leak discovered--same is happened in case of NIKON 610D--even some users complains about 610 WHEN THEY TRAVEL TO HIMALAYAS--

Comment edited 17 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Hasa

Viz. the lab report: To me it looks like the raw images of the D810 are the same as the raw images of the D800. This should not be so. I would like to suggest that dpreview stop using the 50mm lenses of Canon, Nikon and Sony and use the 55mm Zeiss Otus instead on tests of all 3 brands. This is not a lens test. It purports to be a sensor test. How can it be a sensor test when the D8xx sensors outresolve Nikon's 50mm lenses by a far margin?
I guess people who upgrade to 810 also have Zeiss lenses and they would like to see what more they will get from the 810 that they do not already have in the D800 (e). If time permits: The Zeiss 15mm, 50mm and 135mm would be good choices. ( I only have the 35mm F2 ). This test would also show us what more we get from 36 Mpix that we do not already have from the 20-24 Mpix range. ( I have a good idea - but that is not a professional's opinion ).

1 upvote
MarekPyka

Your comment is well taken, if the sensor outpaces the lens, then a test is pointless. Also, a single lens across all platforms would rule out differences being attributable to having used different lenses. Very important to control this source of review error. I hope DP takes your advice. And as I seriously hesitate to buy without having had an in-depth review by DP, sure would be nice to see it soon!!!

Comment edited 3 times, last edit 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
jerrywielo

Nikon’s service advisory for thermal issue (white dots) during long exposures with the D810 camera...

Read more on NikonRumors.com: http://nikonrumors.com/2014/08/19/nikons-service-advisory-for-thermal-issue-white-dots-during-long-exposures-with-the-d810-camera.aspx/#ixzz3AqgPMT6x

0 upvotes
Love nic

I am considering D810 and like to know if the lens I am thinking about a single lens for general photography is good choice. I am thinking of Nikon AF-S FX 24-70/2.8D.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
StevenMajor

For 3oz and $ 700 less the Tamron is better says DXO lens testing.

http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses

The site requires searching but the test info is there...for every worthy lens

0 upvotes
duttind

I went for the Tamron 24 700 f2.8 could'nt have been happier

0 upvotes
HFLM

Cameralabs has a very good comparison: http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Nikon_vs_Tamron_24-70mm_comparison/. I tested both, find the Nikon focuses faster and behaved better when shooting into the sun. As to DXO: look at the curves: Tamron is better for wide angle shots, wheres Nikon takes over from 50-70mm, so depends on your needs.
Another thing: if you want to use fine tuning, only ONE lens of a non-Nikon company can be tuned. All others use the same preset (or you remember it and set it to the desired value everytime you shoot). In case you add a macro or other lens, it's good to know that.

Comment edited 39 seconds after posting
1 upvote
Galbertson

Hoping to get D810 soon, use my pro AI manual lenses.

I know i will need to get into menu to set up for non cpu lenses. Do i have to go back into menu every time i change lenses, or does connections and memory in camera remember the lens attached? It would be frustrating and time consuming if have to dive into menu to make settings every lens change. If so, might be forced to buy new set of lenses.

0 upvotes
StevenMajor

Concerning Lab Report No 10.
What does this say (if anything) about shutter vibration caused sharpness issues when using a shutter speed higher than 1/80 sec? Will a higher shutter speed eliminate the shutter vibration caused sharpness issues? if so, at what shutter speed will all vibration issues be eliminated?
or
Are there shutter vibration issues at all shutter speeds, and the only way to eliminate them is by using the mirror up mode ?

1 upvote
TBImages

Anyone done any performing arts photography with the 810 yet? I shoot mostly dance and theater and have relied on my D4 pretty exclusively to do so. However, the D810 looks pretty interesting.

FPS speed is a non issue for me. Focus speed / accuracy and high dynamic range are.

1 upvote
sgoldswo

All I'm going to say is that after nearly a month, this is a special, no, exceptional DSLR. Really great. All of the issues associated with the D800E have just been solved. The camera just works.

Some user impressions here:
http://wp.me/p2wMAg-C5

Pity that in true DPR fashion we have plenty of people with sour grapes everywhere on this comments section. I guess that is what it is. However, if people get put off by that they are missing a treat...

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
MikeF4Black

Strangely I just turned in my D800 for a new discounted E. I must be certifiable. ;-)

0 upvotes
Galbertson

Thank you for your experienced reply. Also for your user website. Gives me good reasons to purchase. Interesting that there is only overall complimentary websites on D810, but only in DP Review so many have no better thing do do but bash the camera. The more great cameras, the more griping trolls.

0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

@Galbertson: I'm not sure if your commentas directed at mine, but if it was, you misunderstood me by a country mile. I wasn't bashing the 810, nor your praise for it, at all. It happens a lot on the net.
The 810 is an incrementally better camera than the 800/E on every imagineable front. At least, that's my opinion after having tried it a few times.

Any questions?

0 upvotes
Galbertson

Sorry, my poor eyesight mistakenly responded, intended for sgoldswo. I have .been noticing how many positive responses to the D810.. It has every single function i need to at times replace my 4X5. The only thing missing is articulating LCD. But would get 5" external monitor. Its peeking feature would help me see for focus, apparently not available on camera. Still will need my magnifiers to help me read words of menu. I do not have central "target" eyesight, but compose with perifera portion. Not easy, and needing assisting tools to improve camera operation.

The tactile feel and function of contols and buttons tremendously important, the D810 appear excellent, but will only know when in my hands. I have had many cameras in my hands, can honestly say Fuji X-T1 has buttons for baby fingers, tiny and no sense of activation. Cannot afford to make that mistake.

Comment edited 9 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

Yes, I noticed in some other entries that your eyesight is impaired; you're not to be envied for that. My father was an enthousiast photographer, and when at 75-80 his eyesight went, it took a lot out of him. I admire how you're coping. Difficulties are put in your way to overcome them I suppose.

The D810 is an excellent camera, and I hope and expect it will work for you like that.

0 upvotes
Galbertson

Since you have D810, if shooting highest res for main card, will it automatically put lower res in cf card, or do i have to shoot again for lower res file?

0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

No, I had the 800, and now have the 800E, not the 810, but I'm guessing they work the same in that respect. You select image quality (f.i. Raw + Jpeg) and primary and secondary card selection. Maybe in the 810 you can choose a combination of high res and lower res Raw, and send to cf and sd respectively; you'd have to look in the menu.

Comment edited 42 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Galbertson

Mike,
Appreciate your more than you might image. Have studied in depth the world of blindness. For some fortunate reason, my compositions have refined and matured. Magic happens I guess.

D810 question...if shooting hi res raw image, can i set up camera to automatically load a low res jpeg into CF card? Or do I have to go into menu to set the camera, then shoot the same image again? My hi res files for large printing use. The low res jpegs for web , cataloging and emailing. I have a good fried who does my post work, but I would hope to not depend on him to downsize from raw files for my low res use, would hope to download jpegs directly from camera to my iPad.

Again, thanks for your words of confidence.

1 upvote
Galbertson

Mike
Darnit, sorry didnt catch your answer to my question.
One thing about loss of eyesight is screwing up...just something to get accustomed to. I might call tech support to confirm. Camera still ideal for me.

1 upvote
chris1444

Have you seen the moiré on the tests? Look at the close-up of the b-w picture on the left. It is a deal breaker for me. The Canon does not have such an issue. The picture is completely clean.

The most worrying is that it is also present for the D800 and D800E.

BTW I am not a Canon troll. I am a real Nikon fan since decades. I and have bought several Nikon bodies so far plus several lenses, and no Canon. But moiré puts me really off. I am not talking about video where the amount of moiré is ridiculous.

Comment edited 9 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Guenter Hofstaedter

i wonder why they make the sample shoots with all this zooms and not with a good prime ! I got my D810 on the first day it was released, just can tell you the samples here showed on DP are not the max you can get out of this camera !

0 upvotes
MarekPyka

"i wonder why they make the sample shoots with all this zooms and not with a good prime !" Ans: My guess is to hit the widest available market, and because if the camera needs a top lens (crutch), then it is not such a good camera. They need to show where the capability of the camera ends and to do that, they need to test the camera, not the lens.

Comment edited 14 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
ecube

I have reservations about the "Real World" sample photos presented here. What are the sample photos suppose to illustrate? Good looking pictures does not mean anything for evaluating the camera performance because there is no basis of comparison. As for the processed RAW, what does it proved regarding the camera capability? If the purpose is to illustrate the dynamic range, then the three or four samples illustrate the shortcoming of this D810. I have gotten better results of high and varying lighting condition from my D800 than the samples shown in this review. It seems to me that the shooter did not set the HDR properly.

Is the purpose of the sample photos is to compare the D810 against the D800 and D800E, then why not make a side-by-side shots from all three cameras? The comparison to the Canon camera shows the lack of knowledge by the tester because there is no common and controlled basis of comparison. Moreover, it is not relevant.

Was I expecting too much from DPReview?

2 upvotes
InTheMist

You can look at test charts if you like, I suppose.

0 upvotes
ecube

@Inthe Mist - In the 2003-2006, DPR used to present a side-by-side photos of subject taken by cameras being compared against one another. Shots were of identical setting from identical lenses. Test charts were also used. The side-by-side photos illustrates the tester's point and removed reliance on memories. As I recall, the photographs were NOT post processed. . . I wonder if you recall those times.

2 upvotes
InTheMist

Ok, I get you're pining for the old days, but I quite like real-world photos.

1 upvote
ecube

Oh yes, REAL WORLD photos of outdoor scenes, bridges, buildings, lakes/rivers/mountains, sporting events . . . name it. The point is the "side-by-side" comparison of JPEG files right off the camera. While you did not mention RAW, I have nothing against raw files, only that I prefer to compare the ability of the camera on the consumer's view point. Of course D800/800E/810 are not for the average consumer who thinks that raw applies to how their food is prepared.

1 upvote
PVCdroid

For some reason the D810 isn't as sharp as the A7R and contrast isn't as defined. I thought DPReview used the same lens for these tests? idk but can definitely see a difference. Weird. I'm also surprised at how much moire the D810 is generating compared to the A7R.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 2 minutes after posting
1 upvote
shutterbud

"DPReview.com is kindly brought to you by the Nikon Corporation."
This blatant infomercialising should be beneath this site. It really is beyond insulting. Why should we have any other reviews? I mean, it's not like any other camera in history has ever been as important as the D810.

0 upvotes
MarekPyka

Are you suggesting DP would shill out for Nikon?

0 upvotes
shutterbud

It is quite obvious they have already. Just look at the shoot they did for the D750. ANY modern camera would look amazing in those circumstances.

0 upvotes
Galbertson

Without focus peeking, how would i see expanded areas before shootin to see total focus area in broad landscapes? I have limited eyesight and use 15X loupe to see focus on my 4X5.

I have read(i cannot see to read, only recognizing word shape with large magnifier, but use Voicr Over on iPad to speak the words) that external monitors have image peeking. That might be the answer...yes?

0 upvotes
thejohnnerparty

Did anyone happen to catch the photographer's reflection on the old truck's headlight rim?

Comment edited 30 seconds after posting
1 upvote
MarekPyka

Nice catch!!!

0 upvotes
munro harrap

I'm looking for how the D810 moves groups of focus points around like the D200, D300, and D700 do. It is advertized but there is not a sign of it here. I do hope this really is included in the full review, because it is a huge factor in photography.
The Group AF option on a D700 is excellent and so much easier to use than any of Canon's slow two-stage options. It will be the biggest factor in purchase options for many, as mis-focussing is inevitable on occasion when you have zero AF control of where the focus goes, as with the D800(E) and D7100. I am certainly hoping Nikon supply a firmware fix, as that would be easy using the pad that only works ( and so slowly!) using manual focus (and just one point).

This is more important than anything else! As to moire, well, I get moire with my D800 quite often.It's a normal occurrence.Had I known, I would have an E got! Using Capture NX2 I remove it, so moire is a non-issue except for video, and well you can just defocus a little?

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
1 upvote
SmilerGrogan

Yes. It does. And the autofocus seems to be a little faster than other Nikons I've used.

1 upvote
Al Cris

Nikon - if you read this - add a real quiet shutter on the next D 820 or D 900 :-)

1 upvote
Zoron

and Trinity Reboot with Fluorine and vaseline coating

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
Mikael Risedal

best SLR camera out there IQ wise, if you are a spray and pray sport photographer, then you have D4s or 1dx
But for now, there are no competition regarding , metering, resolution, DR, AF, etc etc. Nice work Nikon

10 upvotes
munro harrap

I have not seen a D810. I am curious about comments made regarding vibration at some shutter speeds with the D800(E) models. What are these shutter speeds please, as I have no VR lenses yet have not ever seen this phenomenon using a D800. I have had blurred due to my movement and/or subject movement. And blurred due to the lens being imperfectly focussed, but nothing as described here that I can see.

Nikon removed the filters as at this magnification you can see that everything is slightly off-at all speeds. That said I have not ever been able to detect a visible difference in resolution-just micro-contrast and acuity.tight 0.2 pixel @ 400% USM deals with that.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Mikael Risedal

look at this video, sum up what I think, now are also AF improved , better than my 5dmk3 ps I have also Canon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VR7Kjeq2aH4

3 upvotes
mayurgogoi

Dear Shooters--what is your experience abt ISOs performance of NIKON D810?

0 upvotes
solomonshv

the ISO performance is as good as you can get at this price. if ISO performance is what you are looking for then look no further.

FYI, I am a Canon user but I currently have a D810 in my possession. ISO performance definitely shits all over Canon but I still find that my 5D Mark III units are more complete cameras and easier to use.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
4 upvotes
EricCul

ISO performance is excellent on the D810. Better than the 5D MkIII.

I'd go with the D810 for handling too, but which is easier to use really depends on where the user is coming from. I adjusted to the Nikon system very fast after previously being a Canon shooter.

4 upvotes
rfsIII

It's really great, at least the jpegs out of the camera are—Adobe is still fine tuning its raw converter. But I've shot a lot at 6400 and they're wonderful as long as you look at them as photos and don't go all nerdtastic over them...
If you zoom in to 200 percent they're a little grainy but nothing that makes them unusable. And if you set your masking at 80 or 90 percent in ACR they're awesome.

4 upvotes
Ben Lazar

I sold my D800 to a friend and got the D810 over the weekend. In my opinion, it's absolutely worth it, mostly for the improved mirror mechanism--much less vibration and it's so much quieter. With far less mirror vibration, focus acuity is noticeably improved, and I can bring my shutter speeds down without any fear of the slight blur that I would sometimes get out in the field with my D800, and which relegated it to mainly studio shooting for me. All the little changes have added up to a greatly enhanced shooting experience--the D810 is a camera I'm enthusiastic to take anywhere, under any shooting conditions--Fashion, Landscape, event work, etc. I'm still just getting into the camera, but so far it just feels wonderful, with no niggling issues whatsoever.

8 upvotes
TravelPhotog

I always knew the D800 was only good for in-studio!! ;)

(we can say that now that the D810 is out right?? Which makes Nikon still awesome right??? Even though we were saying they were awesome when they weren't....??? ;) )

Comment edited 28 seconds after posting
1 upvote
DaveE1

TravelPhotog , the D800 is a great camera; one of the best out there. The D810 improves on it.

That's not that different to how technology has always improved over time, so no real need to over analyze or worry about it.

1 upvote
francowan

Cool. I want it.

2 upvotes
Galbertson

Another question...if using EyeFi card, will iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch work as extermal monitor? Will controls operate camera wirelessly from one of these devices? This might solve my need for external monitor that Hoodman loupe works on.

0 upvotes
EricCul

@Galbertson First, I haven't used EyeFi, so I'm not able to directly answer your question. My guess is that EyeFi is for the transfer of files, rather than remote control via iPad/etc. I'm sure someone will correct me if I am wrong.

The CamRanger product may be of interest to you... I have no affiliation whatsoever to the company that produces it; I just thought this link may be helpful:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seGKsbRyQrE

Comment edited 3 times, last edit 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Galbertson

Eric,
If i had cam ranger on d810, connecting to my IPad, would Voice Over speak the worded options showing in live view?

0 upvotes
Gunawan Budihardjo

As long as I understand EyeFi is only to transfer photos directly from your camera which is using the EyeFi SD Card to your mobile or other gadget so that you can send the photos directly to your friends and family. Also to empty you cards directly to iPad or other gadgets.

0 upvotes
Galbertson

Okay, i understand. But assume there is a way to connect and use iPad as external monitor. But my most important question is if the Voice Over function on iPad speaks words when fingers touches screen. I am still waiting for Apple to introduces MacBooks or iMacs with touch screen/Voice Over. Then i could do my own post of raw files. I can see color, but need lots of magnification to see sharpness. But still cannot read words unless Voice Over speaks to me. I accept this rare issue.

Thanks for your help.

0 upvotes
Galbertson

When attaching external monitor to D810, does it disble lcd on camera?

Ideally want 3.2" external monitor, but not made. Because of very limited eyesight, need to use magnifying lcd hood, such as Hoodman. Since D810 does not have articulating lcd, seeking ideas. I even thought purchasing articulating lcd from D5300, but not sure if electronics compatible, plus no technician to manufacture with hdmi out cable.

Any help greatly appreciated.

0 upvotes
HFLM

Conclusion of someone testing thoroughly (shutter shock, resolution ...):
http://blog.kasson.com/?p=6704

1 upvote
jackspra

Found the sample shots boring and unimaginative.

2 upvotes
muesliman

Thanks for that, mate.

0 upvotes
GrahamJohn

Finally. A sensor that matches or exceeds Sigma's Foveon.

3 upvotes
BarnET

They already have it for some time. D800(e) and the sony a7r.
Besides even an decent compact beats the crap out the foveon at anything above base iso.

1 upvote
Pierre Bellefeuille

Too much people don't catch that with cameras having over 20 megapixels there a real need to calibrate the lenses for a specific body. The best thing to do with Nikon or Canon Camera is to bring the lenses and the body to an expert technician that will make very fine tunings. This is of a prime importance with a body such Nikon D800 or D810. With 36 megapixels, it can be pretty easy to mess with focus if anybody doesn't understand well that matter.

I bought lately a Sigma 50mm, f/1.4 Art and a Sigma 17-70, f2.8-4 Contemporary. I am using these lenses with a Nikon D7100. I bought too the Sigma USB Dock to calibrate the lenses. It is really easy to use. I used a Datacolor target to better identify the back or front focus at many distance for predetermined focals on my zoom lens, as an example. The whole procedure is too long here to describe, but if you would like to know more, there is lots of valuable informations on the internet. It makes a huge difference. Really accurate!

Comment edited 33 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Pierre Bellefeuille

By the way, many pro just do that: they bring their cameras and lenses every two or three years to an expert that calibrate the whole kit for them.

0 upvotes
marc petzold

@MikeF4Black

Troll on the roll'? Nice bashing...but just think about who makes many of "Nikon" Sensors - Sony! You must be a die hard Nikon Fan, i like the brand since the 80s - but i enjoy my A7 way much, and it's not sh*t - way silly comment of yours.

Comment edited 26 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

Which particular entry are you referring to Marc? It was probably in jest. I maybe a longterm Nikon user (although there once was a Leica M5 in my life, and there still is a Contax RTSIII), but I don't consider myself to be a fanboy, and really dislike bashing other brands in the process.

But to be honest, you wouldn't catch me using a viewfinderless or EVF-equipped camera (nor an SLR with a porthole viewfinder).

Comment edited 44 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
marc petzold

it was more to the bottom, but there was no "Reply" button, so i wrote it just on top - you said it that way. I'm way happy to have a FF DSLM with my old lenses. The RTS III - was a dream since my teenage days...someday i'd buy one as collector item for my camera collection. If i'd be a billionaire, i would resurrect the Contax brand from the dead & just develop HighEnd DSLR/DSLM under the Contax brand.

I do like a OVF much more then an EVF, but it does have it's advantages - live histrogramm, picture playback into the EVF,
Zebra Mode, etc..the EVF from the A7 is great, but at the end
of the day, i'd like to look through the OVF from my D7000 more.

1 upvote
MikeF4Black

I tried the OMD, X-T1 and A7 in a shop, and was frankly very disappointed by the glimmer, and the noticeable building-up of the image when you swayed the camera. I really don't see any advantage, but I'm old (my first camera was a Werra, very small plain viewfinder) and probably oldfashioned.

Speaking of viewfinders, the D800's not bad, but certainly doesn't reach the level of that of my F2AS or my RTSIII... ;-)

0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

Ahh Marc, I've found it. "We could all just agree" etc.

I found the discussion on the merits of adapters and Sony's apparently severely lacking lens range less than interesting, so tried to stop that discussion. I think I succeeded. Ha!

0 upvotes
issac sam

Pray tell me why Sony took almost 2 years to release a 36 MP DSLR?
Hope you understand that while Sony's fabricating the sensor, they've not designed Nikon sensors.

0 upvotes
marc petzold

It's comparing pear & apples - 2 years ago the A7R have been into the works. The D810 is a great DSLR, but let's face it - DSLR technology would simply fade away within the next years - too heavy, too big, etc...even the IQ is a bit better, i'd prefer the A7R all time over the D810..why? because i wouldn't travel with such heavy gear...and very expensive FX glas, for Studio, Fashion & Landscape Photography the D810 is *the* King, perfect...but for light traveling, mounting any old mf lens with adapter, and saving a lot of money - the A7R rulez.

0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

People have been forecasting the death of the DSLR (a superior system imho) for years and will be doing that for many years to come.

Good luck in the forecasting business, and enjoy your evf.

0 upvotes
marc petzold

@MikeF4Black
as i stated in other Posts - i do like my OVF onto the D7000 - but EVFs like into the A7 Series do have their advantages, too. Apart from that, i've shot since the 80's with OVFs on DSLR.

Comment edited 42 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

Two points:

I've disliked every EVF I've met in a serious camera. Who knows it's a personal thing.

As for weight and size: 6D/Df/D610/D750(?) are approaching the optimum for a full frame (SLR) camera. Anyone finding that "too heavy!" will have to do with inferior ergonomics and handling, and will find that less mass makes for more blur. The RX1 still is a very nice, albeit flawed, camera though.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
marc petzold

The EVF into the A7 Series is great, for now...not bad for sure.

0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

Sorry, I intensely disliked it when I tried it. Glittery, unnatural, and the building up of the image when moving the camera was really annoying.

The camera itself exhibited the handling disadvantages I listed above. That thing is even more awkward than a Leica M5.

0 upvotes
marc petzold

At least that's only your thought - i'm happy with my A7. I wouldn't walk with a D6xx, D8xx DSLR into the field, way too heavy, especially with a bunch of lenses inside the bag.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

I walk around with a D800E, usually just one prime, wriststrap, no problem, Tumi messenger bag with a Billingham insert, an iPad and some accoutrements. I would never give that up for a small light awkward body (I'm not speaking about the lenses; that's something else again).

0 upvotes
marc petzold

Thanks god, everybody does have different needs & preferences into that way, and so is the market, you can buy anything you personally need - there is always a choice, not a must.

0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

Of course, but your prediction of the imminent death of the DSLR is a sweeping statement that conveniently ignores personal preferences, don't you think?

0 upvotes
marc petzold

There's life in the old dog yet, yes. ;)

0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

;-) I'm just oldfashioned I guess...

0 upvotes
marc petzold

Me too, but life goes on... ;-)

1 upvote
MikeF4Black

We can only hope...

0 upvotes
sneakyracer

Word on the forums is that the D810 improvements are most welcome and really make working with the camera much more enjoyable. The improved Live View is receiving high praise and is a great asset for landscape and architectural users. The quieter and smoother shutter also.

3 upvotes
Total comments: 1571
12345