Barney Britton

Barney Britton

Lives in United States Seattle, United States
Works as a Editor
Has a website at www.dpreview.com
Joined on Nov 2, 2009
About me:

I'm in charge of the editorial content of dpreview. I joined dpreview when it was based in London in November 2009, after several years as a print journalist in the UK specialist photographic press. I moved from London to Seattle, USA, a year later and I've been here ever since.

Comments

Total: 1941, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On DPReview Live 2014 videos now available article (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

DouglasGottlieb: I like DPReview and have watched a few interviews from this series so far. None ask any tough questions -- lots of fluff.

For Olympus:

Whatever happened to the rumored "Trip D" fixed lens, 4/3 sensor, enthusiast compact?

What's happening with the Pen "rethink" you promised? How can it challenge the Panasonic GM1, GM5 and LX100? Users repeatedly ask for a Pen with integrated EVF. Why not do it? If a Pen body had EM1 ruggedization and performance, wouldn't enthusiasts and pros buy it? Why do you assume that centered EVF with a hump appeals to pros and smaller, boxy rangefinder style is for selfie shooters?

Where is 4K?

Where are fast, ultra wide primes?

Why not do f/1.2 or f/0.95?

Why not weather seal your primes to match the EM1 and EM5 bodies?

Is 16 megapixels the limit of M43?

You're very welcome - and any suggestions on things to do better, do more of, or do less (and I have my own list!) are always gratefully received.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2014 at 21:39 UTC
On DPReview Live 2014 videos now available article (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

DouglasGottlieb: I like DPReview and have watched a few interviews from this series so far. None ask any tough questions -- lots of fluff.

For Olympus:

Whatever happened to the rumored "Trip D" fixed lens, 4/3 sensor, enthusiast compact?

What's happening with the Pen "rethink" you promised? How can it challenge the Panasonic GM1, GM5 and LX100? Users repeatedly ask for a Pen with integrated EVF. Why not do it? If a Pen body had EM1 ruggedization and performance, wouldn't enthusiasts and pros buy it? Why do you assume that centered EVF with a hump appeals to pros and smaller, boxy rangefinder style is for selfie shooters?

Where is 4K?

Where are fast, ultra wide primes?

Why not do f/1.2 or f/0.95?

Why not weather seal your primes to match the EM1 and EM5 bodies?

Is 16 megapixels the limit of M43?

@ Buena Vista - I respect your opinion, but I honestly challenge anyone who has watched this content in its entirety to seriously argue that this was an 'advertising stunt'.

As for 'doing more reviews' the production and planning of this event was completed in about one working week, while other content was worked on at the same time.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2014 at 03:42 UTC
On DPReview Live 2014 videos now available article (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Maji: Is commenting turned off for the video with Art Wolfe? If it is indeed turned off, can I know why?

Thank you.

We decided to keep commenting turned off for the standalone interviews since the format is so different to our normal content.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2014 at 21:10 UTC
On DPReview Live 2014 videos now available article (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

DouglasGottlieb: I like DPReview and have watched a few interviews from this series so far. None ask any tough questions -- lots of fluff.

For Olympus:

Whatever happened to the rumored "Trip D" fixed lens, 4/3 sensor, enthusiast compact?

What's happening with the Pen "rethink" you promised? How can it challenge the Panasonic GM1, GM5 and LX100? Users repeatedly ask for a Pen with integrated EVF. Why not do it? If a Pen body had EM1 ruggedization and performance, wouldn't enthusiasts and pros buy it? Why do you assume that centered EVF with a hump appeals to pros and smaller, boxy rangefinder style is for selfie shooters?

Where is 4K?

Where are fast, ultra wide primes?

Why not do f/1.2 or f/0.95?

Why not weather seal your primes to match the EM1 and EM5 bodies?

Is 16 megapixels the limit of M43?

Yep, I think we get your point. Please consider that there is no point at all in us asking questions - live - which no manufacturer representative would be prepared or permitted to actually answer... ;)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2014 at 21:07 UTC
On Nikon D3S In-depth review preview (1 comment in total)

First

Direct link | Posted on Oct 25, 2014 at 00:51 UTC as 1st comment
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (499 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scorehound: First of all, she is a FF shooter and from the get-go she is going to slam the camera based on this fact. It should be a non issue. It isn't a FF camera, so don't use the lack of FF as a negative on the camera.

Second, it wasn't much of a review. She spend a little time talking about how much she hated the 7D and went on about how she didn't like the lack of audio notation (a feature most people don't care about).

She didn't discuss the quality of the images she got out of the camera, didn't discuss her opinions on the noise and ISO performance in the shots she made, and didn't spend a lot of time talking ergonomics and features. She touched on points, and that was it.

I, for one am disappointed in this. I was expecting a balanced review based on a $1800 camera, and not a comparison to a $7,000 camera (or a $3500 camera at that). It was a useless review IMHO and didn't tell anyone anything different than what you can read online. I want a real review. This was not it.

This isn't a review.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 23:19 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (499 comments in total)
In reply to:

brownie314: to all the people complaining about the "adds for Canon". Lets assume - worst case scenario - Canon is paying DPR to get some space in the articles section. So what - you are getting all of this content for free. So you have to skip over a few articles that you are not interested in - what harm is done? On the up side - they are funding reviews of other equipment. So lets say Canon is behind this - get over it. Doing all of this equipment review isn't cheap.

I think what Marty means is that it would be stupid for us to bias our content for the sake of selling more, or more valuable advertising. And he would be right.

Plus - if our content was artificially positive, surely the advertiser would have *less* incentive to pay us to place their adverts on the site, since we'd be doing their job for them. Oddly, that's something that the 'this is an advertorial!' idiots never seem to consider.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 23:17 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion article (499 comments in total)
In reply to:

brownie314: to all the people complaining about the "adds for Canon". Lets assume - worst case scenario - Canon is paying DPR to get some space in the articles section. So what - you are getting all of this content for free. So you have to skip over a few articles that you are not interested in - what harm is done? On the up side - they are funding reviews of other equipment. So lets say Canon is behind this - get over it. Doing all of this equipment review isn't cheap.

Canon is not paying for this (or any content).

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2014 at 19:59 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G7 X First Impressions Review preview (908 comments in total)
In reply to:

olypan: Jeez DPR, how many times are you going to try and flog this dead horse!

by... reviewing it? That is what we do....

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 20:04 UTC
In reply to:

snapa: Who Cares!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Clearly not you!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 00:13 UTC
In reply to:

Petak: Since this is not a new idea and has already been implemented by several manufacturers, this is obviously nothing more than an advert, Why is it in the news section? Also, warming filter is irrelevant in digital photography, which is 99% of today's photography.

I love you, you're brilliant.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2014 at 03:58 UTC
In reply to:

Petak: Since this is not a new idea and has already been implemented by several manufacturers, this is obviously nothing more than an advert, Why is it in the news section? Also, warming filter is irrelevant in digital photography, which is 99% of today's photography.

@SmilerGrogan - OK, you gave me a smile. I never expected you to equate a photography site posting news about a new photography accessory with the British class system and the legacy of empire. Well played.

But you know we're based in Seattle, USA, right?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 22:01 UTC
In reply to:

Petak: Since this is not a new idea and has already been implemented by several manufacturers, this is obviously nothing more than an advert, Why is it in the news section? Also, warming filter is irrelevant in digital photography, which is 99% of today's photography.

It's a (likely high quality) new photography accessory released by a manufacturer that sends us press releases. Simple as that. It's tagged as 'accessory news'.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 21:27 UTC
In reply to:

Petak: Since this is not a new idea and has already been implemented by several manufacturers, this is obviously nothing more than an advert, Why is it in the news section? Also, warming filter is irrelevant in digital photography, which is 99% of today's photography.

@ Petak - how is this an advert? I simply don't understand this mode of criticism. Unless you're suggesting that we've been paid to run it? Are you?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 19:37 UTC
In reply to:

Laslen: Why is DPReview covering this? Are you sponsored by this company? This an idiotic product. If something like this was released for Canon or Nikon, it would be laughed at and immediately dismissed.

@ Laslen - if someone came out with this kind of product for Canon or Nikon mounts, I promise we would cover it...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 19:35 UTC
On 7DII_beta_ISO3200_030A9456-ACR photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (12 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jozef M: This is bad, a lot worse then the high iso's of the competition.

Uhuh?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 00:29 UTC
On Canon introduces new $78K 50-1000mm cine lens article (171 comments in total)
In reply to:

Artistico: Okay. If this niche videography product is DPreview newsworthy, when can we expect reviews of medium format digital cameras that might be a tad more in line with DPreview's purpose?

There is a massive disparity between the amount of resources required to write a short news story like this and reviews of medium-format digital cameras. Something to think about...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2014 at 17:29 UTC
In reply to:

ProfHankD: Wow, that's a pretty serious color shift! Is either one right?

It's all 'to taste' to match how I remember the scenes looking. That said, WB adjustments (where I made any) are actually pretty minimal.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2014 at 22:44 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: Must have same binding/shadow noise as previous sensors since author avoided pushing shadows in all the images. I would like to see some shadows pushed in low ISO (1oo or 200)

There's plenty of shadow pushing actually, if you look at the technical captions on the raw conversions.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2014 at 22:19 UTC
In reply to:

TheWhiteDog: REALLY! DPReview is doing a major disservice here. Who would buy an a5100 and use it with a $1000 prime lens in a mount that is not even native to it. I can pretty much guarantee that the vast majority of a5100 purchasers will only ever use the kit lens that comes with it- and that is how it should be tested. I understand you want to show what the sensor is capable of but that has no basis in the reality of how the camera will be used.
So throwing that out of the mix, I like the Canon least, its lens performance has compromised the sensor, I guess getting an extra 30mm on the telephoto end compared to the RX100Mk3 has had an effect on IQ. As for the SONY vs the LX100, the SONY has more detail(expected with the extra pixels) but the LX100 has much lower noise, especially at higher ISOs(again, expected). If choosing, I like the LX100 best, it is an "all arounder". Great job, Panny but the SONY is no slouch. Love the Panny's controls far more though(no PASM dial needed)!

As a general principle, studio photography with interchangeable lens cameras is intended to show the potential of the camera's sensor. What that means in practical terms is that we try to shoot with the best lens we can (without getting into the realms of the truly silly) for whatever system we're looking at.

Sample galleries on the other hand are shot with a mixture of lenses, mostly biasing towards kit or add-on options which are commensurate with the camera's market positioning.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2014 at 03:21 UTC
Total: 1941, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »