Previous page Next page

Canon Powershot S100 Preview

September 2011 | Andy Westlake


Preview based on a pre-production Canon Powershot S100

When Canon revived its Powershot S range with the S90 in August 2009, it was in acknowledgement of a clear demand from enthusiast photographers for high quality yet pocketable cameras offering extensive manual control. The S95, which followed almost exactly a year later, stuck with much the same formula - a relatively large sensor (at least in compact camera terms), a 28-105mm equivalent zoom lens with a fast F2 maximum aperture at wideangle, and a multi-functional control dial around the lens. But while its successor, the S100, looks much the same again on the outside, it is to all intents and purposes a brand new camera.

Crucially, the S100's three key imaging elements are all entirely new. The lens range has been extended wider and longer, to a 24-120mm equivalent 5x zoom; it retains the fast F2 maximum aperture at wideangle but is limited to a rather less-impressive F5.9 at telephoto (an inevitable consequence of the camera's compact dimensions). Secondly the S100 debuts Canon's latest DIGIC 5 image processor, which the company says is six times faster than the previous version, allowing more sophisticated image processing and noise reduction. But perhaps most significantly, the S100's image sensor is a Canon-made 12.1 MP 'high sensitivity' CMOS sensor in the 1/1.7" format (approx 7.5 x 5.5mm); only the second home-grown sensor the company has used in a compact camera after the Powershot SX1 IS of 2008.

Canon says the new sensor employs technology similar to that used in its EOS SLRs, including an on-chip noise cancellation system, and microlenses which cover more of the sensor area to improve its light-gathering characteristics. The company claims that this results in reduced noise and increased dynamic range; the maximum available ISO has accordingly been increased to 6400. A 4-channel readout system also substantially improves the continuous shooting rate, up to 2.3 fps compared to the S95's 0.9 fps. For real speed freaks there's also a scene mode that can capture 8 frames at an impressive 9.6 fps, but it's limited to JPEG images only, with no manual control.

The new sensor also allows the S100 to offer this year's must-have feature: full HD movie recording at 1920x1080 resolution, with a 24P output framerate. Unlike the S95, optical zoom is available while recording movies. This enhanced video capability is supported by a revised control layout, that now includes a direct movie recording button underneath your thumb on the back of the camera. Other features enabled by the new sensor and processor include user control over noise reduction, and a white balance system that can adjust different areas of the image separately to compensate for mixed lighting (when the camera is set to Smart Auto mode).

The lens's optical image stabilization system has been updated too, with no fewer than 7 modes available for different purposes including macro, panning, video, and tripod work. The 'Intelligent IS' system will automatically select the mode it considers most appropriate for the current shooting situation. The S100's lens also gains a built-in neutral density filter, as seen on Powershot G series, to allow the use of larger apertures in bright sunlight.

Also new to the S100 is its built-in GPS unit, similar to that used in the Powershot SX230 HS 'travel zoom'. This not only allows you to tag images with the location at which they were taken, but also includes a logger function that can keep track of your movements (regardless of whether or not you're taking pictures) and plot the result on Google Maps.

In terms of external design, the S100 gains subtle finger and thumb grips, which should reduce the chances of it slipping from your grasp if you're not paying due care and attention. The camera will also be available in a 'titanium silver' version alongside the more conventional black - this is not the shiny silver of the Elph / Ixus series, but a darker, matte-finish look.

The S100 will be available in an understated matte 'titanium' finish, as well as in black.

Compared to Powershot S95 - key differences

The S100 is in effect a whole new camera compared to the S95; almost every key feature has been upgraded or updated:
  • 24-120mm (equivalent) lens range, F2.0-5.9, built-in neutral density filter
  • 12.1 MP 1/1.7" Canon CMOS sensor
  • DIGIC 5 image processor
  • ISO 80-6400
  • 2.3 fps continuous shooting (9.6 fps for 8 frames in High-Speed burst mode)
  • Full HD (1080p24) movie recording; H.264 compression, MOV format
  • Optical zoom in movie mode
  • Super slow motion movie recording (640 x 480 @ 120fps, 320 x 240 @ 240 fps)
  • Direct movie record button
  • Built-in GPS unit with image tagging and logger functions

Powershot S100 vs Powershot S95 - side-by-side

From the front, the S100 looks very much like the S95. It's fractionally taller to accommodate the GPS unit, and has a minimalist finger-grip on the front too.
From the back the most obvious change is the S100's red direct movie recording button, but a few other buttons have changed function too. The 'Ring Func' button is customisable, offering similar options to the S95's 'S' button.
The S100 is, if anything, marginally slimmer than its predecessor. The shutter button is larger, with a shiny silver finish, and the addition of the GPS unit has resulted in the displacement of the Ring Func button from the top plate.

Foreword / notes

If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read some of our Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / recommendation / ratings are based on the opinion of the author, we recommend that you read the entire review before making any decision. Images which can be viewed at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom right corner of them, click to display a larger image in a new window.

To navigate this article simply use the next / previous page buttons or jump to a specific page by using the drop-down list in the navigation bar at the top of the page. You can support this site by ordering through the affiliate links shown at the bottom of each page (where available).

This article is protected by Copyright and may not be reproduced in part or as a whole in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Dpreview use calibrated monitors at the PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make out the difference between all of the grayscale blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally also A, B and C.

Previous page Next page
Share:

Comments

Total comments: 323
123
kbosakavionics
By kbosakavionics (Dec 16, 2011 at 14:17:32 GMT)

Since it has built-in GPS, is it able to synchronise its clock with GPS UTC time in order to avoid typical time skew of the internal clock, drifting as fast as 1s/day in most cameras, S90 included?
I need it to synchronise thousands photos with external source, with 1s final accuracy required.

1 upvote
RKGoth
By RKGoth (Dec 21, 2011 at 12:06:58 GMT)

The GPS does offer a clock update function - not sure how often it updates it though.

0 upvotes
oldd
By oldd (Dec 14, 2011 at 17:56:51 GMT)

I am sorry for probably dumb question.
Is there any "simple" test to check this well discussed lens de-centering?

I am seating with S100 in hands... still trying to make a final decision.
One of the use is the underwater photo/filming.

Comment edited 39 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Patrick Tyrus
By Patrick Tyrus (Dec 8, 2011 at 16:13:13 GMT)

I love my s95. I saw the s100 and want it. I have some concerns.

I picked the s95 for its great low light capabilities. With a higher ISO, & improved dynamic range & new CMOS sensor, does that mean low light mode is not needed? They removed it. I didn't always like it anyway. It lowered the resolution too much, & got great low light shots without it. It was for extremely low light shots (but was slow and grainy)

I hope new cameras focus more on low light rather than more resolution... (or more resolution at low light). I like a compact camera that I don't need a huge lens to get good shots both F2 and low light.

Also a little concerned about losing 2 buttons. I didn't use two of them much, but I did use the self timer a lot for low light use.

How does this compare to the sony hx9v? It looks feature to feature pretty similar. I am guessing the F3.3-5.9 lens and 16.9 MP means it will be bad at low light especially given sony is usually high priced per feature & is $100+ cheaper

0 upvotes
Sad Joe
By Sad Joe (Dec 4, 2011 at 18:25:19 GMT)

I've LOVE to see a proper test comparing the X10 against the Canon s100 - I used the s90 which has been fab but having handled an X10 I'm tempted !

Anyone seen such a test or anything close yet?

1 upvote
nilomanalo
By nilomanalo (Dec 16, 2011 at 20:19:09 GMT)

X10 has a bigger sensor and wider aperture even at full zoom so I don't expect S100 stand a chance with X10.

0 upvotes
Khizer
By Khizer (Dec 3, 2011 at 08:21:09 GMT)

I was trying to take photos of Burj Khalifa (world's tallest building) on the night of UAE National Day and my S100 just did not focus. Any suggestions from experienced users how to focus on objects such as fireworks, dancing fountains, and well lit or shimmering buildings such as the Burj, at night??

0 upvotes
Markus_I
By Markus_I (Dec 6, 2011 at 14:09:23 GMT)

Manual Focus. Since you're probably more than 10 meters/yards away from either the Burj Khalifa and/or the fireworks, just dial it up to 'infinity' and rely on depth of field to cover the rest.

0 upvotes
oscarsanchezm
By oscarsanchezm (Dec 2, 2011 at 06:30:47 GMT)

Check this out from Canon Japan:
http://cweb.canon.jp/newsrelease/2011-11/pr-pss100.html

0 upvotes
Ted SF
By Ted SF (Nov 30, 2011 at 21:05:09 GMT)

Hi everyone -

Not sure if this is the right place to post this question but does anyone have any recommendations on where I can purchase the s100 now? All the major retailers (B&H, Amazon, Adorama, J&R, Sammy's etc) are completely out of stock due to the unfortunate floods in Thailand.

I am going to Disneyland before Christmas with my son and would really like to have the camera for the trip.

