joe1512

Why so expensive? An SX260 is less than 200 bucks now. This buys you more zoom (30x), more unnecessary pixels and um... yeah I dunno. Wifi maybe?

Oh...but I can totally pay double and put that...

Why so expensive? An SX260 is less than 200 bucks now. This buys you more zoom (30x), more unnecessary pixels and um... yeah I dunno. Wifi maybe?

Oh...but I can totally pay double and put that...

Why so expensive? An SX260 is less than 200 bucks now. This buys you more zoom (30x), more unnecessary pixels and um... yeah I dunno. Wifi maybe?

Oh...but I can totally pay double and put that...

Why so expensive? An SX260 is less than 200 bucks now. This buys you more zoom (30x), more unnecessary pixels and um... yeah I dunno. Wifi maybe?

Oh...but I can totally pay double and put that...

Maybe you can turn off the LED screen and just use the electronic viewfinder for composition. That would save a lot of battery life.

How is this any worse than any other Travel Zoom? They all have 3.5-6.3ish aperatures and 1/2.3 inch sensors right?

If you are going to bother with a compact camera, I'd highly recommend springing for a more expensive one. The Panasonic LX7 seems to be highly regarded for 350.  Olympus XZ-1 is around 250 since...

Thanks.  Too bad my wife wont lemme buy an RX100.  I think it has a good combo of sensor size, compactness, and high image quality, with enough zoom for most practical purposes.  My travel zoom can...

Hmm.  I was wondering about this.  I can get a decently blurred background with my SX260 but it requires some special setup.  I have to zoom in 20x to get enough magnification of the little amount...

How come?  I would think that a 10MP sensor that is 8 times as large as a little 10MP one would have that much more light hitting the sensor at a given aperature, thus a greater exposure.  Each...

I have a SX260 with 20x optical zoom that I really enjoy.  However as Ive gotten better at photography I am seeing that I do a lot of lower light indoor shots, where the 3.5-6.8 aperature and...