Previous page Next page

Body Elements

The top of the camera has few controls - just the shutter release, Fn button (that by default is set to change ISO) and the rather-crowded mode dial.

The latter has two user memory positions (C1 and C2) and an 'Adv.' position that access special features such as panorama mode, multi-shot low light mode and the image-processing 'Advanced filters'.
The upper rear dial is perfectly placed for operation by your right thumb. It can be clicked in to change its function in certain modes.
The XF1 has a blindingly-bright autofocus assist LED lamp to aid focusing in dark conditions. This can, naturally, be turned off in the menu if you prefer.

It can also be disabled, along with the flash and operational sounds, by pressing down the 'DISP' button for 2 seconds to enter 'Silent' mode.
The tiny little flash unit pops-up out of the top plate. It's not motorized, so won't activate automatically when the camera is in auto modes. Instead you get an onscreen message asking you to pop it up.
The flash is released by this sliding mechanical switch on the back of the top plate.
The XF1's stereo microphones are placed towards the base of the camera, either side of the lens barrel. They will pick up lens mechanism noises during recording, from both zooming and focusing, although these are only likely to be audible in quiet conditions.
The XF1's connectors lie under a small flexible flap on the handgrip side of the camera. There's an HDMI port for playing back video, and above it a tiny USB/AV out socket. The XF1 has no facility for a remote shutter release.
The battery and SD card go into a conventional compartment in the base of the camera. The camera uses Fujifilm's small NP50 battery (3.6V, 1000mAh, 3.6Wh) that's shared with the X10 and several of the company's compact superzoom cameras.
The tripod socket is placed off-centre from the lens, as is common with zoom compacts. Happily though it's well-separated from the base compartment, meaning you have a fighting chance of being able to change the battery or card with the camera on a tripod.
Previous page Next page
148
I own it
16
I want it
6
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

Total comments: 129
12
tompabes2

Veeeery beautiful!!! Buf f/4.2 at 50mm eq. is a bit too much... :(

1 upvote
zoranT

When will fuji arrive in the 21st century aesthetically? In 100 years' time?

1 upvote
Gully Foyle

You mean Canon Sxxx like? No, thanks.

Comment edited 24 seconds after posting
7 upvotes
marike6

Fuji without a doubt designs the most aesthetically beautiful cameras these days except for perhaps Leica. If they are not to your taste, you have a lot to choose from from other vendors.

10 upvotes
Michael_13

When will you start to develop a taste? At around 50, maybe?
;-)

6 upvotes
lokthefish

what are you talking about? Fuji are making some of the most beautiful cameras out there, and people are loving them, look at the sales figures!

3 upvotes
Dmitriy Balashov

Just look at Hasselbad.

0 upvotes
WT21

Interesting and pretty, but not for me. Hope they sell a boat load to the ladies and the men who like bling.

1 upvote
Dafffid

Seems perverse to leave the XZ-2 off the comparison chart. The XZ-1 was the best of the last generation after all

0 upvotes
Andrew Butterfield

Apart from the raw flesh finish it looks interesting. Would be nice to have a regular finish to the body for those of us born after 1930.

1 upvote
Jimrod

The black finish in the preview looks fine :)

4 upvotes
qwertyasdf

That lens mechanism...
is slow operation a signature of Fuji?

0 upvotes
technic

maybe it's just part of the retro design ;)
slow photography :)

0 upvotes
Jos van Dijk

Who needs a electronic motor to start a camera and to zoom? It consumes a lot of power. Even 110 years old people like me don't need to be assisted to take pictures of their 25 years youg girl friend.... ;-)

1 upvote
Dougbm_2

It's not slow. It's nice to use as it is mechanical. Turning on is as quick as any camera - just different.

0 upvotes
mrdc76

Will Adobe improve its support for the EXR-sensor? As far as I remember, Lightroom produced notably soft output of X10 RAW files. If so, was it fixed?

0 upvotes
_sem_

I guess this is mainly Fuji's responsibility, because no serious 3rd-party raw converter seems to fully support EXR, and the enclosed one isn't serious. Effectively, I can't consider this a raw-capable camera.
And, the user interface is so intuitive that one has to carry a table of modes ;) I't take the X10, once the orbs thing was fixed, if it had a competitive normal sensor.

0 upvotes
easyeddy

This does look to me like an X10 replacement in everything but name. Which would mean Fuji has gone the same way as other manufacturers in reserving the viewfinder for more expensive compact cameras.

0 upvotes
ashwins

At least from the lens speed point of view it's a bad replacement (F1.8-4.9 vs. F2.0-2.8).

0 upvotes
Michael_13

It's more like a little sister to X10 in my opinion.

Comment edited 11 seconds after posting
2 upvotes
JesperMP

It is not a decisive factor for me, but I have to say that it is a very nice retro design. The design of the lettering and knurled zoom dial around the lens base is the most perfect 1950's design I have seen yet. Only when seen from the rear, the LCD and the plastic buttons and dials gives it away. The "leather" body covering will make for a reasonably good grip.

It seems that there is a new product category - "pocketable enthusiast compact" - where there are many good offerings, with a range of quality and prices to chose from. Good times indeed if you want such a camera - I certainly do, I have an S95.

Despite that X10 looks very nice and retro too, I think that this really pocketable camera makes more sense and will sell better.

2 upvotes
RichardAB

The ladies will love this camera as a fashion accessory.

2 upvotes
Gully Foyle

Is that a bad thing?

0 upvotes
gadgets

@RichardAB, So you're saying you like it?

1 upvote
Roland Karlsson

Nice! More and more small quality cameras. Big sensor - small camera. Good.

7 upvotes
technic

interesting to have so much choices for a quality compact. Seems to me that Sony stretched the limits of optics a bit too much with their RX100 (frequent decentering issues, soft corners, low closeup image quality). The XF1 retro design isn't my taste, but 25mm WA is a nice extra compared to the 28mm of RX100 (and XZ-1/XZ-2). Will be interesting to see how the lens performs, compared to RX100, XZ1 (with its great lens but smaller sensor) and S100 (even smaller but also a bit compromised lens).

0 upvotes
pannumon

If the lens performs well wide open, I'm almost forgiving that it is so freaking slow. F4.2 at 50mm-equiv. Seriously?

0 upvotes
unknown member
By (unknown member) (Sep 17, 2012)

Fujifilm telescoping lenses are famous for being decentered so dont think only Sony has this problem. The Fuji F550's lens was horrible.

0 upvotes
technic

yes, the lens needs to perform well wide open to compare favourably to RX100 (which needs 2-3 stops down for good corners). Better close up images could also be an advantage compared to RX100. Will have to wait for the reviews and real life experience regarding decentering issues ...

0 upvotes
Azfar

Any word on the pricing yet ?

0 upvotes
photofan1986

DCRP says $499.

0 upvotes
photofan1986

Nice concept, but lacking usability, I'm afraid.
The lens' aperture decreases too rapidly, the zoom mechanism does look very fragile to me, and it it not suited for videos. I really don't think this was required for such a small camera.

2 upvotes
Azfar

You thing of beauty !!!! I can buy this camera for its look alone if nothing else.

Comment edited 6 minutes after posting
5 upvotes
TxCamFan

Perhaps a slight edit here:
From: When a camera a self-consciously stylish
To: When a camera is as self-consciously stylish

1 upvote
mcam

Looks like a great compact! 12MP is just right (RX100's 20MP is too much) for me. Wish it was f3.5 or wider on the tele end though...

0 upvotes
Ace Disgrace

So pretty!

4 upvotes
Jens_G

So far, I'm still leaning towards the Sony RX100 - will have to wait for in an-depth review to see how IQ and AF performance compare.

4 upvotes
aim120

Its no brainer as far IQ is concerned the RX100 should have a comfortable edge,Fuji also has bad AF reputation.

2 upvotes
Jimrod

The preview says it has fast autofocus...

4 upvotes
Tahir Hashmi

The preview mentions that the IQ is expected to be similar to that of Fuji X10, which looks quite a bit worse than RX100 as per DPreview's tests.

0 upvotes
AbrasiveReducer

The RX100 will (obviously) capture more detail but the Fuji will hold the highlights in contrasty situations whereas the Sony, like all small cameras will blow the highlights through the roof. (I had an RX-100). Neither approach is ideal but for now, that's as good as it gets.

2 upvotes
AbrasiveReducer

Assuming it performs like the X10, it won't have the blown highlights that the other compacts have, but given the sensor size, I don't see the comparison with the RX100.

1 upvote
HowaboutRAW

I wouldn't bring up the Samsung EX2 in comparison, because now that the Samsung is available in the US, all the specs state that the Samsung is jpeg only.

0 upvotes
bluevaping

I have EX2f in my hand and there is a raw option.

2 upvotes
MartinaB

I like the sensor size and the styling. We already have several modern style choice of this type of camera (re:S100) and this adds the retro look. The larger sensor compact cameras coming down the pipe are good news in deed!

1 upvote
Total comments: 129
12