Thank you!

0 upvotes
novasilva
By novasilva (Nov 30, 2011 at 21:58:35 GMT)

I ordered mine from Bestbuy.com on the 15th of Nov. and got it in my hand on the 28th of Nov. I did some resurch and figured that Best Buy would be fastest. Order and wait 2 weeks.

0 upvotes
oscarsanchezm
By oscarsanchezm (Dec 2, 2011 at 06:21:32 GMT)

I noticed on the Canon Japan site about some re-tools in the lenses and the new batch of cameras will be in USA this days. (early December) I ordered almost two weeks ago and I got an email from Crutchfield.com with the UPS tracking number.Scooter is the name of the Sales expert. He is amazingly fast! -Good Luck!-

0 upvotes
Ted SF
By Ted SF (Dec 2, 2011 at 19:42:08 GMT)

Thanks everyone. I have an s100 on order from both Best Buy, JR & Amazon. Hopefully will get one between the two before my trip.

0 upvotes
Gorrddd
By Gorrddd (Nov 28, 2011 at 18:48:28 GMT)

I did shrink them down to the same physical size as the S95 and the two are more comparable. The major difference is that the S95 seems to have a bit better RAW contrast out of the camera. That seems to make it look a bit sharper than the S100. However, here is the deal. Although the S95 has more contrast and sharpness in appearance, the S100 actually has more detail from the 12.1mp CMOS. Detail, more than absolute sharpness is what is important in post processing since the detail can be brought out and made to look sharp. You can not bring out fine detail if it is not already there. Look at the facial shading of the statue and currency face photos. You will see more of it in the S100.

0 upvotes
HansKo
By HansKo (Nov 29, 2011 at 17:35:45 GMT)

First sorry about my english!
May be due to the lens? It seems to me the details on the S100 in the middle of the picture are better and sharper than the total of S95. Significantly worse than the S95 sharpness and details are on the edge. In particular, the Clock is incredibly blurry! Both the RAW and JPG in any ISO!

0 upvotes
oscarsanchezm
By oscarsanchezm (Dec 2, 2011 at 06:25:08 GMT)

Check out the Canon Japan website. (Translated with Chrome) and there is some news about the lenses.

0 upvotes
Gorrddd
By Gorrddd (Nov 27, 2011 at 02:19:39 GMT)

I checked out the new DPReview studio control shots in some detail and there appears to be something wrong. The image captions of the S100 appear almost as large as a full frame caption. This should not be because the physical image size has not changed that much between the S95 and the S100. They both use a 1/1.7" sensor. The only difference is that the S95 is a CCD with 10mp and the S100 is a CMOS with 12.1mp. The additional 2.1mp should not have increased the physical caption by that much. If you were to shrink down the S100 captions to the size of the S95 captions, the slight softness in the S100 captions would be much more comparable with the S95.

0 upvotes
ayosha
By ayosha (Nov 26, 2011 at 14:24:03 GMT)

Test shots for S100 now available:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q42010highendcompactgroup/page14.asp
and change any camera detail to Canon S100.

It looks S100 is lacking in detail compared to others, even to S95. More so when ISO higher.

The grain and noise at 3200 looks just the same, no improvements there, just lack of sharpness.

0 upvotes
Gorrddd
By Gorrddd (Nov 25, 2011 at 02:09:42 GMT)

Having read a number of posts I am surprised that no one, including the review author, has properly defined the Canon S90/S95/S100's primary application. These cameras are true compact imaging devices... not semi-compacts. This means they are trim enough to go with you all of the time while still offering superior image performance. These cameras are not really meant for enthusiasts who want all the bells and whistles. Those guys want chunky... a full plate for their money's worth.

Many of the pros, who are weary of lugging all their gear everywhere they go, want a level of performance that they can easily carry with them while still maintaining post processing excellence, without the added encomberance. That is what these cameras are really all about. They are a serious departure from the 1/2.7" mini sensor compacts that internally bled and spattered where ever they went. These may look the same but are up to four times the price without all the internal hemorrhaging.

2 upvotes
fsigworth
By fsigworth (Nov 24, 2011 at 16:02:28 GMT)

Can you lock the exposure in video mode?

0 upvotes
oscarsanchezm
By oscarsanchezm (Nov 24, 2011 at 00:42:41 GMT)

Check this for new issues about Canon Powershot S100 :
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://canon.jp/&ei=aWbNTtTiPOPb0QGzyrUH&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CGsQ7gEwAw&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dcanon%2Bjapan%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1C1CHMZ_enUS306US309%26prmd%3Dimvns

0 upvotes
Tat3r
By Tat3r (Nov 23, 2011 at 16:56:21 GMT)

Want to know you all/y'alls opinion on something:

I'm about to purchase the S100, but I'm also considering the Lumix DMC-GF2 - which is a 4/3's camera. I know they are different, but I'm looking for something compact to semi-compact that takes great photos with a reasonable amount of automation and yet still giving me the ability to be creative with aperture and/or exposure settings.

So, any opinions: Canon S100 vs Lumix DMC-GF2 ??

0 upvotes
Gorrddd
By Gorrddd (Nov 25, 2011 at 01:43:11 GMT)

Honestly, either you are looking for a compact pocket camera or you are not. All 4/3'rds cameras have a removable lens on account of their sensor size and no matter how compact, the lens sticks out and will not go into your pocket without the bulge.

Even pocket cameras do best in some kind of case on the belt. A camera in your pocket just isn't the best place for it if you are serious about carrying it on a regular basis.

This is where the S90/S95/S100's shine. If you must have a larger sensor, then you must be willing to put up with the protruding lens. This lens will get rubbed, pressed, and pulled on by surfaces that would normally only glance your side. It will still be an incomberance.

That is the reason for the S90/S95/S100 series of compact cameras, according to a professional photographer friend who just doesn't want to haul all his gear around ALL the time. He has an S90 and gets good enough quality for post processing of very high quality professional looking images.

0 upvotes
BBsLX5
By BBsLX5 (Nov 18, 2011 at 02:04:19 GMT)

Buy it for the 1080p HD video w/ optical zoom, but not for much else. Learned today that, adding to the known for awhile now facts of the same size sensor (which for this year has been *newly stuffed w/ more megapixels!!!*) & switched from CCD-->CMOS, it doesn't appear that the lens came out of the "new & improved" model yr. retooling as unscathed as Canon would have one believe @ first glance. Yes, this years 24mm wider wide-end stays at the premium f2.0, but that's as good as the news gets afa the lens is concerned. Not nearly as loudly trumpeted for obvious reasons is the fact that the lens stops all the way down to f5.9 at the tele end of the newly-extended zoom, & that @ last year's s95 equivalent wide end of 28mm, this year's "new & improved" lens aperture value is a narrower f2.2. Boy oh boy, the news of this new camera drop just keeps getting better and better, doesn't it??? ...well, it IS even more pocketable than last year, *that's* REALLY all that matters, isn't it?

0 upvotes
seri_art
By seri_art (Nov 18, 2011 at 21:03:13 GMT)

I love the 24mm wide end of my S100, and the lens opening available as you increase focal length is just a bit smaller than with the S95 a the same focal lengths. I call that a low price to pay for the increased zoom range in a same-size camera. Nothing is free.

0 upvotes
snapseequence
By snapseequence (Nov 17, 2011 at 12:37:54 GMT)

I'm puzzled by the 'fast and responsive' comment. If it's anything like the S95, I'd give this a very wide berth. I have the S95, and find the responsiveness to be orders of magnitude slower than any other camera I've owned, even back to my first 2MP compact 8 years ago.

It's like take a shot, check histogram, figure i need 2/3 stop compensation, turn the back wheel two clicks. *wait* nothing happens *wait*. after a couple of seconds, the adjustment appears on the screen.

Same thing if I change the ISO which I have the ring configured for.

I've had the S95 for 11 months now. Tried a new one in a shop yesterday - does exactly the same as mine.

Most disappointing camera I've bought - also even at ISO 100, noise is high for my liking.

Shot some video at a gig with the S95 and my iPhone 4. Video of the S95 is arguably better, but the sound is 100% distortion. The iPhone sound is easily listenable to.

0 upvotes
pheber
By pheber (Nov 16, 2011 at 19:57:42 GMT)

The Olympus xz-1 has the jump. An ultrafast lens, strong functionality and great performance has my vote. I have had the S95 and now the xz1 and I wouldn't go back. Also, the styling of the Olympus leaves the Canon behind.

0 upvotes
christine santos
By christine santos (Nov 11, 2011 at 14:14:21 GMT)

thinking of buying the s100 but the s95 dropped its price and is too tempting! Am not that good in photography . do i wait for the s100 or just get the s95? Saw the s95 and the flash quickly pops out as if its fast to get destroyed ! Any inputs ?

0 upvotes
Stefan Stuart Fletcher
By Stefan Stuart Fletcher (Nov 16, 2011 at 09:22:27 GMT)

It's the same old story: you can wait until prices drop and by which time the manufacturer will have released another, better model. I've just had my S95 stolen. I'm using the insurance money to buy the 100. The "intelligent IS", full HD, ND filter and new grip are worth the extra money in my opinion. The s100 has more and better features than the G12 but is much more pocketable and costs less. They are aimed at different shooters, so the comparison stops there.

The pop-up flash is amusing but above all allows full override. I really enjoyed the S95 and look forward to the 100.

2 upvotes
gerardeux
By gerardeux (Nov 24, 2011 at 15:39:36 GMT)

Well you don't have to wait longer as the prices are really low now for the S95. If it's for photography the quality of pictures of the S95 are under normal light conditions better then those of the S100 as test pictures more and more seem to imply. If you want to use it much for video the S100 is better. I would get the S95 as long as they are still around.

0 upvotes
novasilva
By novasilva (Nov 9, 2011 at 17:20:31 GMT)

s100 vs lx5 anyone? how about some lab samples please.

1 upvote
Rob Cole
By Rob Cole (Nov 8, 2011 at 02:53:20 GMT)

Where's the raws? (sample(s) to download)

0 upvotes
Lyonesse
By Lyonesse (Nov 6, 2011 at 04:53:25 GMT)

I have read two professional reviews that mention focus issues with closer subjects. Has this been seen by the regular users?

0 upvotes
Lyonesse
By Lyonesse (Nov 11, 2011 at 17:30:32 GMT)

I'm looking between this camera and the Nikon P300. I am a hobbyist only but take a ton of pics of my kids and everything else. Any knowledgeable input would be greatly appreciated.

0 upvotes
Jerwgar
By Jerwgar (Nov 15, 2011 at 03:55:01 GMT)

I do mostly macro and noticed this focus problem very noticably when testing the S95 especially compared to the G12. Really wanted this camera for the size but ended up getting the LX5 because of the soft macro focus in the Canon S95. Hope they fixed it in the S100, they might have a new customer!

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
Stefan Stuart Fletcher
By Stefan Stuart Fletcher (Nov 16, 2011 at 09:28:58 GMT)

I use a DSLR for macro shots so can't help with compact focusing issues. I can say that Nikon compact camera ergonomics are, to put it mildly, "quirky", but all compacts focus more slowly and less accurately on moving subjects in poor lighting, e.g. your kids. Canon says they have made progress in this field. My kids are old enough now to move at the same stately pace as their father, so not a problem for me.

My own beef with the Canon S95 was the (lack of) grip. My hands are too large and operation was fiddly (I had the same problem with the LX3), but perhaps you won't have this problem. The S100 looks less like a bar of soap than its two predecessors.

0 upvotes
seri_art
By seri_art (Nov 18, 2011 at 21:05:51 GMT)

Here's a shot focused on an object less than 2" from the lens using P mode, no macro mode at all. ISO 800, RAW with no NR in DPP.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16620406/IMG_0598_800h.jpg

0 upvotes
47872Mike
By 47872Mike (Nov 4, 2011 at 18:33:08 GMT)

Dave5252 says:

" ISO speed is limited due to slow shutter speed." When making time exposures of 1-15 seconds, the last setting you would choose is ISO80."

I say that when making timed exposures of 1 second or more, the only sensitivity setting I would ever want to choose is base ISO, which in this case is ISO 80.

0 upvotes
nj night rider
By nj night rider (Nov 8, 2011 at 22:29:23 GMT)

Do you do time exposures? I have been working with the powershot 990 and the S95 for a long time and pretty much shoot outside nightly. Noise starts to become a problem above ISO 400, but its nothing Lightroom or Noise Ninja cant handle. Do you own the S100? After extensive testing it funny my Cybershot 5.1 megapixel Lowlight images are better quality than the S100 at this point. It is great in bright light situations. I think there is something terribly wrong with the digic5 or the cmos reader, I think Canon knows it and has stopped shipping.

0 upvotes
BeanyPic
By BeanyPic (Nov 4, 2011 at 17:12:22 GMT)

Played with this at Pro Solutions. Impressive little camera. Every pro would like this in the pocket.

0 upvotes
RLPhotoAndImaging
By RLPhotoAndImaging (Nov 4, 2011 at 03:59:01 GMT)

If the G13 doesn't come out by February, I'll have to just get this.

1 upvote
DYNAMiTE
By DYNAMiTE (Nov 3, 2011 at 04:17:05 GMT)

where is G13 Come on Canon !!

0 upvotes
Dave5252
By Dave5252 (Nov 3, 2011 at 01:35:16 GMT)

In manual mode, while taking a exposure longer than 1 second; you're limited to ISO80. The message you get is " ISO speed is limited due to slow shutter speed." When making time exposures of 1-15 seconds, the last setting you would choose is ISO80.

Canon did this with the Canon SX40 HS also. They didn't do it this way with the S90/95.

0 upvotes
Luis BA
By Luis BA (Nov 2, 2011 at 02:48:18 GMT)

....and the new G13, with the similar sensor that S100..???

0 upvotes
nj night rider
By nj night rider (Nov 2, 2011 at 06:32:51 GMT)

Shame on you Canon, do you really think photographers want a limited ISO no matter what the time setting is. These are not manual controls, who made you do this?

0 upvotes
Canon Wonk
By Canon Wonk (Nov 9, 2011 at 16:19:29 GMT)

They very likely did this to avoid overheating the sensor. Even DSLRs with much larger sensors can have thermal issues during long exposures at higher ISOs. Higher ISO can require running the sensor at greater current creating more heat. While I agree it's less than ideal, Canon likely had a good reason for the limitation.

It's also worth noting once you're over 1 second you pretty much have to use a tripod where ISO is much less of an issue. Generally you want high ISO to either stop motion or get hand held shots in low light. Neither applies to 1 second and longer exposures.

0 upvotes
jpstanley
By jpstanley (Dec 3, 2011 at 01:19:41 GMT)

... or, you're trying to get a picture in very low light, such as a moonlit landscape. I do a lot of these, and they usually require exposures on the order of 15 seconds at ISO 800. Older Powershots can do this, even cheap ones. Why suddenly limit this? The S100 is worthless to me with this ridiculous limitation.

(And before you say I should use a DSLR for that type of shot--I have one, and I use it for that purpose often, but sometimes it's just too bulky to take along; when backpacking overnight, for example, a pocketable camera and travel tripod are a lot easier to carry along.)

0 upvotes
Luis BA
By Luis BA (Nov 2, 2011 at 02:45:05 GMT)

URGENT REVIEW: CANON S100 vs Oly XZ-1 vs FUJIFILM X10..!!!

3 upvotes
ChrisKramer1
By ChrisKramer1 (Nov 1, 2011 at 18:33:57 GMT)

The S95 is now down to 285 euros. I think this is a good deal.

0 upvotes
chuckd83
By chuckd83 (Nov 3, 2011 at 23:35:08 GMT)

It sold for US$299 during black Friday last year. If you're in the U.S., I would wait until this year's black Friday.

0 upvotes
red eye guy
By red eye guy (Nov 1, 2011 at 12:37:22 GMT)

Can you get a still picture from a video clip?

0 upvotes
evogt500
By evogt500 (Nov 1, 2011 at 03:09:03 GMT)

i just tested one...plastic body, and feels "cheaper" than the S95

0 upvotes
ChrisKramer1
By ChrisKramer1 (Nov 1, 2011 at 18:31:58 GMT)

Ugh!

0 upvotes
harryinhbg
By harryinhbg (Nov 30, 2011 at 00:27:18 GMT)

How did you figure out that it has a plastic body? I have one, and can't tell, without taking a file to it.

Elsewhere, someone complained that because it has a metal body, it's heavier than it needs to be...

0 upvotes
ag93
By ag93 (Nov 1, 2011 at 00:18:09 GMT)

The G12 or the S100?

1 upvote
RLPhotoAndImaging
By RLPhotoAndImaging (Nov 4, 2011 at 04:01:48 GMT)

If you don't need the capability to add a Speedlight, then I'd go with the S100.

0 upvotes
ag93
By ag93 (Nov 1, 2011 at 00:17:17 GMT)

whats the s100 lag time?

0 upvotes
Ken75
By Ken75 (Oct 30, 2011 at 17:36:13 GMT)

Apparently yes, video in macro.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZZqFmBO8yA

0 upvotes
red eye guy
By red eye guy (Oct 30, 2011 at 20:59:05 GMT)

I think that is a different camera than the Powershot S100.

0 upvotes
Ken75
By Ken75 (Oct 30, 2011 at 22:36:17 GMT)

Crud. My bad. Apologies.

0 upvotes
NolanM
By NolanM (Nov 4, 2011 at 01:52:11 GMT)

Yes, just did a test video and it works in macro no problem.

0 upvotes
Florida1
By Florida1 (Oct 30, 2011 at 16:22:12 GMT)

Does anybody know, if it will be possible to shoot videos in macro mode?

0 upvotes
red eye guy
By red eye guy (Oct 30, 2011 at 14:23:20 GMT)

Ordered one from Abes, hopefully it's not a dud. I keep saying my next camera is going to have a remote shutter....next time for sure.

0 upvotes
clandestinebird
By clandestinebird (Oct 30, 2011 at 17:04:30 GMT)

Hey, that helps. Many thanks.

0 upvotes
CanoNils
By CanoNils (Oct 29, 2011 at 18:08:24 GMT)

Digital Suicide is dead on, ignore that tool Clay, you will read about that guy in the Darwin Awards soon enough.

0 upvotes
Clay Poole
By Clay Poole (Oct 28, 2011 at 18:16:52 GMT)

Here's a link to a review on the S100 from a photographer that's returning his camera to the retailer. I'm Having second thoughts.

http://freshphotoblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/gear-review-canon-powershot-s100/

0 upvotes
Digital Suicide
By Digital Suicide (Oct 29, 2011 at 08:31:00 GMT)

My advice would be to IGNORE that article and his experience with S100. This guy has no clue how to use camera at all.
First thing he had to do, is to select center focusing point only. I have never used any other focusing points but center, all my entire life. Especially when he likes to make centered frames.
And how could you expect to take 3 exactly the same (HDR mode) images one after another HANDHELD??? And with the moving objects (cars) without ghosts??? HOW STUPID IS THAT?
And how can you compare image colors of this miserable camera to DSLRs??

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
4 upvotes
omygod711
By omygod711 (Nov 3, 2011 at 03:31:44 GMT)

Was it me or he took all his images on a cloudy day and complained the color is bad?

0 upvotes
JeaPS
By JeaPS (Nov 13, 2011 at 21:03:14 GMT)

Don`t hold back now. Tell us how you really feel!

0 upvotes
lola94925
By lola94925 (Oct 28, 2011 at 04:05:18 GMT)

I have had the SD4000 for a couple of years and love it. I wanted the latest greatest and this fit the bill. It has been on order with Amazon for a month and nothing. On their forum, several people found them at BB. There are none in the SF area. The Canon USA website says the camera has not yet been released. Please go to the Amazon forum for this camera. There is an excellent review posted today and is like five thumbs down. It is complete with excellent sample photos. The camera always seems to focus on the far background and focus or lack of it is a huge issue. Also the HDR photos are terrible. The owner says the camera has to be on a tripod as the exposures are taken so far apart they cannot be merged. There are cars in the background with ghost images of the separate exposures. This guy seems to know his stuff and is returning the camera. I am pulling my order until I hear more. Please find his article and look at the photos before making what could be a mistake! Good luck!

0 upvotes
ChrisKramer1
By ChrisKramer1 (Nov 1, 2011 at 18:41:12 GMT)

Could you please give the link? I can't find it...

0 upvotes
seri_art
By seri_art (Nov 18, 2011 at 20:47:25 GMT)

There's a lot of bad information out there about the S100. Here's a shot focused on an object less than 2" from the lens using P mode, no macro mode at all. Also, at ISO 800, RAW with no NR in DPP. I've taken almost 600 shots with my S100 and have had no focus problems at all.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16620406/IMG_0598_800h.jpg

0 upvotes
clandestinebird
By clandestinebird (Oct 26, 2011 at 22:09:15 GMT)

Sorry, I just need to know, how I can get this camera...I try in Best.Buy and it's just available in pre.ordered status. Honestly, I want to try this new S100 in digiscoping Technic. Many thanks if somebody can help me.

0 upvotes
tizeye99
By tizeye99 (Oct 27, 2011 at 13:10:36 GMT)

Down at the bottom of this page is a link to Amazon, and checking, it is in stock. Also the "Buy This" selection on the dropdown menu above takes you to the same place.

NOTE: It helps support DPReview is you access Amazon through their link rather than going direct, and there is no difference in cost to you.

0 upvotes
alvin43
By alvin43 (Oct 27, 2011 at 13:28:08 GMT)

Check the cage where they keep the cameras. They don't have them on is dispay yet. That's how i got mine as did others in this forum. Also check for web ...best buy discount code. I believe expires oct 31t....good luck

0 upvotes
clandestinebird
By clandestinebird (Oct 27, 2011 at 16:00:41 GMT)

thanks, because in amazon it is not available... looking right now in best.buy again...

0 upvotes
clandestinebird
By clandestinebird (Oct 27, 2011 at 16:08:03 GMT)

sorry,¿ but what is the "cage"? at this time just pre-ordered in best.buy... :|

0 upvotes
FJG3
By FJG3 (Oct 26, 2011 at 19:43:11 GMT)

Can you take video by just pressing the red video button WITHOUT the dial turned to the video camera icon?

0 upvotes
Berry van Leeuwen
By Berry van Leeuwen (Oct 27, 2011 at 06:25:16 GMT)

Yes you can.

0 upvotes
Berry van Leeuwen
By Berry van Leeuwen (Oct 26, 2011 at 03:49:28 GMT)

anyone tried fitting the s100 into a psc-900 leather case?

0 upvotes
hiphopnerd
By hiphopnerd (Oct 31, 2011 at 05:15:38 GMT)

It fits pretty well. You can tell the dimensions of the s100 aren't quite the same as the 90 & 95...but it doesn't keep the case from being functional.

0 upvotes
rideincircles
By rideincircles (Oct 24, 2011 at 17:07:24 GMT)

So far I am loving the S100, the image quality blows away my Canon SX1 or SD790, low light concert pictures look amazing for a pocket camera. Videos look amazing, but volume gets distorted at high volumes from bass, not sure why my SD790 can handle any volume but my other two Canons can't with stereo sound. I have my photos up on facebook if anyone wants to check them out. They are from the Epic ruins/ Stardeath show, Nisennenmondai and Battles and St.Vincent day albums located here. I took some raw photos also, but haven't had the chance to view them yet. Gonna try and add them to flickr sometime this week.
http://www.facebook.com/rideincircles

0 upvotes
red eye guy
By red eye guy (Oct 24, 2011 at 16:27:12 GMT)

Yes, called stitch assist.

0 upvotes
Daniel MG
By Daniel MG (Oct 22, 2011 at 23:20:58 GMT)

Does anybody know if I can do panorama pictures with the S100?

0 upvotes
rideincircles
By rideincircles (Oct 21, 2011 at 21:09:15 GMT)

I just got mine yesterday and will be trying it out this weekend for the 3 concerts I am going to. Low light picture taking was one of my primary reasons to get it along with the HD video. I am an amateur photographer and do not yet own a DSLR, but have the Canon SX1, a710 and sd790. Still can't do much comparisons yet, but I already love this camera. Was having fun last night with the 240 frames per second video just to watch things in slow motion like fan blades spinning. It is available at Best buy and I recommend finding a 10% off coupon online if you want to get it. There was no comparison in image quality on auto on my s100 vs my sd790 in low light yesterday. The s100 blew my previous pocket camera away.

0 upvotes
zodiacfml
By zodiacfml (Oct 21, 2011 at 13:26:39 GMT)

just got back to this announcement, and feels that this is just way better than Nikon's 1 system.

0 upvotes
moulton406
By moulton406 (Oct 20, 2011 at 09:22:04 GMT)

I am very keen to get my hands on one of these but here in Thailand there aren't available as yet and no one seems to know when. I can get a good deal on the s95 but the video mode is pretty ordinary esp compared to this. I did find the S100 advertised here http://www.canons100blackfriday.net/tag/canon-s100-12-1-mp-silver-black-friday-sale but if you read the testimonial from a happy customer, you will realize the ad is a fake. ( he got the camera two months ago) and I wouldn't even consider purchasing from this site.

So lucky owners, what is the picture quality like compared to the S95 and Admin at DP *(pant pant) when do we get a full review?

0 upvotes
Tim Copland
By Tim Copland (Oct 19, 2011 at 10:17:26 GMT)

Anyone know when this will be available in the UK, Amazon says its not released until 1/1/2012 and I cant find it anywhere else.

Seem strange as its already available in the US.

0 upvotes
Jeremy_B
By Jeremy_B (Oct 18, 2011 at 17:39:54 GMT)

After reading all these wonderful posts, I went down to my local Best Buy to see if they had any. I checked out all the displays and saw numerous S95s. While waiting for the only blue shirt in photo to finish with another customer, I checked out the cage. Lo-and-behold, there were 2 S100s in the cage. I kindly told the blue shirt that I wanted one, and he said, "S100? We don't have those." I kindly pointed them out, and he rang me up (10% off coupon didn't hurt). I would be rather surprised if he didn't purchase the 2nd one at the end of his shift.

0 upvotes
mark murphy
By mark murphy (Oct 27, 2011 at 23:05:04 GMT)

Which discount coupon did you use?

0 upvotes
Total comments: 323
123