Category A - Photographic Section Portfolio 2013. 'Parade parade-shun!' SAC Tracey Dobson, 21 October 2013
#3 is my favourite!
Bravo,,, #12 is astonishing
the others are good, but #12 is awe-inspiring
Have a look at this:
Nº 12 is fantastic
Good pictures - for Royal Amusement Fraternity.
Real airforce pictures look like these:http://www.google.com/search?q=aerial+strike+iraq&espv=210&es_sm=93&source=lnms&tbm=isch
Its a competition. So, that is to be expected.
"Real airforce pictures" ? The RAF is the "real airforce", the oldest independent airforce in the world, not sure where you're coming from with that silly comment.
RAF might have been a real airforce about 100 years ago. Now they are just as real as these dudes in high hats "protecting" your queen a real army.
You obviously don't subscribe to the adage "Better keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than open it and remove all doubt." Indeed, you seem to delight in displaying your ignorance to the world at large. You may wish to explain to the families of the 36 Guardsmen (the "dudes in high hats", are front line infantry when not on ceremonial duty ) killed in action in Afghanistan to date, that apparently, they are not in a real army. Presumably, all of the 446 British Forces personnel killed in action in Afghanistan are part of the 'pretend' Army/Air Force/Navy as well. If the RAF was only a 'real air force' about 100 years ago, who the hell defeated the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain 73 years ago?
Great shots. No 2 stood out as something special.
Call me Mr. Grumpy, but I mainly see many oversaturated, overexposed and overprocessed photos...I like some, though, like Nos. 4-5-6-10.Not much else.
Not grumpy at all, perfectly right. The truth is that professionals simply don't know what they are doing. What the RAF needs is a bunch of good armchair captains to round up their photo compilations and kick out the riffraff. Your comment has convinced me to put full support behind you. Show those professionals how to do their job!
Thats because your not interested in the photo itself, your interested in the the technical aspects ofthe photo.
1. Are you implying that an amateur cannot criticise a professional, ever?What do you do when you see, say, a pro guitarist fumbling over the fingerboard with a super-distorted effect plugged in? Based on your post you are only allowed to gape in awe because he's the pro and you're the amateur.
2. I never suggested nor implied that I was able to take better photos than those guy here, however this seems to be one of the main targets of you're ridicule.
3. I'd like to point out that there are far better photos online, made by amateurs (on aviation/flightsim enthusiasts fora, or sites like Jetphotos, for instance), and these here are supposedly the best photos from the best photogs who work with RAF and have therefore access to some locations/events which are restricted to the general public (and therefore also to amateur photogs). (continues)
4. I take pictures as a hobby, and when one of my pictures has good composition, portrays an interesting subject, but I've been sloppy with, say, exposure or pp (RAW development, mainly), then I'm not happy with what I've done.I'm not a "pro", in the sense that I don't get a living out of it, but had I been up to similar quality standards in my job (which is not photography) I think I would have been fired immediately. There's a fierce competition in almost every field nowadays.
5. @: Are you then suggesting that professionals should only worry about subject and composition? That's beyond preposterous.
6. You say I should care about the content of those photos, not the form: well I admit I did not say that in the first place, but most of these are flat and unimaginative under this perspective as well. Hell, many of those don't even tell a story.(continues)
7. If I had equally flattered every single gallery here then my praise would be devoided of significance.I'm happy to comment favourably on the many astounding photos and portfolios Dpreview regularly publishes (and those get much more comments than this one, go figure...), and give praise to those who, IMHO, rightfully deserve it.However, I'm sorry to say, that's not the case.
LensBeginner: I am a professional artist and have taught photo for some time. I agree this your initial impressions.
Just a suggestion: be careful not to be too thin skinned here. Someone will likely always be willing to stick a hook in it.
I think the images are good. There are other images that are good in other ways and of course also "gooder" in many ways.
You have to understand that this is a photo competition. Competition seldom results in the uttermost fantastic images. If you want really good images then you should probably look at awarded images instead.
@Roland Karlssonwait... shouldn't the winner of the competition get... an award!? :-D We'll see who the winner will be
@b crawThanks for your kind words,I hope that you noticed the tone of my rebuttal, which was, I do believe - calm and self-controlled
Stunning photos. I think for the last one, he may have intended the title to be "Slip the SURLY bonds of Earth..." by John Gillespie Magee, used by Peggy Noonan to write a speech for President Reagan to describe the fate of the Challenger Shuttle crew in 1986. "Slipped the surly bonds of Earth to touch the face of God."
Amazing photo nonetheless. :)
That last photo is indeed amazing and your proposed title fits perfectly.