Solar Eagle

Solar Eagle

Lives in United States Sioux Falls, SD, United States
Works as a Network Support Technician
Joined on Jun 21, 2012
About me:

Spirit Warrior Extraordinaire
Dragon Slayer, Word Player
The Source Word Sword Is
One Mage, One Man, OM


Total: 48, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

JimW-203: The arrogance of Reuters is astounding! How dare the customer tell me, the great artist, what they will pay for? My new policy: henceforth, I will no longer accept payment from any customer who dares to specify what they want; they will take what I allow them to have and will do so with a deep bow of subservience.

sh10453, I believe that post went right over your head.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2015 at 23:51 UTC
In reply to:

The Silver Nemesis: Good! But why the 45 mm? Why now?

Probably because they can't make a 50mm 1.8 VC and still achieve the same image quality and size.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2015 at 02:40 UTC

To me the Canon looks better than Sony at high ISO, but I don't understand why. I would think the RAWs would be nearly the same if they were using a Sony sensor. I guess Canon can just get more out of the sensor than Sony?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2015 at 22:57 UTC as 43rd comment | 1 reply

Hilarious. I can't believe all the people in here taking that seriously. That's as funny as Chubbs from Happy Gilmore.

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2015 at 02:16 UTC as 26th comment
On article Canon announces EF 50mm F1.8 STM lens (310 comments in total)
In reply to:

VENTURE-STAR: This lens may be a mechanical improvement over the original and I'd be surprised if it wasn't effectively silent. However, for the increase in price, it really should have image stabilization.

What the heck are you talking about? There is no price increase... Both lenses are $125.... For what you get Canon is practically giving this lens away. It's nearly half the price of the 40mm......

I guess people will complain about anything. Some guy at another forum was complaining because it has a metal mount!!! Apparently he can't deal with that extra ounce. lol

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2015 at 01:36 UTC
On article Canon announces EF 50mm F1.8 STM lens (310 comments in total)

"Yes, the optics of the EF 50mm f/1.8 STM are the same as the original EF 50mm f/1.8 and EF 50mm f/1.8 II." ~Chuck Westfall, Canon USA

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 00:16 UTC as 9th comment
On article Canon announces EF 50mm F1.8 STM lens (310 comments in total)
In reply to:

saiko: Looks like Yongnuo forced Canon to upgrade their shoddy EF 50mm f/1.8 II lens by giving a similar lens (better in some aspect like 7 vs 5 aperture blade) for less than half the price...

Canon users should thank Yongnuo.

Yeah Yongnuo "forced" Canon to release a revision to their lens on its 25th anniversary...... That was pretty dumb on their part.....

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 00:12 UTC

Wow I love that picture!

Direct link | Posted on May 12, 2015 at 04:20 UTC as 260th comment
On photo Bread and breakfast in the Around breakfast challenge (2 comments in total)

Awesome picture.

Direct link | Posted on May 12, 2015 at 04:18 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

cpt kent: Seems to be a lot of folks exclaiming brilliance without questioning. Sources? References? Research? Further reading?

Mr SmilerGrogan must think this site is an academic journal...... lol

Direct link | Posted on Apr 28, 2015 at 04:04 UTC

Nice images. A lot more interesting than most samples I see here. Thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2015 at 00:05 UTC as 48th comment
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: Would this lens be good for photographing birds in flight? I'm thinking the wider angle will enable me to photograph birds with a larger wing span?


Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2015 at 00:00 UTC
On Connect post Enlight for iOS launches with high-end photo editing tools (31 comments in total)
In reply to:

nerd2: Professional photo editing tool that supports only iPhones? sounds utter dumb to me.

Wow the comments over here on the connect side are as asinine as the dpreview side. Nowhere does it say "professional photo editing tool", except in your post, and it's "utterly dumb", not "utter dumb".

Direct link | Posted on Mar 17, 2015 at 01:09 UTC
On article CP+ 2015 Sigma Interview - "small office, big factory" (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

HSway: Samples tell us 24 Art bokeh can be very jittery. I don’t say it lightly, I am not any of the bokeh fanatics or a Sigma basher and I am very happy with 50 Art and 60 Art in this particular respect. The point is that while this is absolutely OK with some, say, (14-) 24/4 lens the purpose of f1.4 lens fills also different roles where this is a consideration. I wish they take it into account with such fast lenses including UWAs and avoid rendition that really can be distracting and limiting for certain uses. (As distanced from the character; most people will agree on the difference - my Touit 32 can have unpleasant jittery bokeh @f1.8, it changes to character I love @f2.2, I could go on).
No it is not a disaster but it makes the potential of the lens less versatile.

Not that the standards are not high but thank you for the most interesting article.

I tend to agree the complainers are the ones with the egos. People with a little humility tend to just enjoy life, and what they have been given. Anybody in the humity camp understands that. Those in the ego camp tend to see other egos, and competing views. Funny how so many people come here to express their displeasure with life in general as displeasure for products and that have been made available for them. According to MY scorecard, this round goes to Conrad. BRAVO. lol

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2015 at 00:53 UTC
On article CP+ 2015 Sigma Interview - "small office, big factory" (197 comments in total)

Incredible interview. Great questions to a great man. Love his responses. The guy's a gem.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 09:43 UTC as 40th comment
On article CP+ 2015 Sigma Interview - "small office, big factory" (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

RichRMA: Interesting the engineers are standing at their workstations.

If you want to wear fitted suit like that fine looking CEO they have then better not sit. lol

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 09:18 UTC
On article Sigma goes wide with 24mm F1.4 DG HSM Art lens (184 comments in total)
In reply to:

Solar Eagle: So will this be the star field lens to get? It seems so.... Coma correction made the feature list, which is what I'm most interested in seeing with this one....


Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 22:15 UTC
In reply to:

Digimat: really...i dont get it. its too expensive for entry level. but it seems to pack quite some hardware, but than, why is there no damn EVF in that body to compete with equivalent fuji/sony/m43 cameras? and its not a thing of beauty either...oh well...

Its pretty simple.... An EFV would make the body bigger and make the camera cost more...... Why make everyone suffer with a larger and more expesive camera when the EFV can clip right into the hotshoe for those that need one? I'm sure the percentage that needs one is quite small.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 00:52 UTC
In reply to:

Lynda Botez: I have the first camera; after the major firmware update, I love this camera to bits. Can't wait for the M3. It's got to be a lot better, faster, etc. This size and weight make a great little camera, and the photos are amazing... If you haven't used one I wouldn't make up my mind against it until you try it. The small lenses are awesome too!

@digifanboy, what does the competition have to do with Lynda's love of the EOS M? NEWS FLASH: Only web trolls give a crap about the competition and want to make it a point of contention. The rest of us care about the camera we actually own and use.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 00:41 UTC
In reply to:

ericnon: At last a real contender in the ILC market!
Taking all these improvements into account
nobody can argue that Canon doesn't listen
to their customers!

The photo culture in the US is totally different than the asian markets where mirrorless sells so well. Canon is a smart company so they are only doing what makes sense. I only bought an EOS M because it was $299 with lens, and I picked up the other lens and adapter for next to nothing as well. In total I have a camera, two lenses, and adapter for $450. A deal like that just makes sense.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2015 at 23:59 UTC
Total: 48, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »