Previous news story Next news story

Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 preview

Sep 17, 2012 at 11:00:00 GMT

PREVIEW MICRO-FOUR-THIRDS PANASONIC

Pin It

Print view

Just Posted: Our Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 preview. The GH3 builds on the success Panasonic had with its GH2. With more rugged magnesium alloy construction and a new 16MP sensor, it offers plenty for stills photographers but it's the video specifications that make it a stand-out. Panasonic has been asking video professionals what they wanted out of a camera. Is the GH3 the camera they've been asking for? Read our hands-on preview to find out.

Click here to read our Panasonic GH3 preview

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3

Add to: Login to add this item to your gear lists.

Comments

Total comments: 79

I bought a GH2 and sent it back the a couple of days later. It was terrible. It felt like a disposable plastic camera and was so small it was nearly impossble to shoot comfortably without a wrist /palm strap. My son's Panasonic FZ 150 blew it away in burst speeds and continuous shooting and even had the same LCD pixel density for less than half the price!. For $300.00 less, I got a Sony A65 that shoots 10 FPS with continuous autofocus, full time phase detection autofocusing even in 24, 30, and 60 fps video! The Sony has the fastest and sweetest sounding shudder you will ever hear, like a knife blade thrust into fine sand. Going from the Panny to the Sony was like going from an old Chervolet Vega to a cadillac CTS V!

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting

0 upvotes

this camera is purchased because of its excellent video mode - for photo there are better options - I will not buy them, keep my GH2 VK (Vitaliy Kiselev), because it has unfortunately now installed a Sony sensor (GH3: too soft a video image with aliasing and moire)

0 upvotes

For the love of whatever you hold dear, why oh why must I click the link from the mainpage, enter a silly primer page and then click another link to get to the actual article I want to read? It's so immensly stupid it makes my brain hurt.

1 upvote

With smaller cameras coming out with larger sensors, I no longer understand why a modest sensor in such a large body. Take, for example, the Samsung NX20, with an APS-C sensor, a very nice size and great ergonomics, and the NEX system.
With new developments and choices on the market now, I can't help but wonder if 4/3 was a myopic miscalculation.

0 upvotes

Possibly because the circuitry to provide good video takes more space?
This camera is ALL about the video and happens to take stills also. You would want the G-3 if size and stills were your goal.

2 upvotes

Likely SYSTEM size. Try out a 300mm lens on any of these and tell me who wins. Of for that matter any lens of equivalent capability. It isn't just the body that counts.

1 upvote

In the past, I had no trouble by security with getting the GH1 into a concert with my family for some lovely pictures and video. Given the size increase of the GH3, I wonder if security with consider this a "pro" type camera and restrict it....

2 upvotes

A little bigger but not massive and if the still images are on par with the oly om-d, I will buy it....looking forward to the review

0 upvotes

"Once you're looking at a sensor design that has yet to show it can progress beyond 16MP, in a camera body that is now only slightly more compact than an enthusiast APS-C DSLR like the 24MP Sony SLT-A77, the benefits of buying into a Micro Four Thirds system really come down to feature set."

Wrong totally wrong. The size and weight of the body is fine. A comprehensive set of lenses for this or any m4/3 camera can be carried all day. A comparable set of lenses for any brand of DSLR would be hard to lift off the ground. So the overwhelming benefit is in the lenses.

How serious a limitation is 16MP ? More than enough for most of us.

They just need to get AF-C working as well as it does on the DSLRs and they are sorted. (Did DPR forget to mention this ?)

1 upvote

I was looking to get a new cam 2 months ago I was going to get the GH2... but decided to wait for the GH3.. Now that it is out I wonder if I should keep on waiting or buy the Gh2.... I am a newbie... but would like to spend my money wisely.

Is the Gh2 hacked very close to the natural specs of the Gh3?
also do you think the Gh3 could be hacked?

thanks
p.s when do you guys think this camera is coming out.?

Comment edited 23 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

I think this camera will produce more dynamic range, but honestly, I think the video differences will be modest, Especially hacked. If you don't need weather sealing, I would get the GH2. I have 1 for personal and 1 for work and I was pretty excited about this release, but not because the ALL-i or the different video options...solely for the weather sealing (I do a lot in the desert or on the slopes)

0 upvotes

I think Panasonic blew i with this upgrade. Why all the emphasis on video in a still camera? And then the size increase on top. I see no reason to upgrade from my GH2. I'm very disappointed.

0 upvotes

If you like stills, just buy a OMD or a G5

2 upvotes

Because its target audience isn't stills people.

0 upvotes

@moebius22: indeed, with a sensor a bit small these days, are they getting creative in finding new target uses, buying them time, while they rethink their sensor strategy?

Comment edited 1 minute after posting

0 upvotes

The camera may be very well specced and take beautiful pics and videos (pending reviews), but I got into m4/3 for one reason only; size! Why settle for a camera with a smaller sensor (no matter how good it is) while I can buy a similarly-sized DSLR with a markedly larger sensror. I came to m4/3 from Canon DSLR and accepted the slight hit in image quality for the portability the m4/3 system provides. I'd, therefore, much sooner go back to Canon DSLR rather than buy the GH3.

1 upvote

...or you can get everything you want, in a NX20. ;-)

0 upvotes

If, " it's the video specifications that make it stand-out," should we read the preview to "find-out?" Somebody was hyphen-happy.

0 upvotes

This is going to be a great camera for video makers. The GH2 already is. Panasonic has included almost everything we have asked for. The GH3 out specs their $4000 professional AF-100 m43 video camera. Thank you Panasonic for listening.

0 upvotes

no multi aspect sensor with no real 16:9 ? not really

0 upvotes

Real 16x9?

0 upvotes

Hmmm... I'm not convinced! It may well be the most fantastic m4/3 camera in the world, but if I'm going to have to carry a bigger and heavier camera around, I think I'll fall back on my trusty 7D. I love my GH2 because of its size and the fact I that I have travelled with it very successfully across Europe and have some fantastic photos - I will certainly need some convincing on this one, especially at the price (in the UK, we're likely to be looking at around £1000+ body only!). Ho hum...

0 upvotes

The Gh3 is smaller than the 7D. the lenses are a lot smaller.

3 upvotes

Can't argue with that, but I still think I'll be keeping my hand in my pocket unless the GH3 turns out to be exceptional, blowing the GH2 and 7D out of the water. At that point I may consider trading the whole lot for one... Somehow, I doubt it'll be that good though!

Comment edited 27 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

Ugh - no true 16:9 ratio with a multi-aspect ratio sensor. As someone who shoots a lot of landscapes and is looking for something more compact than my FX DSLR this camera just became much less desirable.

Perhaps, since they say this is "video optimized" they will release some other m43 camera that keeps the multi-aspect sensor capability?

A GH2 may be the way to go or the OM-D just became much more attractive.

Comment edited 39 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

Multi-aspect (or normal 16:9) sensor is important especially for video. Cropping from 4:3 to 16:9 makes no sense at all!

0 upvotes

There is VERY little difference between the 16:9 crop of 4:3 sensor and 16:9 crop of multiaspect sensor. Just a few percent of sensor area. You will never see a difference in an HD movie or even still picture. Just marketing.

0 upvotes

The ultimate button monster! I don't think it would be possible to make this any smaller and still have the space for actually holding the camera. I wonder how the focus mode switch on the back compares with the switch under the left wheel from the ergonomic point of view. But overall I am impressed by the amount of hardware control.

0 upvotes

I still think that getting a real thing is a better option then playing with huge m4/3 mirrorless. How about great AF and large sensor? There's Canon, Nikon and Sony waiting. Or how about outstanding high-ISOs? There's Pentax down there.

No reason to struggle with m4/3 what so ever. Perhaps that's a camera for people with loads of spare m4/3 lenses, but otherwise? Waste if money.

1 upvote

There's only one other SLR style camera that can do high bitrate 1080p, and the 5D Mk III costs $3500. Unfortunately it also comes lumbered with a number of debilitating IQ issues (at 1080p its resolution barely scrapes above standard def). So you can see why the GH2 was coveted so by enthusiasts. So when you talk about the "real thing", this is very much where it's at.

And if all that is meaningless, then possibly you should consider a camera that is not marketed as a true hybrid.

4 upvotes

"I still think that getting a real thing"

Because only Canon, Nikon, and Sony make "real" cameras?

0 upvotes

I could number a few very good reasons: size, lens ecosystem, price, but in the end there is one reason above all others, the GH2 has produced the best video. Go ask Coppola if you don't believe it.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting

0 upvotes

"I still think that getting a real thing"

I want this camera because it is unreal.

Comment edited 48 seconds after posting

2 upvotes

AF is great on those "real" things only with fast moving targets. Single focus is better on m4/3, more precise, more reliable, no need for micro adjustments, since zero problems with front or back focusing.

0 upvotes

@Demon Cleaner - Sony A99 is the second one.

@duartix - size is roughly same as DSLR (larger then some of SLTs actually), lens ecosystem is worse then any of C.N.S. trio, so is the accessory ecosystem, price... we'll see. Video... we'll see.

Xellz - you ever had issues with AF precision or reliability? I hadn't. And guess what? Professional photographers from all around the world use DSLRs exactly because they are reliable!

1 upvote

I have three boys (7, 5, 9months) and have taken plenty of pictures over the years with a GH1. For a consumer like me, the mix of AF video and great images make for a compact system that I can later use to montage vacations for the grandparents....looking forward to the review and checking out a local store in the Chicago area that has this soon!

1 upvote

How did you manage to get three boys just two months apart each other! Do you have three wives? You are faster than Lumix auto-focus!

0 upvotes

I kept hearing about Focus Peaking being available in this camera. I've seen nothing that mentions it here... or maybe I am blind. Does anyone know if Focus Peaking is avaiable in the GH3 or not? If not, then they have really not listened to the users of the GH2 or paid attention to what the competition is doing.

0 upvotes

See nothing too on the Panasonic site, only focus zoom

0 upvotes

Our understanding is that it doesn't. We're hoping to double-check with Panasonic today.

0 upvotes

Are you sure about this being a multi aspect ratio sensor? I don't believe it actually is.

2 upvotes

Yes, Thankfully, it does.

See Specs on Panasonic Site.

http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/systemcamera/gms/gh3/specifications.html

0 upvotes

It's not multi aspect ratio, they are just cropping out.

0 upvotes

Ooops. My bad. NOT multi-aspect like the GH1 and GH2. Yes, alas. They are just cropping. Sorry for the bum steer.

0 upvotes

The GH2 is multiaspect.

0 upvotes

Well, yes, the GH1 and GH2 *are* multi-aspect. That's what I was saying. I guess I should have said: Not multi-aspect, as opposed to the GH1 and GH2, which are. I have a GH1 (hacked) and probably will finally upgrade to a GH3 (if its stills performance are much improved from the GH1). If not, I'll probably go for the Oly EM5 instead and use hacked GH1 for video and EM5 for stills.

0 upvotes

What about lenses? Does anyone know if you will be able to use M4/3 lenses that work with the G5 and OM-D systems on this camera? Thanks.

1 upvote

Yes

1 upvote

All this cameras use the same mount: Micro Four Thirds (aka m43 for short).

IOW, yes, of course, all m43 lenses - from both Olympus and Panasonic - would work on GH3.

