Previous news story Next news story

Just Posted: Pentax K-5 II / K-5 IIS Review

Jun 4, 2013 at 01:11:37 GMT

REVIEW PENTAX REVIEW

Pin It

Print view

Offering a high-dynamic-range CMOS sensor, a unique shake reduction system, and a rugged weatherproof body, the Pentax K-5 II and K-5 IIS are designed for the photographer who likes to get away from the crowd. We spent a little time comparing both cameras, and though we found them quite similar to their predecessors, that didn't keep us from exploring the various features, as well as the differences between the two models. The K-5 IIS, in particular, is designed to capture more detail thanks to its lack of an anti-aliasing filter, but there are pitfalls associated with that extra detail, which we explore in greater depth.

Click here to read our review of the Pentax K-5 II and K-5 IIS

Pentax K-5 II

Add to: Login to add this item to your gear lists.

Pentax K-5 IIs

Add to: Login to add this item to your gear lists.

Comments

Total comments: 263

I realize this is an updated camera, but the review felt too cut-and-pasted. Several places (one of the most obvious being the 'menus' page) talk about changes from the K-7 to the K-5, which do still largely apply to the K-5II, but cold use a little rewriting to make it clear what was unchanged from the K-5. Comparisons with the K-r also seem weird, as updated comparisons with the K-30 would be more useful and take no more than a few minutes to do. I realize you chose to leave some of the review alone as much of the camera is unchanged, but it's a little too obvious. I do love the bits on cool features built into the sensor shift system. The Astrotracer feature is very nice for those of us who might like to do a bit of astrophotography without having to buy expensive gear.

5 upvotes

"PentaRichoh" like Nikon D800E
lol :)

0 upvotes

1 upvote

Too late. Bought one 6 months ago.

15 upvotes

Bought 4 months ago and have no regretes.

8 upvotes

Maybe there will be a Pentax press release pretty soon so they brought it out before there was a K-3 ;)

1 upvote

Hmm not very far from the mark http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51590064

0 upvotes

By today's standards these cameras are extremely cheap. I see new ones going for 780-900 dollars. Which makes it a good deal if AF was fixed. I had the old K-5 and it was awful. And that is being kind. I would plop down that much money in a heart beat if I thought it was a big improvement to the original. But everyone I have talked to said save my money? For the kind of photography I like anyway. As a consequence I am selling all my Pentax gear. Just a shame to wast such good Sigma glass on a poor performing camera.

0 upvotes

If you paired Pentax Lenses with Sigma glass and have a bad AF experience, the fault can be with Pentax or Sigma or both. My experience with Sigma glass is a very, very mixed bag.

Have you also tried AF fine adjustment ?

And what exactly is your problem ? AF-Speed to lock on, AF Precision ? Is you AF randomly off or is it always Front Focus or always back Focus?

What kind of shooting do you do? ( Street | Sport | Landscape | Family | Art ) ?

How is your focus with the Pentax System Lens ? Same problem or no problem ?

Did you made controlled AF tests with controlled light, AF focus test target ? What was the result ?

If you are serious to fix this problem, please answer my questions precisely and I will do my best to help you to fix the root cause saving you the trouble of switching camera gear. There is the chance that if you do not identify the root cause of your problem you will still have it after changing the system.

5 upvotes

garyknrd:

Sorry to hear about your troubles with the K-5.

Fortunately---and let's keep this quiet because it's still unofficial---I have it from reliable sources that Pentax is working on what is basically a revised K-5 with an updated autofocus module. Rumour is that they're thinking of naming it the K-5 II, although this isn't set in stone just yet.

Hopefully, when it arrives on the market, it'll address whatever AF issues you are experiencing.

5 upvotes

@ garyknrd:
I have not seen your reply yet. I will come back a day or two later once more to see your reply and then I can try to help you. I am very experiences in using the Pentax systems and in one of my lives I give professional technical support. I am pretty confident I can help you to get happy with your system again. But you need to do the necessary home work ( which you also need to do if you get familiar with a new system ). I wish you good luck for your photographic journey.

0 upvotes

@ garyknrd:
I came back a 2nd day for you and no reply. In case you do came back later on, I am sorry I will not visit here again. There is no trigger mechanism provided by dpreview in case you reply. Instead it is painstaking work to find your posts. I wish you all the best.

0 upvotes

In the review it seems as though the AF was disappointing.

How would it be vs a Canon 7D or.....The EM-5?

2 upvotes

They specifically said it was much better that the D7100.

The only AF 'issue' I remember was something about video.

1 upvote

Better than the D7100 in low light, which is true to what both manufacturers say about each camera. The D7100 can focus in light down to -2EV, while the K-5 II/S can do -3EV. We were able to confirm this.

15 upvotes

Tilt, shift and rotate sensor?

Novel idea.

5 upvotes

K5 is a late 2010 camera, and it always have this 3 axis stabilization (horizontal, vertical, rotate). It's an old idea :) And there is something unique, the auto-level wich make the horizon straight even if the camera is not perfectly align.

2 upvotes

"the auto-level"

Thanks for the hint! (Now, I'm forced to go and read the E-M5 review to see whether it has that function too.)

All cameras got to have the auto-level. It's probably me, but in PP I routinely have to rotate all my shots by few degrees.

0 upvotes

Interval shooting Pentax 5 II can do up to 999 shots.In review it say 99. :)

5 upvotes

Why are there no DR values for higher ISOs? This can be a bit misleading to many wildlife shooters who may never even use ISO100 and assume DR remains the same as sensitivity increases.

Comment edited 13 minutes after posting

1 upvote

Pentax continues the trend of tough small quality camera. I've acquired several manual Takumar lenses I use with my K10D and I would love to give them a go on a K-5II. Also I have got to pick up one of those Limited lenses.

1 upvote

K-5 scored 83% in 2010, K-5 II (s) scored 81% in 2013. Does it mean a step backward? Anyway, I prefer what K-5 IIs delivers.

Comment edited 9 minutes after posting

3 upvotes

Scores are relative to a camera's performance among current competing cameras. We think the K-5 IIs do very well despite the limited upgrades, but times have also changed. That's reflected in the score, reconsidered point-by-point.

10 upvotes

Thank you very much for the reply!
K-5 IIs has been with me for 2 months, I find the upgrade from K-5 worthwhile, though your review doesn't highly recommend it.

1 upvote

Both cameras got a Gold award; what you detect is not a recommendation against as much as a caution to choose carefully. Low-pass filters exist for a reason, and the review's test images demonstrate that reason. It might not be relevant to you and how you use your camera, but we think the moiré we saw was enough to warn most consumer shooters.

7 upvotes

An excellent 24 Mp sensor is obviously a better choice than an excellent 16 Mp sensor, for most occasions anyway. Also movies matter more these days than 3 years ago. That's where the K5II falls a bit short nowadays. It's not of my interest as I'm happy with my K-5, and I don't care about movies, but I feel Pentax must release a new flagship DSLR if it wants to match the Sonykons (The Canons are easily beaten). At the current price though, I think the magnesium WR K5II is almost a steal.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 3 minutes after posting

3 upvotes

@ KonstantinosK

Who need 24 MP ? No Display is better than 5 MP. I print A4 and 6 MP is enough. Now I have the K30 and are considering an A3 printer. Who could pay for an A2 printer to utilize 24 MP ?

And what about the lenses. I am using already the best glass Pentax has to offer and feel the limit of the lens with 16 MP. What is the point to pair higher resolution sensor with lower resolution lenses ?

I hope Pentax is not going 24 MP in case this is higher cost than 16 MP. In case 24 MP will become lower cost than 16 MP in the future, 24 MP for me is no minus point, as long as they have great scaling to save 16 MP RAW files in camera. If not in camera scaling down to 15 MP, I would pay 100 USD more for 16 MP than for 24 MP.

On a new flagship of Pentax I am hoping for an amazing electronic Viewfinder so I can loose this monstrosity of LCD viewfinder. That would change my live. 24 MP would just slower my workflow and fill my Disk at no benefits.

5 upvotes

Weeell OK, I have an A3+ printer too, have had for a while, and sure results from 16MP are fine. Fine up to A2 if you insist. But it's easy enough to order prints online these days, which I do if I want A2 and A1 prints.

But if you are printing A2 on a regular basis, 24MP definitely has a slight edge, assuming you are using an adequate lens.

Of course if you are not, it's all wasted storage and processing IMO.

1 upvote

@ HubertChen: I said "for most occasions" :) Personally, I don't need more than 16MP, but I wouldn't mind if I could have a bunch of great 24 megapixels either, presuming that wouldn't slow down the fps or the writing speeds. Cropping comes into mind, but that's less than secondary for me. Anyhow, the market trend is towards movies and sensors with bigger resolutions and I'm afraid Pentax can't ignore that for much time if they want to stay relevant.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting

2 upvotes

More competitors nowday. And more camera with 24mpx. But has result spoken, 24mpx is not always better. The next Pentax camera will have 24mpx, not because it's better, but because Sony will cease producing 16mpx Sensor.
I wonder why Pentax don't use the HDR mode of the K-01, it's far better than the fake HDR look of the K5 ? Not enough cpu power maybe. But on my K-01, HDR mode woth the processing wait time :)

0 upvotes

Within less then a decade we're all watching our photo's on 8K devices, wondering why we ever settled with 16mp ;) It won't even fill half the screen...

Comment edited 1 minute after posting

2 upvotes

Thank to all your replies!

@ 57even
Interesting idea to print A2 as service online. Have not considered this. How much do they go for ? How is the color accuracy ?

@ KonstantinosK
I just got my new Pentax K-30. So far only done preliminary testing. But as of right now I am extremely happy with the movie results. If they hold up in professional production, I see Pentax is up to speed in terms of movie. I used the K-30 side by side with the Sony NEX-5 and am more happy with the K-30 due to better handling and better lenses for movie

@ spidermoon
I choose K-30 over K5II because all the Liveview improvements of K01 went into K-30 and not into K5II. After weeks of shooting I am pretty sure I made the right decision. If K5 would have been available with these features, I would have chosen K5, because of external Mic Input. But the movie mode in K5 has serious limitations over K-30

@ Sebastian
Huh! Interesting. You might be right. Have not considered that. Still many if ... ?

0 upvotes

24 MP can be significantly worse than 16 MP:

Resolution: Take the NEX-7 with a 24 MP sensor and NEX-5 with a 16 MP sensor. On certain lenses the resulting resolution shot with the 16 MP sensor was HIGHER than when shot with 24 MP.

Working speed: Using the same Processor 24 MP will always be 1/3 slower than 16 MP

Pentax has to go 24 MP as Sony will cease production of 16 MP
I agree this is going to happen. But with current 24 MP sensor resolving less than 16 MP sensors of Sony, I am grateful Pentax choose the effective higher resolving sensor ( 16 MP). I am sure eventually Sony will fix this problem and eventually only 24 MP sensors will be available. I am hoping that Pentax does have a scale to 16 MP mode to not use unnecessary file size and slower speed.

0 upvotes

Very nice review DPR, good job!

Athough i have to say- I'm a little surprised the build quality & egronomics/handling score wasn't higher. Imo- it's the best dslr body I've ever handled in terms of ergonomics + it's built like a little tank.

21 upvotes

I have to second this. I shot extensively with Canon 5D MKII and Sony NEX-5 and both do not come even close in handling on how smoothly and intuitively operate the camera, plus the depth of customization options. ( 5D and NEX 5 are of course brilliant cameras in their own right, but we are talking handling here only ).

4 upvotes

I use Nikon but I had one of the early K7s and before that a K20 and K10. I still miss the green button - possibly the single most useful feature not found on any other camera - which makes P and M mode a lot more versatile.

4 upvotes

Agreed! I can't live without it. :) So much so that when I handle another brand's camera, I keep looking for it.

0 upvotes

Thanks 57even

I have a new K-30 and have still wondered about the usefulness of the green button. I will make more effort in using it. Thank you!

0 upvotes

I don't see any low light AF/accuracy tests. The different between K-5 and K-5II(s) is concentrated on new AF sensor.

1 upvote

May I commend page 7 to you?

10 upvotes

Sorry. My Bad.

1 upvote

I agree. The sample gallery does not have high-ISO images.

0 upvotes

The K-5 II has this one: http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/2580397/imgp2076?inalbum=pentax-k5-ii
When I went out specifically for night images I took only the K-5 IIS, so you'll see a couple more there.

0 upvotes

Great to see Pentax still producing fine cameras after all these years. Super review. My first Pentax was a ME Super, way back when...

6 upvotes

Total comments: 263


Just Posted: Nikon D7100 in-depth review Apr 26, 2013	Pentax updates firmware for K-5 II/IIs DSLRs and Q mirrorless camera Apr 19, 2013	Review in progress: Pentax K-5 II and K-5 II S Apr 16, 2013	Pentax posts firmware updates for K-5, K-5 II, K-5 IIs, K-30, K-01 and K-r Jan 31, 2013

	Pentax Efina Jun 3, 2013
	Olympus PEN E-P5 May 10, 2013
	Samsung NX2000 May 1, 2013
	Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V Apr 24, 2013
	Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Apr 24, 2013
	Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 Apr 24, 2013
	Ricoh GR Apr 17, 2013
	Samsung NX1100 Apr 11, 2013
	Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6 Apr 9, 2013
	Fujifilm FinePix S8400W Mar 22, 2013
	Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Mar 22, 2013

Considering switch from Nikon, to replace D700 ...	150
Sobering Sales Numbers for Mirrorless	150
New Pentax K-50 leaked	75
Hmmm AF fine tuning : Bullsh#t	67
Praise the Macro Lenses. Post your best macros ...	49
Poor digital camera sales continue....	48
How to turn my Canon PowerShot S3 IS into a ...	42
Still no signs of an Olympus f2.8 zoom?	39
Help me create the best 6D system on a $3500 ...	37
electronic first curtain shutter - on or off?	37
Selecting Camera	36
K5(II) SD Card Door Coming Open	34
USPS... The worst mail servie in the world	34
Mirrorless & DSLR Jan-April shipment & ...	34
Sigma 60/2.8... sigma be damned (for its ...	33
Done Deal - Switched to Fuji XE-1 from ...	31
Focal reducers, why complexity for the sake of ...	30
What's Happening to Sony Stores?	30
micro 4/3s , Owls IF	30
Replacing Olympus OM-D with Fuji XE-1 or Xpro-1	29

Your email address:
Your name: