Previous page Next page

Nikon Coolpix A Hands-on Preview

March 2013 | By Richard Butler


Preview based on a pre-production Coolpix A

A number of factors have helped spur a great increase in the diversity of camera types now available. The Nikon Coolpix A - an APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm equivalent F2.8 lens - is the latest example and is something that would have seemed incredibly unlikely just a few years ago.

The ongoing competition from smartphones has prompted manufacturers to look for ways to offer higher image quality from compact cameras (and carve out the kinds of profit margins that no longer exist in the compact market). Meanwhile, the advent of the mirrorless camera has helped demonstrate that there's an enthusiast market that wants something other than a DSLR. And, in a quirk of fate, the popularity of smartphone shooting has helped introduce a new generation of photographers to the experience of shooting with prime lenses.

The large sensor, fixed-lens camera is a prime example of this new diversity, and the Coolpix A is just the latest offering. The 28mm-equivalent Nikon joins models from brands including Fujifilm, Sony and Sigma in offering small cameras with prime lenses.

The Nikon Coolpix A is built around a 16MP CMOS sensor - the same one that performed so spectacularly well in cameras such as the D7000. The sensor's microlenses have been designed to work with the camera's wide-angle lens, to reduce corner shading, despite the wide-angle lens mounting fairly close to the sensor. It doesn't gain the on-sensor phase detection elements that have started appearing on some of its contemporaries, however.

The Coolpix A follows the lead of the Pentax K-5 IIs and Nikon's own D7100 in doing away with the optical low-pass filter. We can only assume that Nikon's engineers have concluded that attempting to process out any additional moiré was the lesser evil, compared with the sharpness usually sapped by the filter.

Nikon Coolpix A key specifications

  • 16.2MP 'DX' format CMOS sensor
  • 18.5mm (28mm equivalent) F2.8 lens
  • ISO 100-6400 (with 12,800 and 25,600 equivalent extension settings)
  • 3.0" 920k dot LCD
  • 14-bit uncompressed NEF Raw shooting capability
  • Up to 4fps continuous shooting
  • 1080p movies at 24, 25 or 30fps
  • i-TTL compatible hotshoe

As with those other brands, this is an unashamedly enthusiast-targeted product. Nikon makes clear that the camera is primarily intended as a second camera for DSLR users, with PASM exposure modes brought to the fore, and a menu system that's 'much more DSLR familiar than Coolpix familiar.' So, while the Coolpix A does offer nineteen scene modes, including 'Pet Portrait,' they are all clustered together under a single option on the mode dial, leaving room for two user-definable positions.

The Coolpix A will be available in a choice of two colors - DSLR-style black and a 'titanium' colorscheme that brings to mind the elegant Contax G-series rangefinders.

In addition to its external controls and interface being consistent with Nikon's DSLRs, the camera is also compatible with Nikon DSLR accessories. It uses the same 7.4Wh battery as the 1 System J-series cameras and has an i-TTL compliant flash hotshoe. Sadly, though, while it does include a built-in flash, it isn't able to operate as a remote flash commander, so you'll have to attach at least an SB700 to the body to gain the ability to control flashguns remotely.

28mm equivalent Nikkor lens

The Coolpix A has a lens with 7 elements arranged in 5 groups, with one of those being an aspherical element. Nikon promises 'professional quality' in terms of sharpness and corner consistency. Mounting a wide-angle lens so close to the sensor poses a problem, one that Nikon says they've overcome in two ways, first by applying an anti-reflective coating to the sensor. Then they designed the microlenses to cope with the sharp angles from which light will approach the sensor.

The Coolpix A has a dedicated manual focus ring, which can be used to override autofocus at any time.

In front of it is a slim screw-off ring that covers a thread which can be used to mount an (optional) adaptor, to allow the use of 46mm filters or the HN-CP18 hood.

The lens extends when you power up the camera, so startup isn't immediate (although it's still pretty quick). It has a 7-bladed diaphragm and a lens shutter that work together for essentially silent operation. We do not yet know the how fast the flash sync speed is, though.

Movie shooting

The Coolpix A can capture 1080p movies at 24, 25 or 30 frames per second and save them in the MPEG4 format with H.264 compression. The camera allows limited exposure control (you can set exposure before recording and adjust exposure compensation in some exposure modes), but it doesn't include an external mic socket, limiting audio quality. The Coolpix A does offer the ability to trim the videos it's shot in-camera, if you simply want to edit a single clip for upload to the web, though. You can also extract a single fame as a still image.

Optional accessories

The Coolpix A has been designed to share a range of Nikon's DSLR accessories, including flashguns, IR remotes, GPS and Wi-Fi modules - clearly in the hope that existing Nikon users will add the camera to their kit bags. The only unique accessories are a hot shoe mounting optical viewfinder (which will costs around $450) and an UR-E24 adaptor/lens hood pack that allows the use of 46mm filters (recommended price around $130).

The DF-CP1 optical viewfinder includes brightlines that mark 90% scene coverage.


If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.

Images which can be viewed at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a larger (typically VGA) image in a new window.

To navigate the review simply use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the navigation bar at the top.

DPReview calibrate their monitors using Color Vision OptiCal at the (fairly well accepted) PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally A,B and C.

This article is Copyright 2013 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Previous page Next page

Comments

Total comments: 431
1234
Petr Klapper
By Petr Klapper (2 months ago)

Nikon must be one of the slowest companies regarding to customer feedback - since the beginning of mirrorless, there's just one chant and it's "we want fast primes.." over and over. It's really sad to see them waste the great potential outside the DSLR world again ang again.

2 upvotes
Glenn72
By Glenn72 (2 months ago)

A bit pricey, but at least it shoots video at 25P.

1 upvote
Nukunukoo
By Nukunukoo (2 months ago)

As a Nikon (and Fuji X20) user, and since this is one new and unique product that Nikon has introduced in quite a while; with so many cutting-edge features on a compact and unique ones such as the exclusion of the OLPF...

Nah, who am I kidding? This particular model sucks!

2 upvotes
zlosyn
By zlosyn (2 months ago)

Focal length 28 mm ? are they doing this on purpose or did nobody tell them PEOPLE WANT IT WIDER !?

1 upvote
AllMankind
By AllMankind (2 months ago)

What 'PEOPLE'?
For me, 28mm eq would be the PERFECT fixed lens.
But the reality is that I would NEVER buy a fixed lens single focal length camera. I would want either a fixed ZOOM lens, or (best option) an INTERCHANGEABLE lens camera.

1 upvote
cuelho1
By cuelho1 (2 months ago)

A lot is being said about this Nikon against the x100.
So you think the Nikon might be better (nobody actually knows yet) then a three year old X100?
Seriously?
Is it April 1st yet?
Maybe next they will offer a camera with 50mm f3.5 lens and 2 frames per second drive.

0 upvotes
88SAL
By 88SAL (2 months ago)

The new X100 is out soon, dont forget!

0 upvotes
kewlguy
By kewlguy (2 months ago)

f/2.8? yawn... should have made it 35/2 equivalent...

5 upvotes
Jokica
By Jokica (2 months ago)

Olympus PEN E-PL5 + Lumix 20mm f/1.7 = 900$

3 upvotes
fastlass
By fastlass (2 months ago)

My jaw dropped because I just ordered a PEN yesterday, and I do love Nikons. Then I saw the price and everything was OK again.

This is still a fabulous looking model if you have the means.

1 upvote
ponyman
By ponyman (2 months ago)

Why do all these 'professional' cameras lack image stabilisation?

2 upvotes
jon404
By jon404 (2 months ago)

It's the same size as my Olympus XZ-1, which means it will fit in a shirt pocket. But the price! My God! Plus another $450 for an optical viewfinder!

Get a Pentax K-01, folks. Better image quality, interchangeable lenses, 1/3 the price...

1 upvote
LensBeginner
By LensBeginner (2 months ago)

Nah, everybody thinks that's an ugly camera, and it's a Pentax.
This one instead is a Nikon, so it can't be a bad choice... (headbang)

2 upvotes
DerpyWebber
By DerpyWebber (2 months ago)

The K-01 is also about three times the size. That said, paired with a nice Limited prime, I have no doubt the image quality will be in another league.

0 upvotes
JEROME NOLAS
By JEROME NOLAS (2 months ago)

Finally!!!Looks great, however 35mm lens would be even better and we'll have to wait for the price drop...Why it takes Nikon ALWAYS so long to come up with a new, cool products?

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
Northgrove
By Northgrove (2 months ago)

I have Nikon gear and like that setup and I like my X100 and this sort of cameras. But not this one. Too wide, unfortunately. Even the X100 is pushing it as I prefer shooting 35mm on APS-C. This one is just way out there with its 18.5mm.

I sure prefer something more flexible than a fixed wide angle lens...

0 upvotes
Mongkul
By Mongkul (2 months ago)

I will buy this one if it looks something similar to P7700.

1 upvote
fad
By fad (2 months ago)

Looks like they were afraid to compete head on with fuji and sony.

2 upvotes
Trollsgoaway
By Trollsgoaway (2 months ago)

Nikon fanboys will buy this, looks better?!! Sure yeah whatever, enjoy enjoy

1 upvote
Richard Murdey
By Richard Murdey (2 months ago)

I don't see why people are comparing this unfavorably with the X100s. Lets call the lenses evens, the Nikon is a smaller camera but you trade off the built-in viewfinder. That all falls largely to preference. The X100s is cute with its retro styling, but quirky in operation. The Nikon is going to be more durable, with better metering and focus accuracy, larger frame buffer, and more convenient operation. I put that as two ties and one or more wins in the Nikon column.

It also looks better~

0 upvotes
Hugo808
By Hugo808 (2 months ago)

Wow, you can really see into the future! What a great skill, can you review the next FF Nikon for me to save the wait?

2 upvotes
dengx
By dengx (2 months ago)

This Nikon will appeal for lots of people but just not for the reasons you've mentioned.

X100s is not quirky in operation by any means, X100 was, in 2010. And you can't really say it's better to change aperture and shutter speed in menu on LCD (Nikon).
You don't really know which one will be more durable.
Fujifilm wins with metering and autowb for years (since S2 Pro really).
As for the focus - X100s has PDAF sensors, that Nikon has none, my bet is that focus will be painfully slow.

Now why people will buy it?
Because it's a Nikon with a bayer sensor and it's truly pocketable with APS-C.

6 upvotes
Northgrove
By Northgrove (2 months ago)

The lenses aren't even because the X100s sports a "normal" lens, 35mm equivalent. This is on the wide angle-end. This'll make a major difference if you want to shoot the occasional portrait or do macro work, both of which the X100/s is actually pretty capable of although it's not the main purpose.

0 upvotes
the reason
By the reason (2 months ago)

hahahahaha! in the same field as the x100? insane!

1 upvote
deep7
By deep7 (2 months ago)

Makes the Canon G1X look like an absolute bargain! Even though it may be aimed at another market segment, this little Nikon doesn't really offer any more than the G1X and misses much. Not to say it won't be a good camera in its own right. It might be wonderful for some.

0 upvotes
bab4
By bab4 (2 months ago)

This thing is going to fail soooo hard..

1 upvote
Richard Murdey
By Richard Murdey (2 months ago)

Ricoh GR Digital is worried right about now.

0 upvotes
schaki
By schaki (2 months ago)

Guess not. Ricoh filed a patent for a new Aps-c 28mm equivalent lens which probably is going to be used in the GRD V. Not same lens as in the GXR A12 28mm.
As usually in the compact camera segment, Ricoh is going to offer superior customizable user interface.

0 upvotes
Rod McD
By Rod McD (2 months ago)

Interesting, and will probably offer fine IQ, but not for me. I've been hoping for some competition for the Canon G1X on the basis that competition might develop the genre. (The genre being small, large sensor all-in-one cameras). I don't think this is it.

The lack of a good built-in EVF with data has got to be the greatest omission. Cut price 80% tunnel finders don't really do it, and 90% add-on, lose me, forget me, knock me off finders that add 45% to the price of the camera and block the flash shoe in use don't do it either. I'd also prefer a zoom, but that's just me. For a fixed prime camera at that price, the Fuji X100s wins hands down.

Why can't the manufacturers 'get' VFs? The lack of decent VF has put a good proportion of potential buyers off many models. The mirror-less success stories for 2012 - the OMD, NEX6/7 and Fuji XE1 - all have high grade EVFs. The work's been done. No more research required. Just do it - build them in......

4 upvotes
cuelho1
By cuelho1 (2 months ago)

A slow f2.8 lens? $1100? $450 for an optical finder?
There must be a mistake there somewhere.
It doesen't matter how good the lens is, there are better value cameras aimed at this market that make a lot more sense and are more practical.
Too late and too expensive Nikon.

11 upvotes
naththo
By naththo (2 months ago)

Looks like most people agreed it is not useful for anyone who need more than lens. Thats the main problem to start off with. But for someone who wants compact and one lens it may be okay but zoom is much more demand actually. Still prime lens always give you sharper shot compare to zoom lens don't. Only more expensive zoom lens give you better quality shot to compare to cheaper zoom lens. Yeah I think price will drop pretty bad Larry.

1 upvote
John Summers
By John Summers (2 months ago)

I'll wait for the vastly reduced price Nixon Coolpix A Merrill.

2 upvotes
dpLarry
By dpLarry (2 months ago)

Priced at $1100 is high but it is a niche product (low volume that means expensive to design and manufacture) .

Price will drop.

0 upvotes
Mongkul
By Mongkul (2 months ago)

WIth this price, I'd better get X100s if I looked for camera with this sensor size.

