Canon adds 200-400mm support to EOS-1D Mark IV and EOS-1Ds Mark III

hjaeger; again you attack the messenger. Do you work for canon? I tell you of my personal problems with canon, a company that CANNOT keep a customer. There service center in Irvine is COMPLETELY DISHONEST ! Let me give you an example. 7d hot shoe was made incorrectly. A shutter count was requested. Techy said can not do . He said there was to much corrosion on hot shoe, so he knows his counter will not slide in. THERE WAS ZERO CORROSION on hot shoe. I checked to see if a strobe would slide in , NOPE . He knew it was made wrong . NO IT WAS NOT HIT with a sledge hammer ! , A sledge hammer would not bend that hot shoe in with out smashing the whole camera! That camera was NEW. It also had the red eye double flash going on. Menu changes did not change that. Sorry sir we will not repair that under warranty , is was what they said. So , do you want to hear more hjaeger?? I have A LOT more wasted time stories about CaNnOt . So just be glad YOU were not at the lack of service center.

hajaeger: Because the Double flashing from the built in strobe was going on ,, and the lack of sERVICE center did not want to repair the camera. I wanted the lack of service techy guy to see how many shots had NOT been taken with the camera. The camera was used very little . Still no help from cANnOt service , he knew the camera was made wrong , day one.. But a better story is from my friend Steve. His camera was in for a sensor cleaning. The sensor was scratched by the service center, and Canon admitted it !! But caNNots answer was have Steve PAY FOR THE a NEW SENSOR !!!!! THAT DAY Steve SWITCHED to NIKON D800 !! That NIKON really is a F A B CAMERA ! 36 Mega pix is so much better in capture performance , You wont want to shoot with a LESSER sensor . And Yes I am saving my money to get the Best capture at a LESS PRICE . Yes the new 200 400 may be a good lens? But why stick it on a LOW RES camera?? The Panasonic FZ200 would be a better way to go with huge savings.

Juck are you a cAnnOt troll?

If your buddy's images are "far far better" than yours, I can only assume that he is a "far better" photographer?

"tell the truth", first of all, I would suggest reading through your own comment threads - it paints a pretty clear picture of why other people are calling you out as a "troll". You really do have a grudge against Canon and Adobe

Second of all, all I did was point out the obvious "between the lines" message in your post

However, my comment was based on the belief that great images were due to the photographer, not the camera alone. As I understand you, I would be taking much better images with a Nikon camera. This is great news, and a big boost to my confidence, as I am currently producing images that is on par with my Nikon shooting friends - that must mean that I am actually the superior photographer, only held back by my inferior Canon camera. Thanks, I will start saving up for a D800 right away!

:)