Previous page Next page

Canon EOS 700D/Rebel T5i Hands-on Preview

March 2013 | By Shawn Barnett and Andy Westlake


Preview based on a pre-production Canon EOS 700D

With the EOS 700D/Rebel T5i, Canon's made an early move to replace last year's 650D/Rebel T4i, though one with only very minor refinements. Indeed the changes over the 650D are so subtle that it's the older T3i/600D that stays on alongside the 700D - while the too-similar 650D fades into the sunset. The only real changes are that the 700D offers real-time preview of Creative Filters in Live View mode, includes a redesigned new mode dial that turns 360 degrees, and has a new 'upmarket' body finish.

Apart from those additions, the 700D is essentially identical to the 650D, making this the least distinct upgrade we've seen in this range of cameras. Elements carried over include the 18MP CMOS sensor, a 9-point cross-type AF sensor, 3-inch, a 1.04m-dot vari-angle LCD screen, and Full HD video mode. Its Hybrid AF system was also brought over from the 650D, and while the simultaneously announced 100D/Rebel SL1's Hybrid AF II covers a wider area than the one here, neither is said to be any faster than the rather slow implementation on the 650D.

Canon EOS 700D / Rebel T5i key features

  • 18MP APS-C 'Hybrid CMOS' sensor
  • Phase-detection AF from imaging sensor for Live View and Video
  • Continuous autofocus in movie mode with subject tracking
  • New 18-55mm STM kit lens with stepper motor for improved live view/video autofocus
  • 14-bit DIGIC 5 processor
  • ISO 100-12800 standard, 25600 expanded
  • 5 fps continuous shooting
  • 9 point AF system, all sensors cross type, central sensor F2.8 (from 60D)
  • 63 zone iFCL metering
  • 1080p30 video recording, stereo sound with internal or external mics
  • 1.04m dot 3:2 touch-sensitive vari-angle ClearView II LCD (capacitative type, multi-touch support)

The only other significant change made over and above the 650D is the ability to preview and apply Canon's 'Creative Filter' processing effects at the point of shooting, rather than adding them as a post-shot process. This ability to preview the effect (as now offered on the majority of cameras), makes it easier to pre-visualize how the final result will look - helping to inspire the capture of images that only work well in conjunction with the processing effect.

Meanwhile, the simplified mode dial removes any possible frustration of running up against the end of the dial's range of motion, and the larger, raised icons could be easier to find and use in low light situations.

Touchscreen control

The EOS 700D, like the 650D before it and the EOS 100D announced alongside, features a touchscreen. The screen is capacitative rather than resistive, meaning that like the now-ubiquitous smartphone, it's sensitive to contact rather than pressure and capable of interpreting more complex user input. In Live View and Movie modes the screen can be used to specify the point of focus and release the shutter, as we've seen before on several mirrorless cameras. It also supports multi-touch and gestures, meaning that it offers phone-like pinch-to-zoom and image-to-image swiping in playback. The results is a user experience that smartphone users will immediately find familiar.

Like the 650D, the 700D's entire interface can be controlled by touch in a completely seamless fashion, including the onscreen Q menu that's used to access secondary functions, and the entirety of the menu system. Fortunately this doesn't come at the cost of external controls, and the EOS 700D offers essentially the same level of button-and-dial operation as its predecessors; the screen simply adds an additional control option.

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM lens

Introduced alongside the EOS 700D is the EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 IS STM lens. While the camera itself doesn't appear to offer much of an upgrade, the option to buy it with the new, stepper-motor-driven 18-55mm STM lens stands out as its main attraction. It promises better movie focusing and up to four stops of image stabilization, along with a close focusing distance of 0.25m and a circular seven-bladed aperture. An internal focus design means the lens does not extend on focusing. Available separately for $249, the 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 IS STM lens should cost considerably less when purchased as a kit.

Those familiar with using just about any camcorder are accustomed to smooth and reasonably accurate autofocus, while the average SLR focuses slowly (indeed previous Rebels only focused when prompted by the user). Because an SLR can't use its phase-detect sensor while in Live View and video modes, the camera is usually left to struggle with contrast-detect autofocus. And, because non-STM lenses aren't designed with this focus method or for this purpose, the results were often jerky shifts in focus with focus motor noise audible on the video's sound track. Older Rebels were even known to gain up exposure during video if you asked them to focus.

The 700D will also be available bundled with the EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM, which offers an extended zoom range at a higher price. Canon's only other SLR lens with an STM motor is the EF 40mm F2.8 pancake. All are designed to take full advantage of the Hybrid AF system found in the EOS 650D, 700D and 100D, with quiet autofocus, helpful when shooting video, and full time manual focus.

The EOS 700D's Hybrid AF II system is designed to work optimally with Canon's three-lens STM lineup which consists of an 18-55mm, 18-135mm and fixed 40mm pancake lens.
Compared to the previous EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II lens, the STM version is slightly longer to accommodate the internal focus system, and has a 'proper' manual focus ring at the front of the barrel that drive the focus group electronically. As with the older design it's physically shortest in the middle of its zoom range, and extends on zooming either to 18mm or 55mm (click here for a comparison at 55mm).

The STM focus motor is extremely quiet and, when using the optical viewfinder, impressively fast, offering a noticeable improvement over its predecessor. But switch the camera to live view and, just like the 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM, it slows down significantly. This is a unfortunate - Canon's live view AF system still distinctly lags behind the competition.

The filter thread on the STM lens remains 58mm. The inner-focus design means it doesn't rotate on autofocus, and allows the use of an optional petal-type lens hood rather (than the relatively ineffective bowl-type hood of its predecessor). As we'd expect at this level, the lens mount is plastic. This is an EF-S, lens so only fits on Canon's APS-C cameras.

Hybrid Autofocus

Canon says the Hybrid AF system is primarily designed as a video tool. The on-imager phase-detection system means that the autofocus system is able to make use of the company's extensive understanding of phase-detection subject tracking. It also means that, if you're focusing near the center of the image, the camera will always know in which direction to begin searching for focus. Systems based solely on contrast-detection can sometimes get this wrong, with the result that the camera re-focuses all the way out of focus before coming back again, resulting in a video that suddenly drops totally out of focus before recovering.

The camera's hybrid AF system uses a combination of contrast-detection AF and on-imager phase-detection AF. The contrast detection can be used across much of the image area (marked by the red dotted line), with phase-detection limited to the central region (bounded by the green dotted line).

For reference, the spread of the conventional phase-detection points is also marked and these are used if 'Quick AF' is used in live view mode.

The phase-detection system is used for identifying where the subject currently is, with contrast detection kicking-in to fine-tune focus. This means there will still be a slight 'focus wobble' as it confirms focus, but it should be considerably reduced thanks to the combination of the two AF technologies. However, while hybrid AF is available with all lenses, smooth and quiet AF for video is dependent on the use of the latest STM lenses.

Overall, while Canon says that the Hybrid AF system means live view focus is considerably improved, it still says there is a noticeable performance difference between live view AF and using the conventional autofocus sensor. This is underlined by the camera continuing to offer the 'Quick AF' mode in live view, which quickly flips the mirror down so the stand-along phase-detection sensor can be used.

Given the speed improvements we've seen in mirrorless cameras using similar lens and focus technologies (which are often faster than DSLRs using their fastest focus modes), it's disappointing that Canon isn't able to offer similar performance.


If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.

Images which can be viewed at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a larger (typically VGA) image in a new window.

To navigate the review simply use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the navigation bar at the top.

DPReview calibrate their monitors using Color Vision OptiCal at the (fairly well accepted) PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally A,B and C.

This article is Copyright 2012 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Previous page Next page

Comments

Total comments: 154
12
JJ Rodin
By JJ Rodin (2 days ago)

Bill Stewart seems to think DIGIC processor/processing and sensor are the same thing, don't believe so, thats why we have those 2 diff words.

Processing the same sensor (or a diff one) differently will 'probably give diff results, me thinks that is the point!

DIGIC generations always seems to be a faster processor allowing more things done, in the case of the DIGIC 6 in the sx280hs, the AF is certainly faster than sx260hs, as well as other claims.

Same must be said for DIGIC 4->5 change, more is done, enough for you, only you know.

0 upvotes
locke_fc
By locke_fc (3 days ago)

"With the EOS 700D/Rebel T5i, Canon's made an early move to replace last year's 650D/Rebel T4i, though one with only very minor refinements..."

Shocker! A Rebel camera virtually identical to its predecesor? I did not see it coming

0 upvotes
Bill Stewart
By Bill Stewart (4 days ago)

People complaining about it not having a new sensor seem confused: It has the NEW Canon DIGIC-5 Image Processor, which is clearly superior to the older DIGIC-4 sensor in every other Canon except for the T4i. The T4i was dropped and this was added... it's a REPLACEMENT, not an upgrade.

An upgrade would be to another line altogether like a 60D or 7D. Rebel -to- Rebel is NOT an upgrade.

Too many people are missing the point that these are ENTRY level... WHY would you upgrade from 1 entry level to another? Just because the letters & numbers change, it is still the REBEL line, which is entry level.

When you upgrade your PC video card do you upgrade to the same level of card, or do you move up?

Think of it as replacing an NVidia GT550. Would you "Upgrade" to a 650? It's not an upgrade, it's a replacement, GT570 or GT670 would be the correct "upgrade".

0 upvotes
denni515
By denni515 (1 week ago)

I just upgraded my Xsi with the T5i and am thrilled! I had the older 18-135 lens but struggled with the sharpness and the new 18-135 STM lens is the perfect solution. I am very happy with performance and IQ. May not be worth the upgrade from the t4i but definitely worth every penny for me!!

1 upvote
Shaun Iza
By Shaun Iza (1 week ago)

I just got it. I have recent experience with Sony A380, Pentax Kr, and Nikon D3200. The T5i is far superior to those cameras. Finally I have a camera that can produce the combination of sharpness, colors, contrast, and zero noise I want without having to spend time post processing. I don't think this is because I got lucky and got an exceptionally good copy and other cameras were bad copies. This camera with the 18-135STM may not be the cheapest DSLR on the market right now, but it is definitely the best investment without having to break the bank. The better build quality makes it worth the few dollars more over the t4i.

0 upvotes
Hugo808
By Hugo808 (5 days ago)

Good review, all I need to know!

0 upvotes
RichDawson
By RichDawson (1 month ago)

Thinking of getting the T5i but the SL1 is great for women and for entry level. It is the lightest and smallest dslr today. http://runningshoereview.hubpages.com/hub/Canon-EOS-Rebel-SL1-Review

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
LVPhoto1
By LVPhoto1 (2 months ago)

The last cameras that I have are the Canon 1D MK IV’s. I bought the Canon T5i/700D for its compatibility to use the group feature for my 5-600 EX-RT Speedlites coupled with the Canon ST-E3-RT transmitter. This little camera just works great for when I want to use the group feature, a lot cheaper than updating to the Canon 1DX, or the Canon 5D MK III although I will probably update at a later date this year depending if Canon releasing anything new.

Comment edited 9 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
RichDawson
By RichDawson (2 months ago)

I've read a lot of great things about the Canon T5i, but those who already got the T4i are complaining that it only has a few enhancements. I've seen a great review about it at http://runningshoereview.hubpages.com/hub/Canon-Eos-Rebel-T5i-Review

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
domina
By domina (2 months ago)

i'm not getting a lens with a plastic mount!

3 upvotes
Jennah
By Jennah (2 months ago)

Unless maybe you have the 650D, it is worth it to buy the 700D. There are only few upgrades from its predecessor but the quality is still great. I think it is officially available to the public for purchase: http://www.squidoo.com/canon-eos-rebel-t5i-review

1 upvote
kingvj
By kingvj (2 months ago)

is it worth to buy 700D?

0 upvotes
Gintaras_J
By Gintaras_J (2 months ago)

Judging from samples (flickr.com and dpreview.com) this camera has very good IQ.

0 upvotes
Vegasus
By Vegasus (2 months ago)

I thought 700D will hv a built in WIFI n DUAL CARDs, larger screen, and 7fps? Its not happening... Perhaps the next one 750D, hv all the features i mentioned.

Comment edited 6 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Mark my words
By Mark my words (2 months ago)

700D has 9 point AF Cross Focusing. On my 550D only the centre AF is cross. Using servo focus to photograph (for example) birds in flight having 9 point Cross focus is a distinct advantage.

1 upvote
ArtVideo
By ArtVideo (2 months ago)

:::: anyone know what is the maximum Continuous Shooting Time? is true that is about 30 minutes? ::::::anyone know for sure if the camera have plug for headphones and plug for microphone ? :::::: Thanks a lot people ::::::::

0 upvotes
Banhmi
By Banhmi (2 months ago)

Way to open the door a little wider for Sony, Canon.

2 upvotes
HKBen
By HKBen (2 months ago)

The T5i spec is very similar to T4i. T5i is coming out about 1 year after T4i, it may imply that T4i has possible hardware problems which it cannot be fixed easily. Remember, T4i's price cut very often when it just came out. There is no better than T3i in Canon entry DSLR as of today - my opinion.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
KristyO49333
By KristyO49333 (4 weeks ago)

My school offers a voucher for the T3i. I was worried that I was getting ripped...not so sure now. LOL

0 upvotes
Joo Prates
By Joo Prates (2 months ago)

The 700D is a marketing product... I bought a 650 D four months ago and the swivel-and-tilt screen is peeling, and I have only taken studio pictures and a few in the field... I have a 400D for years, and is impeccable. Canon launched 650D full of problems and using cheap quality materials; a camera that cost 750 €, is not cheap and compared to the 400D looks like a plastic toy ... I have been a Canon customer for years, but if I can sell my Canon lenses, I’ll go for Nikon and I advise those who are considering to buy a SLRD, to compare similar cameras and feel the differences. In high-end products Canon cameras are excellent... with entry or mid level cameras, Canon wants to make money and face competition, using cheap materials. It’s my opinion and I’m very disappointed with Canon.

0 upvotes
Artmech
By Artmech (2 months ago)

I bought a 650D within 30 mins it froze with liveview, replacement body did the same Canon said they had no knowledge of a problem. Maybe they have fixed the freeze fault on the 700D or maybe it was the STM 18-135 that had the problem. Canon just said get a refund. I am not sure if it would be wise to get a 700D just yet. As regards video its the large sensor that gives that film look which you cant get with a semi-pro camcorder you would have to go for C300, and some very expensive glass.

0 upvotes
Bernard F
By Bernard F (1 month ago)

Most of the sony NEX range of camcorders have a larger sensor than this Canon SLR. The range includes camcorders aimed at advanced amateurs through to professionals. The mount, through inexpensive converters, allows for a large range of glass to be used.

0 upvotes
CrveneStar
By CrveneStar (3 months ago)

Save yourself some cash. Buy a used Canon Rebel XT for $100. If you want to spend more invest in some high quality lenses that you can keep and use when you upgrade to a Canon 40 D. Both the XT and 40 D are great cameras and very well reviewed (read the DP Review archives). Both set the bench mark.

A true entry level camera should not cost nearly $1,000 with a basic lens. They offer more features than most consumers need. More mega pixels are not practical for best picture quality (high MP = too much noise). If you own a previous Rebel model and want to upgrade step up and get a used 40 D. If you buy the latest Rebel you are dropping a lot of dough and getting about the same thing as what you already have. Most folks who buy one will never use it and end up reselling it. They will be shocked at how little it is worth on the resale market.

If people want a video camera why are they shopping for a DSLR in the first place? Don't true video cameras take better video anyways?

1 upvote
MrPrime
By MrPrime (3 days ago)

I have the XT as my main camera and I can say that it produces perfectly good IQ for my needs. BUT the AF in this cameras is not very good if you have fast lenses. I find the AF unreliable and this is the main reason why I want to upgrade. I am using the Sigma 30mm f1.4 and Canon 85mm f1.8 - both produce great images but I can't trust the AF every time. Of course some skill is needed when focussing such fast lenses, but even taking account of the need to develop the experience and skills to use them, you don't want to be second guessing the camera's AF. And the low resolution LCD viewer is not up to the job of confirming focus accuracy in the field.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
CrveneStar
By CrveneStar (3 months ago)

The T5i seems pointless. What was wrong with the T4i? Canon has not stuck with it for long at all. The Canon XT was and is a great camera. Look at the DP Review archives. Check out Ken Rockwell's blog posting on it. 6 MP is sufficient for great photo quality, the 8 MP that the Rebel XT offers is more than enough to take great consumer/hobby level photos. Camera companies are cramming more MP's into cameras in an attempt to keep up with the competition. Save some money and invest in high quality lenses. if you want to get a semi pro camera go out and buy a good quality Canon 40 D with a 28-135 or 17-85 lens. It has better image quality than the 50 D (see DP Review of 50D) and used versions sell for half what iused 50D 's are selling for.

If you really need a consumer level DSLR that shoots video buy a T2i save some money and get a good lens. No need to get a T5i. If you don't need a DSLR to shoot video save money and buy an old XT. You can always buy a video camera.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Wael Hussain
By Wael Hussain (3 months ago)

canon are really Joking

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 1 minute after posting
3 upvotes
Wael Hussain
By Wael Hussain (3 months ago)

i am surprised to see canon 700d
there is no much time between 650d and 700d !!!!!
there are no differences between them and i think 650d is better than 700d and i don't know why????
canon just make many camera during short time with no much differences not like Nikon and others
compare between Nikon D5000 and Nikon D5200
you will see much differences during just 2 generation
while in canon 500d till 700d
4 generations with no much differences !!!!
i am really shocked

Comment edited 5 minutes after posting
3 upvotes
yabokkie
By yabokkie (3 months ago)

I think Canon should have come with a better sensor but Sony have been using their 16MP sensor on too many models, too. and different from Nikon, Canon fab the sensors themselves which makes them less flexible.

0 upvotes
Oussouye
By Oussouye (3 months ago)

I think that this Joke of Canon called the new 700D came from the first 650D production which had a problem with body material used.
So 650D is linked to bad body material so asking canon for a replacement.
But since at least August 2012 all the 650D are perfect!

So if ever you have a doubt, don't buy that Joke 700D buy the 65OD. same camera but soon much cheaper.

0 upvotes
paxart
By paxart (3 months ago)

I am sorry, I'm late... what is upgraded? I have 650D and I can't find the difference. Just objective, viewfinder and firmware?

1 upvote
Oussouye
By Oussouye (3 months ago)

There is no difference , but the label 700D in place of 650D and the molette, unlocked now, allowing 360° to choose your program!
That dad been more usefull on a 550D or a 600D than on the 650D which already had the Video program apart of the molette.
A Marketing joke job

Comment edited 14 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Bowest
By Bowest (3 weeks ago)

There are very few noticeable differences but apparently the T4i had something wrong somewhere. I don't know where but since it was so short lived there had to be something pretty serious. I'm glad I didn't buy a T4i though.

0 upvotes
danmurrelljr
By danmurrelljr (3 months ago)

Good grief you people are seriously spoiled.

I'm still shooting quality shots with a 40D and a 400D. If you have a 650D, then this camera wasn't for you anyway. It's for new customers, and people with older cameras like mine. Companies don't make milestone cameras (smartphones, cars, etc.) every year for a reason. That kind of R&D takes a much longer view, so that when the truly revolutionary models come out, they actually ARE milestones. In the meantime, they can put out a refreshed model so that their 'latest' isn't three years old.

8 upvotes
OseasMillan
By OseasMillan (3 months ago)

Canon It's a Joke with the T2i with Service Pack 3

5 upvotes
Oussouye
By Oussouye (3 months ago)

Right and the 100D is T2I service Pack 1.5 (3/2) as it has to be less heavy lol

1 upvote
BlackPawPhoto
By BlackPawPhoto (3 months ago)

Would be nice to see something that is innovative or exciting. Don't be afraid Canon. We'll wait and see what you do with the 70D and 7D MKII. Hopefully you increase performance and resolve movie making issues such as moire, rolling shutter, and focus. Try adding something useful that sets the cameras apart from their predecessors. Don't be boring.

In this day and age, by releasing camera bodies with these calculated, incremental upgrades will eventually alienate your customers. We know there's better technology out there, so quit holding back.

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
dtvmike
By dtvmike (3 months ago)

surprised it doesn't have wifi as other like the fuji and the canon sx270 have then built in. or maybe even GPS like the 6d, doesn't seem much of an upgrade from a t4i.

0 upvotes
wmac
By wmac (3 months ago)

Oh, you should buy a $200 dongle I assume! (while my <$100 and < 100 grams phone has both Wifi and 3G)

2 upvotes
spy442299
By spy442299 (3 months ago)

700D have 'Hybrid CMOS' sensor' Or ''Hybrid CMOS' sensor II' ???????????

0 upvotes
CameraLabTester
By CameraLabTester (3 months ago)

Canon and (what's the name of the other fellow? Aah, Nikon) are very good at:

Re-arranging the buttons and switches on an otherwise SAME camera...

...and here ladies and gentlemen, the 700D: the latest Musical Chair control bot.

.

3 upvotes
Nectar D Or
By Nectar D Or (3 months ago)

I don't know about that. The button arrangment is pretty similar to my 600D.

0 upvotes
Pete Mc
By Pete Mc (3 months ago)

This quick replacement of the 650D appears to vindicate my personal assessment the the 650D was actually far worse at focusing than the 550D.

http://www.videometry.net/650D_vs_550D/650D_vs_550D.jpg

Whether this was general, or the manufacturing process was unstable, and I got a one of the bad ones, I guess I'll never know.
Certainly if you were coming from anything other than a 2Meg phone, the results were not impressive. The touchscreen was great though, and the only thing I missed when I returned it.

1 upvote
WayneDB
By WayneDB (3 months ago)

Reading through the majority of comments i can just see this scenario:
DPreview to Ansel Adams: hey Mr A, please try out this new model from Canon...
Ansel to DPreview... Oh my God! It still only has 18 megapixels! What a piece of junk! And hey it costs a whole whopping 20 bucks more then the 650D! Jeesh canon are ripping us off..I couldn't take a picture with this thing!!! The last model was amazing but this thing only added like real time view of creative filters...toss the junk! Shoot the bastards!

0 upvotes
ginobi
By ginobi (3 months ago)

Ansel: d5200 is much better

11 upvotes
Coyote_Cody
By Coyote_Cody (3 months ago)

For what reason do YOU need more than 18mp?? DR improvements would be welcome, no need for more pixels!!

We are NOT talking about your manhood, this is for taking pictures!! :)

Better to have a great 18mp than a mediocre 24mp ?!

0 upvotes
Coyote_Cody
By Coyote_Cody (3 months ago)

BTW, suspect NO Ansel Adams on this forum!! :)

0 upvotes
D Gold
By D Gold (3 months ago)

>DR improvements would be welcome, no need for more pixels!!

Actually, the Nikon D5200 and D3200 have more DR than the 650D, (just check the results right here or DXOMark), and until you have actually shot these higher megapixel cameras, one might want to reserve judgement - they produce stunning detail.

Finally, if you want to get serious about DR and color depth, go full frame and shoot raw.

0 upvotes
wmac
By wmac (3 months ago)

@Coyote_cody

Exactly what improvements have been made from 550D to 700D to make it better or great?

The sensor is the same outdated one which is 2-3 years behind competition (D5200 and even D3200) , not in pixels but in DR, Color Depth and low light performance.

Comment edited 55 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Ron Rosenzweig
By Ron Rosenzweig (3 months ago)

DPReview Editors: On your spec sheet under Connectivity please note whether a camera has a mic connection. This is missing from your reviews and adds confusion until one zooms in on a photo of the camera to reveal a mic jack or not. You guys do a great job and are proud of the amount of detail in your reviews....please include all of the details in the spec sheet. Thank you for your kind consideration !!

2 upvotes
nycgeo
By nycgeo (3 months ago)

Correction: The EOS M had a stereo mic first. It has not been reviewed here.

0 upvotes
SiliconVoid
By SiliconVoid (3 months ago)

BORING….

Oh, sorry.. I was referring to the whinny-ass comments, not the camera….

Why do we have to hear from the gadgetographers every time a new camera is announced? Does a camera have to have more mp and speech recognition to be of benefit? Do we need 36mp to get great 2-8mp downsampled images? Is high-mp high-gain noise ok because it can look like 'grain'? The industry does not need film-like 'grain' at ISO-640 so some gadgetographers can have more mp - especially when 95% of everything they produce ends up a ~2mp image on a computer screen.
Why do people complain what the newest model 'needs' when they are not even capable of using the camera they have...?

What we - need - is better performance from current technology.
We need ISO-100 IQ up to ISO-6400.
We need less expensive better quality lenses.
We need people to stop buying these toys and force the manufacturers back to producing the most efficient, capable, digital photography tools they can for a reasonable price.

11 upvotes
Rbrt
By Rbrt (3 months ago)

I'm with you on the lens comment!

1 upvote
carlosdelbianco
By carlosdelbianco (3 months ago)

Tough competitor for Nikon D5100!

6 upvotes
wmac
By wmac (3 months ago)

or D5000!

3 upvotes
Lucas_
By Lucas_ (3 months ago)

Perhaps Canon's Next model will innovate by having a Sony sensor...

2 upvotes
lightsniper
By lightsniper (3 months ago)

What he said...

1 upvote
wmac
By wmac (3 months ago)

I wish they finally give up if they cannot play in sensor game.

They have good bodies and good software. The outdated sensor ruins all that.

0 upvotes
Bowest
By Bowest (3 weeks ago)

Press 1 for ENGLISH.

1 upvote
ecka84
By ecka84 (3 months ago)

Next stop - EF-S 55-250/4-5.6 STM ?

1 upvote
PaulRacecar
By PaulRacecar (3 months ago)

I was planning to buy the T4i/650D, now I've changed my mind and I'm getting this one instead. Why not get the latest model right?

1 upvote
Zigadiboom
By Zigadiboom (3 months ago)

Actually save your money and get a 550d because in the context of Canon's inability to innovate that too would also be considered the latest model.

3 upvotes
WayneDB
By WayneDB (3 months ago)

Zigadiboom what a pile of absolute junk your comment is. What on earth do you expect from this line of camera? Go back and think about what you want from a camera...this is their budget retail line and it does that job very well...

2 upvotes
Peter62
By Peter62 (3 months ago)

But for the same amount of money NIKON does the job better...and I am a Canon user!

0 upvotes
Coyote_Cody
By Coyote_Cody (3 months ago)

550D does not have some video capabilities & adjustments 650D has, now the 700D has 60p full HD & hopefully even more adjustments, so if you want a still/video cam, the 700D IS the better cam, stills only, only if AF is better.

0 upvotes
GabrielZ
By GabrielZ (3 months ago)

I don't get it. Why doesn't this new model incorporate the upgraded hybrid image sensor found in the 100D?

0 upvotes
Joseph Kerollos
By Joseph Kerollos (3 months ago)

Simply because Next year the 750D will come out with that Sensor! Canon is working with the Concept Milk your own customer until he is dry!

Look at the cheap entry to the full frame field, another joke called 6D when compared with the Nikon D600 (Same Price Range)

Now I almost regret I didn't get a NIKON!!!

2 upvotes
Bill Stewart
By Bill Stewart (4 days ago)

Your comment will probably confuse people. They both have the same DIGIC-5 IMAGE Sensor, the the SL1 (100D) has the new CONTRAST AF sensor.

0 upvotes
Peanut88
By Peanut88 (3 months ago)

yaWNNN ! ! !
z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z

4 upvotes
marste
By marste (3 months ago)

wake up also me when something happen!!

0 upvotes
Bowest
By Bowest (3 weeks ago)

This kind of responses are stupid responses, don't you think!!!!!!!

Comment edited 30 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
peevee1
By peevee1 (3 months ago)

" (Note: these last two images are of the Canon 650D.)"

Right, why even bother with a preview? The list of new features, with pictures, would take half a page.

0 upvotes
naftade
By naftade (3 months ago)

Come on Canon, show us a new sensor for once, or have you lost your mojo?

2 upvotes
naftade
By naftade (3 months ago)

The samples are not really what I'd call awe-inspiring.

Maybe they should have posted one or two images, that were taken with a good lens.

0 upvotes
pixel_colorado
By pixel_colorado (3 months ago)

I am thrilled with the release of the T5i, it should hopefully bring down the cost of the T4i so I can get one. ;-)

Comment edited 21 seconds after posting
1 upvote
Crimguy
By Crimguy (3 months ago)

This camera should be called the EOS 650D Firmware Update Edition™

13 upvotes
wmac
By wmac (3 months ago)

Why not 550D-Sp3

2 upvotes
RXVGS
By RXVGS (3 months ago)

Canon
Recycled
Another
Product
!

5 upvotes
mpgxsvcd
By mpgxsvcd (3 months ago)

I like how the "Compared to Previous Model" chart has been omitted from this preview. That would be a really short list.

7 upvotes
matthiasbasler
By matthiasbasler (3 months ago)

Really strange, this mini-upgrade.

I hope the dpreview team will check whether the firmware has been improved; there certainly are some areas which deserve attention, such as f.e. the fact that on the 650D the continuous burst rate drops to 1 image per second after three images if the chromatic abberation correction is turned on. (This is documented nowhere, I had to figure it out myself.) I wish Canon added features like a digital ND filter or recording sound notes to the firmware, but I fear that's not the case - otherwise they would have mentioned it.

3 upvotes
Peter62
By Peter62 (3 months ago)

Disappointing - at least!

What is wrong with Canon ?

Still the same sensor as in my good old EOS 550D (T2i)?!? So with the 700D you'll get the same image quality as in February 2010... Wow, Canon - respect!

CANON now has clearly fallen behind NIKON. It's a shame...

Comment edited 6 minutes after posting
9 upvotes
DaytonR
By DaytonR (3 months ago)

its not totally disappointing , this camera still represents a good "upgrade" for those with older cameras like the T1i, XT,XTi etc

0 upvotes
mpgxsvcd
By mpgxsvcd (3 months ago)

Technically the T2i sensor was the highest rated APS-C sensor Canon has ever produced. Everything after the T2i has gone downhill.

8 upvotes
ralph m
By ralph m (3 months ago)

I have had no inclination to upgrade from my T2i. I am not into video so maybe that makes a difference. The only lens I have bought in 3 or 4 years is the 40mm 2.8. I hope I am not indicative of the Canon base because if i am.. they are in trouble.

0 upvotes
EDWARD ARTISTE
By EDWARD ARTISTE (3 months ago)

Nailed it on the t2i head. The image quality from the 550 still stands tall today- and i swear by it, guaranteed!

0 upvotes
WayneDB
By WayneDB (3 months ago)

So what is wrong with the IQ of feb 2010... are you just buying a camera because it is the best blah blah and is better then a Nikon...for goodness sake go take a great pic with an old twin-lens reflex...get a photographic life...jeesh it only has 18MP what a crisis!

0 upvotes
Peter62
By Peter62 (3 months ago)

Nothing is wrong with my 3 years old EOS550D. But newer Nikons with SONY sensors have a much better dynamic range! And this is by far the most important difference in todays sensors.

And 3 "real" years are 30 years in camera development...

0 upvotes
JosHendrikx
By JosHendrikx (3 months ago)

Unbelievable.... As a 650D owner I am relieved that my camera has not been surpassed by the 'latest and greatest' flagship model, but I cannot understand why Canon would launch such a non-upgrade. For a camera company that was so innovative in bringing us affordable digital SLRs, this is really a disgrace. My heart goes out to the poor employees of their marketing department who were forced to promote the 'wonderful' creative filters and non-stopping mode dial as the only unique selling point this body has. What a flop! I hope this is not an indicator of poor upgrades of the 60D and 7D and that Canon will learn their lesson and put more effort into a 70D/7DII/800D.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
5 upvotes
DaytonR
By DaytonR (3 months ago)

They cant just keep bringing out innovative improvements all the time because there really arent that many innovative ideas left they could bring , its not just Canon a similar thing happened on the iPhone when they announced the 4S version.

I think sooner or later this will start to be the norm with most camera makers ( and smartphones), if they keep bringing out "new" models almost yearly then we will reach points like this were the next model will hardly have much to distinguish it from the previous one.

Similar stuff is also happening with software which gets yearly releases .....

2 upvotes
WayneDB
By WayneDB (3 months ago)

I am really struggling here...unless the manufacturer doubles their whizz-bang factor on a new release it's crap??? take the canon G11 vs the G12... according to your standards the G12 is a rubbish upgrade as effectively all they added is that little finger wheel on the front? As an owner of both trust me, that little wheel turns the G11 into a spectacular improvement in every day use. It is a granular improvement on an exceptional product. Oh hang on...they didn't double the megapixels! oh no my new G12 will take crap pictures!!!

0 upvotes
Total comments: 154
12