1 upvote
Shamael
By Shamael (2 months ago)

make it at the 500$ it is worth, and it gets a niche runner.

0 upvotes
ryder78
By ryder78 (2 months ago)

It looks like a $120 point-n-shoot. At least make the camera looks more like business if you want to put a huge sensor in that body.

2 upvotes
tkbslc
By tkbslc (2 months ago)

That could be appealing to some street shooters looking for a sleeper cam.

2 upvotes
carlosdelbianco
By carlosdelbianco (2 months ago)

Better buy a Fuji if you plan to show it to your friends.

1 upvote
Photomonkey
By Photomonkey (2 months ago)

You ask for it, they will make it and we will whine about the price.

3 upvotes
tkbslc
By tkbslc (2 months ago)

I don't think too many people would be complaining if the focal length was closer to normal and the VF was included.

1 upvote
carlosdelbianco
By carlosdelbianco (2 months ago)

Whatever... If it was included some people would bitch about paying for something they would just throw in their drawers. Plus, for the 35/50mm people, they already have options out there.

1 upvote
the reason
By the reason (2 months ago)

Really? theres people actually defending this thing? considering buying it even???!!
Nikon fans are hardcore!!!

0 upvotes
Wutwut
By Wutwut (2 months ago)

Nikon has gotta be kidding. @ $1100 here is what the specs sheet SHOULD look like:
DX sensor
28mm f1.4 lens with filter threads
2.3M dot EVF built-in
built in ND filter

$450 for an add-on OVF and $130 for a filter adapter?! pfhahahahaha I'd drop a few more coins for a RX100.

and lastly....Coolpix? Really?

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
12 upvotes
vodanh1982
By vodanh1982 (2 months ago)

And no Hybrid AF.

0 upvotes
eivissa1
By eivissa1 (2 months ago)

Maybe Panasonic can do this trick some day. I hope so.
It will be better in lens and form.

0 upvotes
DStudio
By DStudio (2 months ago)

You must be kidding, asking for a DX 19mm f/1.4 lens at this price! But 24mm f/2 might work. They certainly could have done better than this.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 2 minutes after posting
1 upvote
glarry
By glarry (2 months ago)

Nikon want to catch up Sony (rx-1,rx-100), this is a good idea. Nice to have some light weight camera with good quality, but the price is too high.

0 upvotes
Edgar Matias
By Edgar Matias (2 months ago)

Pretty nice! Even the movie mode looks good.

Wish I was a 28mm shooter... :-|

3 upvotes
tkbslc
By tkbslc (2 months ago)

Seriously, this is a home run with a 40mm equiv prime. (and a MUCH cheaper VF)

0 upvotes
Absolutic
By Absolutic (2 months ago)

no, it is 28mm equivalent (18.5mm)

2 upvotes
Northgrove
By Northgrove (2 months ago)

Yeah, the focal length kills it for me. 40mm equivalent would be perfect though. :p

0 upvotes
kadardr
By kadardr (2 months ago)

Another example of sacrificing features and usability for size. For this sum I do not want a very small camera. The price makes Pentax K-01 with 40 mm pancake a very desirable camera as one.

0 upvotes
Tommygun45
By Tommygun45 (2 months ago)

"Coolpix" and "$1100" should not ever be in the same story.

This camera is about $500 over priced. And learn from your competitors. Get a new name. Its the Sony Nex. Not the Sony Cybershot 7. Its the EOS M, not the Cybershot M. If you are going to introduce a new line of camera that is 4x the price of your already inflated compact line you need a new name.

6 upvotes
atamola
By atamola (2 months ago)

$500 overpriced? I would say $800... and I wouldn't even consider it then.

1 upvote
Fletch50mm
By Fletch50mm (2 months ago)

How about the flagship Sony *Cyber-shot* DSC-RX1

0 upvotes
Shamael
By Shamael (2 months ago)

I care a heck about the name, I care about the price. For this camera and the viewfinder, plus the filter adapter, you get the D7100 with a correct lens, like the Sigma 30/1,4.

0 upvotes
thx1138
By thx1138 (2 months ago)

Fuji X100s is a lot more appealing and please $450 for the OVF option. If I buy one of their $18000 800 f/5.6 VR's will they throw this in for free?

0 upvotes
meanwhile
By meanwhile (2 months ago)

Yeah, if you had $1100 for a camera like this I can't think of any reason for this over the X100s. Can anyone? (serious question)

2 upvotes
LaFonte
By LaFonte (2 months ago)

Maybe it is more pocketable? I am just saying, I am planing to get x100s.

1 upvote
Absolutic
By Absolutic (2 months ago)

no, X100s kills it in every way, cheaper with Optical/EIS hybrid viewfinder, faster fps, brighter lens, looks better, 1080/60fps video, etc, etc.

1 upvote
maxnoy
By maxnoy (2 months ago)

this one's way smaller than an x100. too bad there are no side-by-sides. if you don't care, x100s is more compelling.

1 upvote
the reason
By the reason (2 months ago)

it doesnt matter how small it is, you have to be delusional to buy something like this

0 upvotes
Octane
By Octane (2 months ago)

I'm really puzzled what Nikon thinks. Who would possibly spend that much money on a reduced coolpix camera. Let alone that viewfinder for $450.

4 upvotes
nidri
By nidri (2 months ago)

The specs indicate manual focus, but if there's no control ring around the lens, how does it work?

0 upvotes
Trollshavethebestcandy
By Trollshavethebestcandy (2 months ago)

I think the best thing is the sensor size to body size ratio. Give me wide and telephoto converters thrown in for that price and you might have some temptation.

0 upvotes
mas54
By mas54 (2 months ago)

At least put a tunnel finder in it.

2 upvotes
Trollshavethebestcandy
By Trollshavethebestcandy (2 months ago)

I think for a back up Nikon I would want to use Nikon lenses via adapter. This is a bit two years ago. They want to save their SLR sales it seems. Another example of trying to control the market and failing.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
1 upvote
ybizzle
By ybizzle (2 months ago)

LOL! Fuji X100S owns this in every way for about the same price! Good thing I ordered mine already! ;)

3 upvotes
naththo
By naththo (2 months ago)

LOLOLOL at that! Useless camera with fixed prime lens and is not interchangeable at very pricing tag. No thanks! Next Please!

5 upvotes
MattDine
By MattDine (2 months ago)

at only 350-$400 more Fuji's x-1 pro has my vote for styling, and lens interchangeability. Though I'm a nikon fan unless the lens has incredible acuity and low light noise is superior I'm heading towards Fuji pro for a back up and lighter weight travel camera.

Comment edited 31 seconds after posting
1 upvote
maxnoy
By maxnoy (2 months ago)

to be fair, it's a completely different size category

0 upvotes
El Chubasco
By El Chubasco (2 months ago)

A very ugly, expensive, and limited camera. I can't understand how Nikon thought that this camera would be appealing to customers and competitive in the current market.
This is certainly unbelievable.
I left nikon time ago and I don't see myself going back.

1 upvote
AmaturFotografer
By AmaturFotografer (2 months ago)

As long as Nikon is written on it... hehehehe

2 upvotes
timo
By timo (2 months ago)

Do my eyes deceive me - who is going to pay $1100/£1000 for this fixed-lens camera (with no articulated screen) PLUS $450 on top for an optical view finder? Doesn't make sense.

4 upvotes
maxnoy
By maxnoy (2 months ago)

Anyone who is tired of lugging a dslr around but still wants the aps-c iq. If the 450 for a vf is what really grids your gears, do without it or get a voigtlander one for less than half that.

0 upvotes
Trollsgoaway
By Trollsgoaway (2 months ago)

Nikon is too scared to make a serious mirrorless, just like canon, they want people to buy there daynasour cameras

1 upvote
the reason
By the reason (2 months ago)

maxnoy are you kidding? there are so many better choices in the smaller big sensor camera than this!!
No, you have to be a new brand of stupid (or fanboy) to buy this!

0 upvotes
Dennis Linden
By Dennis Linden (2 months ago)

A great concept, but should have been launched 2 years ago ... now, it looks a bit dated.

1 upvote
stdavid
By stdavid (2 months ago)

Did I read that price correctly?? Ouch!

0 upvotes
johnparas11zenfoliodotcom
By johnparas11zenfoliodotcom (2 months ago)

Oh nikon :-(
I am sure it going to be a good performer/IQ or what have you..but.. No for me..

just the looks of the camera alone is already a no for me.. why is nikon so conservative with designs?

2 upvotes
Trollsgoaway
By Trollsgoaway (2 months ago)

Because they are scared to loose slr sales...

0 upvotes
Ellis Chan
By Ellis Chan (2 months ago)

1 year from now it will be heavily discounted to $500 like the V1 kit.

There is no 1080 60/50p and external mic option.And the max shutter speed is 1/2000s.

A more appropriate MSRP price is $900. Think price of a X100s minus EVF, or a NEX5R plus EVF

The NEX5R plus the new 20mm pancake lens will be a much better buy

1 upvote
jjshelly
By jjshelly (2 months ago)

Dropped to $899 already at BestBuy

0 upvotes
Total comments: 431
1234