russbarnes

russbarnes

Lives in United Kingdom United Kingdom
Has a website at www.russbarnes.co.uk
Joined on Jun 9, 2010

Comments

Total: 97, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Reuters showcases EOS-1D X multiple exposure modes article (226 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ropo16: SDYUE are you the worst marketeer ever employed by Canon, or just someone with a severe disorder?

lol. Yep.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 8, 2012 at 08:34 UTC
On Canon releases promised Firmware v2.0.0 for EOS 7D article (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

facedodge: Canon, one day may we get a built in intervalometer for the 5D Mark III?

Don't worry Canon will be along soon to give their users a "massive" update and everyone will dance around saying how wonderful it is and how Nikon should sit up and take note blah blah blah.

The fact is that it is Canon that deliberately CRIPPLES their products in the first place so that they can keep their users hungry. It's a VERY cynical policy. Try loading the camera with top spec in the first place; the D800 has a huge mass of features the 5DIII does not. Just in the same way even the ageing D300S has features the 7D still not, even after this so called upgrade.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 8, 2012 at 06:25 UTC
On Reuters showcases EOS-1D X multiple exposure modes article (226 comments in total)

Wow. Who the hell does "sdyue" work for? Looks like the Canon marketing department is in overdrive trying to prove what an invaluable unique feature this is. Unfortunately the dated 5 year old sensor in the 1DX has so much banding that you'll barely be able to see the final image or it will have been crushed by the ultra heavy handed JPEG noise reduction.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2012 at 21:00 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
On Just Posted: Nikon D3200 in-depth Review article (357 comments in total)
In reply to:

EmmanuelStarchild: A camera body is only as good as its lens. As a Canon user I admit Nikon makes a technically superior camera body, it just can't compete with Canon lenses. This is the only thing keeping me from switching to Nikon.

lol. Canon can't build a decent wide angle. The 1.2 lenses are painfully slow and near impossible to focus. And people go on about the quality of a single f/4 zoom. In the DPReview forums on here, the first lenses to get recommended in the Canon forums are Sigma and Zeiss - says it all really.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 26, 2012 at 17:42 UTC
In reply to:

Timbukto: This must be a ploy by Canon to get users to try out their first 'mirrorless' camera to have them swear off all mirrorless as a non-functional fad. An attempt to poison the well so no one will actually try competent mirrorless brands.

So this is why we waited so long! So Canon could survey all the advantages of all of its mirrorless competition...and create a camera with *NONE* of them.

Good play Canon...

Agreed this is a VERY poor addition to the market bringing absolutely NOTHING to the table. When will Canon actually innovate with a new product again?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 06:11 UTC
In reply to:

BoyntonBlade: If I'm ever in the market for an ugly poor mans version of the NEX 7, i'll be all over this camera.

Ha ha ha ha. So true. Except it will still cost you the same anyway :)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 06:05 UTC

No viewfinder + ugly as hell + yet another Canon price gouge = FAIL

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 05:59 UTC as 364th comment
On Canon issues allergy warning for EOS 650D/Rebel T4i article (176 comments in total)
In reply to:

waxwaine: Nikon´s new camera batteries exploding, Canon has poissones grip. Looks likes this days you don´t need to go shoot in to Ciudad Juarez or Siria to put your life in danger as a photographer.

Just to prove the point and show the BS people are prepared to peddle on here:

https://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&gs_nf=1&cp=25&gs_id=2w&xhr=t&q=%22nikon+exploding+battery%22&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=%22nikon+exploding+battery%22&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=c72d84806ae8a6&biw=2560&bih=1355

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2012 at 19:40 UTC
On Canon issues allergy warning for EOS 650D/Rebel T4i article (176 comments in total)
In reply to:

waxwaine: Nikon´s new camera batteries exploding, Canon has poissones grip. Looks likes this days you don´t need to go shoot in to Ciudad Juarez or Siria to put your life in danger as a photographer.

Wow. The clueless really do occupy these pages. I guess you don't know how to actually use Google - perhaps it's even a first like the non-existent Nikon exploding battery phenomena. What a crock of crap. Some people really are dumb asses......

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2012 at 18:54 UTC
On Canon issues allergy warning for EOS 650D/Rebel T4i article (176 comments in total)
In reply to:

mcbillIam: July Fool's Day?

Ha ha, I thought exactly the same!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2012 at 06:20 UTC
On Canon issues allergy warning for EOS 650D/Rebel T4i article (176 comments in total)
In reply to:

waxwaine: Nikon´s new camera batteries exploding, Canon has poissones grip. Looks likes this days you don´t need to go shoot in to Ciudad Juarez or Siria to put your life in danger as a photographer.

What exploding batteries? Where on earth are you getting your information? Point to ONE story anywhere of an exploding battery in a Nikon camera?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2012 at 06:18 UTC
On Canon issues allergy warning for EOS 650D/Rebel T4i article (176 comments in total)

lol. I actually thought this was an April fool, until I realised it was the middle of July. This is not even a bad joke, this is unbelievable. Who would literally touch a Canon product these days?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2012 at 06:17 UTC as 64th comment
On Reuters to use robotic DSLRs for Olympics coverage article (105 comments in total)
In reply to:

audijam: 1Dx : )
not Nikon D4.....i wonder why....

Wow, I'd say that's a massive risk for a largely untested camera, a year late after massive design and production issues. No way would I put my eggs in that dodgy basket....

Direct link | Posted on Jul 6, 2012 at 06:36 UTC
On Canon significantly improves EOS 7D with firmware v2 article (296 comments in total)
In reply to:

cgarrard: WOW! That, that...............is why Canon leads. That, is a serious tip of the hat to its customers. They know the value of firmware updates in the digital age now it seems, obviously they can't do this with every camera (not enough time or resources) but they sure picked a good one to do this with.

7D owners have to be ecstatic!

Canon Leads? Progressive? I can't remember seeing a product from Canon in the last 5 years that brought ANY real innovation... Sensor development has died. If Canon didn't roll out updates like this, there would be nothing at all.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2012 at 10:59 UTC
On Canon significantly improves EOS 7D with firmware v2 article (296 comments in total)
In reply to:

panoviews: Canon: We open the crippled functions for the public since we are one step behind in camera innovations.

Ha ha ha. Spot on.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2012 at 10:28 UTC
In reply to:

olyflyer: The 18-300 DX is exactly the lens which is not needed. They should have made a 16-70/2.8VR DX instead. It would have been a much better travel lens, as well as a very useful all purpose "normal" zoom. What's the point of making yet another consumer superzoom?

Consumer superzooms for consumer DX cameras so there is a massive market for this. DX cameras are rarely a professional's choice.....

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 06:49 UTC
In reply to:

Hauer: The launch of yet another DX lens at this stage must mean that there is still hope for a DX dSLR being the long awaited D300/300s replacement in the not too distant future!

There is for the first time solid intel on a D400 and as you say this lens announcement shows that Nikon are still very much committed to DX, backed with the 3xxx and 5xxx series too of course.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 06:42 UTC
In reply to:

Petka: "since it's hard to imagine large numbers of D800 owners using a lens with a recommended price of $599 as their everyday lens."

Funny comment, why would a LOW price be a problem it the IQ is good enough for D800. At least for people who are photographers, not poseurs. Are we expected to leave the price stickers on?

lol. Indeed. Two of the VERY best lenses I have found for the D800 are the 105mm VR and the 85mm f/1.8G. I'm not sure you'd call either of them premium lenses with premium prices (at least not by todays standards) so the DPReview comment is ridiculous. It's clear however they are merely saying the D600 will be here soon, but maybe it would have been better just to say that :)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 06:35 UTC
In reply to:

MikeNeufeld30: Nikon is sure putting out product at a rapid Rate.. Is Canon Awake???

"Is Canon Awake???"

It appears they are dead from the neck down. Over-priced over-hyped equipment like the 24-70 VII a 1DX that was announced nearly a year ago. No thanks......

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2012 at 06:27 UTC
In reply to:

MattiD80: D800 85%
D800E 84%

5d mIII 80%

That's how i see it after reading tons of reviews. Funny to see Dpreview thinks the opposite way. Money not important to DPR so 5d gets status quo. A very very very tiny sharpness increase give 2% extra, without getting price penalty XD I disagree again.

D800 (non e) is by far the best purchase at the moment, of an enthousiast who want fullframe but doenst have endless amounts of money.

I really don't know where this strange comments come from about the 5DMKIII being better built. There is no difference in build quality whatsoever between these cameras, except maybe that light enters the D800 where it's meant to.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2012 at 15:20 UTC
Total: 97, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »