Previous news story Next news story

Just posted: Our Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS preview

Apr 17, 2013 at 05:12:46 GMT

PREVIEW FUJIFILM LENS MIRRORLESS PREVIEW

Pin It

Print view

Just posted: Our hands-on preview of Fujifilm's latest telephoto zoom lens, the Fujinon 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS. Designed for the company's X-system mirrorless cameras, it offers an 83-300mm equivalent angle of view, and a relatively fast maximum aperture. It also includes optical image stabilisation and two linear stepper motors for quiet focusing. Click below to read our detailed preview for more information.

Click here for our Fujinon 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS preview

Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS

Add to: Login to add this item to your gear lists.

Comments

Total comments: 28

Unfortunately, there are a lot of small-minded people who think that if a small camera can't fit inside your pocket, than its completely useless and you might as well carry a 645 medium format camera! LOL.

As someone who uses Canon APS and FF cameras, as well as an m4/3 camera (that can't fit in my pocket, BTW), I can definitely say that "small" still offers a benefit and an advantage even if it's not "small" enough to fit in your pocket. It makes the camera a lot less noticeable, more comfortable to carry around, fits better on a crowded dining table or anywhere else you might want to put it down, easier to maneuver in tight spaces, etc. In other words, even without fitting in your pocket, a small camera can still be worth having.

5 upvotes

Finally a pocketable mirrorless camera and zoom.

Hey, maybe clown pants will become a trend.

0 upvotes

Fast, Heavy, Expensive - the unholy trinity of a good lens.

1 upvote

Just shows that people don't mind big lenses on little cameras. Used to be a lot of fuss over the idea that if you make a small EVIL-type camera then you can only fit small lenses to it.

0 upvotes

Yes, let's have some compact primes.

0 upvotes

Actually, people do mind. Pana 14-42 PZ and Sony 16-50 PZ were created for that reason.

1 upvote

we don't have a choice. in principle we cannot reduce the size of a lens (the aperture size) while keeping the same image quality.

3 upvotes

Well that is why I chose mFT actually. Much smaller lenses. I feel this lens is simply too heavyespecially but also too large.

1 upvote

I would hardly call this a "big" lens. Just put it next to a DSLR lens of comparable effective focal length specs, and you'll see that it really isn't that "big".

2 upvotes

I bet the IQ on this is going to be great(if the 18-55 shows us anything)!

4 upvotes

Fujifilm, please make a fullframe X body. There is market for a better, more reliable Leica M.

3 upvotes

Another good idea. Fujifilm, are you listening?

It's time the clacking, jolting mirror left the scene. IQ will benefit. And subjects will become pleasantly oblivious.

0 upvotes

... and for a better, more reliable Fujifilm X.

0 upvotes

Leica's market is untouchable because they don't care about designing for AF, and neither do their customers - so they can basically use the same designs they've had since 1954. Most of their R&D can go into sensor tech. Fuji would be hemorrhaging money to get their own full frame lens system out as well as developing a full frame sensor AND supporting the APS-C system.

0 upvotes

f 2.0 Summicron, the brass and glass of lore and legend. Rock on.

0 upvotes

APS-C sized Fujis are much better than Leica M9 in IQ, crop sensor or not. New Leica 240 is another matter, but not much. FF sensor "rangefinder" Fuji "XL" would be more expensive again than X-Pro1, market would be too small (raising the price again), people would consider Leica if the price difference is not big enough. Now there is a real choice: manual focus only Leica 240, or almost/practically as good Fuji X-Pro1 with autofocus, at 1/4 of the price. Easy choice for me, at least.

1 upvote

I wish Fujifilm would produce the lenses for the NEX system ... ah well ...

3 upvotes

Good grief! That's a disproportionately large chunk of glass on that camera.

3 upvotes

It's not big consider shooting it at eye level.

2 upvotes

You switched to mirrorless for run-that-by-me-again?

1 upvote

some mirrorless lenses just cannot be smaller. considering the faster aperture of this lens i dont think it looks bad at all. I'd take this over sonys 55-210 anyday of the week!

8 upvotes

That's presumably why they made the Xpro1 suitably chunky.

0 upvotes

"some mirrorless lenses just cannot be smaller. considering the faster aperture of this lens i dont think it looks bad at all."

Compare this f/4.8 monster to 360g Pana 35-100/2.8.

1 upvote

Apparently, you've never seen a big DSLR lens on a DSLR body. Various DSLR lens and body combos can also be very disproportionate, too.

1 upvote

Hi Coguar, my preview contains plenty of samples: http://www.fujirumors.com/first-look-xf55-200mmf3-5-4-8-r-lm-ois/

I also put larger versions of 30 samples on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/25805910@N05/sets/72157633257634014/

Hope this helps.

7 upvotes

Great job, as usual. Thanks for the post. :)

1 upvote

Tnx flysurfer

1 upvote

preview, one sample please :)))

1 upvote

Total comments: 28


Fujifilm releases XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS and updates lens roadmap Apr 17, 2013	Just posted: Pentax MX-1 Preview Samples May 3, 2013	Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Preview Apr 24, 2013	Ricoh GR Preview extended with further details and more comparisons Apr 22, 2013

	Samsung NX2000 May 1, 2013
	Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V Apr 24, 2013
	Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Apr 24, 2013
	Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 Apr 24, 2013
	Ricoh GR Apr 17, 2013
	Samsung NX1100 Apr 11, 2013
	Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6 Apr 9, 2013
	Fujifilm FinePix S8400W Mar 22, 2013
	Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Mar 22, 2013
	Canon EOS 100D (EOS Rebel SL1) Mar 21, 2013
	Canon EOS 700D (EOS Rebel T5i) Mar 21, 2013
	Canon PowerShot SX270 HS Mar 21, 2013
	Canon PowerShot SX280 HS Mar 21, 2013

Adobe Goes All-In on Subscription Pricing - ...	142
Recommended Photoshop Alternatives?	95
Adobe is WRONG!	87
Are we fooling ourselves?	71
From first effort at street.	62
Not completely satisfied with my X100S	58
Sold my RX100 - this is why	54
Lenses, sharpness, and image quality	52
All this Adobe flaming	51
M43 and DOF with a fast lens	44
24mp sensor for m43? 3.2micron pixel pitch!	44
When I increase the aperture my screen goes ...	42
A99 Short Film "Survival of the Fittest" Hi-ISO	41
Primes vs Zooms	41
Anybody out there who does not use Photoshop ...	39
Nikon 1 lens road map...anyone?	37
Alternative to Adobe software	35
Nikor 24-120 F4	31
Tempted by the price of the SAMYANG 14mm f2.8 ...	31
Colors in B/W!!!...	28

Your email address:
Your name: