Barney Britton

Barney Britton

DPReview Administrator
Lives in United States Seattle, United States
Works as a Editor
Has a website at www.dpreview.com
Joined on Nov 2, 2009
About me:

I'm in charge of the editorial content of dpreview. I joined dpreview when it was based in London in November 2009, after several years as a print journalist in the UK specialist photographic press. I moved from London to Seattle, USA, a year later and I've been here ever since.

Comments

Total: 2300, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I am guessing that everyone in the Dpreview office is crowded around just waiting for the comments to roll in. This interview is a gold mine for them. They couldn’t have wished for a better interview even if they had scripted it.

Believe me, comments make no significant difference to our bottom line. And how ignorance and borderline racism can be 'good publicity' for Canon, I really don't know.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 18:34 UTC
In reply to:

zigi_S: The elephant in the room hasn't been noticed. Namely sensor DR. Why?

It's wrong because it's wrong. The relative DR performance of Canon versus Sony sensors is not 'fictitious'. Wrong wrong wrong.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 18:20 UTC
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I am guessing that everyone in the Dpreview office is crowded around just waiting for the comments to roll in. This interview is a gold mine for them. They couldn’t have wished for a better interview even if they had scripted it.

Quite the contrary - the quality of interaction on our interviews with Canon, in particular, is frequently appalling. The amount of bile that get spewed in the comments on these pieces of content is actually highly embarrassing, not to mention depressing.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 18:18 UTC
In reply to:

DFPanno: I find it odd that the single greatest concern that the enthusiast community of Canon DSLR users has, dynamic range, was not addressed in a straighforward manner.

Was the an agreement to keep this off-limits?

He states that he is not concerned with the competition but I have a suspicion that he should be.

I have spent buckets of money with Canon since going digital sometime around 2001 with the S40.

Since buying my Sony RX100 in June of 2012 I haven't spent a dime on Canon gear. The RX100 was followed by a RX1 and then by an A7r and three lenses.

Obviously Canon doesn't give a d*mn where I spend my money but if that trickle to milcs becomes a torrent they might, might, be "left behind the eight ball".

My take, and I acknowledge that I might be proven wrong, is that the future belongs to mirror-less cameras with state-of-the-art underpinnings.

We covered this with Mr Maeda last year:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7079726133/photokina-2014-canon-interview-mirrorless-in-the-very-near-future

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 18:12 UTC
In reply to:

zigi_S: The elephant in the room hasn't been noticed. Namely sensor DR. Why?

"it is a fictional issue. It is an issue for gearhead pixel peepers. It isn't something anyone else notices or even thinks about."

This is entirely wrong Joseph, please stop spreading misinformation in your posts.

The DR issue is very real, and a serious competitive advantage of Sony sensors in particular. There are multiple examples all over DPReview in reviews and sample galleries. We also covered this with Mr Maeda last year:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7079726133/photokina-2014-canon-interview-mirrorless-in-the-very-near-future

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On Making 'Art': We go inside Sigma's lens factory article (190 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scottelly: Interesting that these photos were shot with an Olympus E-M5 Mk II, rather than a Sigma SD1 with the 17-50mm f2.8 OS.

Not really - that was the camera I was traveling with.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 16:18 UTC
In reply to:

Matewka: The portrait of the Ricoh representative, in comparison with portraits of representatives in other CP+ interviews only proves the general DPR's attitude to the company.

I have no words.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 04:52 UTC
On Making 'Art': We go inside Sigma's lens factory article (190 comments in total)
In reply to:

Suave: "The elements are held in place initially by friction, inside their TSC trays, before the TSC is heated at the edges and sealed to lock the elements into place. This type of construction replaces the much more involved traditional method where glass elements were held in place by metal bezels screwed tightly into the barrel."

So replacing front or rear element now requires replacent of the entire assembly at god knows how much the cost.

"So replacing front or rear element now requires replacent of the entire assembly at god knows how much the cost"

No - just replacement of the group. I'm not an engineer but to my mind this should simplify repair, as well as reducing the risk of tolerances slipping over time during normal use. But I'm sure there are people out there more qualified to assess this approach to construction.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 23:39 UTC
On Making 'Art': We go inside Sigma's lens factory article (190 comments in total)
In reply to:

alcaher: manufactured landscape... nothing nice about it, very robotic-posthuman enviroment. But that is what it is and we use their products.

"robotic-posthuman enviroment"

It's a factory.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 19:32 UTC
In reply to:

Matewka: The portrait of the Ricoh representative, in comparison with portraits of representatives in other CP+ interviews only proves the general DPR's attitude to the company.

Oh give it a rest, for heavens' sake... good grief.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 19:26 UTC
On Making 'Art': We go inside Sigma's lens factory article (190 comments in total)
In reply to:

Markol: Great read.
One thing though: the images are tiny and that's because dpr still uses only 50% of modern 16:9 screens.
Come on, 4:3 is long gone, it's 2015 now.

All images can be maximized to 3000px wide by hitting the expand button at the upper right.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 18:01 UTC
On Making 'Art': We go inside Sigma's lens factory article (190 comments in total)
In reply to:

Phil Askey: Nice job Barney.

Thank you - and hello from the Yamakis!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2015 at 16:31 UTC
On Nikon D5500 real-world samples article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hugo808: Nice pics but all are taken with large and expensive full frame lenses and not the sort of small and light DX lenses that the body was designed for.

It may show off the sensor at its best but nobody buying a D5500 will be getting the same results.

We actually did a bit inventory recently and sent a load of stuff back. Unexpectedly the camera showed up body only. These things happen.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2015 at 18:50 UTC
On Nikon D5500 real-world samples article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hugo808: Nice pics but all are taken with large and expensive full frame lenses and not the sort of small and light DX lenses that the body was designed for.

It may show off the sensor at its best but nobody buying a D5500 will be getting the same results.

We didn't have a representative DX zoom in the office. Simple as that. We'll be taking a lot more shots on various lenses as we work on the review.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2015 at 02:10 UTC
On Nikon D5500 real-world samples article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

earthbound_ca: Why is it the long grass and rocks have been viewed 956 times (as I write this) and the young lady on the stairs has been viewed almost 2,500 times? People don't like rocks?

That must be it.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2015 at 02:09 UTC
In reply to:

Dazzer8888: At last, DPR sends out a pro photography to take some great shots!

Thank you - I think we got the point.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2015 at 03:03 UTC
In reply to:

Dazzer8888: At last, DPR sends out a pro photography to take some great shots!

Dan - your mum's back on here commenting on your sample galleries again.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 21:58 UTC
In reply to:

Studor13: These "tests" make me laugh.

Try doing this regularly over an entire European winter nights:
Leave the lenses on a tripod and shoot 1 to 2 hour long exposures. Make sure you have a few days where you are certain to get some serious condensation coming down onto the lenses.

After 3 winters my 14-24 is still going strong without any problems. I also have the 16-35mm f4 but I don't dare risk this lens because I am fairly certain that it would die a very sudden death.

There is far more to a lens than some apparent sharpness in the corners when viewed at 100% on a D810!

And BTW, 1mm is not insignificant on an extreme wide angled lens.

"Try doing this regularly over an entire European winter nights:
Leave the lenses on a tripod and shoot 1 to 2 hour long exposures. Make sure you have a few days where you are certain to get some serious condensation coming down onto the lenses."

We will not be doing that. But your suggestion is noted.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 20:14 UTC
In reply to:

Karl Summers: Aside from sharpness, how do you account for the difference in hue/luminance values in the blue trim around the window?

Assuming I'm looking where you're looking I can't see dignificant difference in the hue/luminance between the shots but I'll let Rishi chip in here, I think.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 18:26 UTC
In reply to:

Karl Summers: Aside from sharpness, how do you account for the difference in hue/luminance values in the blue trim around the window?

That's no clearer, sorry. At which widget are you looking, on which page, for which lens, at which aperture, and in which area of the scene?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 18:09 UTC
Total: 2300, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »