What's more alarming is that people use online comments ( which is what we're talking about in therms of "reviews" ) as a basis for decision making.
Where, I wonder, does advice people like me give on forums to beginners sit in the scale of "trusted". Does the fact we post on DPR lend credence to us or take it away ? Does the number of posts we've made make a difference ? I keep hoping people are reading the advice and spotting the fanboys from the fools and people who are giving honest opinions. But are we all just over-ridden by one idiotic remark ( "my Nikon killed my cat" kind of thing :-) ) ?
The worst thing about this is that it shows how incredibly slowly Ricoh reacts to things. Business suicide.
The second worst thing is that when they decided to buy Pentax in the first place they should have already have had a name and structure in mind for the resulting business units. This suggests a management mess at the highest levels in Ricoh, and one that hasn't been sorted out yet.
Lastly it's hard to worry about the name on the product when there isn't a product. If it takes them this long to just decide on a name it's no surprise that there isn't even a hint of anything other than trivial product iteration going on.
Dead or in a coma. What's the difference ?
Anyone astonished by these claims of enormous dynamic range can head over to Thom Hogan's website ( bythom.com ) where he explains how far from astonishing this is, and how less impressive it sounds when put in the right context.
Compact as a brick.
No more compact that any MILC with a lens attached.
No viewfinder. For £2000+ it's hard to see why the "optional" viewfinder isn't standard. Even if it wasn't integrated, it really ought to be in the box with the camera as standard.
And unlike a MILC, I'm stuck with that hideous slow lens.
Another toy for badge obsessed "photographers".
Should come with a free "More Money Than Sense" tee-shirt for the user, and a "I'm With Stupid" tee-shirt for said user's spouse or occasional companion.
Free ? What am I saying ? They should charge $1000 for the tee-shirts.
nwind: She was very unreasonable and rude. Radio station behaves properly and very politely in they response to the situation.
A polite thief is still a thief.
I don't see why the station should not be punished heavily for their theft. Companies cynically use any images they want and only act repentant when they're caught. It's no different from "Oh, I'm sorry, was that YOUR car I stole by mistake ?".
Who PAYS for this "service" ?
It's all very well Nikon issuing a notice, but what they don't say is whether they pay for the service or the user does. ( And I won't even ask about delivery costs. )
I'm also baffled why the European notice has a different wording to the US one. Is "cut and paste" a difficult concept for Nikon ?
So where's the cheap manual only version, given that the AF isn't worth having ?
The advantage of removable lens systems is that you can upgrade the body ( i.e. the sensor et al ) while keeping your good selection of valuable glass.
This idea of the sensor being part of the lens completely wipes that out. If you want a better sensor you effectively have to buy a sensor as well.
And if you decide to change systems the value of your equipment is much lower, because the lens+sensor has intrinsically less appeal to future buyers than the lens and sensor as separate parts.
rhlpetrus: Please, get back to the more compact thread presentatiuon, we don't need that large lettering and display.
Have you tried using the "collapsed" view mode ?
Any way to disable the hovering previews ?
I find them distracting elsewhere as if you just leave your mouse parked in the wrong place all of a sudden opening a thread gets you a preview and you've to move it again.
Any more info on the moderation system ?
Bottom line - no plan underway going forward and no solid plan yet because they're still merging.
No plan for connectivity. The marketing equivalent of suicide, IMO.
Sounded like someone dodging and weaving, rather than someone with a solid plan backed by the board.
If I were an investor I'd be looking for the exit.
Nice price - make the J1/V1 more interesting to me anyway.
toughluck: In terms of DOF, it's a 50/9 equivalent, so good luck trying to get meaningful defocusing. It should have been f/1.2 or f/0.9 for the size -- while it would still have poor defocusing control, it would have been much better.
Also: Why is the lens and the bodies so huge? Sony just released RX1 which, lens included, is thinner than this lens is long. Not to mention huge N1 bodies.
It's actually equivalent to about f4.8 on full frame, which is fine. About f3.5-ish on crop frame.
DPR - smartphones do allow extra memory to be added. No idea why you think otherwise.
Consumer wants : Phone with good camera.
Consumer gets : average camera with ... whoops.
It's still asking the consumer to carry two devices when they want one.
Consumers don't care if it can run Android, let alone which version of Android. It could run DOS if it did what they wanted.
Can't tell if this thing has an audio-out socket. If it doesn't it would be a HUGE fail, as that would mean no MP3 playing.
In case Nikon et al haven't noticed all Apple or Nokia or the rest of them have to do to make a better product is add a zoom lens in a phone. All Nikon et all have to do is build a phone, get it certified and make deals with carriers, which is a lot harder.
A tiny sensor in a camera without a phone, or just get a phone with a camera instead ?
And the phone also plays music, does email and lets you send and receive images and movies from other people. And you can expand the memory with cards. And runs applications. Oh, and it's a phone.
I wonder if Nikon let's it's marketing people out much ? They certainly seem to have missed a lot of the last ten years of technological development.
Might as well have used the R&D costs to pay redundancy to the marketing types that claimed this was a good idea.
Peiasdf: In other word, designed by committee.
Good thing the launch wasn't delayed until 2020 otherwise we would have RC cars more advanced than this.
I like NASA and really don't like private space companies but I bet they would not have made similar choices due to better managements.
This is a common mistake people make.
Most of the choices would have been very similar as the physical, financial and temporal constraints would have been the same.
NASA isn't like a government department run by career paper-pushers. It's a mission centric organization where the decisions are made by very hard nosed engineers.
When the Space Shuttle Challenger blew up, it was a result of business managers ( not engineers ) at Thiokol refusing to back the the objections of the engineering team at Thiokol who wanted to postpone the launch. So don't think that private business managers would make NASA more efficient.
A valuable lesson - always get a signed model release.
I can't help wondering how much more you have to pay for the EVF over the (apparently) identical Olympus EVF with nothing more than a Leica name-tag.
One for the red-dot addicts only, I guess.
It would be interesting to see how the Leica M-9 compares to using something like an X100, XPro1, Panasonic G3 or an NEX-7, which feature all the things the authors listed as negatives for the M9-P ( better LCDs, TTL metering and to some extent controls ).
All the authors mentioned how it changed their approach by making them slower and more thoughtful. This really sounds like a glass-half-full kind of statement, as one of the things that we mark modern MILCs down for is anything that slows down the operation. If it's now an advantage shouldn't we be giving the first NEX and X100 menus systems more praise ?
Lastly I have to wonder how the authors would react in a production environment. There's a world of difference between indulging in nostalgic admiration for a bit of fun and using it for critical pay-my-mortgage type scenarios day-in and day-out. I just don't see the Leica M9-P, with it's high cost and mediocre value, being the choice of most pros.