Barney Britton

Barney Britton

DPReview Administrator
Lives in United States Seattle, United States
Works as a Editor
Has a website at www.dpreview.com
Joined on Nov 2, 2009
About me:

I'm in charge of the editorial content of dpreview. I joined dpreview when it was based in London in November 2009, after several years as a print journalist in the UK specialist photographic press. I moved from London to Seattle, USA, a year later and I've been here ever since.

Comments

Total: 2645, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On #1 in France: Hands-on with DxO ONE article (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

Leandros S: Doesn't this need a disclaimer that DPReview has a business cooperation with DxO?

I just explained our relationship with Dxo to you. So I'm lying?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 24, 2015 at 05:11 UTC
On #1 in France: Hands-on with DxO ONE article (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

Leandros S: Doesn't this need a disclaimer that DPReview has a business cooperation with DxO?

We have no 'business co-operation' with DxO. We use their (publicly available) lens test data in our lens reviews and talk under NDA from time to time about photo science. The first time I saw the ONE was when we were briefed on it a couple of days before announcement.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 19:11 UTC
In reply to:

veroman: "Sponsored content, produced in partnership with Canon."

Well, no matter how you explain what this is, in the end it's an out-and-out commercial for Canon, no different than an "advertorial" in print media (an advertorial looks just like a magazine article, but it's really paid advertising space).

Call it a "Video Feature," call it whatever you like, in the end it doesn't really "add value" (one of dpreview's criteria for features like this). How can it when it's an extremely biased view of the product?

"no matter how you explain what this is, in the end it's an out-and-out commercial for Canon".

With respect, that doesn't make any sense. The purpose of the FAQ is to make it clear that this is *not* an 'out-and-out commercial'. This video was a DPReview production, and we had final editorial veto. I personally selected Josh as talent (he's someone we've known for a while) and the location and concept emerged from conversations between the two of us and our director (who is also a friend of ours).

I also wrote that FAQ myself, in an effort to be as clear about this kind of content as possible. Pay particular attention to this final line:

"We do not and will not ever accept financial or other incentives to say something about a product or manufacturer that we believe to be untrue or misleading".

The value of this video (we think) is in showing how a professional photojournalist works with the tools available to him, and how his family background and career have intersected.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 18:59 UTC
On Canon EOS Rebel T6i Review preview (299 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: Holy cow!

Not even a Silver Award!

Heads will roll in Seattle!

Heads will roll...?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 17:52 UTC
On Canon EOS Rebel T6i Review preview (299 comments in total)
In reply to:

Celsus: Wow. What I noticed first is that only 17 people state "I want it". Wow. That's amazing for a camera that's been out a while and is a *Canon* (most of us first serious cameras, right?). Has Canon really lost the enthusiast crowd (small though it might be)?

This is an entry-level DSLR, and actually it's not been out all that long.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 16:03 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

saralecaire: DPreview's articles have really changed a lot since Amazon's buyout. They read more like opinion pieces than proper online magazine articles, as they used to be like.

So, Michael, just to be clear. We are, or are not getting paid to write content, in your opinion?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 01:11 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dimit: Uncompressed 14 bit raw ???
No thanks...no need for 100 MB files for something won't even notice in 90% of the cases..

I mean 14 bit in relation to 12 bit. That's 2 extra EV of dynamic range. Clever chaps like Rishi have told me so.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 00:48 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

MarshallG: Rishi,
I personally feel as though you are over-hyping this camera. It is not available yet, and there could still be significant problems that only a full review will (hopefully) uncover. For example, you give an example that shutter shock is a serious limitation in the A7R. But you can't uncover such an issue without a review.

I have deep respect for DPReview, but it's the REVIEW, not the preview, that sets you apart. I can find 100 websites that will republish or rewrite the camera's marketing copy and call it a "review." It's drivel! DPReview is different because you rely on your hands-on testing. With great admiration and respect, I admonish you to temper your enthusiasm until you can be certain that it's justifiable.

We also rely on our insight into the technology of new products and product-related technical developments.

And as such - we're pretty excited about the a7R II.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 00:47 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

saralecaire: DPreview's articles have really changed a lot since Amazon's buyout. They read more like opinion pieces than proper online magazine articles, as they used to be like.

Oh really? Amazon acquired DPReview in 2007. Also this *is* an opinion piece, which might be why it reads like one...

I mean - it's literally the first word in the headline.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 00:46 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dimit: Uncompressed 14 bit raw ???
No thanks...no need for 100 MB files for something won't even notice in 90% of the cases..

Compared to 12bit Raw, I mean.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2015 at 23:39 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dimit: Uncompressed 14 bit raw ???
No thanks...no need for 100 MB files for something won't even notice in 90% of the cases..

You'll miss those extra 2EV of highlight dynamic range when they're gone, I reckon...

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2015 at 23:11 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

salamander1: "One of the major points of that entire section was to dissuade users from ever moving AF points manually."

real photographers want to choose their own focal point for various reasons, which is one of the most important things in photography i dare say. there is nothing like putting your square on your subjects eye, not the forehead, not the nose, and not the eyelashes, and taking that sublime and masterful shot of exquisite beauty and excellence. canon pro bodies can do this very well, real quick and easy, thank you very much. :)

Even when your subject is moving?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2015 at 21:54 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

bartolyni: It can only be groundbreaking if it was designed in India, produced in China and reviewed by Rishi in USA! otherwise its just another camera on the block...

?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2015 at 21:54 UTC
On Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? article (1085 comments in total)
In reply to:

Smitty1: Can DPmirrorless writers use questions in their headings when they already know the answer?

Is writing in the form of a question annoying?

Who is on first?

I do like that you wrote 'Opinion:' at the front of your heading to differentiate it from the rest of the opinions in every other article. :cP

I can't make sense out of any part of that comment.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2015 at 20:06 UTC
In reply to:

wansai: Shouldn't the title be: SPONSORED CONTENT?

It's only an analysis insomuch as it talks about the camera but it's actually a marketing and sales pitch (or press release).

I have no issues with reading sponsored content but I'd like to know beforehand so I don't start rejecting the content as I read through, expecting it to be an unbiased look when it isn't.

IN DxO's defence, they're quoting both figures for both filetypes. This really does not seem like a big deal at all, surely?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 20:16 UTC
In reply to:

Spectro: most Seattle area photographers will be at the Fremont Summer Solstice Parade in the morning and noon. Maybe push back your appearance later in the day.

Their event, their rules - enjoy the naked ladies on bikes!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 18:42 UTC
In reply to:

JoeBingham: Read this...

http://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/3adqnl/has_dpreview_lost_its_way_a_commentary_on_their/

I just read it (it's nonsense) and replied on Reddit.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 17:44 UTC
On #1 in France: Hands-on with DxO ONE article (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rooru S: no mention of the QX100...it has a 3.5x zoom with a 1.0 Type Sensor too...! and a better bracket to mount it on several types of mobile phones... Perhaps because DPR doesn't want to hurt DxO?

Yeah now that the Kodak money has dried up, I mean - we take it where we can find it.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 01:15 UTC
On #1 in France: Hands-on with DxO ONE article (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rooru S: no mention of the QX100...it has a 3.5x zoom with a 1.0 Type Sensor too...! and a better bracket to mount it on several types of mobile phones... Perhaps because DPR doesn't want to hurt DxO?

There's no money in being sponsored by Pentax! Ricoh, maybe... ;)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 23:29 UTC
On #1 in France: Hands-on with DxO ONE article (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jim Evidon: So, let me get this straight. According to the picture, in the French article, you hold the iPhone in one hand while balancing the DXO Cam in the other hand while attempting to keep the Cam level while you are looking at the iPhone, right?

It is an interesting exercise in technology, but for the same money, I agree with other responses that you are better off buying a Sony RX100 model (I through IV ) or a Ricoh, Fuji, or other pocketable and let those who have to be the first on their block to own the latest gadget knock themselves out. Future models of the DXO may make a different impression.

"you hold the iPhone in one hand while balancing the DXO Cam in the other hand while attempting to keep the Cam level while you are looking at the iPhone, right?"

Right. And it's extremely easy to do.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 21:52 UTC
Total: 2645, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »