Previous page Next page

Operation and controls

The EOS M is distinctly stripped-down in terms of physical controls compared to Canons SLRs - deliberately so, as it's designed to appeal to a different type of user. But it still allows you to control many of the main photographic functions without having to use the touchscreen.

Top of camera controls

The top-plate controls are sparse indeed - there's just the three position mode switch surrounding the shutter button, with the power switch on the top plate behind it. On the camera's shoulder is the red movie record button, which is only active when the top-plate dial is set to movie mode.

Rear of camera controls

Again, there's not a huge amount here, but it's sufficient to set all the key exposure parameters while you're shooting. The rear dial behaves much like it does on an EOS SLR - it's used to set exposure parameters and change settings. While small rear dials like this can often be fiddly and unresponsive, the one on the EOS M is actually pretty good; it's relatively resistant to accidental settings changes, with clear click-points providing tactile feedback that you've moved it a notch.

In the P, Av, Tv and M modes the EOS M behaves rather like an entry-level SLR. The rear dial is used to control program shift, aperture or shutter speed by default - pressing the +/- button toggles it to operate exposure compensation, or change the aperture in Manual. The 'Left' key provides autoexposure lock, while the 'Up' key sets the drive mode; single, continuous or self-timer. The 'Down' key can be customized; by default it returns the AF point to the centre of the screen, but can alternatively be set for Depth-of-field preview, ISO, Flash exposure compensation, or to temporarily increase the LCD brightness. So if you set it to control ISO, you have direct access to all the key exposure parameters without having to use the touchscreen.

The 'Q' button activates the onscreen Quick Control menu, and it's entirely possible to navigate around this and change settings using the direction keys and SET button. But this is the point where it just makes more sense to embrace the touchscreen interface, as it'll often be quicker. Indeed the EOS M's touch controls are often quicker and more direct than the button-operated onscreen interfaces found on simple entry-level SLRs such as the Nikon D3200.

Around the controller are three buttons that are used to access the camera's menus, enter playback mode, and change the amount of information displayed onscreen. In typical Canon fashion the menus are context sensitive, and are simpler and have fewer options when the camera is set to full Auto mode.

Previous page Next page

Comments

Total comments: 505
2345
highwave
By highwave (10 months ago)

Dpreview guys

As always I love your work and very much appreciated

But I sure wish you included side by side shots with competitors and even SLRs like you usually do.

Thanks overall though.

1 upvote
GlobalGuyUSA
By GlobalGuyUSA (10 months ago)

I totally agree -- I want to see it next to the S95 series, as well. A lot of consumers will be upgrading from there (probably more than will downgrade from a DSLR) -- just a thought!

1 upvote
kapanak
By kapanak (10 months ago)

These are all Canon provided press shots. Dpreview doesn't have their "production" sample yet.

0 upvotes
Jokica
By Jokica (10 months ago)

Can someone justify price difference between Canon EOS M (with18-55) and Sony NEX-5n (with18-55)?
-------------------------------
Battery Life (CIPA) 230 ?

4 upvotes
GlobalGuyUSA
By GlobalGuyUSA (10 months ago)

$100 for the Canon brand. Canon has more loyal users than Sony -- so it can charge more. (Call it a "sucker tax"). Canon can quickly get as many users as Sony even with the premium price. So from Canon's perspective, why not keep the price up? They can always lower it later. By the way, if anyone from Canon reads this, I am a Nikon user and would consider buying this camera if it was a $100 less expensive! Its just slightly too high right now. Thanks.

3 upvotes
xlotus
By xlotus (10 months ago)

Historically, Canon consumer/prosumer cameras (DSLR or not) would see a price drop within 3-6 months after launch date. I got my 60D for $900, $200 less the list price in about 3 months after the announcement. Sony NEX 5N which I also own, has been in the market for about a year and the price has not come down.

1 upvote
kapanak
By kapanak (10 months ago)

NEX-5N has not come down in price, because it is still selling. Unlike most lower end Canon products, which consumers buy today, and sell on Craigslist for 30% less 6 months later.

2 upvotes
olyflyer
By olyflyer (10 months ago)

Well, the best justification for the higher price is that now you can whine about something...

If it's too expensive for you there is a simple solution. Don't buy it.

0 upvotes
Jokica
By Jokica (10 months ago)

I agree with you, guys. But, Canon is forgetting that they are not so strong brand in mirrorless market, they have to prove themselves yet. APS-C users are not so naive to go for it. They decision is based on facts, not brand. Now, there is no Canon legacy lenses to protect this new body. One thing more: P&S users do not need APS-C sensor, and they are fine with 230 battery life. APS-C sensor users will find 230 shot battery small. I soot that much to get one good picture, and I am not even a pro.

0 upvotes
Plastek
By Plastek (10 months ago)

"Canon is forgetting that they are not so strong brand in mirrorless market" - can't agree with that. People don't care about "mirrorless market" brand strength. They care how strong the brand is in photography world. And Canon is very strong there.

1 upvote
Jokica
By Jokica (10 months ago)

"People don't care about..."
Don`t you think that it would be more appropriate:
"Some people don't care about..."

0 upvotes
EsVeeFoto
By EsVeeFoto (10 months ago)

Off late, Canon have been a disappointment as far as pricing is concerned. They priced the G1X at $800 when it came out in Jan. It is selling in the used market for $500. I won't be surprised if the EOS M depreciates similarly. If Canon had priced the G1X at $650, it would have sold like hot cakes just like the Sony RX100.

5 years back, Canon users like me, were proud out the fact that they offered value compared to other brands like Nikon. How times have changed.

3 upvotes
eyeshutter
By eyeshutter (10 months ago)

I just saw a video demonstrating the focus speed. SLOW AS MOLASSES.

0 upvotes
highwave
By highwave (10 months ago)

I'm not buying into that video

The autofocus just seems way to slow for a PDAF system. Maybe it was turned off by the reviewers and they were using CDAF of Canon (which sucks like nothing else on the market).

I really think the real PDAF of Canon will be very fast.

0 upvotes
GlobalGuyUSA
By GlobalGuyUSA (10 months ago)

It probably is slow. Unfortunately, even DP Review's review mentioned that it is as slow as using Live View with a Rebel. So that's your benchmark.

0 upvotes
Plastek
By Plastek (10 months ago)

"I really think the real PDAF of Canon will be very fast" - we've been through that many times already. PDAF on sensor got too small sensors to be really fast and really accurate. That's why Sony never bothered with it as a sensor-design company. What works through most of focusing process is CDAF - and Canon never got fast one on APS-C sensors unlike Sony, or m4/3 people. (Nikon 1 is a different story cause out there depth of field is so huge that any AF works good enough)

1 upvote
locke_fc
By locke_fc (10 months ago)

Looks pretty good to me. Coupled to that 22 mm f2 pancake should be interesting, provided it delivers above average IQ.

0 upvotes
Sergey Borachev
By Sergey Borachev (10 months ago)

I can hear a big sigh of relief from Panasonic and Olympus!

At least for now, there is little threat from Canon. This is mainly Canon's attempt to stop its DSLR owners deserting to M43 or NEX cameras, as owner of EF lenses are the main target. New buyers, those upgrading from P&S, and also those more demanding enthusiasts will not be so happy with this camera. With no IBIS, no possibility of any viewfinder, this is offering little threat to other mirrorless makers. When a better model is released, and when there are more lenses, then it may be more threat, but still it would be mainly to Sony, then to M43. M43 still has a clear advantage in terms of size (especially lens sizes) and lens line-up even if Canon would release a high-end model matching the features of the better M43 cameras. But Canon won't for a long time due to its DSLR business.

This is a compromised short-sighted approach. Lens size will still be too big, defeating much of the mirrorless cause. And no IBIS.

10 upvotes
xlotus
By xlotus (10 months ago)

I also own an Olympus EPM1. There is nothing to write home about its autofocusing speed indoor nor the IBIS either. Panasonic is definitely the king in AF speed in good light or low light.
As far as physical size, the Sony 18-55 for NEX is about the same size as Pany 14-42. I know for sure because unlike you, I own both cameras. Sorry, no size advantage for m43 kit lenses and short primes lenses when compared to APS-C mirrorless cameras. This is to be expected simply by comparing the sensor size.

Comment edited 37 seconds after posting
2 upvotes
olyflyer
By olyflyer (10 months ago)

M43 had size advantages until there was only M43 on the mirrorless market. As for the IBIS... well, I hope it stays in Olympus. I certainly don't want it and I doubt there are many Nikon or Canon users who envy you for that.

1 upvote
vincelau
By vincelau (10 months ago)

and a big sigh of disappointment from this long time Canon SLR user AND m43 early adopter....

the Canon side of me always wanted a small/lightweight camera with retro and photographer focused styling with great prime a la a Fuji x-pro

the m43 side of me wanted Canon, with it's late-comer advantage, to put out something really great to compete with the balanced size/speed/quality of m43 system

instead Canon gave us this uninspired EOS-M that will be more suitable to proof to the corporate brass why mirrorless is NOT the way to go...

sigh....!

0 upvotes
Dan Nikon
By Dan Nikon (10 months ago)

The touchscreen feature is pretty cool, I would like to see that in DSLR's as well. But no viewfinder, not the least bit interested. Makes me love my X100 even more, a real camera for real photographers.

1 upvote
Plastek
By Plastek (10 months ago)

C650D got touch screen - it's a first DSLR with it. And the feature is definitely overpriced.

1 upvote
intruder61
By intruder61 (10 months ago)

Fail!!

4 upvotes
acassino
By acassino (10 months ago)

Just because Canon is struggling to make headway with mirrorless, doesn't mean the consumer is.

3 upvotes
macky patalinghug
By macky patalinghug (10 months ago)

This will get the silver award.

0 upvotes
Dougbm_2
By Dougbm_2 (10 months ago)

I thought they would have used the sensor from the G1-X. Then it would have had smaller lenses. Is any one really going to mount a huge L lens via the adapter on this? Seems quite good with the touch screen but no wow factor. Sony Nex 7 seems more appealing despite the dearth of decent lenses. Then again I think Sony is on the money with it's RX100. Maybe this camera is for those that don't have a compact or a DSLR??? Won't encourage me to move from my X100. Anyway it can't be any good - doesn't have an X in the name!!

1 upvote
T3
By T3 (10 months ago)

I already use my Canon EF lenses on my tiny Oly E-PM1. Sure, the lenses are proportionally large compared to the body, but people seem to forget that the overall body+lens is still quite a bit more compact and lighter than the same lenses on a thick DSLR, so there's still an attractive net loss of bulk compared to a DSLR.

It definitely would be a nice thing to have an EOS M body sitting in the side pocket of a Canon DSLR user's camera bag. Great for back up, great as a secondary body with a separate lens mounted, etc.

1 upvote
GlobalGuyUSA
By GlobalGuyUSA (10 months ago)

This camera is CONFUSED. It is for the DSLR user who wants a "more subtle" camera (thus keeps APS-C sensor). But its controls are for "idiot user." I hate this condescending attitude of Canon and Nikon when it comes to the Mirrorless cameras -- make one for a pro. For gods sake, its not unimaginable that Photography Majors in college, Professionals, and those wanting a real DSLR will actually buy this thing. Just make a "simple mode" if you are expecting your customers to be simple minded -- and give us a few more buttons and setting switches. There is such a thing as being "too Apple" for your own good. I don't want a car where I just have one button to push -- I want a car that I can drive, whether its a mini, a corvette, or a semi.

2 upvotes
Plastek
By Plastek (10 months ago)

"It is for the DSLR user who wants a "more subtle" camera" - no, it's not.
It's just a P&S upgrade.

2 upvotes
nevada5
By nevada5 (10 months ago)

It has no viewfinder but you can get it in red. Nuff said.

17 upvotes
Mark Bellon
By Mark Bellon (10 months ago)

Does the rotational dial work well with the touchscreen? After selecting Av/Tv with the touch screen, I assume the dial can be used to adjust shutter speed, fstop etc.

How many steps does it take to adjust something? How many button presses to drop 1 fstop?

0 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (10 months ago)

When you're in Av mode (you don't to keep selecting it), you just turn the dial to change Av. Press one direction on the four-way, or tap on the Exp. Comp. section of the screen screen and the dial switches to Exp. Comp. It's a lot like a one-dial DSLR (D3200, say).

1 upvote
macky patalinghug
By macky patalinghug (10 months ago)

any color but black! my 350d, 450d, 500d, 55od, 600d, 20d, 30d,50d, 7d, D5100, e-330, c-8080 and GF2 were/are all black.

The red and silver EF-M sure looks good. No more black for me.

1 upvote
GlobalGuyUSA
By GlobalGuyUSA (10 months ago)

Where is an actually attractive blue (not fake/cheap looking blue) when you need it. Red is too noticeable no matter how its done. And silver always looks like a cheap black.

0 upvotes
Lisa O
By Lisa O (10 months ago)

Glad to see Canon went with APS-C instead of a smaller sensor like the Nikon 1. I would like to see the lens map for the next year. I find it odd the part about mirror less cameras struggling to make headway in the US market. I thought Olympus, Panasonic and Sony were really breaking some ground in the mirror less arena.

I hope the red one is available in the USA.

7 upvotes
b534202
By b534202 (10 months ago)

Would've been glad if it were an FF sensor. We don't need more dinky size sensor mirrorless cameras on the market. Especially not one that does not offer anything new.

4 upvotes
Plastek
By Plastek (10 months ago)

Companies don't want FF mirrorless. Can't blame them for this though. It'd endanger their DSLRs/SLTs/whatever Pentax has. Also the production cost would be very high - right now with EF-M a profit margins for Canon are ENORMOUS.
Sadly: users loose on that (or they'll just go with m4/3 or NEX which are far more reasonable options then this one).

4 upvotes
micahmedia
By micahmedia (10 months ago)

Nobody wants to go FF yet because they want some place "up" to go if they run out of places to innovate. And profit margin is higher on the smaller sensors (more chips per wafer) which is just a fact of life, unless process changes in a revolutionary way.

0 upvotes
DoctorJerry
By DoctorJerry (10 months ago)

Until you have tried using a mirrorless camera with a big, heavy adaptor along with one of those big, heavy, bulky lenses, you don't appreciate how bad that combination is and how awkward it is to use.mi just sold my big Sony adaptor that I was trying to use on my NEX 7 and 5N. The optional EVF on the Sony is superb,
And in some ways better than optical since you can easily see the effects on the image that your exposure or other settings produce.

I would suggest you avoid this camera and wait for the update.i think Canon is taking Kodak's play book so I will look for them to go belly- up in a few years.

0 upvotes
Tony Defriez
By Tony Defriez (7 months ago)

Strange how people can review and knock a camera which has only just started shipping?
On the serious side I just recieved one last night with the standard 22mm lens. Over the next few weeks I'll use it although I'd prefer to have both the lens adaptor and 18-55mm lens to test it more fully - one buying point for me was as a good replacement for a point and shot with the ability to use all the EF lenses I already own (best of all worlds). So far in limited testing the focus is faster than the G1X (or other G body cameras I have owned or used, G9 thur G1X) even in poor indoor lighting. Image quality looks good even at high ASA settings, although limit chance to test fully yet.
To be continued

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Total comments: 505
2345