Previous page Next page

Shooting with the Canon EOS 70D (Beta sample)

by Shawn Barnett

Having shot with the beta Canon EOS 70D for a little over a week, we thought we'd post a few notes about how it is to use in the field. We've also published a gallery of mostly daylight images for your perusal. I shot at the beach, took in an airshow and boat races, and shot in the studio, and can report that the EOS 70D seems at least as good as its predecessor, but with considerably better live view and video autofocus performance thanks to the 70D's new Dual Pixel AF system. Shooting with the 70-200mm F2.8L IS lens netted some great images at the air and boat show, as well as a few good videos.

The standout feature of the videos is that there was no detectable seeking or focus tweaking for the duration of the videos: Just solid focus. Most of the race video was at or near infinity, so there's not much to report except again that the camera didn't lose focus or seek, so we shot some additional video to show how it works. What's clear is that Canon's new Dual Pixel AF is working quite well, far better than the Hybrid AF systems used by recent Rebel-series SLRs and the EOS M, which didn't seem much different from contrast-detect systems its older SLRs.

Live view autofocus

Autofocus in live view is very fast, but how fast depends on which mode you choose. In the default Face-detection + tracking mode, pointing the camera at 'faceless' scenes can take about a second to focus on just about anything you point it at. However, as soon as it detects a face, the Canon EOS 70D will confirm focus almost instantly, about as fast as the optical viewfinder's phase-detection system.

Ultimately, we determined that the 70D's Dual Pixel AF gets faster with a smaller target area. Letting the camera determine where to focus, which it does in the Face-detection/Tracking AF, takes much longer. Pressing the Set button in FlexiZone auto-area confines the camera's attention to a smaller area, which greatly speeds things up. Switching to FlexiZone single-point AF gets even faster; seemingly as fast as traditional phase-detect. It seems clear that when the system has less data to process it makes autofocus decisions more quickly. That's generally true of most autofocus systems, whether phase or contrast-detect, so it isn't a surprise, but the length of this delay - nearly one second - in auto-area AF is worth considering when choosing which AF method is right for a given subject.

We've prepared a video to show the differences between the FlexiZone single-point phase-detect AF and Face-detect/Tracking autofocus.

Video shot of the back of the Canon EOS 70D in live view mode.

Video autofocus

When shooting videos, the Canon EOS 70D's Dual Pixel autofocus system is the most steady we've seen from an SLR. My race videos featured below seem to completely lack the usual seeking we've come to expect when using non-STM lenses with previous Canon AF systems. The first four videos below were shot with the 70-200mm F2.8L, a non-STM lens. As a reminder, STM lenses use a focus motor that's designed to work better in videos where USM lenses have typically struggled; but this wasn't the case with the 70D/70-200mm combo, thanks to the new Dual Pixel AF. Even the Rebel SL1 we reviewed last month, and which represents Canon's best effort at live view AF until now, struggled with ordinary USM lenses; the 70D seemed to have no such trouble.

Sample video 1

1920 x 1080, 30p IPB - Testing the jet engine of a speed boat, shot with 70D in servo AF mode using 70-200mm F2.8L IS lens. 84.1MB. Click here to download original file.

Note that the camera does not appear to 'seek' for focus, instead keeping focus on the foreground.

Sample video 2

1920 x 1080, 30p IPB - Testing another engine as the race progresses in the background (focus stays on near subject), shot with 70D in servo AF mode using 70-200mm F2.8L IS lens. 42.7MB. Click here to download original file.

Again, the camera stays on our subject in the above video.

Sample video 3

1920 x 1080, 30p IPB - Tracking a subject, shot with 70D in servo AF mode using 70-200mm F2.8L IS lens. 87.9MB. Click here to download original file.

Though we're in Servo AF mode with both the above and below videos, it's unclear whether the camera is making many focus changes. The story is that it's not losing focus dramatically, if at all.

Sample video 4

1920 x 1080, 30p IPB - Tracking an even faster subject, shot with 70D in servo AF mode using 70-200mm F2.8L IS lens. 246.2MB. Click here to download original file.

Sample video 5

1920 x 1080, 30p IPB - Subject switching video: With autofocus confined to the center point, the camera quickly notices an out-of-focus condition and makes the change (using the 18-135mm kit lens). 48.1MB. Click here to download original file.

Shooting in bright daylight, the 70D most often focuses very quickly, as seen in the above video. In four tries at different focal lengths using the 18-135mm STM zoom, the camera only had trouble when it was set at focal lengths approaching 135mm. In general, the 18-135mm lens seemed to start seeking when the minimum aperture hit F5.6. This video (above) was shot at about 85mm.

Conventional Phase-detect Autofocus

Most of my studio shooting was in the usual SLR mode, using conventional (reflex) phase-detect autofocus through the optical viewfinder. Overall, shots are good and focused in the studio as well as outdoors, and performance was quite fast. Part of the reason for this exercise, as well as the low light shots, was to confirm that the image quality is still up to snuff, despite the radical redesign of the sensor to support Dual Pixel AF. We think our shots show the Canon EOS 70D beta unit performs quite well, with the detail we'd expect from a 20.2MP camera.

JPEG - F4.5, 1/1250 sec, ISO 100, 200mm w/70-200mm F2.8L IS lens 100% crop
Raw processed via ACR 8.2 (beta) with sharpening set to: Amount 77, Radius 0.6, Detail 12, Masking 0 100% crop

JPEGs were a little soft straight out of the camera, as we're used to seeing from Canon's semi-pro and pro cameras. We were able to open the files in ACR 8.2 (beta) and retrieve a little more detail from the shots above and below.

In bright daylight, the Canon EOS 70D's traditional phase-detect autofocus had no trouble with this victorious racer below. Detail was still a bit soft, so we opened it in ACR 8.2 and managed to find a bit more detail through sharpening.

JPEG - F6.3, 1/400 sec, ISO 100, 148mm w/70-200mm F2.8L IS lens 100% crop
Raw processed via ACR 8.2 (beta) with sharpening set to: Amount 64, Radius 0.6, Detail 15, Masking 0 100% crop

Raw files also revealed a little more shadow detail, while JPEGs show slight sharpening halos and more pumped color, which is unsurprising on both counts.

Low light image quality

Image quality in low light is about what we expect from Canon sensors. ISO 25,600 produces images that are usable with good detail, considering. The first set of shots below were made on a tripod to minimize motion blur. The second set was shot handheld image stabilization active. The 70D's ISO 25,600 is softer, but allowed a shutter speed of 1/100 at F6.3.

ISO 800, F5.6, 1 sec, 19mm w/18-135mm 100% crop
ISO 25,600, F5.6, 1/25, 19mm w/18-135mm 100% crop
ISO 6400, F6.3, 1/25 sec, 18-135mm lens @ 78mm 100% crop
ISO 25,600, F6.3, 1/100 sec, 18-135mm lens @ 78mm 100% crop

Again, we shot these primarily to see whether making a 20MP sensor with 40M photosites would cause noticeable degradation in image quality, in this case in low light. When the final camera ships, we might arrange a comparison or two with a comparable Canon camera to better illustrate whether there's a noticeable change. In the meantime, check the High ISO JPEG comparison page to see how the camera does with our Studio Test Scene.

In Summary

Overall, the Canon EOS 70D has more of what you want in an intermediate SLR without over-reaching. It's true that most of what's improved about the 70D has more to do with live view and movie modes, which at first blush doesn't make it a compelling upgrade for still photographers. The advantage becomes more clear when you remember the 70D's articulated LCD, which is made more useful by live-view phase-detect autofocus that's essentially as fast and accurate as conventional, optical-viewfinder phase-detect AF. That won't be significant to those who are accustomed to always bringing an SLR to their eye, but it will matter to anyone raised in the generation used to framing their world on an electronic display.

For 60D owners, there's also the advantage of a faster frame rate, up from 5.3 to 7 fps, an improvement that came in handy when shooting the boats.

As has often happened in the 26 year history of EOS cameras, sometimes lesser models appear to leapfrog other cameras in the line with superior technology than more expensive models. That's certainly happened here with the 70D's advanced sensor-based Dual Pixel autofocus. However, it's quite likely the Canon EOS 70D's Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology will appear in more DSLR models soon. The question remains whether the 70D leaves room for a 7D replacement, with so many enthusiasts and pros gravitating to full-frame cameras, but this innovation certainly breathes new life into a once-popular APS-C camera line that looked like it might become irrelevant after the Rebel-like Canon 60D. What's sure is that live view and video phase-detect autofocus has a new champion in Canon's new Dual Pixel AF. We'll do more testing when we get a final version of the camera.

Previous page Next page

Comments

Total comments: 1013
12345
tjsnappy
By tjsnappy (1 day ago)

compared to my 550d, wow no progress been made over almost 4 years!!! still using mirror wtf!

0 upvotes
K E Hoffman
By K E Hoffman (1 week ago)

How can we compare the a77 to the 70D with is a very interesting comparison if one is on old and one is on new.. The test board is very nice.. but it really creates a break in value of the previous DPReview tests.

0 upvotes
PhotoKhan
By PhotoKhan (1 week ago)

Got to love how the "DPReviewer" found out that, in "Face-detection/Tracking AF" mode, the camera takes noticeably longer to lock focus when there's no face in the scene and then writes an whole paragraph and makes a video to make it look like a limitation.

It's called "Face-detection/Tracking AF" for Pete's sake!!!

0 upvotes
F4Gunstar
By F4Gunstar (1 week ago)

Can the Canon 70D trigger a 430EX II wireless through radio or does it have to fire the built-in flash in order to optically fire the remote flash? I'd like to be able to position my flash wherever and have the camera trigger it without needing to also fire the built-in flash.

0 upvotes
bugbait
By bugbait (2 weeks ago)

The new scene has many well thought out elements, plenty of shadow opportunities when combined with the alternate light.

I would appreciate it if you would tell us the brand of the color wheels you used so we might buy one for ourselves, not all brands are the same.

One problem does persist though. Although I appreciate your including the four most common ethnicity, none of these people actually live their lives with a flash bulb in front of their face. Especially the white man's image, it is nearly worthless. Very few clients would pay for such blown out face shots. Just look at the forehead of the black gentleman it is ridiculous. The scene is large enough to accommodate 8 human subjects, older with lots of character wrinkles and varied skin tone would be advisable. I am curious if others feel the same. I would also of included the female image from the previous scene as so many of us remember the iris and lips so well in comparisons.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 3 minutes after posting
1 upvote
Frank_NZ
By Frank_NZ (2 weeks ago)

Guess you have an extra STM lens (55-250mm) to test with the 70D now Mr Butler. :-)

0 upvotes
donald82R0
By donald82R0 (3 weeks ago)

So when is the full review coming up? I'm holding back on buying the 70d until I see this review :)

1 upvote
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

We're working on it and will try to publish as soon as we can.

4 upvotes
donald82R0
By donald82R0 (3 weeks ago)

Are we talking about days or weeks or months? :)

I'm basically wondering if I should get the 70d for $1200 or a used 7d for $800-900, and I expect that the final review will provide a direct comparison I could use to make this decision.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 43 seconds after posting
1 upvote
jackpro
By jackpro (3 weeks ago)

70D not bad at 6400

0 upvotes
Kaushik Ghosh
By Kaushik Ghosh (1 week ago)

Why on the earth someone or you want to shoot at iso 6400 ?

0 upvotes
Ciskje
By Ciskje (3 weeks ago)

Please when will be visible Sony A58 results?

0 upvotes
Ron Rosenzweig
By Ron Rosenzweig (3 weeks ago)

I am really impressed with the file quality, especially the tonality of the Fuji X-Pro 1. No, I don't own one but I am continually impressed with the images I see from that camera. And yes, I am blown away by the very little difference in apparent image quality between the 70D and the 5D MkIII. Nice comparison. I think you cold grab any of these cameras and create images of the finest file quality.

2 upvotes
dylanbarnhart
By dylanbarnhart (3 weeks ago)

I like the day light and low light simulation. Low light looks quite a bit worse that day light at the same ISO.

How about add another one for high contrast light? That way we can see the effect of dynamic range too. I know there's a Kodak gray scale chart at the top for judging dynamic range, but it's hard to see how it affects real life pictures. It needs a highlight region with high intensity light on it, and a shadow region in near darkness. Then it'd be easier to judge blown-out and black-out areas.

0 upvotes
JackM
By JackM (3 weeks ago)

Wow Nikon doesn't know how to write a JPEG!

0 upvotes
FujicaST605
By FujicaST605 (3 weeks ago)

No, Nikon's default jpeg are soft, but can be easily adjusted by their picture controls

0 upvotes
Ciskje
By Ciskje (3 weeks ago)

Nikon's jpeg are compressed very bad, they are not "soft", there is huge amount of noise visible.

0 upvotes
chj
By chj (3 weeks ago)

70D looks good, I can't pick a clear winner. GX7 also looks good.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
rhlpetrus
By rhlpetrus (3 weeks ago)

I have to say the new target is not very good, especially the images of people. All seem overexposed, with clipped Reds, not useful for evaluation of cameras or lenses. I miss the 3-dimensionality of the previous scene, and the many different colors and textures in feathers and other objects. The exception is the addition of the Beatles ;-)

Re the new Canon, it seems to lose a bit in detail compared to the 700D. And all lose compared to D7100 (RAW, of course).

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 5 minutes after posting
3 upvotes
lem12
By lem12 (3 weeks ago)

When placed on B&W scale the whites turn yellowish from X-Pro1 sample.

0 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

Sorry, I don't understand your point.

0 upvotes
lem12
By lem12 (3 weeks ago)

When I place that rectangular thing from the 20 bill to any white scale the output from two Canons and Nikon looks white, from FujiFilm is yellowish.

0 upvotes
lem12
By lem12 (3 weeks ago)

I have nothing against New Studio Scene. To me it looks more than enough, it's fine.

0 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

Is this in daylight mode or low light mode? The low light JPEGs are shot in Auto White balance, so give an insight into how much correction the cameras will try to do in tungsten light.

0 upvotes
lem12
By lem12 (3 weeks ago)

Thanks

0 upvotes
David Hull
By David Hull (3 weeks ago)

This thing looks to be relatively free of banding compared to past offerings (based on these images anyway).

0 upvotes
lem12
By lem12 (3 weeks ago)

As I see every camera maker chooses their own picture style method for JPEG's here. Both Canons are more natural in contrast - the 70D is leading, the 700D a bit brighter but has just a bit less contrast and bit yellower. The D7100 is even more yellow with everything but contrast. The X-Pro1 applies much less contrast than both Canons, less color saturated than Canons and Nikon and more balanced in that regard.

Comment edited 8 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
SaltLakeGuy
By SaltLakeGuy (3 weeks ago)

Across the board I see NO advantage of the 70D's output over my current OMD-EM5, in fact in most cases the OMD is crisper pulling better resolution. It's a nice try on Canon's part to improve upon the LiveView. Keep working on it I'd say.

0 upvotes
CNY_AP
By CNY_AP (3 weeks ago)

Olympus current 16MP cameras are awesome...but they lack a mirror which many still like (I think I'd prefer an EVF). 70D just tries to catch up on live view / direct focusing, nobody claimed it had best in class IQ. But realistically, every camera that's in this new tool/scene looks very good, and in prints or display on a computer, they would be very hard to tell apart.

1 upvote
D1N0
By D1N0 (3 weeks ago)

I'd like to see more camera's in the comparison tool. I'm missing my old reference points like the Pentax K-5 an Nikon D7000.

0 upvotes
Hugo808
By Hugo808 (3 weeks ago)

So they are to all intents and purposes identical then?

It's nice to know that judging a camera by IQ these days is a pursuit for obsessives and decisions can be made on the other features that they all share.

The differences must be so miniscule that buying a camera could be done on
whether you like the button arrangement.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 8 minutes after posting
3 upvotes
Akpinxit
By Akpinxit (3 weeks ago)

Actually , lack of controls , buttons , grip ...the " button arrangement" , is on main turn offs \ turn ons in this business .
IQ for non PP would be the second thing to compare .

As for this model , it seems (as was said here before) that next ACR may fix the softness of RAW file . Bit noisy though comparing to 700D .

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
BeaniePic
By BeaniePic (3 weeks ago)

Reading through the comments here reiterates to me that what the image taker wants and likes is different to what others like. This has been the same argument for years. Goes to show, use what you like. All the current range of cameras do a Fantastic job. I have my preference. Canon is my number 1 and gives me what I want.Sony misses the mark for me... Enjoy your kit whatever it is and love your photography :)

5 upvotes
Timbukto
By Timbukto (3 weeks ago)

ACR conversion not ready? Similar to strange EM-1 colors, 70D is 1/3rd stop brighter in low light but in jpeg the difference dissapears. AA filter is strong, one of the most moire free RAWs...I suspect its video performance will be very good. This comes at the cost of applying slightly more sharpening in post. Red channel performance suspect in ACR conversion...in jpeg not nearly the same difference between sensors as RAW. I do not think ACR is ready for the 70D or EM-1 with regards to sensor profiling.

Look at the black man's forehead in low light shot with raw vs jpeg...pretty significant difference in brightness...I have not digged into RAW to see if it actually is more greatly exposed although exposures should be same as 700D

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
yabokkie
By yabokkie (3 weeks ago)

the dual-pixel AF is too good that it's dull to play with.
I used to wow when someone did it manually.

0 upvotes
Timbukto
By Timbukto (3 weeks ago)

Skimmed DxOMark and the PMP scores did not improve over the 18MP sensor, so again it is pretty much true that the 70D is the most competent video camera but has made little progress in stills. A very offensive thought to pixel peepers, but in terms of consumer wants, its probably the correct business strategy on Canons part.

0 upvotes
Henry M. Hertz
By Henry M. Hertz (3 weeks ago)

the fuji color noise at high iso is amazing.

2 upvotes
chj
By chj (3 weeks ago)

because the Fuji applies noise reduction

0 upvotes
huyzer
By huyzer (3 weeks ago)

Colorchecker question

The addition of the ColorChecker is great. I read that those fade after a while (how long it takes will vary upon how, and how long it has been lit for, most likely). What are the plans to rotate in a new one?

Also, how about a chrome ball (for absolute highlight), and a black trap (for absolute shadow)? Similar in vein to this would be the SpyderCube.

Thanks.

0 upvotes
Lucas_
By Lucas_ (3 weeks ago)

Why no Sony SLT's for comparison? IMO at least the A57 and A58 (20MP) should be there.

2 upvotes
R Butler
By R Butler (3 weeks ago)

Both those two will be included in the coming days - I think the A58 is currently on the camera stand.

0 upvotes
chouster
By chouster (3 weeks ago)

As you can see it at imaging-resource, details and structure especially in the reds getting totally smudged and lost pretty fast with increasing iso.

0 upvotes
ThePassenger
By ThePassenger (3 weeks ago)

@DPR: On my monitor I noticed the followig behaviour of the test scene:

When I change my browser resolution to 110% and switch image size to "Print" or "Web", the grey rectangle of the test scene jumps to the upper left corner. Then the crops (at least the lower two ones) loose connection to the grey rectangle and remain unchanged or show a plain grey when the rectangle is moved.

If I leave image size at 100% everything works perfectly.

System: Win7, Browser: IE 9.0.20 or FF 11.0

0 upvotes
chouster
By chouster (3 weeks ago)

What can be seen here is that the Nikon D7100 is the best APS-C camera.

1 upvote
ThePassenger
By ThePassenger (3 weeks ago)

...with the worst JPG-engine ;-))

2 upvotes
Lucas_
By Lucas_ (3 weeks ago)

Just check the Nikon7100 at 1600ISO and above...

0 upvotes
Henry M. Hertz
By Henry M. Hertz (3 weeks ago)

only if you are a stupid biased nikon fanboy....

0 upvotes
lensberg
By lensberg (3 weeks ago)

@ chouster - your statement even contradicts DXO's findings... where apparently the D5200 is the "best APS-C DSLR" ... but Nikon's probably got DXO on their payroll...

Nobody's denying the D7100 is good ... but give credit where credit is due... the 70D is easily as good... if not better...

Even dpreview's studio sample scene clearly demonstrates that the 70D captures practically the same amount of detail plus retains it better all the way up the ISO ladder...

Look at all 4 peoples face in the test scene... the 70D definitely delivers the cleaner, less noisy set of images...

0 upvotes
yabokkie
By yabokkie (3 weeks ago)

@chouster
I think it is but I'd want to have a LPF even with slightly more noise (more shot noise for less high frequency noise).

@lensberg
I protest the low resolution 20.2MPix sensor. the 4MPix difference is quite visible. would prefer a 40.3MPix if Canon can do it (that is 80.6M photodiodes).

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 7 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
chouster
By chouster (3 weeks ago)

I admit the 70D is a very nice camera. But please take a look at the low light scene, raw, iso 800 and above, the red yarn looks disgusting, even compared to the 700D. IQ wise, the 70D can't match the D7100.

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
1 upvote
BeaniePic
By BeaniePic (3 weeks ago)

Oh dear.

0 upvotes
yabokkie
By yabokkie (3 weeks ago)

E-M1 looks noisier than E-M5 ...

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
James Booba
By James Booba (3 weeks ago)

hm 70D doesnt even comes close to a nex-6 in higher ISO ... meh.

0 upvotes
lensberg
By lensberg (3 weeks ago)

So it would be safe to assume Sony is light years ahead of Canon in sensor design... best solution lets stop buying Canon cameras... :)

Its obvious even to the untrained eye... Sony is applying NR in their RAW files... Look at the sketch of the old bearded man... Canon & Nikon's samples are much sharper...

2 upvotes
yabokkie
By yabokkie (3 weeks ago)

it's hard to define the word RAW. both Canon and Nikon process RAW files so we get black dots and missing stars. Sony do it quite heavily and Pentax do it to extreme (well done).

E-M5 maybe somewhere between Sony and Pentax but it's difficult to punish NR quantitatively.

btw, I'm convinced that 70D's sensor is inferior, though it may be less than 0.44 stops (difference between 70D and D7100 according to DxOMark) but exactly how much I don't know.

Comment edited 5 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Neal Hood
By Neal Hood (3 weeks ago)

Looks to me like the Fuji is the overall best one here. Nikon is very good too. But the truth of the matter, they are all pretty close. No one is vastly better than the other.

0 upvotes
chouster
By chouster (3 weeks ago)

Take a look at the artificial bulb light view. The 70D can't handle reds. RAW at iso 100 looks really bad, especially the red yarn. At iso 800 it's starting to look terrible, unacceptable.

Comment edited 50 seconds after posting
1 upvote
Duncan Dimanche
By Duncan Dimanche (3 weeks ago)

It's not the artificial light.... it's the actual low light test... this is where canon really falls apart.. I'm so glad that Dpreview finaly does an actual low light test.

Open your eyes world. Nikon IS the king of low light (in a low light environment not under the sun)

1 upvote
JustDavid
By JustDavid (3 weeks ago)

Duncan, might I suggest that there are two kings? Don't forget Pentax squeeze a bit more from the same sensors that Nikon uses. When DPreview add Pentax samples for the new tests, we shall see who's king and who is a Queen :)

0 upvotes
Frederik Paul
By Frederik Paul (3 weeks ago)

What is strange is that I get better results for the D7100 when I process the RAW files myself, especially regarding color noise.

1 upvote
Duncan Dimanche
By Duncan Dimanche (3 weeks ago)

Raw is the way to go ;)
So don't be surprise

0 upvotes
Eleson
By Eleson (4 weeks ago)

This was the day i stopped caring about test charts...
Seeing how the RX100 compares to the others @ ISO3200 or even 6400 I ask to myself "Why bother?"
Yes, the RX100 is softer in the corners, but still...

There must be other differentiators between cameras that matter a lot more!
Like repetitive tests of AF speed please ....

0 upvotes
JustDavid
By JustDavid (4 weeks ago)

just about as fast as my Pentax Q, well done :)

0 upvotes
Henry M. Hertz
By Henry M. Hertz (4 weeks ago)

have you noticed that the D7100 shows strange red cast in the "stripes" (JPG).

70D is all black and white, the D7100 showes ugly redish colors where none should be.

and at ISO 3200 the D7100 is no match for the 70D anymore.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 7 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
Duncan Dimanche
By Duncan Dimanche (3 weeks ago)

Are you looking at the JPGs or the RAW ?

Cause the 7100 blows away the Canon in terms of noise and sharp images... (Look at the low light scene for the high ISO cause this is what matters.. you use high ISO in low light not in a sunny day)
If you are going to judge the images with the jpgs then yes canon are sharper and so and so but that's just the Nikon way of exporting their JPGs...

Cheers

ps Go RAW !!

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
3 upvotes
InTheMist
By InTheMist (4 weeks ago)

I find the Fuji best, followed by the Nikon. Except reds where Canon 70D rules.

0 upvotes
chouster
By chouster (3 weeks ago)

Ehmm, no. The reds with the 70D are really bad.

0 upvotes
Matt1645f4
By Matt1645f4 (4 weeks ago)

What an excellent way of preventing comparisons for owners of cameras who might consider upgrading or changing brands. might as well not bothered doing this comparison studio test!!!

0 upvotes
Andy Westlake
By Andy Westlake (4 weeks ago)

You can still compare using the old test scene, which will remain in this review. We're actively working towards adding more cameras for the new scene.

2 upvotes
lensberg
By lensberg (4 weeks ago)

Very impressive noise performance... clearly leaps & bounds ahead of the 60D / T5i ... JPEG definitely looks cleaner than the D7100 ... albeit ever so slightly softer... D7100 image looks speckled with chroma noise for some reason...

0 upvotes
CJ Lan
By CJ Lan (4 weeks ago)

I really do not like the layout of this studio test.

2 upvotes
webrunner5
By webrunner5 (3 weeks ago)

I think it is terrible.

0 upvotes
TheProv
By TheProv (4 weeks ago)

Nikon D7100 JPG ISO 12800 is MISSING

1 upvote
TheProv
By TheProv (3 weeks ago)

I reply myself: it's not missing, but it's under/past ISO 25600, so if you set ISO12800 for 70D, the tool cannot find the same for D7100.

0 upvotes
Nukunukoo
By Nukunukoo (4 weeks ago)

As a D7100 owner, I am impressed at how the 70D's noise performance at ISO800 and below has improved over the 700D/60D. Granted some detail is lost at ISO1600 and above over the Nikon, it's still an improvement over its predecessors.

0 upvotes
Jacques Cornell
By Jacques Cornell (4 weeks ago)

I'm impressed by how well the latest m43 stack up. At ISO 1600 and above for RAW, I see little or no advantage to APS-C and only about a 1-stop advantage to the 5D3. Looks to me like MFT is now usable for event work up to ISO 3200. This is 1Ds2 performance, which was bloody good, in a tiny, cheap body. Cool!

0 upvotes
devlin2427
By devlin2427 (4 weeks ago)

Its pretty sad that Canon is now trailing m4/3s in sensor performance.

5 upvotes
Matt1645f4
By Matt1645f4 (4 weeks ago)

I find it shocking they've fallen so far, may be their concentrating on the FF sensors?

1 upvote
Henry M. Hertz
By Henry M. Hertz (4 weeks ago)

stop trolling morons....

0 upvotes
halfwaythere
By halfwaythere (3 weeks ago)

Truth, such a bitter pill.

0 upvotes
BeaniePic
By BeaniePic (3 weeks ago)

Each to there own... m4/3s misses the mark for me in all test work and jobs I've tried. Not used one to sell yet...

0 upvotes
Marko Laurits
By Marko Laurits (4 weeks ago)

I personally hope that the review will answer to my question: which is better video camera - Panasonic GH-3 or Canon 70D / 750D / M2?

And if Canon is good then which lenses are recommended?

Thank you in advance!

0 upvotes
rfsIII
By rfsIII (4 weeks ago)

Focus performance in video and still is much more important to me than almost any other parameter. Noise, dynamic range, pixel flavor, and all the other things don't matter if the shot is soft.

0 upvotes
Cindro
By Cindro (1 month ago)

Does anyone know, whether 70d has a problem with externally monitor as a 60d. At 60d when pressed rec automatically switches the image from 1080i to 480i

0 upvotes
V2MEdia
By V2MEdia (4 weeks ago)

That is for sure?

0 upvotes
mrtrik71
By mrtrik71 (1 month ago)

i think dxmo or whatever its called loves slamming canon maybe its just me but i think they just might be Nikon enthusiasts ,i think the 70D is a very awesome camera full stop.

Comment edited 33 seconds after posting
4 upvotes
Scott Eaton
By Scott Eaton (1 month ago)

One of my biggest gripes about my 60D is it's bad habit of blowing strong reds, which Dx0 confirmed in their sensor tests and can be illustrated on Dpreview's test studio scene. I hate to agree with 70D defenders, but I'm seeing a marked improvement in the 70D over the 60D, in terms of noise floor and especially color accuracy. Not sure what Dx0 is testing, but the tests I'm seeing here do show an improved sensor over the 7D and 60D, and not just results only visible by pixel peepers.

0 upvotes
yabokkie
By yabokkie (1 month ago)

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Database/
add to the end:
Canon/EOS-70D
Canon/EOS-700D
Nikon/D7100
Sony/NEX-7
for respective cameras.

1 upvote
gooz49
By gooz49 (4 weeks ago)

wow dxo. first time seeing this site. but. its a nikon site i tihnk. cause a crop sensor of a nikon is more than a full frame of any other brands. are you kidding me? not just the body. but the lenses as well. its in accurate and 100% nikon. all papers no real world test.... stick to dpreview. dxo is nothing.

0 upvotes
Matt1645f4
By Matt1645f4 (4 weeks ago)

DPReview love quoting and mentioning their friends at DX0 so you cant trust DPR 100% anymore :(

0 upvotes
KW Phua
By KW Phua (3 weeks ago)

Base of DXO result, all pro should use RX1 not D4 or 1D4. LOL.

0 upvotes
Total comments: 1013
12345