1 upvote

It seems that the hackers forced Panasonic's hand with the higher bitrates. But, with most cameras outputing, clean uncompressed video via HDMI.. the onboard video codecs are becoming less important, esp. for mid to high end productions where youre going to rig it up with other accessories.

1 upvote

not that it will matter for this camera, since its 4:2:0 color space at 8-bit from the HDMI...so its not really going to look any better than the internal codec. I use a samurai on my af100 and despite the fact that you actually get 4:2:2 8-bit from the SDI, and at 220 mbps datarate, I'm hard pressed to notice a difference in all but the most demanding color correction shots (green screen) or extremely high motion. Having tried the hacks as well, same story, mildly better but the bottleneck isn't at the codecs like it used to be.

0 upvotes

DPR--what does that rear combination control dial / diamond pad do? Is that actually a spinning wheel around the arrows? What functions can the top, upper rear and rear dials be set to control?

Considering that you've undoubtedly had this body for a while, the lack of information in your preview is staggering.

Comment edited 41 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

Samy's listed the pre-order price as $1300 body only.

0 upvotes

That's good news as I had read an article on NoFilmSchool that asked "Would you pay $2000 for a GH3?" That would have been extreme, but $1300 seems reasonable for professional quality video output.

0 upvotes

Price???? Availability????

0 upvotes

Not enough information in this preview to help me decide whether I want one or not. While the enhanced control layout looks very nice, I'm OK with the GH2 layout. I don't think the extra size will be an issue (in spite of DPR's comparisons to the Sony SLT, the lack of a mirror box really makes the overall volume quite a bit less). I don't really need a weather proofed body, and I'm willing to trade the more rugged construction of the 3 for the lighter weight of the 2. Have to see just how much heavier it feels.

The important questions (for me) aren't answered: How much better, really, is the EVF? Is C-AF any better? Are card writes faster? They really need to be MUCH faster. Is the rear screen usable in bright sunlight? How much better is image quality?

For the price and weight trade off the GH3 will have to offer real advances in multiple performance areas to make me consider it, I'm afraid, especially since it appears to lose one of my favorite features, the multi-aspect sensor.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting

0 upvotes

Looking forward to seeing some production unit reviews asap. Philip Bloom said he would post his impressions as soon as it was announced (having shot the 'Genesis' vid with it).

1 upvote

Looks like an incredible camera, but I agree. The loss of the multi-aspect sensor is a big loss.

Comment edited 38 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

What is the point to make a M4/3 camera as big as a SLR camera?

3 upvotes

Sensor size doesn't necessarily make for body size. We see this all the time.

0 upvotes

The point is you have choices in m4/3 bodies as to what size you want.... but what stays consistent is the size of the lenses and a whole kit is still much smaller than a dslr kit.

Try and put together a kit in m4/3 with the 12-35 and 35-100 along with a few primes and compare that to other fast glass from Canon, Nikon, Sony, etc.

3 upvotes

Get the GF5 if you want a tiny camera for your tiny hands.
http://1.static.img-dpreview.com/files/news/0415293542/520/gf5.jpg

2 upvotes

The GH3 is the size of a very small Sony SLE A57 which is considered a amateur camera. The sensor on that camera is much bigger. This is a ruggedize professional SLE.

0 upvotes

Panasonic seems to have developed exactly the camera that GH1/2 users have been asking for. Very little to complain about here and my somewhat tired GH1 will have to play second violin from now on. Looking very much forward to this camera!

1 upvote

This is my next camera. Most wanted.

But, resolutions in specs not correspond to Multi-aspect feature! Check it!

1 upvote

Panasonic needs to retire this line. At best, it is a decent video camera. That's it. Boring and shows how the m43 is nearing the end of the road. Maybe they ought to merge two m43 sensors together for some real estate to build on?

8 upvotes

what are you complaining here about?? :)))

5 upvotes

I don't think you quite know what you're talking about, the GH3 has a video bitrate that only the $3500 Canon EOS 5D Mark III can match, with the most body controls of any m4/3 camera (more than most DSLRs), at half the weight of the 5D (and that's before you include the lens)

You not being the target audience does not make it a bad camera.

13 upvotes

as a photographer I am excited by the control layout.

@pentaxination: and you should lower your voice given the quality pentax lenses can offer … LOL

5 upvotes

Retire the line? Are you completely retarded? Did you just forget how well the GH2 sold?

May as well tell Canon to retire the 5d and tell Nikon that the D800 is a failure.

12 upvotes

Don't feed the trolls.

11 upvotes

Decent video camera?? GH2 kicks some 5D2 a$$ for its buck! And it's very popular among pro video shooters. The only camera that uses pixel binning instead of line skipping to record video. Can a Pentax mount a native f/0.95 lens? Can Canon? Even Canon's own 50mm f/0.95 of the 70's can mount on GH2 but not on a Canon!
Have you even ever *tried* an m43 camera?
Get serious.

3 upvotes

The GH2 sold an astronomical number of units. Why on earth would they retire the line?

3 upvotes

This moron is a Pentax fanboy. Enough said.

1 upvote

Too bad rumors about 100 iso were false, what for me would be nice improvement is more cleaner files at base iso.

3 upvotes

By making the base iso 100 you lose a stop of DR.

Of course you can always emulate iso 100 and even 50 by exposing at +1 and +2 ev then taking the brightness back down in post.

1 upvote

I am not sure this is correct , a lower base ISO typically impacts the higher ISO performance not DR as an example the D800 has a base ISO of 100 with the highest DR ever recorded by DXO. I think that you are perhaps basing your opinion on cameras that list ISO 100 but actually have a base of 200. The proper base ISO by its nature has the the best performance of the sensor.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting

1 upvote

Yep, seems high ISO performance sells better than base native iso noise and dr. Well, i'm more or less satisfied with G3, until i get the lenses i want and learn more about photography. Maybe by that time something more suited for me will be released :)

0 upvotes

Can't wait to get this!

4 upvotes

Total comments: 79


Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 review Apr 15, 2013	Panasonic posts firmware for DMC-GH3 and announce GH3-Minute Movies Mar 29, 2013	Panasonic announces upcoming firmware update for GH3 camera and lenses Mar 6, 2013	Panasonic UK launches a 'Try Before You Buy' service for DMC-GH3 Feb 14, 2013

	Samsung NX2000 May 1, 2013
	Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V Apr 24, 2013
	Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Apr 24, 2013
	Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 Apr 24, 2013
	Ricoh GR Apr 17, 2013
	Samsung NX1100 Apr 11, 2013
	Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6 Apr 9, 2013
	Fujifilm FinePix S8400W Mar 22, 2013
	Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Mar 22, 2013
	Canon EOS 100D (EOS Rebel SL1) Mar 21, 2013
	Canon EOS 700D (EOS Rebel T5i) Mar 21, 2013
	Canon PowerShot SX270 HS Mar 21, 2013
	Canon PowerShot SX280 HS Mar 21, 2013

Recommended Photoshop Alternatives?	99
Adobe is WRONG!	91
Are we fooling ourselves?	78
From first effort at street.	69
Not completely satisfied with my X100S	58
Sold my RX100 - this is why	56
All this Adobe flaming	53
M43 and DOF with a fast lens	48
Primes vs Zooms	47
24mp sensor for m43? 3.2micron pixel pitch!	45
When I increase the aperture my screen goes ...	42
Anybody out there who does not use Photoshop ...	42
A99 Short Film "Survival of the Fittest" Hi-ISO	41
Nikon 1 lens road map...anyone?	37
Alternative to Adobe software	35
Nikor 24-120 F4	33
Tempted by the price of the SAMYANG 14mm f2.8 ...	31
Colors in B/W!!!...	30
Who own the copyright and why?	30
X100s exposure inconsistency	28

Your email address:
Your name: